Donald Trump
Comments
-
Waiting...... watching the drop.....it's 4:00...... Mueller finally stopped.tbergs said:I haven't seen half of theses posters on here since around December 2016.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Sad, but true. I always know you've been by when the posts double by the hour. Either that or a lot of cut and pasting from those secret Halifax dossiers.BS44325 said:
Like the band who’s name is on the masthead some of us only tour when we feel like it.tbergs said:I haven't seen half of theses posters on here since around December 2016. Lots of laughs in here today though. Thanks for that.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
What in the world does this have to do with your argument that Comey and the FBI were trying a coup to unseat a duly elected president? It didn't address that at all. Worse, its criticism of the media included instances when the FBI (namely Comey) disputed public reporting, further weakening your case.BS44325 said:
How about some Matt Taibbimrussel1 said:
You read way too much Jon Solomon. He can take any event and attempt to spin it into a coup d'etat narrative. At one point I thought you were a principled conservative, but you've got onboard like the rest of them. I suggest you read more Reason.com, Goldberg, Dreher and Sullivan, rather than McCarthy and Solomon.BS44325 said:
At this stage most still thought Trump would lose. Comey included. The memo was released to protect himself and clear the deck for Hillary going forward. You see some in the FBI were outraged about the handling of the Hillary investigation and the newly discovered Weiner laptop. Comey wanted to get ahead of this prior to the incoming Clinton administration. If it came up after her election he can claim it was already investigated. Clinton could claim the public had this information and voted for her anyway. Everybody thought she would win.mrussel1 said:
So why did he release the email memo a week before election? Was theat a clever head fake, or his he just bad at diabolical strategies?BS44325 said:
Yes. He testified to it in June of 2017 when he discussed he leaked FBI memos to a friend who then passed it on to the NY Times in order to trigger a special counsel investigation. You see he and others signed off on a fraudulent FISA application against Carter Page in order to weaponize the intelligence community against a political opponent. With Trump’s unexpected election that was going to be discovered. Comey was in to deep. Many were. They needed to force Trump’s removal in order to protect themselves. They failed. Now they are being exposed.mrussel1 said:
So it's factual that Comey wad attempting a coup. And his other motivation was to protect the brass. These are factual statements.BS44325 said:
Yes. Facts that have been reported. Where it goes from here nobody knows. The IG is working on it.mrussel1 said:
No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts, are ya?BS44325 said:
You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.Halifax2TheMax said:
The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true,BS44325 said:
McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.OnWis97 said:
I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle. They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason. Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.Halifax2TheMax said:
More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?OnWis97 said:So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?“There was no collusion.””I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”“Very legal, very cool.”Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
Why would you fire the director of the FBI?
ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
Also, none of the events prove your crackpot theory. Your abandonment of conservative principles has led to the adoption of Trumpian conspiracy mongering.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
This is the most definitive unbiased report I have read yet. Spend the time and go through it all. It’s damning.
As for Taibbi, it's fascinating that he uses countless examples from the past to support his argument that things are super terrible now. When all he had to do was count the number of media sources that existed from the beginning of time and compare them to the internet age (post WMD) and it will seem pretty obvious how the same errors are happening as before, only that there are so many more sources.
No offense, but you wasted my time with that article.0 -
Yeah. As of late I either have the time or I don’t. More often don’t.tbergs said:
Sad, but true. I always know you've been by when the posts double by the hour. Either that or a lot of cut and pasting from those secret Halifax dossiers.BS44325 said:
Like the band who’s name is on the masthead some of us only tour when we feel like it.tbergs said:I haven't seen half of theses posters on here since around December 2016. Lots of laughs in here today though. Thanks for that.0 -
Are you joking? Did you completely ignore the part where Comey briefed Trump on the Dossier which just magically gave CNN followed by Buzzfeed the opportunity to report on it? Of course you did. Did you ignore the FISA on Carter Page which Comey signed off on? Of course you did. To quote Tiabbi himself “Stop. Just stop...you’re making it worse”.mrussel1 said:
What in the world does this have to do with your argument that Comey and the FBI were trying a coup to unseat a duly elected president? It didn't address that at all. Worse, its criticism of the media included instances when the FBI (namely Comey) disputed public reporting, further weakening your case.BS44325 said:
How about some Matt Taibbimrussel1 said:
You read way too much Jon Solomon. He can take any event and attempt to spin it into a coup d'etat narrative. At one point I thought you were a principled conservative, but you've got onboard like the rest of them. I suggest you read more Reason.com, Goldberg, Dreher and Sullivan, rather than McCarthy and Solomon.BS44325 said:
At this stage most still thought Trump would lose. Comey included. The memo was released to protect himself and clear the deck for Hillary going forward. You see some in the FBI were outraged about the handling of the Hillary investigation and the newly discovered Weiner laptop. Comey wanted to get ahead of this prior to the incoming Clinton administration. If it came up after her election he can claim it was already investigated. Clinton could claim the public had this information and voted for her anyway. Everybody thought she would win.mrussel1 said:
So why did he release the email memo a week before election? Was theat a clever head fake, or his he just bad at diabolical strategies?BS44325 said:
Yes. He testified to it in June of 2017 when he discussed he leaked FBI memos to a friend who then passed it on to the NY Times in order to trigger a special counsel investigation. You see he and others signed off on a fraudulent FISA application against Carter Page in order to weaponize the intelligence community against a political opponent. With Trump’s unexpected election that was going to be discovered. Comey was in to deep. Many were. They needed to force Trump’s removal in order to protect themselves. They failed. Now they are being exposed.mrussel1 said:
So it's factual that Comey wad attempting a coup. And his other motivation was to protect the brass. These are factual statements.BS44325 said:
Yes. Facts that have been reported. Where it goes from here nobody knows. The IG is working on it.mrussel1 said:
No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts, are ya?BS44325 said:
You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.Halifax2TheMax said:
The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true,BS44325 said:
McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.OnWis97 said:
I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle. They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason. Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.Halifax2TheMax said:
More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?OnWis97 said:So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?“There was no collusion.””I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”“Very legal, very cool.”Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
Why would you fire the director of the FBI?
ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
Also, none of the events prove your crackpot theory. Your abandonment of conservative principles has led to the adoption of Trumpian conspiracy mongering.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
This is the most definitive unbiased report I have read yet. Spend the time and go through it all. It’s damning.
As for Taibbi, it's fascinating that he uses countless examples from the past to support his argument that things are super terrible now. When all he had to do was count the number of media sources that existed from the beginning of time and compare them to the internet age (post WMD) and it will seem pretty obvious how the same errors are happening as before, only that there are so many more sources.
No offense, but you wasted my time with that article.0 -
You're applying intent where it doesn't actually exist and therefore making the same mistakes that Tabbi and You are criticizing others for doing. You don't see the irony in that? Further, you don't see the irony that you and others are now using the Mueller report to vindicate no collusion, when Mueller was the former FBI director, career Deep State and Comey's "best friend" (according to Trump). If this was all some grand conspiracy that everyone is so desperate to cover, then why is the report (which no one has seen, we only 'believe' there are no further indictments) going to vindicate Trump? There is a circular madness in that logic.BS44325 said:
Are you joking? Did you completely ignore the part where Comey briefed Trump on the Dossier which just magically gave CNN followed by Buzzfeed the opportunity to report on it? Of course you did. Did you ignore the FISA on Carter Page which Comey signed off on? Of course you did. To quote Tiabbi himself “Stop. Just stop...you’re making it worse”.mrussel1 said:
What in the world does this have to do with your argument that Comey and the FBI were trying a coup to unseat a duly elected president? It didn't address that at all. Worse, its criticism of the media included instances when the FBI (namely Comey) disputed public reporting, further weakening your case.BS44325 said:
How about some Matt Taibbimrussel1 said:
You read way too much Jon Solomon. He can take any event and attempt to spin it into a coup d'etat narrative. At one point I thought you were a principled conservative, but you've got onboard like the rest of them. I suggest you read more Reason.com, Goldberg, Dreher and Sullivan, rather than McCarthy and Solomon.BS44325 said:
At this stage most still thought Trump would lose. Comey included. The memo was released to protect himself and clear the deck for Hillary going forward. You see some in the FBI were outraged about the handling of the Hillary investigation and the newly discovered Weiner laptop. Comey wanted to get ahead of this prior to the incoming Clinton administration. If it came up after her election he can claim it was already investigated. Clinton could claim the public had this information and voted for her anyway. Everybody thought she would win.mrussel1 said:
So why did he release the email memo a week before election? Was theat a clever head fake, or his he just bad at diabolical strategies?BS44325 said:
Yes. He testified to it in June of 2017 when he discussed he leaked FBI memos to a friend who then passed it on to the NY Times in order to trigger a special counsel investigation. You see he and others signed off on a fraudulent FISA application against Carter Page in order to weaponize the intelligence community against a political opponent. With Trump’s unexpected election that was going to be discovered. Comey was in to deep. Many were. They needed to force Trump’s removal in order to protect themselves. They failed. Now they are being exposed.mrussel1 said:
So it's factual that Comey wad attempting a coup. And his other motivation was to protect the brass. These are factual statements.BS44325 said:
Yes. Facts that have been reported. Where it goes from here nobody knows. The IG is working on it.mrussel1 said:
No assumptions baked into this statement.. sticking to the facts, are ya?BS44325 said:
You fire the director of the FBI when he or she is doing a shitty job. He was too busy participating in coups in order to protect the FISA abuses of his upper brass instead of working to serve the citizenry. He lost the plot and lost the confidence of his employer.Halifax2TheMax said:
The appointment of a special counsel was triggered by the firing of James Comey. Please stick to the facts. Which, if the following were true,BS44325 said:
McCain was involved in the bipartisan effort to take Trump down. The dossier was the tool. It was assembled, laundered, recycled and distributed by multiple to make it seem like it was a set of corroborated sources. It was a fraud that only those like Halifax still believe. It was used to obtain FISA warrants even when some in the DOJ objected. It was used to spy on a candidate. It was used to hamstring an unexpected and unwanted President. It was used to trigger a Special Counsel. It’s all coming out.OnWis97 said:
I’m parroting MAGAs...their take on the McCain kerfuffle. They say he was part of that and tried to unseat a duly-elected president; Treason. Truthfully, I know nothing about the dossier so I wanted to bounce this off the board.Halifax2TheMax said:
More of the “fraudulent” dossier has been proven true than less. Who should be indicted?OnWis97 said:So are we looking at indictments over the fraudulent dossier?“There was no collusion.””I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk to anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”“Only the guilty plea the fifth.”“Very legal, very cool.”Follow the money, from Russia with love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
Why would you fire the director of the FBI?
ps: Team Trump Treason never “sat down and talked to anyone.”
Also, none of the events prove your crackpot theory. Your abandonment of conservative principles has led to the adoption of Trumpian conspiracy mongering.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
This is the most definitive unbiased report I have read yet. Spend the time and go through it all. It’s damning.
As for Taibbi, it's fascinating that he uses countless examples from the past to support his argument that things are super terrible now. When all he had to do was count the number of media sources that existed from the beginning of time and compare them to the internet age (post WMD) and it will seem pretty obvious how the same errors are happening as before, only that there are so many more sources.
No offense, but you wasted my time with that article.0 -
I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.0
-
I'm shocked that Taibbi wrote this.BS44325 said:
How about some Matt Taibbimrussel1 said:
You read way too much Jon Solomon. He can take any event and attempt to spin it into a coup d'etat narrative. At one point I thought you were a principled conservative, but you've got onboard like the rest of them. I suggest you read more Reason.com, Goldberg, Dreher and Sullivan, rather than McCarthy and Solomon.
At this stage most still thought Trump would lose. Comey included. The memo was released to protect himself and clear the deck for Hillary going forward. You see some in the FBI were outraged about the handling of the Hillary investigation and the newly discovered Weiner laptop. Comey wanted to get ahead of this prior to the incoming Clinton administration. If it came up after her election he can claim it was already investigated. Clinton could claim the public had this information and voted for her anyway. Everybody thought she would win.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
This is the most definitive unbiased report I have read yet. Spend the time and go through it all. It’s damning.
Wow.0 -
Approaching 30 hours
Still no tweets
Why wouldn't today include some sort of celebration? Or at least, "see I told you so"0 -
Haven't you been paying attention? He's been there all along.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.0 -
Why? He's been a collusion skeptic from the beginning.tempo_n_groove said:
I'm shocked that Taibbi wrote this.BS44325 said:
How about some Matt Taibbimrussel1 said:
You read way too much Jon Solomon. He can take any event and attempt to spin it into a coup d'etat narrative. At one point I thought you were a principled conservative, but you've got onboard like the rest of them. I suggest you read more Reason.com, Goldberg, Dreher and Sullivan, rather than McCarthy and Solomon.
At this stage most still thought Trump would lose. Comey included. The memo was released to protect himself and clear the deck for Hillary going forward. You see some in the FBI were outraged about the handling of the Hillary investigation and the newly discovered Weiner laptop. Comey wanted to get ahead of this prior to the incoming Clinton administration. If it came up after her election he can claim it was already investigated. Clinton could claim the public had this information and voted for her anyway. Everybody thought she would win.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
This is the most definitive unbiased report I have read yet. Spend the time and go through it all. It’s damning.
Wow.0 -
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.0 -
You mean how the media did it with Iraq, Vietnam, Watergate and lots of other examples. But sure, it was the Comey and the deep state exacting a coup. Good thing the Deep State Mueller saved the country from the Deep State.BS44325 said:
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.0 -
There was an assumption that Trump’s support would collapse during two years of investigation. It did not. There was an assumption that the GOP would lose the Senate under the weight of investigations. It did not. There was an assumption that those charge with process crimes would reveal bigger crimes. They did not. There was an assumption that high crimes and misdemeanors would eventually be found. They were not. The Deep State tried but failed. Mueller did what he could but at the end of the day he isn’t following everybody else off the cliff. What’s it like down there by the way?mrussel1 said:
You mean how the media did it with Iraq, Vietnam, Watergate and lots of other examples. But sure, it was the Comey and the deep state exacting a coup. Good thing the Deep State Mueller saved the country from the Deep State.BS44325 said:
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.0 -
Ok so now you're disparaging Mueller too. Yeah, you're a conspiracy nut now. Congrats.BS44325 said:
There was an assumption that Trump’s support would collapse during two years of investigation. It did not. There was an assumption that the GOP would lose the Senate under the weight of investigations. It did not. There was an assumption that those charge with process crimes would reveal bigger crimes. They did not. There was an assumption that high crimes and misdemeanors would eventually be found. They were not. The Deep State tried but failed. Mueller did what he could but at the end of the day he isn’t following everybody else off the cliff. What’s it like down there by the way?mrussel1 said:
You mean how the media did it with Iraq, Vietnam, Watergate and lots of other examples. But sure, it was the Comey and the deep state exacting a coup. Good thing the Deep State Mueller saved the country from the Deep State.BS44325 said:
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.
And no one expected to win the Senate. Pelosi and leadership never assumed high crimes. You're literally just making shit up, or listening to the extreme voices of the left and assuming everyone thought the same. So let me give you some other anecdotal information from someone who actually lives in the US and talks to Americans in person, every day, in a moderate state. No one talks about Mueller or Russia.., but people laugh every day about the dumb shit the president does, or gets mortified about it. Opinions are locked in.0 -
Guys... start focusing on the important stuff.
I was watching the greasy orange one on the tube the other night as I winded down for the evening in a hotel room. His side wisps were glued to the side of his head. Those strands of crusty hair were going nowhere- just absolutely locked in place. Lookin' good! Now I know why all those gorgeous girls wanna get with him.
Why do I bring this up?
If McDonald wants his wall... he should sign a sponsorship with Brylcreem. Let's get serious. He's a walking billboard in the most visible occupation in the world. Throw in a Depends and Viagra sponsorship... and that wall gets built. If they're a little short... they can run a pay for view Trump vs. Obama in the octagon. McConnell and Michelle Obama can be on the card as a prelim.
F**k why do I have to generate these ideas for you guys? Geezuz man.
"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Still doesn’t explain away all of the Team Trump Treason campaign/Administration contacts with Russians, why the Team Trump Treason Tower meeting took place and why the very stable genius wrote a memo saying it was about adoptions, why Pauley Manafort shared polling data with Russians, why Team Trump Treason openly stated, “Russia, if you’re listening,” nor Team Trump Treason’s lying about “no business ties in Russia,” or “I don’t know any Russians,” and most importantly, why everyone involved lied about it. Repeatedly. And I guess you and Matt have read Team Mueller’s report as well?BS44325 said:
There was an assumption that Trump’s support would collapse during two years of investigation. It did not. There was an assumption that the GOP would lose the Senate under the weight of investigations. It did not. There was an assumption that those charge with process crimes would reveal bigger crimes. They did not. There was an assumption that high crimes and misdemeanors would eventually be found. They were not. The Deep State tried but failed. Mueller did what he could but at the end of the day he isn’t following everybody else off the cliff. What’s it like down there by the way?mrussel1 said:
You mean how the media did it with Iraq, Vietnam, Watergate and lots of other examples. But sure, it was the Comey and the deep state exacting a coup. Good thing the Deep State Mueller saved the country from the Deep State.BS44325 said:
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.
Post edited by Halifax2TheMax on09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
If there was “an organized effort to take down Team Trump Treason (full disclosure, I hate him),” then the Steele Dossier would have been made fully available before the election by Hillary or Obama and Comey would have publically announced that Team Trump Treason and his campaign were under FBI investigation in summer 2016 and McCain could have passed the Steele Dossier around in September rather than December. But you know, facts. 3,2,1 cue “the insurance policy.”BS44325 said:
I understand his point completely. As he critiques the media he outlines how they blindly accepted bullshit fed to them by the intelligence community. This includes being played by Comey in the intial reporting of the dossier. Quit skipping over this part. You are now doing it intentionally and it is not a good look. I am not with the crazies. I am with the fact that there was an organized effort to take down a president you hate. You refuse to see what is plainly before your eyes. It is too painful to look.mrussel1 said:I mean are you so myopic that you are misunderstanding that his point is a critique of the media, and yet you're trying to use the piece as evidence if a completely different point? Your argument is in the same universe as Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who worships at a radical Christian church, Vince Foster was murdered and Hillary personally sold all of our uranium to the Soviets. That's where you're sitting right now, with those crazies.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
team trump treason0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help