Donald Trump
Comments
-
What a fucking mess.I LOVE MUSIC.
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com0 -
njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont0 -
They had better learn how to fight like Republicans & quickly.Lerxst1992 said:njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont
I always find 45's bs "you're fired" persona laughable since he is incapable of firing anyone in person.
Rosenstein's been meeting with Kelly for quite some time now.Post edited by njnancy on0 -
I disagree. The way they have handled this nomination has been "hardball" politics. It's not dirty because they ddin't invent the shit, but it's hardball to spring it late, inflicting maximum damage. If this came up 2 months ago, he would never have been nominated.njnancy said:
They had better learn how to fight like Republicans & quickly.Lerxst1992 said:njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont
I always find 45's bs "you're fired" persona laughable, since he is incapable of firing anyone in person.
He's been meeting with Kelly for quite some time.0 -
What is Team trump Treason hiding?
"I don't know any Russians."
"There wasn't any collusion."
"I have nothing to hide."
"I'll sit down and talk with anyone."
"We do everything by the book."
Yea, sure.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
He still has his job for now. Trump and he are going to meet on Thursday. At the request of Rosenstein.njnancy said:
They had better learn how to fight like Republicans & quickly.Lerxst1992 said:njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont
I always find 45's bs "you're fired" persona laughable since he is incapable of firing anyone in person.
Rosenstein's been meeting with Kelly for quite some time now.
The same day that the judiciary committee is having the new Kavanaugh hearing.
Post edited by njnancy on0 -
Not Acting Attorney General's in charge of a special investigation, no not normal. Hence, Thursday's meeting.HughFreakingDillon said:
to be fair, is it not normal for the Chief of Staff to be the one to fire people?njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.0 -
Time for... INFRASTRUCTURE WEEK!0
-
Since there’s no money for that, I think infrastructure week means telling people to pass local tax levies to pay for that bridge.mrussel1 said:Time for... INFRASTRUCTURE WEEK!0 -
Remember back A WEEK AND A HALF AGO? Manafort Plea Deal?
How much longer is this goddamn movie?Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 -
Hello? Midas? Is that you?
Michele Bachmann Explains Why Everything Donald Trump Has Touched 'Turned To Gold' - HuffPost https://apple.news/AfAjmIxvvTJarNsh2fKx6qA
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
mrussel1 said:
I disagree. The way they have handled this nomination has been "hardball" politics. It's not dirty because they ddin't invent the shit, but it's hardball to spring it late, inflicting maximum damage. If this came up 2 months ago, he would never have been nominated.njnancy said:
They had better learn how to fight like Republicans & quickly.Lerxst1992 said:njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont
I always find 45's bs "you're fired" persona laughable, since he is incapable of firing anyone in person.
He's been meeting with Kelly for quite some time.
Two months ago they were trying to get access to all of his documentation. It was the gop playing hardball by denying access.
The timing of this news hitting late could easily be the decisions of Dr. Ford and not the dems.Post edited by Lerxst1992 on0 -
Could be... and even if it wasn't, there are no hold barred on this after the Merrick Garland BS.Lerxst1992 said:mrussel1 said:
I disagree. The way they have handled this nomination has been "hardball" politics. It's not dirty because they ddin't invent the shit, but it's hardball to spring it late, inflicting maximum damage. If this came up 2 months ago, he would never have been nominated.njnancy said:
They had better learn how to fight like Republicans & quickly.Lerxst1992 said:njnancy said:
The solicitor general, Noel Francesco, would be the next in line and would assume the control (or devastation) of the Mueller investigation.The President can appoint any previously appointed, senate confirmed person if the position is open due to death, resignation or inability to perform duties. Rosenstein's people say he will not resign. Creating an opening through firing someone would not fit into that definition described in the vacancy act. But rule of law does not seem to matter much to this President.mrussel1 said:
The question is..then what? Who assumes control of the Mueller investigation? Will it be a new appointee (I'm not sure if a deputy has to go through confirmation) or would an existing deputy take the reigns? If the latter, I would think the investigation is safe. If there's a new deputy and they don't have to go through confirmation, then you can expect a hack. It will interesting if Sessions acquiesces to such a miscarriage of justice. He has been surprisingly resolute recently. It appears he is trying to salvage his legacy.njnancy said:Rosenstein has been summoned to the White House. Figures that 45 is in New York. He can't do his own dirty work. If Rosenstein refuses to resign, will 45 'bravely' fire by tweet? This could get ugly.
Amazing how he is using an article in what he refers to as 'fake news' as his impetus to do what he has wanted to do.
The solicitor general has entanglements with Trump's legal firms.
There is no protection for Mueller; Congress has declined to pass a law to do so.
This is serious shit.
Then it's up to the dems for once to have a spine.
Start withholding quorum at every opportunity to slow down kavanaugh. Shut the govt down until Congress passes a law to protect Mueller.
But they won't because they dont
I always find 45's bs "you're fired" persona laughable, since he is incapable of firing anyone in person.
He's been meeting with Kelly for quite some time.
Two months ago they were trying to get access to all of his documentation. It was the gop playing hardball by denying access.
The timing of this news hitting late could easily be the decisions of Dr. Ford and not the dems.0 -
Trump's reaction to being laughed at while ranting at the UN is kinda worrying.
It seems he actually believes his lies that he gets away with to his maga-hatted usual crowd.
I prefer the idea he is just evil and tricking the uneducated white folks rather than him seeing himself as some powerful leader. Scary.
0 -
I think he is so narcissistic that he believes what his yes-men/women around him keep telling him: how awesome he is.Kev - Coat and Keys said:Trump's reaction to being laughed at while ranting at the UN is kinda worrying.
It seems he actually believes his lies that he gets away with to his maga-hatted usual crowd.
I prefer the idea he is just evil and tricking the uneducated white folks rather than him seeing himself as some powerful leader. Scary.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
Swedish newspapers reporting Trump was laughed at, at the UN? Haha..."Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
Cringing. He's so embarrassing.
Falling down,...not staying down0 -
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"0
-
and he says later "I didn't expect that, but that's ok". he is so clueless as to how terrible he really is.Spiritual_Chaos said:Swedish newspapers reporting Trump was laughed at, at the UN? Haha...Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help