Donald Trump

1…11131114111611181119…2954

Comments

  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    edited July 2018
    they measure those bad boys by waist size...

    “Even more important than Donald Trump’s weight is how unhealthy he looks. I had the chance to see him in person. He has said on many occasions that he is on a fast-food diet of burgers and fried chicken and French fries, and he looked like it — unhealthy complexion, puffy, pasty skin, sweating a lot.

    "He looked like Morgan Spurlock at the end of 'Super Size Me.'”


    #fatass


    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    hippiemom = goodness
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    no collusion
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • OnWis97
    OnWis97 St. Paul, MN Posts: 5,610
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Worst shade ever thrown at an athlete.  Nobody throws worse shade.
    1995 Milwaukee     1998 Alpine, Alpine     2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston     2004 Boston, Boston     2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty)     2011 Alpine, Alpine     
    2013 Wrigley     2014 St. Paul     2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley     2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley     2021 Asbury Park     2022 St Louis     2023 Austin, Austin
    2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    no
    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • ikiT
    ikiT USA Posts: 11,059

    Rudy on Mueller probe: "They don't have a goddamn thing"

    Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 06132018
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    hippiemom = goodness
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    Tiki said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    no
    Trump >>>>>> Brady

    Fixed. 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • LongestRoad
    LongestRoad Posts: 477
    brianlux said:
    LongestRoad said:
    brianlux said:
    LongestRoad said:
    PJ_Soul said:

    Thoughts_Arrive said:
    vaggar99 said:

    Good People Don’t Defend A Bad Man

    At times in this life it can be a challenge to figure out who the bad people are, but sometimes they help you.

    Sometimes they do the work for you.

    Sometimes with their every vulgar, bitter word from their mouth, they testify to their personal malignancy and they make it easy to identify them.

    Generally speaking, there are things that good people do and things good people don’t do.

    Good people don’t refer to entire countries as “shitholes”—most notably countries that have given birth to our very humanity; ones that for hundreds of years have been colonized and poached and mined of their riches by powerful white men; countries whose people have been enslaved and sold and forced to come and build your country. 

    Good people by any measurement we might use—simply don’t say such things.

    Of course good people also don’t say they could grab women by the genitalia, either.
    They don’t defend racists and nazis and call them “fine people,” days after murdering a young girl and terrorizing an American city.
    They don’t brag about their penis size during debates, or suggest protestors at campaign rallies should be roughed up, or crack jokes about captured war heroes, or make fun of the physically disabled.
    They don’t.

    Good people don’t tweet anti-Muslim rhetoric in the moments immediately following a bombing in order to bolster a position.
    They don’t leave American territories filled with brown skinned people without power for months upon months, after publicly ridiculing their public servants and questioning their people’s resolve.
    They don’t pull children from the arms of their parents and place them in cages and detention centers.
    They don’t erase protections for the water and the air, for the elderly, the terminally ill, the LGBTQ.
    They don’t take away healthcare from the sick and the poor without an alternative.
    They don’t gouge the working poor and shelter the wealthy.
    They don’t abuse their unrivaled platform to Twitter-bait world leaders and to taunt private citizens.
    Good people don’t prey upon the vulnerable, they don’t leverage their power to bully dissenters, and they don’t campaign for sexual predators.

    But this President is not a good human being, and there’s simply no way around this truth.

    He is the ugliest personification of the Ugly American, which is why, as long as he is here and as long as he represents this nation, we will be a fractured mess and a global embarrassment. He will be the ever lowering bar of our legacy in the world.

    And what is painfully obvious in these moments, isn’t simply that the person alleging to lead this country is a terrible human being—it is that anyone left still defending him, applauding him, justifying him, amening him, probably is too.

    At this point, the only reason left to support this President, is that he reflects your hateful heart; he shares your contempt of people of color, your hostility toward outsiders, your ignorant bigotry, your feeling of supremacy.

    A white President calling countries filled with people of color shitholes, is so far beyond the pale, so beneath decency, and so blatantly racist that it shouldn’t merit conversation. It should be universally condemned. Humanity should be in agreement in abhorring it.

    And yet today (like so many other seemingly rock bottom days in the past twelve months) they will be out there: white people claiming to be good people and Christian people, who will make excuses for him or debate his motives or diminish the damage. 

    They will dig their heels in to explain away or to defend, what at the end of the day is simply a bad human being saying the things that bad human beings say because their hearts harbor very bad things.

    No, good people don’t call countries filled with beautiful, creative, loving men and women shitholes or do most of the horrible things he does.

    And good people don’t defend people who do.

    You’re going to have to make a choice here.

    https://johnpavlovitz.com/2018/01/12/good-people-dont-defend-bad-man/
    Made me sad and angry reading this.
    How low have people stooped that they voted and continue to support this germ.
    I personally have cut someone off from my life because of his support for Trump.
    I have too. I had a friend - a Canadian non-white person no less - who lost his mind and basically became a Trump troll for some reason. I tried to deal with it for a while, but he just got worse and worse, started digging his heels in, and even started getting in arguments with stangers in bars about it and shit. I finally just had to cut him off. Blocked him on facebook, got rid of his contact info. He basically just made the decision to be "the asshole". I think he gets off on it. I don't need that kind of idiocy in my life.
    so your "friend" didn't agree with people at a bar and they were arguing with him. take your time and read that over. 
    Your "friend doesn't agree with your politics as much as you don't agree with his but he didn't unfriend you. you unfriended him. 
    Like I always say, liberals want everyone to be free to believe whatever they want as long as you believe exactly as they believe. 
    I think your "friend" is lucky.

    Wow!  :lol:  You slipped in that "liberals want everything free" thing?  :lol:  Wow!  :lol:
    Liberals want their form of freedom which is agree to their view or be gone. Only the extremists can't see that freedom means free to have different views. 
    First you were saying liberals want everything free.  Then you starting talking about liberals wanting a specific type of freedom.  I'm not agreeing nor disagreeing with what you're saying, I'm just trying to understand what the point is you are trying to make.  Wanting everything free (which implies that worn out misunderstanding of the difference between socialism, communism and democratic socialism) and wanting freedom are not the same thing. 

    As for "Liberals want their form of freedom which is agree to their view or be gone. Only the extremists can't see that freedom means free to have different views", I would say, yeah maybe some think that  way,  just like some conservative think that way, and some libertarians think that way, and some ... etc.  Why the all or nothing/ black and white view point.  Why these sweeping generalizations.   I don't get it.



    lol I didn't mean free. I was talking about free as in views. There are extremes on both sides, I agree. I'm generalizing in a sense because I see and hear the same things over and over from the liberal and far right sides. Only liberals choose to use a lot more mockery. That doesn't help their cause with trying to sway independents, it only hurts it. It seems a lot are coming to conclusions based on who and where they are at that time not on actual research of the issues choices for solutions.
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • LongestRoad
    LongestRoad Posts: 477
    oftenreading said:
    LongestRoad said:
    oftenreading said:
    LongestRoad said:
    oftenreading said:
    LongestRoad said:
    my2hands said:
    LongestRoad said:
    Unless your living in another country, he's your POTUS too. I don't applaud and cheer the negative. Some is accurate news, some is fake news. Trump has done some good for this country. You can't deny. I think he needs to tighten up on the epa issues a bit more. He needs to make changes to the immigration policy but not to the point that allows drugs and traffickers in with ease. I can see  good points made from both parties. There are also extremes with each that I don't agree with. 
    Oh, I can deny, quite easily actually.... and NO, he's not my president, he can go fuck himself.... BUT, let me get on my soap box real quick about something.... 

    "Drugs and traffickers in with ease"

    Our country is being polluted with drugs by FORTUNE 500 companies, NOT Hispanic immigrants. The American opioid epidemic was brought to you by the major pharmaceutical companies, period. Big Pharma created a nation of addicts, and laughed all the way to the fucking bank. And now I have to listen to a clueless orange shit gibbon blame immigrants while maga morons cheer on not realizing who is really fucking them and their community

    The real scumbags where suits, wake up america


    We  can blame the Bush era for the rise of the opioid crisis. All the f'cking pain management clinics opening. Plenty of drugs are coming from the south. Portugal who has legalized to an extent drugs is now the gateway for traffickers into Europe. We don't want any drugs here. Don't twist my words and make it sound like i'm saying keep immigrants out. That's not at all what I'm saying. There are a lot of immigrants that have come to this country legally, had to endure hardship while waiting and are pissed that other immigrants think they can just jump the line and get in front and make it that much more time for someone who is following the rules to get in. Not to minimize their horrid conditions for why they want to leave their countries. If you think it's ok, let me know where you're standing in line forPearlJam Ten Club GA. I don't have a ten club ticket either but you can let me cut in line in front of you and I can tell the guards how it would be biased for them not to let me in just because I don't have a ticket. I mean I really need to get in. It's causing me great distress not to get to see Eddie. You think they'll let me in? Maybe I can jump the fence. Maybe... 


    Equating fleeing a violent, war torn nation with cutting in line for GA at a PJ concert.

    Well done. 
    Perhaps you missed the line I wrote about not to minimize the horrid conditions that the immigrants are coming from. 

    Complaining about not getting the rail because people cut the line when there's people in other countries suffering and trying to get in legally but people keep cutting the line after coming to amt to bitch that people should be able to cut the line.  Hypocrosy. 
    Oh yeah and I forgot that they like to throw in the wording "first world problems" are you f'n kidding me?!? 
    I didn’t miss that line at all. When you make a comparison that ridiculous and then say “not to minimize....”, its like when someone makes a really sexist or racist joke and then says “just kidding”. Doesn’t really remove the comment. 
    Sometimes for people that have blinders on you have to make it as simple as possible for them to try to understand the issue. Sorry it wasn't something you can understand.
    As the point flies gently over your head....

    No amount of backpeddling gets you out of that one. 
    I understand your point and I'm not backpeddling. I can assure you. What I wrote is for those who choose to be hypocrites and can't see what they do in everyday life. Do you understand now??
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,491
    Tiki said:

    Rudy on Mueller probe: "They don't have a goddamn thing"

    Sure, they don’t. That explains why Trump won’t sit down for an interview.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,185
    You kind of forget what they do have....some of which was all done in public

    He's fucked and he knows it
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    Trumps approval rating > Brady’s 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    Trumps approval rating > Brady’s 
    * A statistically significant difference with a 95% CI among a sample of Bengals fans 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    Trumps approval rating > Brady’s 
    * A statistically significant difference with a 95% CI among a sample of Bengals fans 
    Not a bengal fan. Cincycpaw reference to the University of Cincinnati. ;)

    anyhow this is fun but back to trump. 
    hippiemom = goodness
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,193
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    Trumps approval rating > Brady’s 
    FAKE NEWS! ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    oftenreading said:
    cincybearcat said:
    Tiki said:
    Leave Tom Brady out of it.
    Trump > Tom Brady.......  
    Brady at least has a marketable skill. 
    Both cheaters
    If your argument is both are cheaters, and that is your only deciding factor, then your equation should read Trump = Brady. If we are going to determine superiority, then other factors need to be taken into account ;) 
    Trumps approval rating > Brady’s 
    * A statistically significant difference with a 95% CI among a sample of Bengals fans 
    Not a bengal fan. Cincycpaw reference to the University of Cincinnati. ;)

    anyhow this is fun but back to trump. 
    I knew what it referred to, but given that that’s college and not pro football I went with the bengals. Obviously I failed to account for grudges ;) 
     
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
This discussion has been closed.

Categories