***DONALD J TRUMP HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN IMPEACHED***

The Juggler

2019

HughFreakingDillon said:

The Juggler said:

This is accurate

agree, and look at that. MSNBC is dangerously close, if not slightly overlapping into, to "extreme/unfair interpretations of the news". 

It is in the Hyper-partisan/Analysis sections. I think that is accurate.
Fox New is in the Hyper-partisan/Extremely Unfair interpretation of the news sections. I think that is also accurate.

oftenreading

The Juggler said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

The Juggler said:

This is accurate

agree, and look at that. MSNBC is dangerously close, if not slightly overlapping into, to "extreme/unfair interpretations of the news". 

It is in the Hyper-partisan/Analysis sections. I think that is accurate.
Fox New is in the Hyper-partisan/Extremely Unfair interpretation of the news sections. I think that is also accurate.

Whatever you are saying is accurate isn't visible to me.

oftenreading

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

oftenreading

And this is what they say about Fox:

RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories that later must be retracted after being widely shared. Further, Fox News would be rated a Questionable source based on numerous failed fact checks by hosts and pundits, however straight news reporting is generally reliable, therefore we rate them Mixed for factual reporting.

The Juggler

2019

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

How exactly is this different than saying they are hyper partisan left/analysis?

The majority of the news of MSNBC comes from NBC which is ranked one of the highest on that chart.

.

Gern Blansten

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

agreed....obvious left, mostly factual

The Juggler

2019

Gern Blansten said:

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

agreed....obvious left, mostly factual

As reflected in the chart for the most part.

Gern Blansten

The Juggler said:

Gern Blansten said:

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

agreed....obvious left, mostly factual

As reflected in the chart for the most part.

The chart that cannot be accessed?

tempo_n_groove

Gern Blansten said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Gern Blansten said:

I disagree with the "bullshit" part.  It's not bullshit.  I don't listen to bullshit.

Bullshit...

whore!

TY for seeing the humor, I chuckled, lol!

oftenreading

The Juggler said:

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

How exactly is this different than saying they are hyper partisan left/analysis?

The majority of the news of MSNBC comes from NBC which is ranked one of the highest on that chart.

.

Who said it was different?

I can't see the chart, so hard to comment on that. 

The Juggler

2019

Gern Blansten said:

The Juggler said:

Gern Blansten said:

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

agreed....obvious left, mostly factual

As reflected in the chart for the most part.

The chart that cannot be accessed?

Jason P

I’m finding it hard to find a source of news to trust.  Most headlines are just regurgitated grand-standing Tweets from someone who clearly has an agenda (don’t believe me?  Just browse through a few pages of almost any thread on here).  

This whole issue will either sink Trump (unlikely) or will go away and never be spoken of again while another inquiry for treason is launched for something else.  

tempo_n_groove

The Juggler said:

Gern Blansten said:

The Juggler said:

Gern Blansten said:

oftenreading said:

Media Bias/Fact Check says this about MSNBC:

LEFT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation.  They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

• Overall, we rate MSNBC Left Biased based on story selection that consistently leans left editorially. Although pundits and hosts have failed a few fact checks, straight news reporting is usually factual and sourced, therefore we rate them Mostly Factual for news reporting.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/msnbc/

agreed....obvious left, mostly factual

As reflected in the chart for the most part.

The chart that cannot be accessed?

Where is Breitbart?

dankind

tempo_n_groove said:

Gern Blansten said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Gern Blansten said:

I disagree with the "bullshit" part.  It's not bullshit.  I don't listen to bullshit.

Bullshit...

whore!

TY for seeing the humor, I chuckled, lol!

ikiT

2018

tempo_n_groove said:

cincybearcat said:

Cliffy6745 said:

Haven't been in this thread in ages and not reading back, buuuuut seems like there is about a 100% chance of impeachment and a 0% chance of the Senate removing him from office, right? 

That there appears to be the correct data at this point

Clintons popularity soared after impeachment...

Blowies and Outright Treason are two different things.

ikiT

2018

Gern Blansten said:

tempo_n_groove said:

Gern Blansten said:

tempo_n_groove said:

The Juggler said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Cracks they are appearing. Need the testimony of the whistle blower to seal the deal.

https://apple.news/AX-PD8KPpRAO6QhMAmYNVkg

And this is before the complaint was released. 

I believe I saw a PBS poll had it at 49% before the complaint too. 

Bottom line is this is just a much easier to digest issue than the Russia investigation is for most people. Easy and quick. A slam dunk, you might say. 

It really is amazing how different political sides talk about things.  Watching FOX yesterday and the message they were conveying that "impeachment is not wanted by a majority of the country." and yet this poll is growing to "yes" on impeachment.  Show a poll to a conservative and they'll shoot it down too...

The news shows are really getting tiresome.  Does anybody read a source that isn't biased?  Do they exist?

Yes they exist.  Even Fox's nightly news with Shepard Smith is fairly centered because he isn't a tRump drone.

Comparing MSNBC to Fox isn't fair.  Fox's pundits just outright lie and use false stories and conspiracy theories as support.  MSNBC pundits (Maddow, O'Donnell, etc.) are clearly liberal but they do not lie or use selective facts.  They always present both sides of the story.

Maddow?  Really?

Shepard Smith I happen to love.  He really is the lone bight spot on all of FOX.

Yes, really.  She is liberal and she let's you know it.  But she is always the first to let you know when she is using unconfirmed information.  She consistently uses "if this is true" to preface information presented.

She spits nothing but truth. 

ikiT

2018

Halifax2TheMax said:

Comparing Clinton impeachment to Team Trump Treason impeachment is ridiculous. White Water land deal morphs into Rose Law Firm billing records morphs into pork belly futures morphs into Vince Foster suicide morphs into the Lewinsky affair (talk about a witch hunt) versus Team Mueller investigating Team Trump Treason and Putin on the ritz interfering in our election morphs into Team Trump Treason asking Ukraine to interfere in our election (after declaring “Russia if you’re listening” and telling George Stephanopolous he’d accept foreign dirt on a political opponent). Get the fuck outta here.

#FOH

CM189191

https://twitter.com/FBIRecordsVault/status/1177644087874179072?s=19

FBI trolling tRUmp on Twitter

cincybearcat

2018

Halifax2TheMax said:

Comparing Clinton impeachment to Team Trump Treason impeachment is ridiculous. White Water land deal morphs into Rose Law Firm billing records morphs into pork belly futures morphs into Vince Foster suicide morphs into the Lewinsky affair (talk about a witch hunt) versus Team Mueller investigating Team Trump Treason and Putin on the ritz interfering in our election morphs into Team Trump Treason asking Ukraine to interfere in our election (after declaring “Russia if you’re listening” and telling George Stephanopolous he’d accept foreign dirt on a political opponent). Get the fuck outta here.

Except you don't have to compare...you can look at them individually. Unless, you know....Go Team!

Halifax2TheMax

cincybearcat said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

Comparing Clinton impeachment to Team Trump Treason impeachment is ridiculous. White Water land deal morphs into Rose Law Firm billing records morphs into pork belly futures morphs into Vince Foster suicide morphs into the Lewinsky affair (talk about a witch hunt) versus Team Mueller investigating Team Trump Treason and Putin on the ritz interfering in our election morphs into Team Trump Treason asking Ukraine to interfere in our election (after declaring “Russia if you’re listening” and telling George Stephanopolous he’d accept foreign dirt on a political opponent). Get the fuck outta here.

Except you don't have to compare...you can look at them individually. Unless, you know....Go Team!

Not even close to comparable. Not. Even.