Text of Muslim Ban Executive Order in a few posts
Comments
-
Hopefully people will follow her lead.... and join together to start the resistance.... That sounds like a cheezy movie line; I can't believe it's actually a statement that now has real meaning. Crazy times.Bentleyspop said:
Trump fires defiant acting attorney generaldignin said:Heard she has been fired.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-immigration-executive-order-234401With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I'm picturing courts will be busy everywhere, because that's where a lot of the formalized resistance will happen. State's and cities are already suing, and State Supreme Courts and AGs will be pushing back on mandates from the White House.PJ_Soul said:
Hopefully people will follow her lead.... and join together to start the resistance.... That sounds like a cheezy movie line; I can't believe it's actually a statement that now has real meaning. Crazy times.Bentleyspop said:
Trump fires defiant acting attorney generaldignin said:Heard she has been fired.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-immigration-executive-order-234401Post edited by Go Beavers on0 -
Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.Falling down,...not staying down0
-
I wouldn't have believed this actually happened given what happened yesterday. Watch the whole thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqz0eiIf1Uw
0 -
Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
0 -
Yeah.... such resistance doesn't seem to be working so far though, does it? They're completely ignoring the courts so far, fired the AG, set up Bannon on the National Security Council, has fired all kinds of experienced people from the Justice Department to create chaos, etc etc. TBH, I actually figured the President had less power than I'm discovering he has. A bunch of Americans have been saying for months that Trump/the POTUS can't just pull shit that will directly affect people (aside from pushing the buttons, basically) without checks and balances and debate. They kept saying some of us were paranoid.... well, those people were obviously mistaken in some regards.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Post edited by PJ_Soul onWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
If you say so, I just don't spend much capital on his opinion.HughFreakingDillon said:
then you aren't informed. he's the one who came up with the plan, and he stated on the record that trump asked him to implement a muslim ban.unsung said:
No, but I really don't care about what Rudy 9/11 has to say.HughFreakingDillon said:
did you happen to see Guiliani's interview? he stated precisely that Trump asked him how to legally construct a muslim ban. he said it more than once, that yes, this is indeed a muslim ban. and it was guiliani's making.unsung said:
Based on country, not religion.Halifax2TheMax said:
According to JC, 12% of muslims are banned.unsung said:
Fake news. Muslims are not banned.Halifax2TheMax said:Ms. Haiku said:Heather Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College wrote in a Twitter thread that this Executive Order is a "shock event." That it causes chaos to ultimately get what Trump wants which is Sessions elected. She has a long Twitter thread for this, but this following tweet is part of it.
https://twitter.com/womanistpsych
Jefferson Sessions being received as the acceptable one, as head of DOJ, to restore order to Bannon's generated chaos is one of the setups.
Do you think this is a shock event, and that Sessions as AG could be the goal?
I'm not completely convinced that this is a "shock event." It looks like Trump is doing what he said he would do. I think the Executive Order for the wall could be considered a shock event as well, but putting a wall up was part of his presidential campaign.
So was banning Muslims.
Countries that Obama picked.
None of you protested when he froze visas.0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.0 -
Then you should pass that along to all the attorneys working on their court filings in opposition.JC29856 said:
Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
0 -
it wasn't his "opinion".unsung said:
If you say so, I just don't spend much capital on his opinion.HughFreakingDillon said:
then you aren't informed. he's the one who came up with the plan, and he stated on the record that trump asked him to implement a muslim ban.unsung said:
No, but I really don't care about what Rudy 9/11 has to say.HughFreakingDillon said:
did you happen to see Guiliani's interview? he stated precisely that Trump asked him how to legally construct a muslim ban. he said it more than once, that yes, this is indeed a muslim ban. and it was guiliani's making.unsung said:
Based on country, not religion.Halifax2TheMax said:
According to JC, 12% of muslims are banned.unsung said:
Fake news. Muslims are not banned.Halifax2TheMax said:Ms. Haiku said:Heather Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College wrote in a Twitter thread that this Executive Order is a "shock event." That it causes chaos to ultimately get what Trump wants which is Sessions elected. She has a long Twitter thread for this, but this following tweet is part of it.
https://twitter.com/womanistpsych
Jefferson Sessions being received as the acceptable one, as head of DOJ, to restore order to Bannon's generated chaos is one of the setups.
Do you think this is a shock event, and that Sessions as AG could be the goal?
I'm not completely convinced that this is a "shock event." It looks like Trump is doing what he said he would do. I think the Executive Order for the wall could be considered a shock event as well, but putting a wall up was part of his presidential campaign.
So was banning Muslims.
Countries that Obama picked.
None of you protested when he froze visas.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/
Falling down,...not staying down0 -
Unsung's convinced himself he's in the militia so he can cover his bases in a gun ownership argument.0
-
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Exactly. Your feelings don't trump my rights.Kat said:
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/
I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated more than two genders either.0 -
I disagree and think that our founding fathers faced much more dire circumstances than we face today in our cushy little America. Not to mention having to deal with Muslim Pirates during the Barbary Wars...Kat said:
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/0 -
They didn't anticipate every change, but allowed for change at the same time. They probably figured we'd always have a need for a militia, and that women wouldn't ever be voting.unsung said:
Exactly. Your feelings don't trump my rights.Kat said:
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/
I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated more than two genders either.0 -
Mischaracterizing my rights as feelings doesn't contribute to an honest discussion. I'm done.unsung said:
Exactly. Your feelings don't trump my rights.Kat said:
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/
I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated more than two genders either.Falling down,...not staying down0 -
I didn't say it can't or shouldn't be challenged, I'm saying illegal spying and data collecting, allegations and trials for the accused and killing americans all have been litigated and defeated by the "national security".Go Beavers said:
Then you should pass that along to all the attorneys working on their court filings in opposition.JC29856 said:
Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Like I said earlier let's wait and see how these lawsuits turn out.0 -
I think you said legal precedent isn't on the side of immigrants.JC29856 said:
I didn't say it can't or shouldn't be challenged, I'm saying illegal spying and data collecting, allegations and trials for the accused and killing americans all have been litigated and defeated by the "national security".Go Beavers said:
Then you should pass that along to all the attorneys working on their court filings in opposition.JC29856 said:
Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Like I said earlier let's wait and see how these lawsuits turn out.0 -
I did...I read a bunch today. If I can find it I'll post. At quick glance I couldn't dig it up.Go Beavers said:
I think you said legal precedent isn't on the side of immigrants.JC29856 said:
I didn't say it can't or shouldn't be challenged, I'm saying illegal spying and data collecting, allegations and trials for the accused and killing americans all have been litigated and defeated by the "national security".Go Beavers said:
Then you should pass that along to all the attorneys working on their court filings in opposition.JC29856 said:
Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Like I said earlier let's wait and see how these lawsuits turn out.0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
They did a pretty good job with some misgivings that have been adjusted through the amendment process.Go Beavers said:
They didn't anticipate every change, but allowed for change at the same time. They probably figured we'd always have a need for a militia, and that women wouldn't ever be voting.unsung said:
Exactly. Your feelings don't trump my rights.Kat said:
The Constitution has always been a work in progress...the experiment that is America...that is slipping way.unsung said:
Thanks for the laugh.Kat said:Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
Remember that C word the next time you talk about my gun rights.
I mourn 93 additional dead Americans today.
There is a reasonable place between someone's right to have guns and people's right to be safe and not be victimized. One doesn't trump the other and the founding fathers never imagined what's going on today.
https://everytownresearch.org/gun-violence-by-the-numbers/
I am guessing the founding fathers never anticipated more than two genders either.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help