Blank Discussion Topic

17778808283234

Comments

  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576

    "see you court" tweets trump. I wonder if he knows that he just did see them in court?

    I doubt he understands much about government.
    The SC may not hear it at all, they don't usually hear cases from the lower courts regarding temporary stays.
    If they do, they will likely split 4-4 and the decision will remain.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • mrussel1mrussel1 Posts: 29,309
    rgambs said:

    "see you court" tweets trump. I wonder if he knows that he just did see them in court?

    I doubt he understands much about government.
    The SC may not hear it at all, they don't usually hear cases from the lower courts regarding temporary stays.
    If they do, they will likely split 4-4 and the decision will remain.
    Exactly... Plus this isn't even a final judgement, it's an intermediate one. The court usually doesn't hear a case until all arguments are heard and final judgment rendered.

    All the while...bad hombres are pouring in....

    See you in court...what a db.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited February 2017
    my2hands said:
    Is this what American politics are coming to now? Insulting each other on social media?

    (btw way m2h, I would like to congratulate you for having the shortest thread ever) :smile:
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • trump will see them in court.

    right.

    he just got smacked by an appeals court and does not have a legal leg to stand on to sway an 8 person supreme court to a 5-3 decision.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • my2hands said:
    Is this what American politics are coming to now? Insulting each other on social media?

    (btw way m2h, I would like to congratulate you for having the shortest thread ever) :smile:
    *asks the guy who posts Trumps twitter insults every single day
  • So now that the lower courts are out of the way now the game changes and the real business will get done in the Supreme Court.
    "We have a situation where the security of our country is at stake and it's a very, very serious situation so we look forward ... to seeing them in court," Trump said. "We're going to win the case."
    The president said he did not believe the decision undercut his presidency.
    "The statute provides a president ... with great latitude and authority to protect the citizens and to protect the nation's national security," Conway said. "This was not argued on the merits. Now that we'll have an opportunity to argue on the merits we look forward to doing that. We look forward to prevailing."

    http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/politics/trump-calls-ruling-on-travel-ban-a-political-decision/ar-AAmN765?li=AAadgLE&ocid=spartanntp
  • my2hands said:
    Is this what American politics are coming to now? Insulting each other on social media?

    (btw way m2h, I would like to congratulate you for having the shortest thread ever) :smile:
    *asks the guy who posts Trumps twitter insults every single day
    My question stands.
  • vaggar99vaggar99 Posts: 3,427
    my2hands said:
    can't believe the SNL Zimbabwe bit hasn't gotten more attention. Its been all McCarthy this week.
  • There's your fascism right there and Herr Trump's tweets add fuel to the fire.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/judges-threatened-immigration-order/index.html

    I hope everyone shuns this idiot.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 8,942

    There's your fascism right there and Herr Trump's tweets add fuel to the fire.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/judges-threatened-immigration-order/index.html

    I hope everyone shuns this idiot.

    I'm wondering if the usual crew can find the Obama equivalency?.........
  • mfc2006mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,405
    Unreal...
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • There's your fascism right there and Herr Trump's tweets add fuel to the fire.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/judges-threatened-immigration-order/index.html

    I hope everyone shuns this idiot.

    I'm wondering if the usual crew can find the Obama equivalency?.........
    The irony of having to increase security to judges who just ruled against the immigration band (which is done in the name of defending us from terrorism) from homeland risks is just too much for me to compute late at night...
  • There's your fascism right there and Herr Trump's tweets add fuel to the fire.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/judges-threatened-immigration-order/index.html

    I hope everyone shuns this idiot.

    Wow

    Honestly... to me this has gone too far. This is a blatant strong arm tactic.

    His brutal behaviour is escalating.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • mfc2006mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,405

    There's your fascism right there and Herr Trump's tweets add fuel to the fire.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/09/politics/judges-threatened-immigration-order/index.html

    I hope everyone shuns this idiot.

    Wow

    Honestly... to me this has gone too far. This is a blatant strong arm tactic.

    His brutal behaviour is escalating.
    Yup.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Yes, he is one man. That's scary enough given the power he has been given. I think the scary thing is that 60+ million people thought he was the man for the job. Not even that, but the lengths to which his followers will go to in his name. It's so weird. I've yet to hear a breaking point from his supporters as to where he'd lose them. That baffles me. I have them with every candidate I back and work for. I just don't get it.
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    So are you saying that you now take President Trump seriously or not?
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576

    It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    So are you saying that you now take President Trump seriously or not?
    Tro-lo-lo-lo-lolio! A droll troll extracting his toll, tro-lo-lo-lo-lolio!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    So are you saying that you now take President Trump seriously or not?
    I'm saying the situation is worse than I thought. The country is going to have to manage the idiot. Left unchallenged... he'll f**k up everything.

    Are you still defending him?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • RYMERYME Posts: 1,904
    edited February 2017
    Ok. The 9th Circus Court has spoken.
    Non of this was aimed at a religion. It was aimed where most of the terrorists originate from.
    Federal judge James Robart's ruling putting a nation wide stay on those actions didn't bother to reference this statute; in part It would seem because the statue is crystal clear.
    8 U.S. Code-1182-Inadmissible Aliens.
    (f) Suspension or entry or imposition of restrictions by President.
    Whenever the President finds that the entity of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States, would be detrimental to the interests of the United States: he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or class of aliens as immigrants, or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
    This of course includes a class of aliens from a specific countries.
    (I.e. any one of the 7 named in the executive order.)
    Could not be possibly clearer:
    So, Like it or lump it.
    President Trump has the absolute authority to issue the actions that he did.
    Of course some old liberal activist judge will shoot it down, until further appeal.
    Post edited by RYME on
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    So are you saying that you now take President Trump seriously or not?
    I'm saying the situation is worse than I thought. The country is going to have to manage the idiot. Left unchallenged... he'll f**k up everything.

    Are you still defending him?
    I'm not defending him I just point out facts that happen because of what he does whether you agree or not.
  • It's not so funny anymore as it is serious.

    What has gotten you so scared?
    He is one man.
    I didn't say I was scared ya boob. I said it was serious.
    So are you saying that you now take President Trump seriously or not?
    I'm saying the situation is worse than I thought. The country is going to have to manage the idiot. Left unchallenged... he'll f**k up everything.

    Are you still defending him?
    Does a bear shit in the woods?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtOckG5tNhc
  • RYME said:

    Ok. The 9th Circus Court has spoken.
    Non of this was aimed at a religion. It was aimed where most of the terrorists originate from.
    Federal judge James Robart's ruling putting a nation wide stay on those actions didn't bother to reference this statute; in part It would seem because the statue is crystal clear.
    8 U.S. Code-1182-Inadmissible Aliens.
    (f) Suspension or entry or imposition of restrictions by President.
    Whenever the President finds that the entity of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States, would be detrimental to the interests of the United States: he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or class of aliens as immigrants, or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
    This of course includes a class of aliens from a specific country.
    (I.e. any one of the 7 named in the executive order.)
    Could not be possibly clearer:
    So, Like it or lump it.
    President Trump has the absolute authority to issue the actions that he did.

    It is absolutely aimed at religion! If it weren't, why even bother mentioning giving preference to minority religions? (Christianity). Zero, 0, LESS THAN ONE American citizen has lost their life on our homeland from anyone from these countries in an act of terrorism since like 1973!
    The Constitution outweighs the President here, and the Constitution says we do not prefer one religion over another.
  • RYME said:

    Ok. The 9th Circus Court has spoken.
    Non of this was aimed at a religion. It was aimed where most of the terrorists originate from.
    Federal judge James Robart's ruling putting a nation wide stay on those actions didn't bother to reference this statute; in part It would seem because the statue is crystal clear.
    8 U.S. Code-1182-Inadmissible Aliens.
    (f) Suspension or entry or imposition of restrictions by President.
    Whenever the President finds that the entity of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States, would be detrimental to the interests of the United States: he may by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or class of aliens as immigrants, or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
    This of course includes a class of aliens from a specific countries.
    (I.e. any one of the 7 named in the executive order.)
    Could not be possibly clearer:
    So, Like it or lump it.
    President Trump has the absolute authority to issue the actions that he did.
    Of course some old liberal activist judge will shoot it down, until further appeal.

    Care to point out which terrorists and their attacks have originated from the seven countries on the ban? Care to expound on why "christians" from these countries aren't banned?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • AND...

    Rudy G went on Fox and talked about the President calling him. saying he wanted a Muslim ban, and how legally could they do it. Rudy suggested this very action.

    The White House only has themselves to blame. He's the one calling it a ban, members of Congress call it a ban...

    I think these two acts can't go unnoticed as to why we got the ruling we thankfully got tonight. This White House is inept at best.
  • RYMERYME Posts: 1,904
    There are a dozen or more predominantly Muslim countries that aren't on the list. Why?
This discussion has been closed.