Blank Discussion Topic

13637394142234

Comments

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    M
    my2hands said:

    You are either with the Nazi's, or against them. Are you for the ban or against the ban? Are you pro-refugee or anti-refugee? Do you prefer to build walls or bridges? Do you support LGBTQ rights or not? Do you support Womens rights or not?

    This shit isn't rocket science.

    Just read the above twice and file under S for simpleton.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited January 2017
    I listened for 8 years that Obama was a Kenyan Muslim Socialist with a fake birth certificate. Including from this asshole in the Oval Office.

    Now shit gets real and you'll all excuse or explain it away

    If youre not openly against the racist and hate filled executive orders filed so far by President Trump them you're all sympathizers as far as I'm concerned.

    Again, this isn't rocket science. You either support it or you don't. The line is clearly drawn in the sand, Dude
    Post edited by my2hands on
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Supports black sites... supports torture... alternative facts... building walls... muslim bans... anti-immigrant... anti-refugee...

    Wake up sympathizers
  • Latest tweet folks.
    The joint statement of former presidential candidates John McCain & Lindsey Graham is wrong - they are sadly weak on immigration. The two Senators should focus their energies on ISIS, illegal immigration and border security instead of always looking to start World War III.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,062

    Could we please stop this nonsense (I'm trying to be polite here) of referring to Trump and his supporters as Hitler and Nazis? I understand the desire not to "normalize" what the current President is doing, but what you're inadvertently doing is minimizing the horrors of what occurred during World War II. Yes, measures are being taken that are extreme in our culture, but 10 million lives were lost in the Holocaust (in addition to soldiers on both sides).

    I was going to suggest Stalin as an alternative, but that would minimize the 20 million (mainly his own citizens) that died under his regime.

    In this poster's eyes it weakens one's position when such hyperbole is employed, and unnecessarily offends some who might have been sympathetic to your point of view.

    Rant finished, with appreciation to those who take this under serious consideration.

    Can we agree on authoritarian xenophobic demagogue?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Look at all the right wing snowflakes getting triggered... by the truth
  • vaggar99vaggar99 Posts: 3,427
    “Nice people made the best Nazis. My mom grew up next to them. They got along, refused to make waves, looked the other way when things got ugly and focused on happier things than ‘politics,’” wrote Shulman, whose mother Elizabeth was born in Munich in 1934 and grew up in Nazi Germany. “They were lovely people who turned their heads as their neighbors were dragged away. You know who weren’t nice people? Resisters.”
  • dignin said:
    yeah. I love following the twitter feed coming out of there.
    And the sun it may be shining . . . but there's an ocean in my eyes
  • DarthMaeglinDarthMaeglin Posts: 2,598

    Could we please stop this nonsense (I'm trying to be polite here) of referring to Trump and his supporters as Hitler and Nazis? I understand the desire not to "normalize" what the current President is doing, but what you're inadvertently doing is minimizing the horrors of what occurred during World War II. Yes, measures are being taken that are extreme in our culture, but 10 million lives were lost in the Holocaust (in addition to soldiers on both sides).

    I was going to suggest Stalin as an alternative, but that would minimize the 20 million (mainly his own citizens) that died under his regime.

    In this poster's eyes it weakens one's position when such hyperbole is employed, and unnecessarily offends some who might have been sympathetic to your point of view.

    Rant finished, with appreciation to those who take this under serious consideration.

    Can we agree on authoritarian xenophobic demagogue?
    Works for me. At some point totalitarian may even come into play, but some of the labels being thrown around carry much more baggage than applies to Trump (thus far).

    Be vigilant, to be sure, but save the loaded labels for when they actually apply.
    "The world is full of idiots and I am but one of them."

    10-30-1991 Toronto, Toronto 1 & 2 2016, Toronto 2022
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336

    Could we please stop this nonsense (I'm trying to be polite here) of referring to Trump and his supporters as Hitler and Nazis? I understand the desire not to "normalize" what the current President is doing, but what you're inadvertently doing is minimizing the horrors of what occurred during World War II. Yes, measures are being taken that are extreme in our culture, but 10 million lives were lost in the Holocaust (in addition to soldiers on both sides).

    I was going to suggest Stalin as an alternative, but that would minimize the 20 million (mainly his own citizens) that died under his regime.

    In this poster's eyes it weakens one's position when such hyperbole is employed, and unnecessarily offends some who might have been sympathetic to your point of view.

    Rant finished, with appreciation to those who take this under serious consideration.

    Can we agree on authoritarian xenophobic demagogue?
    Works for me. At some point totalitarian may even come into play, but some of the labels being thrown around carry much more baggage than applies to Trump (thus far).

    Be vigilant, to be sure, but save the loaded labels for when they actually apply.
    I think that is fair. Staying vigilant is very important.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    Do you support the current Muslim/refugee/immigration ban?

    Do you support the propsed wall & deportations?

    One word yes or no answers, please
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    How do the right wing sympathizers feel about the restructuring of the National Security Council that downgrades the Chair of The Joint Chiefs and National Intelligence Director while making white nationalist Steve Bannon a full member??? Don't forget kooky Mike "Fake News" Flynn, who Colin Powell felt had gone off the deep end, is running it

    Pro military conservatives should be screaming the loudest right now... maybe they will just get in line like good little sympathizers
  • JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    You really are clueless. If this was really a priority for the republicans who passed the bill as part of a huge tax and spend package, wouldn't they have filed suit when Obama didn't enforce it?

    The esteemed professor called it Obama's law.

    Your hangover elixir sounds like something a child predator would drink. No thanks.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    You will feel better when you let go of the bitterness and move on. I promise. We now have seen the light and we want to walk with you comrade.
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    Do you support the current Muslim/refugee/immigration ban?

    Do you support the propsed wall & deportations?

    One word yes or no answers, please
    I wouldn't call it a Muslim ban..see previous post a few pages back.
    I have no problem with a temporary ban issued by a new administration, in order for it them to work thru a more permanent solution whatever it may be, extreme vetting etc. I do have a problem with trumps implemention and preparedness dealing with those en route or within 72 hours of travel.
    I'm am totally against ILLEGAL immigration.
    I have no problem with a proposed wall, it worked for Israel and we paid for that one so why not. Without knowing the details I can only say I'm not against a wall. I'll reserve judgement on the wall until I know the particulars.
    I'm all for the continuance of Obamas record breaking deportations of ILLEGAL immigrants.
    Trust the process.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    my2hands said:

    Look at all the right wing snowflakes getting triggered... by the truth

    Not triggered. Observing a meltdown. Those are two very different things.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,062
    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?

    This is Extreme Vetting. All refugees will be required to sing More Then Words.
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    BS44325 said:

    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?

    This is Extreme Vetting. All refugees will be required to sing More Then Words.
    I hate to admit it...but that made me chuckle.


    BUT, extreme vetting is fucking stupid.
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617

    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?

    I'm pretty sure people know there is a vetting process but thorough can be subjective, the current admin wants it extreme not thorough.
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    BS44325 said:

    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?

    This is Extreme Vetting. All refugees will be required to sing More Then Words.
    Obligatory link

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrIiLvg58SY
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    my2hands said:

    How do the right wing sympathizers feel about the restructuring of the National Security Council that downgrades the Chair of The Joint Chiefs and National Intelligence Director while making white nationalist Steve Bannon a full member??? Don't forget kooky Mike "Fake News" Flynn, who Colin Powell felt had gone off the deep end, is running it

    Pro military conservatives should be screaming the loudest right now... maybe they will just get in line like good little sympathizers

    I am very interested in what you think about this move BS, foreign policy is one of the issues you hang your hat on and I wonder how this can be viewed in a positive light.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited January 2017
    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    Do you support the current Muslim/refugee/immigration ban?

    Do you support the propsed wall & deportations?

    One word yes or no answers, please
    I wouldn't call it a Muslim ban..see previous post a few pages back.
    I have no problem with a temporary ban issued by a new administration, in order for it them to work thru a more permanent solution whatever it may be, extreme vetting etc. I do have a problem with trumps implemention and preparedness dealing with those en route or within 72 hours of travel.
    I'm am totally against ILLEGAL immigration.
    I have no problem with a proposed wall, it worked for Israel and we paid for that one so why not. Without knowing the details I can only say I'm not against a wall. I'll reserve judgement on the wall until I know the particulars.
    I'm all for the continuance of Obamas record breaking deportations of ILLEGAL immigrants.
    Trust the process.
    So that is a yes, yes, and yes. I appreciate you taking a clear cut position.

    But, you clearly told me in the Podesta emails thread that you were voting for Jill Stein??? I'm having a really hard time believing a Jill Stein voter would support those positions???

    So which time you were lying, then or now?
    Post edited by my2hands on
  • dignindignin Posts: 9,336
    vaggar99 said:
    You beat me to it. Oh well, double Extreme!
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    BS44325 said:

    my2hands said:

    Look at all the right wing snowflakes getting triggered... by the truth

    Not triggered. Observing a meltdown. Those are two very different things.
    No meltdowns here... just sympathizers to a racist & xenophobic president & policies... whether they realize yet or not
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited January 2017
    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    my2hands said:

    JC29856 said:

    And the law that our resident professor cited was introduced by a republican congressman and passed by a republican house and senate as part of a trillion dollar tax and spending package.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_114th_United_States_Congress

    I would hardly characterize this as "Obama's law." And once passed, did Obama's DHS immediately enforce it, leading to similar chaos that Trump's actions caused? False equivalency. The least you can do is own Trump's actions. You own it. And about those numbers, JC? Obama raised the number of immigrants allowed in in his final year of office from 70,000 to 110,000 probably because he saw the writing on the wall. This is just the beginning. You trump supporters own it.

    Let's back up because I know not everyone has a stellar memory.
    Yesterday, H2m asked for the visa ban law that Obama signed, as if one didn't exist or as if he is ignorant to the fact that one existed. I kindly provide the law directly from .gov.
    Today H2M wakes up after late night peek-a-boo, makes his lemon water and Manuka honey drink, sits at his computer, checks the Trump thread, reads benjs posts, thinks it's a good idea, takes it to heart, then proceeds attempt to implement said benjs strategy. H2M then proceeds for the next 3 hours to study the law I posted composes his retort and comes up with this:

    It's not "Obamas law" even thou nobody referred to it as "Obamas law" ignoring that the president has to sign bills in order for it to become law. Obama signed it, no veto, sign and drive.
    Then he further tries to dissociate Obama from his signature on the visa ban law by claiming, it was
    1. part of a larger more important bill package that needed to be passed
    2. originated in the house / senate, furthermore noting that the house and Senate were opposition party republicans.

    My question, if this was so un American to Obama, couldn't he issue an executive order doing away with the visa ban instead of having his DHS enforce it?

    H2M failed to mention the 4 month Iraqi ban Obama also implemented in 2011.

    Cheers...TAILTUCK
    Do you support the current Muslim/refugee/immigration ban?

    Do you support the propsed wall & deportations?

    One word yes or no answers, please
    I wouldn't call it a Muslim ban..see previous post a few pages back.
    I have no problem with a temporary ban issued by a new administration, in order for it them to work thru a more permanent solution whatever it may be, extreme vetting etc. I do have a problem with trumps implemention and preparedness dealing with those en route or within 72 hours of travel.
    I'm am totally against ILLEGAL immigration.
    I have no problem with a proposed wall, it worked for Israel and we paid for that one so why not. Without knowing the details I can only say I'm not against a wall. I'll reserve judgement on the wall until I know the particulars.
    I'm all for the continuance of Obamas record breaking deportations of ILLEGAL immigrants.
    Trust the process.
    So that is a yes, yes, and yes. I appreciate you taking a clear cut position.

    But, you clearly told me in the Podesta emails thread that you were voting for Jill Stein??? I'm having a really hard time believing a Jill Stein voter would support those positions???

    So which time you were lying, then or now?
    Whatever you say
    You missed my post where I vote pact'd, I'll be glad to find it for you.
    Keep trying.... The cheerleaders in here are taking on the role of the media with their failed gotcha attempts.
    Post edited by JC29856 on
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,062
    JC29856 said:

    There's a thorough vetting process for refugees already. Do people not know this?

    I'm pretty sure people know there is a vetting process but thorough can be subjective, the current admin wants it extreme not thorough.
    That's an assumption that I wouldn't make with trump supporters. The current admin wants to control people with fear.
This discussion has been closed.