Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
2016 FBI: Possible that access was gained (no evidence that data was accessed despite the possibility) 2018 FBI: No evidence that data was accessed
What’s the problem?
True, plausible. I think whether one is a Democrat Republican or American it becomes concerning that the FBI 1. was informed by the ICIG about possible access by foreign hostile actors 2. relied on a private 3rd party company, Crowdstrike (retained by the DNC), about DNC server "hacking".
I (most would agree) have little confidence in the FBIs ability or success in finding something they do not look for.
For any that are interested in the specifics (ICIG communications with the FBI) I recommend FBI vault 3.
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
2016 FBI: Possible that access was gained (no evidence that data was accessed despite the possibility) 2018 FBI: No evidence that data was accessed
What’s the problem?
True, plausible. I think whether one is a Democrat Republican or American it becomes concerning that the FBI 1. was informed by the ICIG about possible access by foreign hostile actors 2. relied on a private 3rd party company, Crowdstrike (retained by the DNC), about DNC server "hacking".
I (most would agree) have little confidence in the FBIs ability or success in finding something they do not look for.
For any that are interested in the specifics (ICIG communications with the FBI) I recommend FBI vault 3.
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
2016 FBI: Possible that access was gained (no evidence that data was accessed despite the possibility) 2018 FBI: No evidence that data was accessed
What’s the problem?
True, plausible. I think whether one is a Democrat Republican or American it becomes concerning that the FBI 1. was informed by the ICIG about possible access by foreign hostile actors 2. relied on a private 3rd party company, Crowdstrike (retained by the DNC), about DNC server "hacking".
I (most would agree) have little confidence in the FBIs ability or success in finding something they do not look for.
For any that are interested in the specifics (ICIG communications with the FBI) I recommend FBI vault 3.
Team Trump Treason indictments incoming.
Tuesday morning thoughts: Anyone know why Carter Page hasn't been indicted jailed hanged yet? All those facts in the Steele dossier, all the evidence of Russian collusion!
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Wow, you really are desperate. Taking the D’ing to a whole other level. Daily Caller? Do you have a direct line? Wait for them to call you? Or wait for Team Trump Treason’s tweet penetrates the basement walls of the Kremlin? Mail the poster.
2016 FBI: "Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account".
2016 FBI: Possible that access was gained (no evidence that data was accessed despite the possibility) 2018 FBI: No evidence that data was accessed
What’s the problem?
True, plausible. I think whether one is a Democrat Republican or American it becomes concerning that the FBI 1. was informed by the ICIG about possible access by foreign hostile actors 2. relied on a private 3rd party company, Crowdstrike (retained by the DNC), about DNC server "hacking".
I (most would agree) have little confidence in the FBIs ability or success in finding something they do not look for.
For any that are interested in the specifics (ICIG communications with the FBI) I recommend FBI vault 3.
Team Trump Treason indictments incoming.
Tuesday morning thoughts: Anyone know why Carter Page hasn't been indicted jailed hanged yet? All those facts in the Steele dossier, all the evidence of Russian collusion!
One more Lobster Mary please....
It’s called a Team Mueller investigation, thorough resulting in guilty pleas and convictions
I love people complaining about why some people have not been indicted or jailed or this or that....it's called an ON-GOING INVESTIGATION, folks.
Stay tuned. Your patience shall be rewarded.
Tell me about it, then you have US senators spewing unindicted co-conspirator under investigation mumbo jumbotron. For all we know I could fall into that category. #onlymuellerknows
I love people complaining about why some people have not been indicted or jailed or this or that....it's called an ON-GOING INVESTIGATION, folks.
Stay tuned. Your patience shall be rewarded.
Tell me about it, then you have US senators spewing unindicted co-conspirator under investigation mumbo jumbotron. For all we know I could fall into that category. #onlymuellerknows
Comments
http://timelines.latimes.com/la-fg-china-cyber-disclosures-timeline/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyberattacks/state-actor-behind-slew-of-cyber-attacks-idUSTRE7720HU20110803
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
400 pounds is alot of Vatrushka.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/fbi-no-evidence-clinton-server-hacked-despite-trump-tweet/2018/08/29/2879a52c-abba-11e8-9a7d-cd30504ff902_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cb93d22d3ba2
Dancing panda had ***AUTHORISED ACCE$$***
Post: links source... ICIG and NSA claim China hacked server
Rebuttal: links source... FBI says no evidence of China hack
Conclusion: Debunked! Womp Womp!
“It’s not surprising that the FBI ‘has not found any evidence’ regarding Clinton’s servers being breached. Like I stated to Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok in the House Judiciary Hearing, it was the Obama-appointed Intelligence Community Inspector General that discovered the breach. It was not the FBI that found it, so their statement was technically correct, but very deceptive in its omission.
https://gohmert.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398653
If you had to guess ICIG and FBI, which department inspected the actual server and which department inspected a disk image of the server?
What was learn here, same with the DNC server, don't go looking for something you don't want to find?
Disputing Trump, FBI says no evidence Clinton server was hacked - CBC News https://apple.news/A7lBu2w8lTpuhoVBCSUHWdg
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Hefty price for the pee tape!
https://www.gofundme.com/qj3upu-friends-and-enemies-of-donald-trump
2016 FBI: Possible that access was gained (no evidence that data was accessed despite the possibility)
2018 FBI: No evidence that data was accessed
What’s the problem?
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
I think whether one is a Democrat Republican or American it becomes concerning that the FBI
1. was informed by the ICIG about possible access by foreign hostile actors
2. relied on a private 3rd party company, Crowdstrike (retained by the DNC), about DNC server "hacking".
I (most would agree) have little confidence in the FBIs ability or success in finding something they do not look for.
For any that are interested in the specifics (ICIG communications with the FBI) I recommend FBI vault 3.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Anyone know why Carter Page hasn't been indicted jailed hanged yet? All those facts in the Steele dossier, all the evidence of Russian collusion!
One more Lobster Mary please....
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Stay tuned. Your patience shall be rewarded.
#onlymuellerknows
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
”I don’t know any Russians.”
”I have nothing to hide.”
”I’ll sit down and talk with anyone.”
”We do everything by the book.”
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I couldn’t find a posted link for him today throwing an orange towel at Papadopoulos today holding Team Putin sign awesome !
Also possible why P-Dop got off with such a light sentence.
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-09-07/dnc-lawyers-raise-prospect-papadopoulos-u-k-contact-may-be-dead
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/local/public-safety/prosecutors-appear-to-back-off-claim-that-accused-russian-agent-maria-butina-traded-sex-for-access/2018/09/08/d47136de-b3a2-11e8-aed9-001309990777_story.html