"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-) ..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-) ..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
“Partisan hack.” That’s rich. That’s Marc Rich. You didn’t even know which side brought up the 2016 election before you breathlessly posted your misleading 3D post. Pass the sugar, butter, eggs and cream, along with the poster and rubles, please.
"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-) ..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
I read the court transcripts, I don't need CNNs analysis. If you read them you would know a few more things that Gates testified to, specifically having to do with Ukraine.
I'm any case what's this have to do with Russia Russia Russia and election "influence and meddling"? Manafort was no longer on the trump campaign after August so I'm not sure what you think happened? He tried to leverage his role in the campaign to secure a loan? That's the least of his troubles.
I hope Manafort never sees the light of day, I wish somehow for every Manafort guilty verdict 10 more electoral votes go into Hillary's column.
My advice, don't get caught up in this Manafort trial, the next one will be much more interesting.
If you're so convinced of judicial bias then the prosecution can and will easily win on appeal.
"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-) ..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
I read the court transcripts, I don't need CNNs analysis. If you read them you would know a few more things that Gates testified to, specifically having to do with Ukraine.
I'm any case what's this have to do with Russia Russia Russia and election "influence and meddling"? Manafort was no longer on the trump campaign after August so I'm not sure what you think happened? He tried to leverage his role in the campaign to secure a loan? That's the least of his troubles.
I hope Manafort never sees the light of day, I wish somehow for every Manafort guilty verdict 10 more electoral votes go into Hillary's column.
My advice, don't get caught up in this Manafort trial, the next one will be much more interesting.
If you're so convinced of judicial bias then the prosecution can and will easily win on appeal.
Prosecution can’t appeal a verdict, unless it’s a hung jury, in which case they need to have a compelling reason to retry the case. Double jeopardy, yo. However, 3Xs the evidence in a different venue with a different judge looms. If it’s so unimportant to you and to Team Trump Treason, why do you keep spinning it?
Gates’s testimony regarding the Ukraine is relevant to the known associations with Russians, Russians, Russians and how money flowed and was hidden. It’s always been all about following the money, from Russia with Love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment.
Author of Trump-Russia dossier wins libel case in US court
Suit against Christopher Steele by three Russian oligarchs thrown out by judge
But the judge concluded that it was covered by the US first amendment, which protects free speech. He ruled that the oligarchs had failed to prove a key part of their case: that Steele knew that some information in the dossier was inaccurate, and had acted “with reckless disregard as to its falsity”.
Author of Trump-Russia dossier wins libel case in US court
Suit against Christopher Steele by three Russian oligarchs thrown out by judge
But the judge concluded that it was covered by the US first amendment, which protects free speech. He ruled that the oligarchs had failed to prove a key part of their case: that Steele knew that some information in the dossier was inaccurate, and had acted “with reckless disregard as to its falsity”.
"WE WILL PUT FORTH NO EVIDENCE HAVING TO DO WITH THE 2016 ELECTION"
should I screen grab the court transcript or just trust $30M Maddow?
Who thinks H2M scrambled to Google the woods procedures? Or is he such a partisan hack that he didn't even bother?
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-) ..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
I read the court transcripts, I don't need CNNs analysis. If you read them you would know a few more things that Gates testified to, specifically having to do with Ukraine.
I'm any case what's this have to do with Russia Russia Russia and election "influence and meddling"? Manafort was no longer on the trump campaign after August so I'm not sure what you think happened? He tried to leverage his role in the campaign to secure a loan? That's the least of his troubles.
I hope Manafort never sees the light of day, I wish somehow for every Manafort guilty verdict 10 more electoral votes go into Hillary's column.
My advice, don't get caught up in this Manafort trial, the next one will be much more interesting.
If you're so convinced of judicial bias then the prosecution can and will easily win on appeal.
Thanks Hal for answering the double jeopardy...
You may be right that this has nothing to do with Russian election interference but it don't sure dont look that way. Dont forget Gates was involved with Trump through the inauguration. Anything potentially questionable Manafort set up could have been managed by Gates after Manafort was let go.
And there is something possibly significant they have placed under seal.
The defense sure wanted to know what Gates said to the OSC, and the judge did everything he could to make the prosecution look dishonest while deciding whether to allow this testimony.
Cohens lawyer on Maddow right now calling the Baffoon a total liar lol
It's fascinating that both Cohen and trump have PR lawyers on TV all day, not litigators. They both seem to believe they need to win the court of public opinion.
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Thanks for being right about the Manafort decision.
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Thanks for being right about the Manafort decision.
Thank Team Mueller and the jury. I just went with my gut.
Cohens lawyer on Maddow right now calling the Baffoon a total liar lol
This was da bomb on Maddow last nite...
"Mr. Cohen has knowledge on certain subjects that should be of interest to the special counsel, and is more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows,"
Cohens lawyer on Maddow right now calling the Baffoon a total liar lol
This was da bomb on Maddow last nite...
"Mr. Cohen has knowledge on certain subjects that should be of interest to the special counsel, and is more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows,"
Don't go on me. Lanny.
I saw Lanny and Avanatti last night and Dershowitz. The former came across as calm and confident while the latter was shrill and more interested in discussing legal theory. Team Trump Treason’s charade is going to crash down around him. The best part was hearing how White House staffers are shocked and demoralized. Do they know who the fuck they’re working for? Suckers.
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Thanks for being right about the Manafort decision.
I was getting a bit concerned when the jury was taking so long to deliberate. Now we know it was hanging on certain charges. My guess is they don't refile.
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Thanks for being right about the Manafort decision.
I was getting a bit concerned when the jury was taking so long to deliberate. Now we know it was hanging on certain charges. My guess is they don't refile.
They really don’t need to on the remaining 10 as they have the September trial to look forward to. I thought it was telling that Manafort’s attorney didn’t state that they immediately be filing an appeal but rather, “we're considering our options.” Who here will be surprised when Team Trump Treason pardons Manafort?
Cohen appears multiple times in the supposedly fake dossier.
You do mean the sweet fruit from the poisonous tree, do you not? Brilliant brilliance of brilliancy in disappearing headlines. It’ll all blow over in a day or two, into the dust bin of history.
Thanks for being right about the Manafort decision.
I was getting a bit concerned when the jury was taking so long to deliberate. Now we know it was hanging on certain charges. My guess is they don't refile.
They really don’t need to on the remaining 10 as they have the September trial to look forward to. I thought it was telling that Manafort’s attorney didn’t state that they immediately be filing an appeal but rather, “we're considering our options.” Who here will be surprised when Team Trump Treason pardons Manafort?
I will be surprised... I don't see how Trump could survive the backlash to that... If he is clinging on to any hope of winning in 2020, which he seems to be, I can't see how pardoning Manafort would be something he'd actually go through with, even if he starts babbling about how he can on Twitter. But hey, it's fucking Trump. You never know! I would definitely never bet any money against Trump doing something insane and stupid.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
Laughable, did they mention in the article how many times Bruce was interviewed by the FBI? How many times he met with Steele?
Bruce Ohr has a long history of prosecuting Russian mobsters. Gee, wonder why he’s under scrutiny. Oh well, Team Mueller and states’ AGs will sort it out. Seven ways to Sunday.
Follow the money, from Russia with Love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment. Oh, and charitable foundations and slush funds, oh my!
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
JC, you are just not capable of seeing bias? You can read the 7.6.18 CNN excerpt below that OSC publicly said they would present evidence linking to Trump? BTW,it was regarding the transition, not the election
You know it was the DEFENSE that wanted Gates to disclose election related testimony in court, the OSC OBJECTED
..... and the biased judge made them argue it out in front of the jury with a sound machine instead of in Chambers, as would have ordinarily been done? This made the OSC look like they were hiding election related testimony RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JURY?
Judicial bias in plain sight yet you don't see it? Red hats n facts, hmmmm.
Don't forget M2Hs poster either, please ':-)
..
"CNN)Prosecutors for special counsel Robert Mueller intend to present evidence at the trial of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort that a banking executive allegedly helped Manafort obtain loans of approximately $16 million while the banker sought a role in the Trump campaign."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/06/politics/paul-manafort-trial-public/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/maria-butina-russian-gun-rights-advocate-charged-in-mueller-probe-moved-to-va-jail/2018/08/18/66a74252-a302-11e8-93e3-24d1703d2a7a_story.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
If you read them you would know a few more things that Gates testified to, specifically having to do with Ukraine.
I'm any case what's this have to do with Russia Russia Russia and election "influence and meddling"?
Manafort was no longer on the trump campaign after August so I'm not sure what you think happened?
He tried to leverage his role in the campaign to secure a loan? That's the least of his troubles.
I hope Manafort never sees the light of day, I wish somehow for every Manafort guilty verdict 10 more electoral votes go into Hillary's column.
My advice, don't get caught up in this Manafort trial, the next one will be much more interesting.
If you're so convinced of judicial bias then the prosecution can and will easily win on appeal.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Microsoft claims new evidence Russia tried to hack U.S. politics
www.headstonesband.com
Author of Trump-Russia dossier wins libel case in US court
But the judge concluded that it was covered by the US first amendment, which protects free speech. He ruled that the oligarchs had failed to prove a key part of their case: that Steele knew that some information in the dossier was inaccurate, and had acted “with reckless disregard as to its falsity”.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/21/author-of-trump-russia-dossier-wins-libel-case-in-us-court-christopher-steele
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://news.gallup.com/poll/241124/favor-diplomacy-sanctions-russia.aspx
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Thanks Hal for answering the double jeopardy...
You may be right that this has nothing to do with Russian election interference but it don't sure dont look that way. Dont forget Gates was involved with Trump through the inauguration. Anything potentially questionable Manafort set up could have been managed by Gates after Manafort was let go.
And there is something possibly significant they have placed under seal.
The defense sure wanted to know what Gates said to the OSC, and the judge did everything he could to make the prosecution look dishonest while deciding whether to allow this testimony.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
This was da bomb on Maddow last nite...
"Mr. Cohen has knowledge on certain subjects that should be of interest to the special counsel, and is more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows,"
Don't go on me. Lanny.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/27/us/politics/bruce-ohr-trump-justice-department.html
Laughable, did they mention in the article how many times Bruce was interviewed by the FBI? How many times he met with Steele?
Follow the money, from Russia with Love and a PTape, all the way to impeachment. Oh, and charitable foundations and slush funds, oh my!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
William Browder
Sergi Magnitsky
Hermitage Capital
Natalia Veselnitskaya
Jared Kushner
Paul Manafort
Michael Cohen
Alexander Pereepilichny
Michael McFaul
Heather Nauert
Mossack Fonseca
Robert Otto
Bernie Sucher
Steven Dashevsky
Gazprom
Kalmykia
Yukos Oil
Mikhail Khodorkovsky
Celeste Wallander
Kameya
Benjimin Cardin
David Kramer
Stephen Sestanovich
Daniel Fried
Michael Carpenter
Boris Nemstov
Prevezon
Denis Katsyv
Pyotr Katsyv
Baker-Hostetler
Yuri Chaika
Ziff Brothers
Preet Bharara
Rinat Akhmetshin
Dana Rohrabacher
Aras Agalarov
Donald Trump, Jr.
Emin Agalarov
Robert Goldstone
Hillary Clinton
Steven Hall
Sergi Skripal
Vladimir Kara-Murza
Team Mueller
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©