I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
Republican house member Chavez calling for the Inspector General to investigate Trump's firing of Comey. Yup, nothing to see here, nothing to talk about. It's all going away like those long faded headlines.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Or confirmation of details. What was Clinton impeached for again? Keep spinning and deflecting with your BS and making it seem, how did you characterize it? It's all just a joke or meaningless, unsubstantiated, baseless claims, sour grapes by liberals. Trump is guilty. And if there is no there, there, why not fully cooperate with all 7 or 8 investigations?
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Or confirmation of details. What was Clinton impeached for again? Keep spinning and deflecting with your BS and making it seem, how did you characterize it? It's all just a joke or meaningless, unsubstantiated, baseless claims, sour grapes by liberals. Trump is guilty. And if there is no there, there, why not fully cooperate with all 7 or 8 investigations?
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Or confirmation of details. What was Clinton impeached for again? Keep spinning and deflecting with your BS and making it seem, how did you characterize it? It's all just a joke or meaningless, unsubstantiated, baseless claims, sour grapes by liberals. Trump is guilty. And if there is no there, there, why not fully cooperate with all 7 or 8 investigations?
Is it 7 or 8? I love your running count.
It's hard to keep track. FBI, GAO, Treasury's Financial Crimes Unit, NSA, House Intelligence Committee, Senate Intelligence Committee, Senate Judiciary Committee, House Jusiciary Committee, House Government Oversight Committee. Oops, it's 9. I apologize for the fake news.
Or maybe it's 10 as I didn't include the law suit filed in federal court and while not a formal investigation, it can result in investigative characteristics like depositions of witnesses,subpeoneas of financial and business records as well as requests for tax returns to be entered as evidence. So, you tell me BS, is it 7, 8, 9 or 10?
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
You conspicuously didn't answer my challenge about Clapper on the other page, so I'll do it again.. James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
You conspicuously didn't answer my challenge about Clapper on the other page, so I'll do it again.. James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
You conspicuously didn't answer my challenge about Clapper on the other page, so I'll do it again.. James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
Let's try this...how about you cite somebody that has seen evidence of collusion? How about one official person?
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
You conspicuously didn't answer my challenge about Clapper on the other page, so I'll do it again.. James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
Let's try this...how about you cite somebody that has seen evidence of collusion? How about one official person?
It may be classified and there are ongoing investigations. Amazing that you still defend Trump. But then again, you thought the headlines would fade away and that Trump is brilliant. Those in the know don't typically comment on what evidence they have. That comes out in discovery and at trial. But spin it any you'd like, it's not going to
Whatever, there are no new details, this story will be disappearing any day now.
You might want to wait for the transcript. You linked to a tweet with "Trump-Russia" investigation. Base on the testimony I have seen so far that hyphen between the two belongs to the tweeter.
McCabe has confirmed that there is an "investigation" which we all know but not who/what specifically it pertains to. He doesn't confirm or deny that Comey told Trump he wasn't being investigated. He stated that Comey being fired will not change a thing and he disputes that the FBI asked for more resources for the investigation. Clearly that was #fakenews. The story has not changed.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
"I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
How can you say that after two different sets of subpoenas in the last 48 hours? Are you delusional or not paying attention?
A subpoena isn't a new detail. It is a search for new details. Feel free to keep searching.
Oh stfu, that's ridiculous and you know it. Plus any "detail" under your definition will be classified or under a gag order. Ergo, you think unless you know about it affirmatively, it isn't happening. So since you don't know every detail about what is happening in close door committee hearings, nothing is happening.
What we have is testimony and all testimony to date says "no evidence of collusion". That comes from Clapper and democrats. For all of you to make the assumption that there is more "behind closed doors" is what is ridiculous. Birthers you have all become.
You conspicuously didn't answer my challenge about Clapper on the other page, so I'll do it again.. James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
Let's try this...how about you cite somebody that has seen evidence of collusion? How about one official person?
It may be classified and there are ongoing investigations. Amazing that you still defend Trump. But then again, you thought the headlines would fade away and that Trump is brilliant. Those in the know don't typically comment on what evidence they have. That comes out in discovery and at trial. But spin it any you'd like, it's not going to
On this topic I will defend him. I have to. You just confirmed that we know nothing. Only "those in the know" know things. When this discovery and trial you speak of ever occurs then maybe I could reconsider but for now that is not possible. We have no evidence. Only "those in the know do".
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
You are naïve to believe that with all that we do know, with all that has transpired, that there is no Trump-Russia collusion, because it hasn't been explicitly said or evidence that you've seen proves it. Its all part and parcel of a normal Administration's transition. All of which will be going away soon and Trump will serve out his term and be re-elected. Untenable and impeachable brilliance.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
“I’ve been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said in testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. “That includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
“I’ve been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said in testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. “That includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”
Guess you need to get rid of that hyphen between Trump and Russia, huh? Brilliant.
Wyden said the hold will stay in place until the Treasury Department provides "any information that relates to financial connections between Russia and President Trump and his associates," to the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Finance Committee. Wyden is on both committees.
"I have stated repeatedly that we have to follow the money if we are going to get to the bottom of how Russia has attacked our democracy," Wyden said in a statement.
In addition, Warner announced that the Committee had made a request to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, which is responsible for sharing intelligence in order to combat illicit financial behavior.
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
You are naïve to believe that with all that we do know, with all that has transpired, that there is no Trump-Russia collusion, because it hasn't been explicitly said or evidence that you've seen proves it. Its all part and parcel of a normal Administration's transition. All of which will be going away soon and Trump will serve out his term and be re-elected. Untenable and impeachable brilliance.
What does Halifax2theMaxineWaters know that Maxine Waters doesn't know?
I'm still waiting for the whole Trump Russia story to die down, as predicted by so many resident scholars in this thread probably as far back as page 2 (in the event you didn't notice, we're on page 52 & there's no end in sight).
It has died down. 50 pages and not a single new detail. Just because you won't stop talking about it doesn't mean you are any further ahead. I don't doubt you will still be talking about it for years to come.
Trump firing the head of the FBI who's also investigating him is a pretty big detail, but keep spinning Holden.
To you as well... Please site evidence that the head of the FBI is investigating Trump.
Well, McCabe did say that the Trump-Russia investigation is a "highly significant" investigation currently underway. He's the head of the FBI currently, so probably knows a thing or two about what's going on there.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
“I’ve been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said in testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. “That includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”
Exactly "any links" and "whether". That doesn't mean "any links" were found or "whether" there was any coordination. It's an open investigation that to date from what we know had produced nothing on the Trump front.
Comments
My guess? Delusional.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
James Clapper said he was unaware of any evidence because he asked specifically not to be kept informed of the investigation. He was not aware that it continued until Comey revealed it in public testimony in March. Read what he said. Don't read what Trump and Spicer said he said, because it ain't right. Clapper does not know if there's a there or not. Quit citing him as evidence, it's misleading and false.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-to-meet-russian-foreign-minister-at-the-white-house-as-moscows-alleged-election-interference-is-back-in-spotlight/2017/05/10/c6717e4c-34f3-11e7-b412-62beef8121f7_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_usrussia-730a:homepage/story
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://twitter.com/rzollap/status/862696306866892800
Whatever, there are no new details, this story will be disappearing any day now.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
No new details guys, we are definitely nearing the end of this story.
Even Maxine Waters won't say that.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
McCabe has confirmed that there is an "investigation" which we all know but not who/what specifically it pertains to. He doesn't confirm or deny that Comey told Trump he wasn't being investigated. He stated that Comey being fired will not change a thing and he disputes that the FBI asked for more resources for the investigation. Clearly that was #fakenews. The story has not changed.
This story is totally going away you guys.
No new details whatsoever.
Read my post above... I am waiting for a transcript but I don't believe the phrase "Trump-Russia" investigation was used. People are quoting a random tweet. There is an investigation on Russian interference and wherever that may lead. The phrase "Trump-Russia" was not said. There is no evidence on "Trump-Russia". Just Russia.
You are naïve to believe that with all that we do know, with all that has transpired, that there is no Trump-Russia collusion, because it hasn't been explicitly said or evidence that you've seen proves it. Its all part and parcel of a normal Administration's transition. All of which will be going away soon and Trump will serve out his term and be re-elected. Untenable and impeachable brilliance.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
“I’ve been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election,” Comey said in testimony before the House Intelligence Committee. “That includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts.”
Guess you need to get rid of that hyphen between Trump and Russia, huh? Brilliant.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/senator-places-hold-on-trump-nominee-until-release-of-russia-info/ar-BBB1SvU?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp
Wyden said the hold will stay in place until the Treasury Department provides "any information that relates to financial connections between Russia and President Trump and his associates," to the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Finance Committee. Wyden is on both committees.
"I have stated repeatedly that we have to follow the money if we are going to get to the bottom of how Russia has attacked our democracy," Wyden said in a statement.
In addition, Warner announced that the Committee had made a request to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, which is responsible for sharing intelligence in order to combat illicit financial behavior.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
/hate the new quote system
Exactly "any links" and "whether". That doesn't mean "any links" were found or "whether" there was any coordination. It's an open investigation that to date from what we know had produced nothing on the Trump front.