Bernie Sanders

1…2122242627…50

Comments

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Must be the polls' fault.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited August 2016
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,424
    edited August 2016
    rgambs said:

    Must be the polls' fault.

    The polls are rigged
    the election is rigged
    The NBA Draft is rigged
    Everything is rigged toward the elite
    D'uh :dizzy:
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    :rofl:

    Just because someone might be aware of the Clinton corruption, doesn't mean they're in support of Trump. Duh.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited August 2016
    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    Post edited by Free on
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Moot point of course since Trump will either a) get a last minute call and tell us he "got a better offer" (vacation in the Bahamas) or b) will be annihilated in the upcoming election.

    My money is that b) will happen.

    But does Hillary really deserve to set records for the biggest win in POTUS elections ever? I don't think so!

    The influence Sanders had on American politics is huge. I hope we see this trend continue. It will do us well for that to happen. Otherwise, it's the same old thing: either snails pace progress in a world in big trouble or regress which could be argued as a good thing (i.e. the sooner we humans do ourselves in the better).

    I'm for making faster progress (what I see as being "progressive") and giving our species and thousands of others a fighting chance. Anything else means bad news for all of us large mammals.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Voting the less of 2 evils in the election with the least liked candidates in history doesn't say a whole lot.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Moot point of course since Trump will either a) get a last minute call and tell us he "got a better offer" (vacation in the Bahamas) or b) will be annihilated in the upcoming election.

    My money is that b) will happen.

    But does Hillary really deserve to set records for the biggest win in POTUS elections ever? I don't think so!

    The influence Sanders had on American politics is huge. I hope we see this trend continue. It will do us well for that to happen. Otherwise, it's the same old thing: either snails pace progress in a world in big trouble or regress which could be argued as a good thing (i.e. the sooner we humans do ourselves in the better).

    I'm for making faster progress (what I see as being "progressive") and giving our species and thousands of others a fighting chance. Anything else means bad news for all of us large mammals.
    Tim Canova is poised to lose his primary to DSW, after all the outside money that was poured in, all the DNC madness, etc. The Sanders team is even exiting already. It doesn't really say a lot as to how deep and wide the movement is.
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    mrussel1 said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Moot point of course since Trump will either a) get a last minute call and tell us he "got a better offer" (vacation in the Bahamas) or b) will be annihilated in the upcoming election.

    My money is that b) will happen.

    But does Hillary really deserve to set records for the biggest win in POTUS elections ever? I don't think so!

    The influence Sanders had on American politics is huge. I hope we see this trend continue. It will do us well for that to happen. Otherwise, it's the same old thing: either snails pace progress in a world in big trouble or regress which could be argued as a good thing (i.e. the sooner we humans do ourselves in the better).

    I'm for making faster progress (what I see as being "progressive") and giving our species and thousands of others a fighting chance. Anything else means bad news for all of us large mammals.
    Tim Canova is poised to lose his primary to DSW, after all the outside money that was poured in, all the DNC madness, etc. The Sanders team is even exiting already. It doesn't really say a lot as to how deep and wide the movement is.
    Someone didn't see the strategically placed debate of a Sunday morning at 8 am so no one would watch DWS embarrass herself. He has a good chance of winning, you're not fooling anyone, nor has Sanders' support diminished.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    edited August 2016
    Free said:

    mrussel1 said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    brianlux said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    rgambs said:

    Free said:

    I love how people assume that if you criticize the left you must be from the right. :lol:

    That will happen when you criticize the left exclusively. You dont seem to have an interest in anything here but bashing the most progressive real candidate running for POTUS.

    Stein couldn't make the debates even if everyone who knows who she is suddenly threw her their support.
    Dude, you couldn't be more clueless about me. And that part about "...most progressive real candidate running for POTUS"?

    LMAO
    I only know what you post here, and it is almost exclusively related to Clinton's corruption.

    And yes, she is the more progressive of the two real candidates.
    With all due respect Gambs, isn't referring to Clinton as "progressive" a stretch? More than Trump? Sure. But Ann Coulter is more progressive than Donald Trump, right?
    Hahaha no Coulter makes Trump look like a smart progressive lol

    Clinton is certainly center-left, but she's definitely the most progressive candidate that has a chance at the Oval Office!
    Clinton is a closet republican at best posing as a progressive to earn Sanders supporters' votes. She will say anything for a vote.
    I'm less concerned with what she says than what she will do ad POTUS. The answer to that question is that she will do much less damage to our country than her opponent.
    Moot point of course since Trump will either a) get a last minute call and tell us he "got a better offer" (vacation in the Bahamas) or b) will be annihilated in the upcoming election.

    My money is that b) will happen.

    But does Hillary really deserve to set records for the biggest win in POTUS elections ever? I don't think so!

    The influence Sanders had on American politics is huge. I hope we see this trend continue. It will do us well for that to happen. Otherwise, it's the same old thing: either snails pace progress in a world in big trouble or regress which could be argued as a good thing (i.e. the sooner we humans do ourselves in the better).

    I'm for making faster progress (what I see as being "progressive") and giving our species and thousands of others a fighting chance. Anything else means bad news for all of us large mammals.
    Tim Canova is poised to lose his primary to DSW, after all the outside money that was poured in, all the DNC madness, etc. The Sanders team is even exiting already. It doesn't really say a lot as to how deep and wide the movement is.
    Someone didn't see the strategically placed debate of a Sunday morning at 8 am so no one would watch DWS embarrass herself. He has a good chance of winning, you're not fooling anyone, nor has Sanders' support diminished.
    The local political shows are on early, followed by the national shows. That's how it works down there. You think NBC Miami is going to put a congressional debate on prime time in one of the biggest markets in America?

    And about Team Sanders... http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/tim-canova-bernie-sanders-strategists-226936
    Post edited by mrussel1 on
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    edited August 2016
    https://www.facebook.com/TimCanovaForCongress/videos/1675938446065853/

    And where are DWS supporters? There are none unless you count corporate interests...

    Srsly Dude, anyone backing DWS at this point is a fool. Being publicly shamed and fired wasn't enough.
    Post edited by Free on
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    Free said:

    https://www.facebook.com/TimCanovaForCongress/videos/1675938446065853/

    And where are DWS supporters? There are none unless you count corporate interests...

    Srsly Dude, anyone backing DWS at this point is a fool. Being publicly shamed and fired wasn't enough.

    So you think the corporate interests are the ones casting votes in her district? I guess we'll see what happens on primary day, but the winds of change are not blowing for Canova right now, hence the strategists exiting.

    I'm not saying I would vote for her, but she's not my rep so it doesn't matter what I think. I'm just making the point that all of these outside interests have donated millions to Canova and it doesn't seem to be working. It's not that much different than the dude that tried to unseat Ryan last week. I think he lost by 50.
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,664
    Trying to dissuade people who are truly in favor of a progressive movement from continuing to support that movement is like trying to persuade Pearl Jam fan that that band sucks. Good luck with that.
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    mrussel1 said:

    Free said:

    https://www.facebook.com/TimCanovaForCongress/videos/1675938446065853/

    And where are DWS supporters? There are none unless you count corporate interests...

    Srsly Dude, anyone backing DWS at this point is a fool. Being publicly shamed and fired wasn't enough.

    So you think the corporate interests are the ones casting votes in her district? I guess we'll see what happens on primary day, but the winds of change are not blowing for Canova right now, hence the strategists exiting.

    I'm not saying I would vote for her, but she's not my rep so it doesn't matter what I think. I'm just making the point that all of these outside interests have donated millions to Canova and it doesn't seem to be working. It's not that much different than the dude that tried to unseat Ryan last week. I think he lost by 50.
    Watching someone side with big corporate interests is kinda pathetic. You're either a robot or one of those corporate interests.
  • Free
    Free Posts: 3,562
    brianlux said:

    Trying to dissuade people who are truly in favor of a progressive movement from continuing to support that movement is like trying to persuade Pearl Jam fan that that band sucks. Good luck with that.

    Yeah. Great point Brian.

Categories