Trump
Comments
-
The most interesting part of the article, for me, was the fact that he hasn't filed the paperwork to forgive the loans he made to himself for the primary season. This means he could use the campaign donations to pay himself back. He said he was filing them, but hasn't yet. Maybe he'll just give it to charity.The Juggler said:
Yeah not bad. Buuuuut it's half of what Romney raised in June of 2012 and 17 million less than what Clinton raised in June. Oh and he's praising Saddam Hussein, tweeting that Frozen is anti Semitic, is in danger of being the first republican in 60 years to lose the college educated white vote, and two of his VP choices took themselves out of the running.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well looks like since he has a fresh horse since firing his old campaign manager things are looking up.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/trump-raises-51-million-in-june-as-donation-efforts-ramp-up.html
Things are looking up alright!
BTW, for both candidates, these are self reported numbers. Real FEC filings don't happen for a few weeks. So then we'll see where we are. Not that Trump would exaggerate. I don't mean to imply that.0 -
I don't think his tweet was anti-Semitic at all.The Juggler said:
Yeah not bad. Buuuuut it's half of what Romney raised in June of 2012 and 17 million less than what Clinton raised in June. Oh and he's praising Saddam Hussein, tweeting that Frozen is anti Semitic, is in danger of being the first republican in 60 years to lose the college educated white vote, and two of his VP choices took themselves out of the running.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well looks like since he has a fresh horse since firing his old campaign manager things are looking up.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/trump-raises-51-million-in-june-as-donation-efforts-ramp-up.html
Things are looking up alright!
In fact if Frozen wants to use religious symbols so what?
0 -
No we know everything he has done/said up to this point has all been made up by the media ...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I don't think his tweet was anti-Semitic at all.The Juggler said:
Yeah not bad. Buuuuut it's half of what Romney raised in June of 2012 and 17 million less than what Clinton raised in June. Oh and he's praising Saddam Hussein, tweeting that Frozen is anti Semitic, is in danger of being the first republican in 60 years to lose the college educated white vote, and two of his VP choices took themselves out of the running.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well looks like since he has a fresh horse since firing his old campaign manager things are looking up.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/trump-raises-51-million-in-june-as-donation-efforts-ramp-up.html
Things are looking up alright!
In fact if Frozen wants to use religious symbols so what?jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I don't think his tweet was anti-Semitic at all.The Juggler said:
Yeah not bad. Buuuuut it's half of what Romney raised in June of 2012 and 17 million less than what Clinton raised in June. Oh and he's praising Saddam Hussein, tweeting that Frozen is anti Semitic, is in danger of being the first republican in 60 years to lose the college educated white vote, and two of his VP choices took themselves out of the running.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well looks like since he has a fresh horse since firing his old campaign manager things are looking up.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/trump-raises-51-million-in-june-as-donation-efforts-ramp-up.html
Things are looking up alright!
In fact if Frozen wants to use religious symbols so what?
It originated from a racist website. The Disney defense is absurd.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I don't think his tweet was anti-Semitic at all.The Juggler said:
Yeah not bad. Buuuuut it's half of what Romney raised in June of 2012 and 17 million less than what Clinton raised in June. Oh and he's praising Saddam Hussein, tweeting that Frozen is anti Semitic, is in danger of being the first republican in 60 years to lose the college educated white vote, and two of his VP choices took themselves out of the running.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:Well looks like since he has a fresh horse since firing his old campaign manager things are looking up.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/06/trump-raises-51-million-in-june-as-donation-efforts-ramp-up.html
Things are looking up alright!
In fact if Frozen wants to use religious symbols so what?0 -
^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
0 -
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.0 -
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?
0 -
Actually nobody made it about religion until the white supremacists did.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Me talk sports now.PJ_Soul said:
Actually nobody made it about religion until the white supremacists did.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?0 -
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?
0 -
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?0 -
lamest....defense....ever...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?0 -
That totally sounds like a Trump tweet.mrussel1 said:
lamest....defense....ever...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?0 -
Just stop trying to defend the indefensible. Like I said, I have no idea if Trump is racist or anti-Semitic or not. I do know that racists gravitate to him, that's for sure. Whether he meant it as ant-Semitic or not, we don't know. But it's a fact that it originated in precisely the same form, at a site that traffics in racism. The Disney defense is bullshit. The 'sheriff' defense is bullshit. It was meant, by the author, as a star of David. I think his campaign is just too stupid to have realized it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
That totally sounds like a Trump tweet.mrussel1 said:
lamest....defense....ever...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?0 -
You have no idea if he is what most people say he is?mrussel1 said:
Just stop trying to defend the indefensible. Like I said, I have no idea if Trump is racist or anti-Semitic or not. I do know that racists gravitate to him, that's for sure. Whether he meant it as ant-Semitic or not, we don't know. But it's a fact that it originated in precisely the same form, at a site that traffics in racism. The Disney defense is bullshit. The 'sheriff' defense is bullshit. It was meant, by the author, as a star of David. I think his campaign is just too stupid to have realized it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
That totally sounds like a Trump tweet.mrussel1 said:
lamest....defense....ever...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?
Anyone that likes Trump is a racist?
You just don't know yet you and many others cast judgment on this man.
0 -
I'm talking about this tweet. I don't recall calling him a racist. His attacks on Curiel were racist, but I think they were motivated by his stupid defense of his university and that was his best angle, in his twisted mind. But I absolutely think he appeals to racists and does not emphatically disown them.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
You have no idea if he is what most people say he is?mrussel1 said:
Just stop trying to defend the indefensible. Like I said, I have no idea if Trump is racist or anti-Semitic or not. I do know that racists gravitate to him, that's for sure. Whether he meant it as ant-Semitic or not, we don't know. But it's a fact that it originated in precisely the same form, at a site that traffics in racism. The Disney defense is bullshit. The 'sheriff' defense is bullshit. It was meant, by the author, as a star of David. I think his campaign is just too stupid to have realized it.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
That totally sounds like a Trump tweet.mrussel1 said:
lamest....defense....ever...PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
How come anti-Trump people can post anti-semitic propaganda?mrussel1 said:
Who is no one? That is another Trump talking point. Where else would we hear it from but the media? I don't follow Trump. It's so blatantly obvious that is is anti Zionist. Is this just another unfortunate coincidence for the Trump team? Is Duke pointing to Disney too?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
No one made this about religion until the media did.mrussel1 said:
The Star of David is not racist. It was the context... Corrupt, money, all the things that were pinned on Jews for a thousand years.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
It was not a defense.
He was asking why there is no outrage when used in one context compared to his.
His was an ad to appeal to Jewish voters.
He is for and understands the star of david.
Did you see David Duke retweeted it with anti Zionist language? He got it.
Does this not seem strange?
Anyone that likes Trump is a racist?
You just don't know yet you and many others cast judgment on this man.
But that's all a distraction by you. The bottom line is this tweet was racist. All his various defenses are silly.0 -
^^^
Your opinion is that he appeals to racists.
Am I racist because I sometimes post truths that he says?
A distraction? No. Trump appeals to many not just the uneducated racists.0 -
I didn't say just or only. But it's a fact that he appeals to racist. David Duke is example one. You can peruse a Stormtrooper site for plenty more examples. See how many of those people like Hillary or Obama.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
Your opinion is that he appeals to racists.
Am I racist because I sometimes post truths that he says?
A distraction? No. Trump appeals to many not just the uneducated racists.0 -
^^^
Yes he appeals to some people that are racist.
How many voters didn't vote Obama? Are they racist?0 -
Stop asking inane questions. You can't possibly misunderstand what I'm saying.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
Yes he appeals to some people that are racist.
How many voters didn't vote Obama? Are they racist?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help