Trump
Comments
-
The establishment maybe but not Trump.josevolution said:
No matter what at the end of campaign on Election Day all the Republicans will fall in line with him and vote for him republican stablishement are a bunch of weak no balls group , they will never ever stand against the NRA hence they will have to vote for Trump ..Bentleyspop said:Clearly qualified......
Mark Sanford: Trump defended articles of the Constitution that don't exist
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/sanford-questions-trump-constitution-gaffe/
0 -
Why don't you take a picture of you wearing it show us you have balls go out in public wearing it !!PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
The establishment maybe but not Trump.josevolution said:
No matter what at the end of campaign on Election Day all the Republicans will fall in line with him and vote for him republican stablishement are a bunch of weak no balls group , they will never ever stand against the NRA hence they will have to vote for Trump ..Bentleyspop said:Clearly qualified......
Mark Sanford: Trump defended articles of the Constitution that don't exist
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/sanford-questions-trump-constitution-gaffe/jesus greets me looks just like me ....0 -
Because he wanted to use the tragedy to glorify himself. Again.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
Why does this make him a piece of shit? He asked for a chance to address them big deal.
He supports the police and the NY vets support him.
Reminds me of the scene from Gladiator.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6Guvyp9SP8
Post edited by eddiec on0 -
What are you saying? A person wearing that would have something to worry about?josevolution said:
Why don't you take a picture of you wearing it show us you have balls go out in public wearing it !!PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
The establishment maybe but not Trump.josevolution said:
No matter what at the end of campaign on Election Day all the Republicans will fall in line with him and vote for him republican stablishement are a bunch of weak no balls group , they will never ever stand against the NRA hence they will have to vote for Trump ..Bentleyspop said:Clearly qualified......
Mark Sanford: Trump defended articles of the Constitution that don't exist
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/sanford-questions-trump-constitution-gaffe/
What about if the name was changed to Hillary...oh wait nevermind that wouldn't work but you know what I mean.0 -
That's why he evaded the Vietnam draft.. Due to his huge balls.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
The establishment maybe but not Trump.josevolution said:
No matter what at the end of campaign on Election Day all the Republicans will fall in line with him and vote for him republican stablishement are a bunch of weak no balls group , they will never ever stand against the NRA hence they will have to vote for Trump ..Bentleyspop said:Clearly qualified......
Mark Sanford: Trump defended articles of the Constitution that don't exist
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/08/politics/sanford-questions-trump-constitution-gaffe/0 -
^^^
Other known figures have done the same thing and have received accolades for it.
0 -
Calling him ballsy is not an accurate description. He's like any other big mouthed bully.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
Other known figures have done the same thing and have received accolades for it.0 -
^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.
0 -
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.0 -
Words that people like Stephen Hawking can understand like demagogue. Not small Trump friendly words like very bad man.mrussel1 said:
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.0 -
Hey! I understood all those words he said. I must agree with him!InHiding80 said:
Words that people like Stephen Hawking can understand like demagogue. Not small Trump friendly words like very bad man.mrussel1 said:
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.0 -
I've always wondered why some people around here seem to pluck or should I say pick an obscure word randomly from a thesaurus to insert into a response sometimes. Often it is met with a pat on the back.InHiding80 said:
Words that people like Stephen Hawking can understand like demagogue. Not small Trump friendly words like very bad man.mrussel1 said:
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.
Anyway http://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/semantics/ConsequencesErudite.pdf
If some people can't even understand Trumps or others simpleton way of speech says a lot.0 -
The problem is your sentence structure. I have no idea what the bold sentence means, or what you typed earlier.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I've always wondered why some people around here seem to pluck or should I say pick an obscure word randomly from a thesaurus to insert into a response sometimes. Often it is met with a pat on the back.InHiding80 said:
Words that people like Stephen Hawking can understand like demagogue. Not small Trump friendly words like very bad man.mrussel1 said:
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.
Anyway http://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/semantics/ConsequencesErudite.pdf
If some people can't even understand Trumps or others simpleton way of speech says a lot.0 -
Some people speak or write with utmost brevity without wasting time with needless speech.mrussel1 said:
The problem is your sentence structure. I have no idea what the bold sentence means, or what you typed earlier.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I've always wondered why some people around here seem to pluck or should I say pick an obscure word randomly from a thesaurus to insert into a response sometimes. Often it is met with a pat on the back.InHiding80 said:
Words that people like Stephen Hawking can understand like demagogue. Not small Trump friendly words like very bad man.mrussel1 said:
Can you type that whole thing again please...adding more words? I really don't understand it at all.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He has said a lot of things that others think and you won't admit that. I'm not sure why many won't actually.
Balls.
Anyway http://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/semantics/ConsequencesErudite.pdf
If some people can't even understand Trumps or others simpleton way of speech says a lot.
Example - Trump would beat Bernie Sanders.
Not - Trump could beat Bernie Sanders in an election if it came down to those two candidates in an election.0 -
Forget it.. My point was that I don't understand what you were trying to say. "Trump would beat Sanders" is a crystal clear sentence. The other ones were not.0
-
That's great. Trump is scum and it's nice to see someone so simply acknowledge his motivation in asking to do that.Gern Blansten said:The New York Daily News reports that Trump on Friday morning called up the New York Police Department and asked if he could speak to officers at a 3 p.m. roll call at the NYPD Midtown North Precinct.
Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, however, quickly nixed the idea.
“Our interest is staying out of the politics of the moment, and not to provide photo ops,” Bratton told reporters. “If Mr. Trump wants to speak to me, I would be happy to brief him on what we’re doing. If Sen. Clinton wants to speak to me, I would very happy to brief her on what we’re doing. But we are not in the business of providing photo ops for our candidates.”
What an absolute piece of shitWith all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
So is this a false statement by Trumps campaign? http://www.wbaltv.com/politics/trump-campaign-denies-asking-nypd-to-address-cops/40427246PJ_Soul said:
That's great. Trump is scum and it's nice to see someone so simply acknowledge his motivation in asking to do that.Gern Blansten said:The New York Daily News reports that Trump on Friday morning called up the New York Police Department and asked if he could speak to officers at a 3 p.m. roll call at the NYPD Midtown North Precinct.
Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, however, quickly nixed the idea.
“Our interest is staying out of the politics of the moment, and not to provide photo ops,” Bratton told reporters. “If Mr. Trump wants to speak to me, I would be happy to brief him on what we’re doing. If Sen. Clinton wants to speak to me, I would very happy to brief her on what we’re doing. But we are not in the business of providing photo ops for our candidates.”
What an absolute piece of shit
Donald Trump's campaign is denying that the candidate wanted to meet with New York police officers Friday afternoon and hold a news conference at a midtown precinct in a show of support after the Dallas police ambush. An aide on the Trump campaign said that a request might have gone out tangentially from someone within the Trump Organization, mentioning long-standing ties between members of the organization and the NYPD.0 -
The Blue Lives Matter people who support Trump have to make up their minds now. Can't have it both ways.PJ_Soul said:
That's great. Trump is scum and it's nice to see someone so simply acknowledge his motivation in asking to do that.Gern Blansten said:The New York Daily News reports that Trump on Friday morning called up the New York Police Department and asked if he could speak to officers at a 3 p.m. roll call at the NYPD Midtown North Precinct.
Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, however, quickly nixed the idea.
“Our interest is staying out of the politics of the moment, and not to provide photo ops,” Bratton told reporters. “If Mr. Trump wants to speak to me, I would be happy to brief him on what we’re doing. If Sen. Clinton wants to speak to me, I would very happy to brief her on what we’re doing. But we are not in the business of providing photo ops for our candidates.”
What an absolute piece of shit0 -
The Hat Making Trump Supporters See Red
Make Racists Afraid Again
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/b-dolan/the-hat-making-trump-supp_b_10824872.html0 -
If the police commissioner actually said that, then yes, I would assume Trump's people are lying. Obviously I am going to trust the NYC police commissioner over Donald Trump. Lol, a request "might have gone out tangentially".PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
So is this a false statement by Trumps campaign? http://www.wbaltv.com/politics/trump-campaign-denies-asking-nypd-to-address-cops/40427246PJ_Soul said:
That's great. Trump is scum and it's nice to see someone so simply acknowledge his motivation in asking to do that.Gern Blansten said:The New York Daily News reports that Trump on Friday morning called up the New York Police Department and asked if he could speak to officers at a 3 p.m. roll call at the NYPD Midtown North Precinct.
Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, however, quickly nixed the idea.
“Our interest is staying out of the politics of the moment, and not to provide photo ops,” Bratton told reporters. “If Mr. Trump wants to speak to me, I would be happy to brief him on what we’re doing. If Sen. Clinton wants to speak to me, I would very happy to brief her on what we’re doing. But we are not in the business of providing photo ops for our candidates.”
What an absolute piece of shit
Donald Trump's campaign is denying that the candidate wanted to meet with New York police officers Friday afternoon and hold a news conference at a midtown precinct in a show of support after the Dallas police ambush. An aide on the Trump campaign said that a request might have gone out tangentially from someone within the Trump Organization, mentioning long-standing ties between members of the organization and the NYPD.
Please. With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help