Canadian Politics Redux

Zod

Sounds like the Tariff's are on starting at midnight.... grr... tough times ahead no matter who is in charge.  Not an easy thing to fix :(

Parksy

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I don't care what trump says about him. He's using the same rhetoric and tactics that trump uses. There's no denying this. 

I don’t see it, but I’ll say again that Justin is far more similar to Trump, but everyone refuses to see it, and I really don’t understand why. The only explanation that’s ever been given is Justin speaks nicely, which misses the point.

Trudeau is similar to Trump in that he lies a lot, pretends a lot, and instead of going out of his way to attack, belittle, and humiliate to make himself look like a strong man... Trudeau does the opposite. He virtue signals like crazy to make himself seem like a sympathizer, a kind hearted man, etc.  It's all bull shit. 

Pierre is similar to Trump in his campaign tactics. Populism. He lies, he manipulates, he uses fear and emotion to win over crowds and voters. He attacks 'wokeness' and tries to relate to the lower to middle class even though he stinks of capitalism. 

Parksy

BF89905 said:

It's shocking that the Ontario PC Party won a third majority last week with a campaign slogan that was federally motivated - "Protect Ontario" (from Trump). The PC's have shown us since 2018 that they have prioritized the distribution of alcohol over all of their real provincial responsibilities - public health care, the environment, ODSP, autism supports, affordable housing, public education, and public works projects. Corruption at every turn

Not shocking to me at all.  

Two things at play here; 1. Lack of good choices.  2. He capitalized on a moment and exploited it. 

While I don't agree with him.... about most things.. credit where credit is due... if politics is a game, and we're all pawns... he's winning. 

DarthMaeglin

Parksy said:

DarthMaeglin said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

I don't care what trump says about him. He's using the same rhetoric and tactics that trump uses. There's no denying this. 

I don’t see it, but I’ll say again that Justin is far more similar to Trump, but everyone refuses to see it, and I really don’t understand why. The only explanation that’s ever been given is Justin speaks nicely, which misses the point.

Trudeau is similar to Trump in that he lies a lot, pretends a lot, and instead of going out of his way to attack, belittle, and humiliate to make himself look like a strong man... Trudeau does the opposite. He virtue signals like crazy to make himself seem like a sympathizer, a kind hearted man, etc.  It's all bull shit. 

Pierre is similar to Trump in his campaign tactics. Populism. He lies, he manipulates, he uses fear and emotion to win over crowds and voters. He attacks 'wokeness' and tries to relate to the lower to middle class even though he stinks of capitalism. 

2025 Poilievre sounds an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau however.

DarthMaeglin

Watched most of Trudeau’s press conference and I wasn’t impressed (surprise, surprise) but neither was I disappointed except for one point.

In reply to a question he said that (among other things) Canadians will continue to boo the American anthem, essentially justifying that boorish behaviour.

Why can’t people do what I did in 2017 when Trudeau took the stage at a WE indoctrination session. I didn’t applaud but neither did I boo, I simply stood quietly.

HughFreakingDillon

Why be so divisive? Why the hate towards those that don’t think
like you? 

Being sarcastic to make a point. 

PJ_Soul

DarthMaeglin said:

Watched most of Trudeau’s press conference and I wasn’t impressed (surprise, surprise) but neither was I disappointed except for one point.

In reply to a question he said that (among other things) Canadians will continue to boo the American anthem, essentially justifying that boorish behaviour.

Why can’t people do what I did in 2017 when Trudeau took the stage at a WE indoctrination session. I didn’t applaud but neither did I boo, I simply stood quietly.

I guess because nobody is as awesome as you are? There can be no other explanation.

HughFreakingDillon

PJ_Soul said:

DarthMaeglin said:

Watched most of Trudeau’s press conference and I wasn’t impressed (surprise, surprise) but neither was I disappointed except for one point.

In reply to a question he said that (among other things) Canadians will continue to boo the American anthem, essentially justifying that boorish behaviour.

Why can’t people do what I did in 2017 when Trudeau took the stage at a WE indoctrination session. I didn’t applaud but neither did I boo, I simply stood quietly.

I guess because nobody is as awesome as you are? There can be no other explanation.

Nearly choked on my banana. 😂 

DarthMaeglin

HughFreakingDillon said:

Why be so divisive? Why the hate towards those that don’t think
like you? 

Being sarcastic to make a point. 

Your point eludes me, please clarify.

DarthMaeglin

PJ_Soul said:

DarthMaeglin said:

Watched most of Trudeau’s press conference and I wasn’t impressed (surprise, surprise) but neither was I disappointed except for one point.

In reply to a question he said that (among other things) Canadians will continue to boo the American anthem, essentially justifying that boorish behaviour.

Why can’t people do what I did in 2017 when Trudeau took the stage at a WE indoctrination session. I didn’t applaud but neither did I boo, I simply stood quietly.

I guess because nobody is as awesome as you are? There can be no other explanation.

Will I ever be giving God an earful when we’re face-to-face, believe me. (Credit to The Frantics for that line.)

pjhawks

Good for Trudeau trying to explain to maga idiots what these idiotic tariffs will do to the American people.  I'm an American but i stand with Canada. Fuck Trump.

HughFreakingDillon

pjhawks said:

Good for Trudeau trying to explain to maga idiots what these idiotic tariffs will do to the American people.  I'm an American but i stand with Canada. Fuck Trump.

just watched that presser. put it in simple terms hopefully even stupid magats understand. 

ekwipt

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

Hawk123

The border has been secured. 

HughFreakingDillon

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

sums it up. 

DarthMaeglin

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

So all I’ve been able to find is people think Poilievre is Trump based on his style, that’s it. As I pointed out above, 2025 Poilievre is sounding an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau.

ekwipt

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

So all I’ve been able to find is people think Poilievre is Trump based on his style, that’s it. As I pointed out above, 2025 Poilievre is sounding an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau.

Palecek has been watching PP since he was a shitstain on Harper’s boxer shorts. He knows what he’s talking about. 

DarthMaeglin

ekwipt said:

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

So all I’ve been able to find is people think Poilievre is Trump based on his style, that’s it. As I pointed out above, 2025 Poilievre is sounding an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau.

Palecek has been watching PP since he was a shitstain on Harper’s boxer shorts. He knows what he’s talking about. 

After looking up substacks and discovering they’re basically blog posts I went back and reread the column. I’ve had columns from legitimate publications blown off here and I’m getting really, really confused as to what the standard is here.

He says a lot but proves very little and betrays his bias by using Pierre Trump throughout, as well as his assessment of free market democracy. There’s only one direct quote in the entire piece.

 I can buy into his argument that Poilievre employs some aspects of Trump’s style, but Poilievre is FAR from the only one and it’s not confined to the right. Personal insults? Have you heard Trudeau speak?

As I watched Trump speak last night I couldn’t help but flashback to 2015 when he opened with “America is back!”

ekwipt

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

So all I’ve been able to find is people think Poilievre is Trump based on his style, that’s it. As I pointed out above, 2025 Poilievre is sounding an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau.

Palecek has been watching PP since he was a shitstain on Harper’s boxer shorts. He knows what he’s talking about. 

After looking up substacks and discovering they’re basically blog posts I went back and reread the column. I’ve had columns from legitimate publications blown off here and I’m getting really, really confused as to what the standard is here.

He says a lot but proves very little and betrays his bias by using Pierre Trump throughout, as well as his assessment of free market democracy. There’s only one direct quote in the entire piece.

 I can buy into his argument that Poilievre employs some aspects of Trump’s style, but Poilievre is FAR from the only one and it’s not confined to the right. Personal insults? Have you heard Trudeau speak?

As I watched Trump speak last night I couldn’t help but flashback to 2015 when he opened with “America is back!”

Why do you constantly deflect to Trudeau? He’s done. Old news. Neither I nor Palecek supported Trudeau ever. So why constantly bring him up? Not liking Trudeau & the Liberals has nothing to do with what a scumbag PP is and has always been. 

DarthMaeglin

ekwipt said:

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

DarthMaeglin said:

ekwipt said:

No lies detected. 
https://palecek.substack.com/p/beware-of-pierre-trump

So all I’ve been able to find is people think Poilievre is Trump based on his style, that’s it. As I pointed out above, 2025 Poilievre is sounding an awful lot like 2015 Trudeau.

Palecek has been watching PP since he was a shitstain on Harper’s boxer shorts. He knows what he’s talking about. 

After looking up substacks and discovering they’re basically blog posts I went back and reread the column. I’ve had columns from legitimate publications blown off here and I’m getting really, really confused as to what the standard is here.

He says a lot but proves very little and betrays his bias by using Pierre Trump throughout, as well as his assessment of free market democracy. There’s only one direct quote in the entire piece.

 I can buy into his argument that Poilievre employs some aspects of Trump’s style, but Poilievre is FAR from the only one and it’s not confined to the right. Personal insults? Have you heard Trudeau speak?

As I watched Trump speak last night I couldn’t help but flashback to 2015 when he opened with “America is back!”

Why do you constantly deflect to Trudeau? He’s done. Old news. Neither I nor Palecek supported Trudeau ever. So why constantly bring him up? Not liking Trudeau & the Liberals has nothing to do with what a scumbag PP is and has always been. 

I was trying to illustrate how one-sided the analysis you provided is, nothing more, nothing less. As well as how the piece is lacking in proofs (or am I supposed to do my homework again, lol).

 I could easily say I’ve just been watching Trudeau for years just like Palecek has been watching Poilievre. Many here will choose to blow me off and insult me by calling me obsessed instead.

Edited to clarify the meaning of a sentence.