Hillary won more votes for President

PJPOWER

Hmmm, will she be vindicated or vilified?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/14/sources-russia-intercepted-hillarys-private-emails/

rssesq

and the IMF and World Bank and the other Rothschilds scum branches, lol

mrussel1 said:

Bentleyspop said:

mrussel1 said:

^I'm sick of you covering for the Illuminati.

Don't forget ZOG and the NWO

Yes, we know ZOG commands the Masons today. I'm monitoring their HQ in Alexandria as we speak.

Kat

PJPOWER said:

Hmmm, will she be vindicated or vilified?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/14/sources-russia-intercepted-hillarys-private-emails/

I wonder if it'll be possible to tell where the emails actually came from. There was discussion today that the State Dept was hacked but not Secretary Clinton's server. Since her emails had cc names, all kinds of people were on her emails. We'll see.

gimmesometruth27

PJPOWER said:

Hmmm, will she be vindicated or vilified?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/14/sources-russia-intercepted-hillarys-private-emails/

by breitbart? obviously vilified. bashing clintons is what has kept them in business this long.

PJfanwillneverleave1

Well whatever happens I guess she is now the nominee?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/14/politics/district-of-columbia-primary-results/index.html

Jearlpam0925

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Well whatever happens I guess she is now the nominee?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/14/politics/district-of-columbia-primary-results/index.html

No reason to guess, she definitely is.

what dreams

Kat said:

PJPOWER said:

Hmmm, will she be vindicated or vilified?
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/14/sources-russia-intercepted-hillarys-private-emails/

I wonder if it'll be possible to tell where the emails actually came from. There was discussion today that the State Dept was hacked but not Secretary Clinton's server. Since her emails had cc names, all kinds of people were on her emails. We'll see.

The IG report said the same thing. The State Dept. was hacked. Her private server was not. Everyone screaming afoul about the private server fail to acknowledge that her private email was more secure than the government accounts. Sigh. I really wish people would read the IG report and quit making up stories because the real facts don't fit their fairy tale.

what dreams

I just read the comments section on the posted breitbart article and the WikiLeak link contained within. I just don't get people who are obsessed with their hatred of public figures. They are so obsessed that they create entirely alternative storylines full of these larger-than-life characters. Killary, Hitlary, last week one C-span viewer called her "the most murderous, treasonous person walking the planet." Really?!! The most?!!

Where does that kind of deeply held belief come from? I swear, I don't even hold that much anger for the people I know personally who have deeply wronged me, former friends, family who have seriously violated my personal trust over issues that actually impact me. How is it possible to carry around so much hate and anger for someone who doesn't even matter all that much to our own daily lives?

And how can it be good for our national soul to have such destructive language being vomited all over the Internet? Why do we wonder that people blow each other's brains out when they spend their days filling their brains wirh such vitriol?

A fan favorite Avett Brothers lyric: "Your life doesn't change by the man that's elected." It really doesn't. The earth will continue to revolve and evolve, no matter what Clinton's emails say. Knowing what's in those dang emails will not change any of our lives, not one bit. Why do I feel like nobody understands this? Or even cares? Why is it so important to believe that Hillary Clinton is the most murderous, treasonous person walking the planet . . . and the emails will reveal this to be true?

I have a lot of questions these days. No answers.

Gern Blansten

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

Kat

I like that article a lot. Two thumbs up. I especially agree with the scandals/accusations/intent to hurt her credibility part. I've never seen a Hillary perp walk so it's all just politics to me. I've been watching it for decades and all that crying wolf got old a long time ago. I think she'll make a fine president, much better than a fear monger. Being a leader does mean uniting us, not dividing us. Thanks for posting that.

Gern Blansten

Kat said:

I like that article a lot. Two thumbs up. I especially agree with the scandals/accusations/intent to hurt her credibility part. I've never seen a Hillary perp walk so it's all just politics to me. I've been watching it for decades and all that crying wolf got old a long time ago. I think she'll make a fine president, much better than a fear monger. Being a leader does mean uniting us, not dividing us. Thanks for posting that.

agreed....and what happened to Trump's promise to give a speech about Hillary's dirty laundry? Wasn't that supposed to have happened Monday?

Reminds me of his promise to provide shocking details about Obama's birth certificate that never came to be.

Kat

From what I heard, his speech was supposed to be based on that book Clinton Cash or something, not sure about the name, that came out last year. The press were all over it then and I guess there was no there there.

what dreams

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

I will be sharing this one. Thanks.

Gern Blansten

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/283608-networks-drop-trump-rally-for-clinton-speech

Hilarious...Fox, CNN and MSNBC all dumped Trump's "speech" to cover Clinton's.

Free

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

The first paragraph notes this article is from a FB post.

Gern Blansten

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

The first paragraph notes this article is from a FB post.

Yes we were all aware of that. Welcome to the club.

mrussel1

It's a great synthesis. I'm with her.

Free

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

The first paragraph notes this article is from a FB post.

Yes we were all aware of that. Welcome to the club.

Which means opinion.

mrussel1

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

Free said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/6/11/1537582/-The-most-thorough-profound-and-moving-defense-of-Hillary-Clinton-I-have-ever-seen?detail=facebook

Interesting read....

The first paragraph notes this article is from a FB post.

Yes we were all aware of that. Welcome to the club.

Which means opinion.

Of course it's an opinion piece. It wasn't represented otherwise.

mrussel1

Gern Blansten said:

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/283608-networks-drop-trump-rally-for-clinton-speech

Hilarious...Fox, CNN and MSNBC all dumped Trump's "speech" to cover Clinton's.

Yeah, you know this chaps his orange ass like nothing else. He is counting on free media since he is too cheap to have a real campaign. He is also WAY behind in fundraising and without a ground game. One source I saw estimated that he had 70 full time campaign staff and HRC has over 700. Trump is going to rely on the RNC which is a terrible idea. Both the House and Senate re-election committees have bailed on the RNC ground game because it's so shitty.