County Clerk released

191012141528

Comments

  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    See, we all have our reactions. I'd feel bad (actually never would've even ventured there) had she been some decent-hearted, open-minded, my-beliefs-are-separate-from-the-duties-of-my-overpaid-job.

    Nah, I don't like her one bit. Said before I can be childish in thought. Thank god! Figure that has no direct effect on anyone else.

    Say the same of her actions and I'll eat my words.
  • hedonist said:

    See, we all have our reactions. I'd feel bad (actually never would've even ventured there) had she been some decent-hearted, open-minded, my-beliefs-are-separate-from-the-duties-of-my-overpaid-job.

    Nah, I don't like her one bit. Said before I can be childish in thought. Thank god! Figure that has no direct effect on anyone else.

    Say the same of her actions and I'll eat my words.

    Her actions are the same as any other child. Misguided until otherwise.
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524

    hedonist said:

    See, we all have our reactions. I'd feel bad (actually never would've even ventured there) had she been some decent-hearted, open-minded, my-beliefs-are-separate-from-the-duties-of-my-overpaid-job.

    Nah, I don't like her one bit. Said before I can be childish in thought. Thank god! Figure that has no direct effect on anyone else.

    Say the same of her actions and I'll eat my words.

    Her actions are the same as any other child. Misguided until otherwise.
    Except she's not a child.

    She's a well-paid elected....ah, fuck it.

    (and let it be known I could've joyously gone the hair route again but with great restraint chose not to - please be gentle when patting my back)

  • hedonist said:

    hedonist said:

    See, we all have our reactions. I'd feel bad (actually never would've even ventured there) had she been some decent-hearted, open-minded, my-beliefs-are-separate-from-the-duties-of-my-overpaid-job.

    Nah, I don't like her one bit. Said before I can be childish in thought. Thank god! Figure that has no direct effect on anyone else.

    Say the same of her actions and I'll eat my words.

    Her actions are the same as any other child. Misguided until otherwise.
    Except she's not a child.

    She's a well-paid elected....ah, fuck it.

    (and let it be known I could've joyously gone the hair route again but with great restraint chose not to - please be gentle when patting my back)

    Yes kitty :smiley:
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Last-12-Exit
    Last-12-Exit Charleston, SC Posts: 8,661

    Why would you subject children to something that you openly, firmly and stoically reject as an adult?

    Because my wife does not share my view about religion. I don't know if you're married, but if you are, I'm sure you can understand.
  • jnimhaoileoin
    jnimhaoileoin Baile Átha Cliath Posts: 2,682
    Personally, religion and religious beliefs make me uncomfortable. I fully respect the rights of others to hold such beliefs but I have absolutely no respect for those who impose them on others.

    I was raised by an atheist mother and all my older brothers would also be atheists. Ireland has traditionally been a very strongly Catholic country so unsurprisingly this posed some issues. I was baptised and also did my communion and confirmation as it was quite simply just what you did. In fact, even today it is extremely difficult to get into a primary school (age 4-12) if you have not been baptised. I went on to a convent school from age 12-18. Again choices were limited as we didn't have a car and it was the best school in the area. I'd had enough of religion class and regular trips to confession at that point though, so I simply refused to participate. This eventually led to me being called to the principal's office where she suggested to me that I might be better off in the Protestant school down the road! I stayed in the school but it certainly didn't enamour me of Catholicism or any other religion.

    I find it deeply unsettling when a person believes they have a right to force their religious views on others and attempt to impose their way of life on them. When a state does so, well to me that is just unacceptable. Religion is a personal thing and as I said, people can believe whatever they want. If they want to teach religion in schools I believe it should only be taught as a subject of cultural, historical and sociological interest and it most certainly should not be compulsory. Naturally, it should also be taught from an anthropological point of view, presenting varying sets of beliefs, rather than presenting them as facts.

    More importantly, religion has no place in the laws of our lands. If you choose to apply for or accept a job that requires you to uphold and enforce the laws of your jurisdiction, then you should first ensure that you are prepared to do so. If a law is subsequently passed that conflicts with your beliefs, then you should immediately speak to your employers and explain this to them. If you're fortunate, perhaps they might be able to find a way to allow you to continue in your job without contravening your beliefs. If not, tough shit. You are hired to perform a job, if you cannot meet the requirements of the job then they are entitled to replace you with someone who can.

    I live in a country where, sadly, religion still casts its shadow over our laws. This situation is changing, though far too slowly. Hopefully there will come a day where religious considerations have no bearing on the laws of any land, as no government has the right to choose the religion of its citizens by enacting such laws.

    Sorry for the long ramble but I guess you could say it's an issue I feel strongly about :)
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504

    HAHHAHHAHHAHHAHA I just love a good laugh ! thank you.

    Godfather.

    Care to elaborate on what you find humourous?

    a hand full of people on here have no more than insults to add to this topic
    and they talk about equal rights but only see and agree with the rights of the party they feel has been wronged, anger is a funny thing, I believe if you read all the posts on this thread you will see a mirror image of just about every topic brought forth to the train from muslim terrorist to gays and Christians and when they try to take thier point to an extreem they bash the Christain faith or talk about the bigots who don't agree with them, this hand full of people are a prime example of what they feel is wrong with the world to start with and that's why total world peace is imposible in the big picture, I realize this is just a forum with no real solution to any propblems (and it's probably a good thing) but sometimes I just have to laugh at the hand full.

    Godfather.

  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576

    HAHHAHHAHHAHHAHA I just love a good laugh ! thank you.

    Godfather.

    Care to elaborate on what you find humourous?

    a hand full of people on here have no more than insults to add to this topic
    and they talk about equal rights but only see and agree with the rights of the party they feel has been wronged, anger is a funny thing, I believe if you read all the posts on this thread you will see a mirror image of just about every topic brought forth to the train from muslim terrorist to gays and Christians and when they try to take thier point to an extreem they bash the Christain faith or talk about the bigots who don't agree with them, this hand full of people are a prime example of what they feel is wrong with the world to start with and that's why total world peace is imposible in the big picture, I realize this is just a forum with no real solution to any propblems (and it's probably a good thing) but sometimes I just have to laugh at the hand full.

    Godfather.

    You don't seem to understand things, no matter how many times they are explained. It is not incumbent on anyone to except anyone elses bigotry, and respect is earned not given. Racists, bigots, thieves, predators...they all deserve our disdain and it is not at all the same thing to hate a hater as it is to hate someone who hasn't given cause.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524

    Personally, religion and religious beliefs make me uncomfortable. I fully respect the rights of others to hold such beliefs but I have absolutely no respect for those who impose them on others.

    I was raised by an atheist mother and all my older brothers would also be atheists. Ireland has traditionally been a very strongly Catholic country so unsurprisingly this posed some issues. I was baptised and also did my communion and confirmation as it was quite simply just what you did. In fact, even today it is extremely difficult to get into a primary school (age 4-12) if you have not been baptised. I went on to a convent school from age 12-18. Again choices were limited as we didn't have a car and it was the best school in the area. I'd had enough of religion class and regular trips to confession at that point though, so I simply refused to participate. This eventually led to me being called to the principal's office where she suggested to me that I might be better off in the Protestant school down the road! I stayed in the school but it certainly didn't enamour me of Catholicism or any other religion.

    I find it deeply unsettling when a person believes they have a right to force their religious views on others and attempt to impose their way of life on them. When a state does so, well to me that is just unacceptable. Religion is a personal thing and as I said, people can believe whatever they want. If they want to teach religion in schools I believe it should only be taught as a subject of cultural, historical and sociological interest and it most certainly should not be compulsory. Naturally, it should also be taught from an anthropological point of view, presenting varying sets of beliefs, rather than presenting them as facts.

    More importantly, religion has no place in the laws of our lands. If you choose to apply for or accept a job that requires you to uphold and enforce the laws of your jurisdiction, then you should first ensure that you are prepared to do so. If a law is subsequently passed that conflicts with your beliefs, then you should immediately speak to your employers and explain this to them. If you're fortunate, perhaps they might be able to find a way to allow you to continue in your job without contravening your beliefs. If not, tough shit. You are hired to perform a job, if you cannot meet the requirements of the job then they are entitled to replace you with someone who can.

    I live in a country where, sadly, religion still casts its shadow over our laws. This situation is changing, though far too slowly. Hopefully there will come a day where religious considerations have no bearing on the laws of any land, as no government has the right to choose the religion of its citizens by enacting such laws.

    Sorry for the long ramble but I guess you could say it's an issue I feel strongly about :)

    Excellent ramble! Honestly, well-said.
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,237

    Personally, religion and religious beliefs make me uncomfortable. I fully respect the rights of others to hold such beliefs but I have absolutely no respect for those who impose them on others.

    I was raised by an atheist mother and all my older brothers would also be atheists. Ireland has traditionally been a very strongly Catholic country so unsurprisingly this posed some issues. I was baptised and also did my communion and confirmation as it was quite simply just what you did. In fact, even today it is extremely difficult to get into a primary school (age 4-12) if you have not been baptised. I went on to a convent school from age 12-18. Again choices were limited as we didn't have a car and it was the best school in the area. I'd had enough of religion class and regular trips to confession at that point though, so I simply refused to participate. This eventually led to me being called to the principal's office where she suggested to me that I might be better off in the Protestant school down the road! I stayed in the school but it certainly didn't enamour me of Catholicism or any other religion.

    I find it deeply unsettling when a person believes they have a right to force their religious views on others and attempt to impose their way of life on them. When a state does so, well to me that is just unacceptable. Religion is a personal thing and as I said, people can believe whatever they want. If they want to teach religion in schools I believe it should only be taught as a subject of cultural, historical and sociological interest and it most certainly should not be compulsory. Naturally, it should also be taught from an anthropological point of view, presenting varying sets of beliefs, rather than presenting them as facts.

    More importantly, religion has no place in the laws of our lands. If you choose to apply for or accept a job that requires you to uphold and enforce the laws of your jurisdiction, then you should first ensure that you are prepared to do so. If a law is subsequently passed that conflicts with your beliefs, then you should immediately speak to your employers and explain this to them. If you're fortunate, perhaps they might be able to find a way to allow you to continue in your job without contravening your beliefs. If not, tough shit. You are hired to perform a job, if you cannot meet the requirements of the job then they are entitled to replace you with someone who can.

    I live in a country where, sadly, religion still casts its shadow over our laws. This situation is changing, though far too slowly. Hopefully there will come a day where religious considerations have no bearing on the laws of any land, as no government has the right to choose the religion of its citizens by enacting such laws.

    Sorry for the long ramble but I guess you could say it's an issue I feel strongly about :)

    Wasn't there a Led Zeppelin song that was called *Ramble On*......and you did so. Bravo you, well done.....like you said it should have no bearing and if so move unto something to your liking.

    Peace

    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    edited September 2015
    quote: "I live in a country where, sadly, religion still casts its shadow over our laws. This situation is changing, though far too slowly. Hopefully there will come a day where religious considerations have no bearing on the laws of any land, as no government has the right to choose the religion of its citizens by enacting such laws."

    are there any countries in the world that live by the laws you hope for ? serious question and if so what shape are they in ?

    Godfather.

  • jnimhaoileoin
    jnimhaoileoin Baile Átha Cliath Posts: 2,682

    quote: "I live in a country where, sadly, religion still casts its shadow over our laws. This situation is changing, though far too slowly. Hopefully there will come a day where religious considerations have no bearing on the laws of any land, as no government has the right to choose the religion of its citizens by enacting such laws."

    are there any countries in the world that live by the laws you hope for ? serious question and if so what shape are they in ?

    Godfather.

    As far as I know, Sweden and Denmark live by secular laws and are pretty good models of what we should be aiming for
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758

    HAHHAHHAHHAHHAHA I just love a good laugh ! thank you.

    Godfather.

    Care to elaborate on what you find humourous?

    a hand full of people on here have no more than insults to add to this topic
    and they talk about equal rights but only see and agree with the rights of the party they feel has been wronged, anger is a funny thing, I believe if you read all the posts on this thread you will see a mirror image of just about every topic brought forth to the train from muslim terrorist to gays and Christians and when they try to take thier point to an extreem they bash the Christain faith or talk about the bigots who don't agree with them, this hand full of people are a prime example of what they feel is wrong with the world to start with and that's why total world peace is imposible in the big picture, I realize this is just a forum with no real solution to any propblems (and it's probably a good thing) but sometimes I just have to laugh at the hand full.

    Godfather.

    but equal rights don't extend to infringing on the rights of others. you can't be accepting of laws that offer religious freedom for one, but oppression of any kind of another. that's not equal in the slightest.

    religious freedom isn't about imposing your views on others (as this person did). religious freedom is personal, not all-encompassing. spread the message, state your opinion, no problem. but don't FORCE the message. that goes against what jesus is depicted as saying in the bible.

    a gay couple getting married does not infringe on your rights. it affects you in no way, shape, or form, except in your own head. it only affects the couple getting married.

    a gay couple not being allowed to marry by any person IS infringing on their rights.

    what would be infringing on your rights as a religious person who doesn't believe in gay marriage, is forcing you to marry a man.

    total world peace isn't possible because of people like kim davis, anyone who imposes their views on others in a forceful way. not the gay couples who just want to be left alone and. case closed.

    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    imposing your views on others is a two way street, I agree with you, both sides are imposing thier views on each other so it boils down to personal choices, her religious freedom was used by her and she made the choice to not do her job so she should have been fired or suspended not put in a position to be thrown in jail.

    Godfather.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758

    imposing your views on others is a two way street, I agree with you, both sides are imposing thier views on each other so it boils down to personal choices, her religious freedom was used by her and she made the choice to not do her job so she should have been fired or suspended not put in a position to be thrown in jail.

    Godfather.

    this is where you are incorrect. imposing your views is not a two way street. they were not obstructing her from anything. she was. no one is imposing their views on her. they are not stopping her from doing anything. they were requesting a service allowed by law. she, however, was stopping them from getting a marriage license.

    if a black person was being told they couldn't use a washroom in a southern US restaurant, would you say the black person is imposing their views on the white restaurant owners?



    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • imposing your views on others is a two way street, I agree with you, both sides are imposing thier views on each other so it boils down to personal choices, her religious freedom was used by her and she made the choice to not do her job so she should have been fired or suspended not put in a position to be thrown in jail.

    Godfather.

    this is where you are incorrect. imposing your views is not a two way street. they were not obstructing her from anything. she was. no one is imposing their views on her. they are not stopping her from doing anything. they were requesting a service allowed by law. she, however, was stopping them from getting a marriage license.

    if a black person was being told they couldn't use a washroom in a southern US restaurant, would you say the black person is imposing their views on the white restaurant owners?



    And this is correct.

    GF... you are confusing religious freedom with being free to persecute others based on your religious beliefs.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    and I can't comment on the jail thing. I don't know enough about those laws to understand why she was in contempt of court instead of a just a deadbeat not doing her job, requiring dismissal.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • riotgrl
    riotgrl LOUISVILLE Posts: 1,895

    and I can't comment on the jail thing. I don't know enough about those laws to understand why she was in contempt of court instead of a just a deadbeat not doing her job, requiring dismissal.

    County clerks in KY are elected officials. And as someone mentioned earlier, they can only be dismissed by state leg. or governor. Both the AG, Conway, and the Governor, Beshear, have elected to do nothing. Conway is running for Governor and Beshears son is running for AG. State leg. is primarily conservative so most are on her side, or at the very least, not willing to piss off the conservative constituency in this state. Most people outside Louisville, the states largest city, are really conservative even if they say the are Dems.
    Are we getting something out of this all-encompassing trip?

    Seems my preconceptions are what should have been burned...

    I AM MINE
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,517

    and I can't comment on the jail thing. I don't know enough about those laws to understand why she was in contempt of court instead of a just a deadbeat not doing her job, requiring dismissal.

    As an elected official she could not be dismissed. She could only be removed by being voted outnof office or removed by impeachment (I think).

    She was jailed because she continued to defy a judge's order to sign off on all marriages. The therefore she was in contempt of court which is a jailable offense.