The Donald for President

Gern Blansten

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-republican/

Nate Silver still gives Cruz a 52% chance of winning Iowa. Trump has a 31% chance.

Not that it really matters but this is an unusual situation with the blowhard Trump....if he loses Iowa his whole mantra (constantly bragging about polls, his greatness, etc.) will go to shit.

Wobbie

callen said:

Gern Blansten said:

I certainly didn't mean to insult anyone. I didn't really think our posts were that offensive but if someone took offense then I apologize.

Let's move on to the topic at hand which is what a disaster Donald Trump and his hair are.

And how Palin's endorsement added to the carnage.

apparently, her son's arrest is Obama's fault.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sarah-palin-blames-obama-son-track-legal-problems-article-1.2503589

rr165892

Was talking to someone who really likes trump the other night.They think of Trump as a socially liberal Capitolist who is doing nothing more than playing to the base right now,but when the general comes he will revert back to his usual schtick.Hes not religious,he could care less about guns and evangelical voters after this.He is a moderate who is a great delegater and is very talented in putting the right people in the right places.His strong point would be his fiscal knowledge.
I kinda agree.

Kat

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

callen

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

PJ_Soul

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Dude, you just don't get it.

callen

PJ_Soul said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Dude, you just don't get it.

Probably don't. Help me out.

Empty Glass

.

jeffbr

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.

Gern Blansten

Let's not get this thread locked please. Time to move on.

Gern Blansten

jeffbr said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.

I can see a difference between saying someone is "hot" and saying you want to have sex with someone.

Let's move on

jeffbr

Gern Blansten said:

jeffbr said:

callen said:

Kat said:

rr165892 said:

ldent42 said:

commenting on the fuckablity of a woman is belittling women.

If stated as bluntly I would agree.But hinting the same in a g rated manor is not.

The bottom line is no more sexist comments...whether stated bluntly or thinly veiled, it's sexist and unacceptable here. Thank you for understanding this in this new century and not doing it again.
Admin

Kat,

I get it but do feel there's a bit of a double standard when we have threads dedicated to how Hot Ed is.

Peace

Yup, not into objectification or belittling based on either gender, and it sure is strange to see the hot ed picture threads and talk of his tight white pants. If that is somehow different than saying some woman is hot, I would love to hear the distinction.

Not trying to derail this thread, or debate with mods - if there's a rule we're expected to follow, it is important that the rule is understood, and that the rule applies to all parts of the board.

I can see a difference between saying someone is "hot" and saying you want to have sex with someone.

Let's move on

Ha, a rebuttal and then a call to end. I'll just say I see the difference too. One is more thinly veiled.

Kat

There's a line. If someone says [political figure] is hot, that's one thing and not usually a problem. If someone makes noise about doing something to Ed that crosses a line, flag it for me if you see if first, ok? It's NOT ok and that has been communicated when it has happened before. Without explaining every little nuance, a problem post is usually pretty clear so just check yourself before hitting Submit.

usamamasan1

Donald Trump is poised for the strongest primary performance in modern history

http://theweek.com/articles/600335/donald-trump-poised-strongest-primary-performance-modern-history

I hope I don't have to hear a bunch of liberal banter in Wrigley from Ed, but hope is not a strategy (unless you are BHO). So I guess the banter will be my new piss break song.

rr165892

Thanks for seeing I wasn't trying to offend,and that there is double standards around here sometimes.

Gern Blansten

usamamasan1 said:

Donald Trump is poised for the strongest primary performance in modern history

http://theweek.com/articles/600335/donald-trump-poised-strongest-primary-performance-modern-history

I hope I don't have to hear a bunch of liberal banter in Wrigley from Ed, but hope is not a strategy (unless you are BHO). So I guess the banter will be my new piss break song.

And if Cruz does win, it's worth noting that Iowa frequently doesn't vote for the nominee. It voted for Bush in 1980, Dole in 1988, Huckabee in 2008 and Santorum in 2012. There's a common assumption that a narrow Cruz victory would puncture the Trump hype balloon — and it might. But that's not the way Iowa has ever played out before.

rr165892

You're talking about Iowa here guys.whtcha expect.Other then Chadwick and Slipknot/Corey Taylor not much to say.

Bentleyspop

imalive said:

callen said:

Gern Blansten said:

I certainly didn't mean to insult anyone. I didn't really think our posts were that offensive but if someone took offense then I apologize.

Let's move on to the topic at hand which is what a disaster Donald Trump and his hair are.

And how Palin's endorsement added to the carnage.

apparently, her son's arrest is Obama's fault.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sarah-palin-blames-obama-son-track-legal-problems-article-1.2503589

D'uh everything is President Obamas fault from before the crucifixion all the way up to and including the recent drop in the stock market.

And how do I know this?










Easy.....foxnews told me

josevolution

So she's blaming Obama for her son's post traumatic syndrome, how about blaming the bafoons from her own party that started the whole destabilization of the Region .....what a disgrace this bimbo turned ou to be .....

usamamasan1

its W's fault still right