Knowing what you know now would you still support the withdrawal of troops from Iraq
Comments
-
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
What are you even talking about? Make sentences please. Carson voting nay on veteran's aid? He's not even in office?InHiding80 said:
Cool strawman, Dubya ass kissing brah. You seem to have no problem with Carson and Cruz voting nay on veteran's aid. Then again, you're a chickenhawk too like your fellow peas in a pod so why am I not surprised? As long as those with an R next to their name like them and Cotton do it, it's ok, right?BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.0 -
ted nugent did everything in his power to avoid the draft. he shit himself and he lived in it for a week. people like that are not allowed to question the patriotism of people like me who chose to use my voice against unjust wars instead enlisting in them.InHiding80 said:
Yet Ted Nugent and Phil Robertson go full retard and these cons cry "Freedom of speech! Wah! Derp! Murica!"gimmesometruth27 said:
no. they never should have been there to begin with.BS44325 said:
So all things being equal you think the troops should have stayed?gimmesometruth27 said:Uh yeah.
Status of forces agreement, signed by GWB, guaranteed we would be out by the agreed upon date. Obama tried to keep us there. But they kicked us out.
Don't pin the withdrawal on Obama, he could not make Iraq allow us to stay.
You can't blame the successor, a man who never supported the war, for the fuck up of the predecessor.
Let's cut the history revision crap please.
i said it in 2003 back when people on this message board were telling me to get the fuck out of america. i protested. just like pearl jam, just like the dixie chicks. just like the countless other ones. we were right.
i signed up at 18. i had no further obligation. i was not drafted because there was no draft. had i been drafted i would have gone. i would have gone and hated every minute of it. but i would not have avoided my responsibility, and i would not have sabotoged my duty had i been drafted."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
afghanistan was justifiable, in a sense that afghanistan was responsible for harboring the people that attacked us.Last-12-Exit said:
Afghanistan wasn't justifiable? Or the first gulf war?brianlux said:It totally blows my mind that we're having this discussion at all. We have not been justifiably involved in any wars in at least the last 70 years.
As for Musky's statement, let's hear from the man who wrote it. Tell us about it, Musky.
iraq had nothing to do with it."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
You packin' up yet?muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
chest beat much??
is this the internet??
yep..."You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."0 -
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.
0 -
If a man talks to himself in the forest and no one else hears, is he still wrong?0
-
Wait, so me not supporting Chris Kyle means I don't support ALL troops? Lol, what does someone say to this delusional post? And since you posted a link to that Michael Moore thread, there's a link in there of an American sniper calling out that same Chris Kyle. Why don't you go re-read that thread.BS44325 said:
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
How did you know?? I am gathering my gear as we speak for a Musky trip to the great state of Wisconsin as I am watching the Blackhawks….thanks for asking…GO HAWKS!!!rgambs said:
You packin' up yet?muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
Shame on me? Really musky? Mr story teller, shame on me? Should I tell everyone what I found out about your stories you "claim" happened? Shame on you for using the vets in the manner you did trying to promote your lame ass agenda. Should I tell this site? Let everyone know what kind of a phony you are? I've been sitting on it for a while. Maybe I should share with everyone so they can see how shameful you are. You remind me of those guys who dress up as vets and try to get special treatment, only to be found out as phonies. Being ridiculed by someone like you ain't shit, seeing that you're the source of the ridicule.muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
I swear I might be going crazy. Do you not understand the difference between "proud" and "support"? I really wish you had the ability to follow the flow of these threads. Musky used the term "proud". You and Brian then worked yourself up into a lather on being accused of not "supporting" the troops. I corrected you guys. Callen then said he's never seen anyone say they are not "proud". I showed an instance where you did just that and which you confirmed. Does that mean that you don't support the troops in general? Of course not. It seems you are an expert on the term "ass-clown" but have no clue when it comes to the difference between "proud" and "support".badbrains said:
Wait, so me not supporting Chris Kyle means I don't support ALL troops? Lol, what does someone say to this delusional post? And since you posted a link to that Michael Moore thread, there's a link in there of an American sniper calling out that same Chris Kyle. Why don't you go re-read that thread.BS44325 said:
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
Are you fucken kidding me? So your acting like an ass over "proud" or "support"? Here Einstein, I'm not "proud" or "support" what Chris Kyle did. Is that clear enough for you? Does that make sense to you professor? You corrected us? Lol, you mean like H2M and drowned out have been handing you your ass? Is that what you mean? LolBS44325 said:
I swear I might be going crazy. Do you not understand the difference between "proud" and "support"? I really wish you had the ability to follow the flow of these threads. Musky used the term "proud". You and Brian then worked yourself up into a lather on being accused of not "supporting" the troops. I corrected you guys. Callen then said he's never seen anyone say they are not "proud". I showed an instance where you did just that and which you confirmed. Does that mean that you don't support the troops in general? Of course not. It seems you are an expert on the term "ass-clown" but have no clue when it comes to the difference between "proud" and "support".badbrains said:
Wait, so me not supporting Chris Kyle means I don't support ALL troops? Lol, what does someone say to this delusional post? And since you posted a link to that Michael Moore thread, there's a link in there of an American sniper calling out that same Chris Kyle. Why don't you go re-read that thread.BS44325 said:
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.
You burned me. I need a hug. I've said it before, get off the bath salts.0 -
Again...thank you. This is exactly what I was saying to Callen. People who think the invasion was wrong, that american troops did more harm then good and are not proud of the harm the troops caused are entitled to feel that way. You can feel that way without having your overall support of the troops questioned. Now go get that hug.badbrains said:
Are you fucken kidding me? So your acting like an ass over "proud" or "support"? Here Einstein, I'm not "proud" or "support" what Chris Kyle did. Is that clear enough for you? Does that make sense to you professor? You corrected us? Lol, you mean like H2M and drowned out have been handing you your ass? Is that what you mean? LolBS44325 said:
I swear I might be going crazy. Do you not understand the difference between "proud" and "support"? I really wish you had the ability to follow the flow of these threads. Musky used the term "proud". You and Brian then worked yourself up into a lather on being accused of not "supporting" the troops. I corrected you guys. Callen then said he's never seen anyone say they are not "proud". I showed an instance where you did just that and which you confirmed. Does that mean that you don't support the troops in general? Of course not. It seems you are an expert on the term "ass-clown" but have no clue when it comes to the difference between "proud" and "support".badbrains said:
Wait, so me not supporting Chris Kyle means I don't support ALL troops? Lol, what does someone say to this delusional post? And since you posted a link to that Michael Moore thread, there's a link in there of an American sniper calling out that same Chris Kyle. Why don't you go re-read that thread.BS44325 said:
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.
You burned me. I need a hug. I've said it before, get off the bath salts.0 -
this is getting old as the crust in your tiddy whitiesmuskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
Ah, okBS44325 said:
Again...thank you. This is exactly what I was saying to Callen. People who think the invasion was wrong, that american troops did more harm then good and are not proud of the harm the troops caused are entitled to feel that way. You can feel that way without having your overall support of the troops questioned. Now go get that hug.badbrains said:
Are you fucken kidding me? So your acting like an ass over "proud" or "support"? Here Einstein, I'm not "proud" or "support" what Chris Kyle did. Is that clear enough for you? Does that make sense to you professor? You corrected us? Lol, you mean like H2M and drowned out have been handing you your ass? Is that what you mean? LolBS44325 said:
I swear I might be going crazy. Do you not understand the difference between "proud" and "support"? I really wish you had the ability to follow the flow of these threads. Musky used the term "proud". You and Brian then worked yourself up into a lather on being accused of not "supporting" the troops. I corrected you guys. Callen then said he's never seen anyone say they are not "proud". I showed an instance where you did just that and which you confirmed. Does that mean that you don't support the troops in general? Of course not. It seems you are an expert on the term "ass-clown" but have no clue when it comes to the difference between "proud" and "support".badbrains said:
Wait, so me not supporting Chris Kyle means I don't support ALL troops? Lol, what does someone say to this delusional post? And since you posted a link to that Michael Moore thread, there's a link in there of an American sniper calling out that same Chris Kyle. Why don't you go re-read that thread.BS44325 said:
Well you are not a vet and I didn't expect for you to back down on your Chris Kyle comments. That's my point. When Callen says he "doesn't know a single person on these boards who isn't proud of the troops" I can tell him that you said otherwise.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.
You burned me. I need a hug. I've said it before, get off the bath salts.0 -
Pretty Please…This aught to be really entertaining. Please enlighten the group about what I have experienced in my own life. I love it how some people think that if its not on the internet it did not happen. Getting back to the point, if you don't understand how offensive it is making a comment like "if I were a VET" then there are many many things you need to reconsider about yourself. GOD BLESS THE USA on this day and everyday…badbrains said:
Shame on me? Really musky? Mr story teller, shame on me? Should I tell everyone what I found out about your stories you "claim" happened? Shame on you for using the vets in the manner you did trying to promote your lame ass agenda. Should I tell this site? Let everyone know what kind of a phony you are? I've been sitting on it for a while. Maybe I should share with everyone so they can see how shameful you are. You remind me of those guys who dress up as vets and try to get special treatment, only to be found out as phonies. Being ridiculed by someone like you ain't shit, seeing that you're the source of the ridicule.muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
Except on the days when liberals are elected, then it's ok to criticize, right? Pack up and move out America hater lolmuskydan said:
Pretty Please…This aught to be really entertaining. Please enlighten the group about what I have experienced in my own life. I love it how some people think that if its not on the internet it did not happen. Getting back to the point, if you don't understand how offensive it is making a comment like "if I were a VET" then there are many many things you need to reconsider about yourself. GOD BLESS THE USA on this day and everyday…badbrains said:
Shame on me? Really musky? Mr story teller, shame on me? Should I tell everyone what I found out about your stories you "claim" happened? Shame on you for using the vets in the manner you did trying to promote your lame ass agenda. Should I tell this site? Let everyone know what kind of a phony you are? I've been sitting on it for a while. Maybe I should share with everyone so they can see how shameful you are. You remind me of those guys who dress up as vets and try to get special treatment, only to be found out as phonies. Being ridiculed by someone like you ain't shit, seeing that you're the source of the ridicule.muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
How do u even know that's what I was even referring to? As for my comment "if I was a vet" being offensive, how? I've done more trying to support the vets and keeping them home, and SAFE then you ever will. If that is offensive in any way, so be it. I can live with it. As for you and your stories, says a lot about you as a person knowing you have no issue with what bullshit you lied about. And to have no shame in it. You're a real piece of work Dan. You really are.muskydan said:
Pretty Please…This aught to be really entertaining. Please enlighten the group about what I have experienced in my own life. I love it how some people think that if its not on the internet it did not happen. Getting back to the point, if you don't understand how offensive it is making a comment like "if I were a VET" then there are many many things you need to reconsider about yourself. GOD BLESS THE USA on this day and everyday…badbrains said:
Shame on me? Really musky? Mr story teller, shame on me? Should I tell everyone what I found out about your stories you "claim" happened? Shame on you for using the vets in the manner you did trying to promote your lame ass agenda. Should I tell this site? Let everyone know what kind of a phony you are? I've been sitting on it for a while. Maybe I should share with everyone so they can see how shameful you are. You remind me of those guys who dress up as vets and try to get special treatment, only to be found out as phonies. Being ridiculed by someone like you ain't shit, seeing that you're the source of the ridicule.muskydan said:
"if I was a vet"……that's priceless. Shame on you for even thinking let alone mentioning that on a day like today. Go back to the basement kid.badbrains said:
I did and stand by whatever I said in that thread. I'm not a pussy ass chicken shit who slithers out of what I say. What's your point? I should be proud of someone like Chris? No thanks.BS44325 said:
How soon you forget the Michael Moore thread discussing American Sniper.callen said:
I don't know of a single person on this board that is not proud of US troops putting their lives in grave danger by following orders as they swore to do. It's the orders that are given as to deployment and stated enemy that's deplorable. This though shouldn't even have to be explained. It's so elementary but guess twisting reality to fit ones motivations blinds common sense.BS44325 said:
Probably not but if we can't even agree on the contents of four clear as day sentences how can we agree on anything else? Musky stated that he was proud of what the troops did over there and that some of you were not. This is not complicated. Most have you have been arguing that you are not proud of the invasion, you are not proud of what our military did, that the US did more harm then good. This doesn't mean you don't support the troops and no one suggested otherwise. It is just another strawman argument built up so that people can play the victim card.brianlux said:It was obviously inferred and we all know that but, no, not specifically stated as such. No use arguing the point though, is there?
http://community.pearljam.com/discussion/242094/michael-moore-proving-once-again
Lot of people not "proud" of the troop's actions on there. Go back and read it if you like...a number of you including Brian and Badbrains clearly didn't have any pride for the Chris Kyles of this world who were just following orders. You yourself even said this:
"I call those that stand up to invading force that has drones , jets, precision guided missiles and sharks with freakin laser beams Hero's."
Essentially you were supporting any resistance to those Americans who were just following orders. It's a fine position to take if you want but don't expect US veterans to appreciate how proud you are of their service.
Edit-and if I was a vet, you'd be the LAST person I'd want to be advocating for or thanking me for my services. I'd actually tell you to fuck off, if I was a vet.0 -
"Our number one job is to make this president fail." How proud you all must be seeing that the president is also our commander in chief, whether he served or not. Rah, rah, rah, USA, USA, USA! Just thought I'd remind you of your party's leadership on this day of all days.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help