Gun owner stops rampage

dimitrispearljam

the logic ..its ok to have guns,cos you can die from many others reason too,.
the logic..its ok to have guns..cos people sucks
the logic its ok to have guns cos maybe one day you will be Rambo-superman-jack noirris all at one person and you will defend your self and save the whole city..
.its just crazy talk..

dimitrispearljam

redrock wrote:

Therefore you weren't in a position to answer the question whether you were a 'responsible' gun owner or not.

from the moment those guns can kill someone there is no such thing as 'responsible' gun owner..

gimmesometruth27

colbert hits it out of the park again. exposes hypocracy of the nra and the right in this video.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/0 ... 01618.html

catefrances

pandora wrote:

fife wrote:

my definition of a responsible gun is the following. Keeps their guns in a lock safe, takes safety classes and uses common sense.

mine too...
so the killer you speak of then what causes this and do you consider them still responsible?
I mean there isn't much common sense in murder unless your own life or that of a loved one is at stake.

killing in self defence is not murder. murder is a legal term used to define intent in the determination of whether a killing is unlawful.

pandora

catefrances wrote:

pandora wrote:

fife wrote:

my definition of a responsible gun is the following. Keeps their guns in a lock safe, takes safety classes and uses common sense.

mine too...
so the killer you speak of then what causes this and do you consider them still responsible?
I mean there isn't much common sense in killing unless your own life or that of a loved one is at stake.

killing in self defence is not murder. murder is a legal term used to define intent in the determination of whether a killing is unlawful.

fixed thanks!

Hugh Freaking Dillon

pandora wrote:

Abe Froman wrote:

pandora wrote:

Who lets five year old watch The Following and Hannibal or take them to
an R rated extremely violent movie that starts at midnight?

Who allows a 6 year old to play violent killing machine video games meant for adults,
for hours at a time for years?

Who lets a five year old little innocent girl prance around adults
without her panties on?

Who leaves their 3, 5 and 6 year old home alone...
only to lose them in a housefire?

Who puts their kids in a car without any protection, not even a seatbelt?

Who swears, drinks, smokes pot, does hard drugs, beats their wife, beats their dog,
beats their children in front of their children?

Nothing surprises me anymore. Some people don't think about anyone but themselves,
about anything other than what they want for themselves
and are clueless the future adults they are raising in their homes.

Buying a gun for a five year old, future hunter, future hobbyist, future sportsmen,
seems young to me as well but definitely not as harmful as some of the above.

Teaching personal responsibility starts young but unfortunately some are never taught
it by their parents because they themselves never learned it from theirs.
Hopefully the future gun enthusiast's parents did.
I assume they are responsible gun owners from the pics but I can see how anti gun people
would not assume this.

This has gotta be one of the more ridiculous statements iv'e read on this board. :fp:

well care to elaborate?
never mind ...
we've heard is all and it fails time and again.

The fact you would lump bad parenting in the hideous examples I stated with
a responsible parent teaching a child gun sportsmanship and responsibiliity
tells us why it fails.

you call a person who buys a 5 year old a gun a fucking responsible parent?? BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Hugh Freaking Dillon

between letting kindergarteners own guns and some women deserving rape, I really think you've finally gone off the deep end.

catefrances

pandora wrote:

...Who puts their kids in a car without any protection, not even a seatbelt?

aaaahh the 70s.

Cosmo

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:

pandora wrote:

pandora wrote:

Who lets a five year old little innocent girl prance around adults without her panties on?

you call a person who buys a 5 year old a gun a fucking responsible parent?? BWAHAHAHAHAHA

...
Seriously...
Who the fuck gets aroused by a 5 year old running around naked?
The person that sexualize a naked 5 year old... in my book, THAT'S the one with fucking problem.
Pervert.

catefrances

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/2013/0 ... t-security



A US man turned his gun on himself after being confronted by law officials at security at Houston's Bush International Airport.

The man tried to get through security with a gun, and then killed himself when authorities tried to stop him, CNN reports, citing law enforcement sources.

The man walked into the airport's Terminal B with a military-style semi-automatic rifle and fired shots into the ceiling.

When an air marshal confronted him, the man pulled out a second gun and shot himself, CNN reports.

A call that there had been a "discharge of firearms" came into police, said John Cannon, the spokesman said.

The shots were fired near the ticket counter in Terminal B at Bush Intercontinental Airport, he said.

Dale Howard was at the baggage handling area of the airport waiting for his sister to arrive on an incoming flight when he heard two shots fired from the floor above. A few seconds later, he said he heard three more shots.

"People were screaming. I knew exactly what it was - gunfire," Mr Howard said.

Police from an adjacent station rushed in, and Mr Howard said he directed them to the floor above.

Parts of the terminal were blocked off as police investigate

go pre

so, gun lovers keep saying that guns don't kill people. using that same logic, guns have never saved anyone from harm. this lead me to the next question: what are guns good for if they don't kill people or animals, or if they don't save people from being harmed?

Hugh Freaking Dillon

go pre wrote:

so, gun lovers keep saying that guns don't kill people. using that same logic, guns have never saved anyone from harm. this lead me to the next question: what are guns good for if they don't kill people or animals, or if they don't save people from being harmed?

dimitrispearljam

Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:

go pre wrote:

so, gun lovers keep saying that guns don't kill people. using that same logic, guns have never saved anyone from harm. this lead me to the next question: what are guns good for if they don't kill people or animals, or if they don't save people from being harmed?

Godfather.

go pre wrote:

so, gun lovers keep saying that guns don't kill people. using that same logic, guns have never saved anyone from harm. this lead me to the next question: what are guns good for if they don't kill people or animals, or if they don't save people from being harmed?

the anti gun fanaticsjust don't understand if guns were outlawed that would mean ONLY the public would be bared from owning guns NOT the police,CIA etc.(not to mention criminals)
but the thing to me is who is the government or anybody else for that matter to tell me I can't own a weapon ?
or tell me I can't go hunting for meat or target shoot or own a gun for protection.
it just sucks when OUR (out of control) government tells us we can't have something,in many states gays can't get married,how do you all feel about that or the fact that most of these gun bills are taxing the crap out of ammo and guns or even cigerets,gas/oil to the point where you pay more in taxes than the product is worth it seems like and OUR government keeps taking in OUR money under the disguise of protecting YOU from yourself, they know guns will never go away so they tax the fuck out of them knowing we will pay for them and other products, it's time to wake up folks ...the government is using your emotions to seperate YOU from your money...and then use it in ways we don't aprove of in many cases. :fp:

Godfather.

pandora

guns have never saved anyone from harm :? what?
my neighbor is alive because a gun saved him from harm ...

countless stories nationwide everyday

I don't understand why common sense is not with the anti gun people.
The main reason that people own guns is to protect themselves.
The recent surge to arm the average man and women is because criminals
have guns and will always have guns because they do not follow the law.

So logically removing guns from criminals and removing criminals from society
removes the need to own a gun other than those who collect and for sport.
Which does not include me.

So any laws pushed through now should be directed towards those who are criminals
not law abiding responsible gun owners. This alone would help the average citizen
feel safer without the need to arm.

Godfather.

[Pandora]"So any laws pushed through now should be directed towards those who are criminals
not law abiding responsible gun owners. This alone would help the average citizen
feel safer without the need to arm."

:thumbup:

Godfather.

polaris_x

the ignore function is really great ... i think less threads would be locked ...

you know you're completely out of touch when you think it's ok to market and sell guns to 5 year olds ... that you have lost any sense of reason and that basically anything that might RESTRICT gun ownership is bad ... in none of the scenarios discussed here nor in congress has there been a discussion of an all out ban on guns ... but that is what the pro gun folks keep bringing up ... :fp:

Jason P

If someone juggled chainsaws on a unicycle … for a living … they would not defend letting their five year old kid own a chainsaw, less yet juggling the chainsaw on a unicycle.

And when worst comes to worst, they would not say that letting their kid play Duke Nukem is more irresponsible then letting them cut down a tree with a chainsaw.

But who the hell knows. Maybe the kid is going to be a responsible logger some day.

Hugh Freaking Dillon

pandora wrote:

guns have never saved anyone from harm :? what?
my neighbor is alive because a gun saved him from harm ...

countless stories nationwide everyday

I don't understand why common sense is not with the anti gun people.
The main reason that people own guns is to protect themselves.
The recent surge to arm the average man and women is because criminals
have guns and will always have guns because they do not follow the law.

So logically removing guns from criminals and removing criminals from society
removes the need to own a gun other than those who collect and for sport.
Which does not include me.

So any laws pushed through now should be directed towards those who are criminals
not law abiding responsible gun owners. This alone would help the average citizen
feel safer without the need to arm.

he's saying you can't have it both ways. if you believe that "guns don't kill people, people kill people". then it stands to reason then that you have to believe the inverse:"guns don't save people, people save people".

and your last statement is in direct contractiction to what you've always held dear: "why make more laws since criminals don't follow laws?"

Hugh Freaking Dillon

Jason P wrote:

If someone juggled chainsaws on a unicycle … for a living … they would not defend letting their five year old kid own a chainsaw, less yet juggling the chainsaw on a unicycle.

And when worst comes to worst, they would not say that letting their kid play Duke Nukem is more irresponsible then letting them cut down a tree with a chainsaw.

But who the hell knows. Maybe the kid is going to be a responsible logger some day.

a responsible logger.