Bush's torture admission is a dismal moment for democracy

1234689

Comments

  • OnTheEdgeOnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    did you know that it was the iraqi governmente who hanged saddam, not us? they would never have deposed him nor caught him if we did not pay people to sell him out.



    Yes, I was/am aware of this. Which speaks very loudly to me. They would have never HUNG him if it wasn't for america giving them our backs because they were too afraid of him.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    You supported Sadaam when he was killing and torturing people. But that was just a mistake, right?

    wth are you talking about?

    What am I talking about? I'm taking about the fact America supported Sadaam when he was killing and torturing people in the 1980's and at the end of the first Gulf War. Not everyone regards 9/11 as year zero.
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Terrorists deserve no mercy. Period.

    The U.S is the only country on Earth to have been formally charged with state terrorism by the International Court of Justice. What do you think about that?
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    personally yes I think Saddam had his hand in there some how and I think he helped to fund the attack but thats just my opinion.

    Godfather.

    I think the world was created by a pink toad called Trevor. I also believe Trevor created the world after eating a Big Mac and taking a massive shit on some depleted Uranium left behind on a toilet seat after Scotland invaded Tierra Del Fuego in 1927.

    But that's just my opinion.

    coming from you that sounds about right.

    Godfather.
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    edited November 2010
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    did you know that it was the iraqi governmente who hanged saddam, not us? they would never have deposed him nor caught him if we did not pay people to sell him out.



    Yes, I was/am aware of this. Which speaks very loudly to me. They would have never HUNG him if it wasn't for america giving them our backs because they were too afraid of him.
    Off topic, but just for the record:

    "—Usage note
    Hang has two forms for the past tense and past participle, hanged and hung. The historically older form hanged is now used exclusively in the sense of causing or putting to death: He was sentenced to be hanged by the neck until dead".



    ... somehow, I feel a little empty inside that my 1,500th post wasn't a bit less... y'know... geeky

    ... oh well. :?
    Post edited by wolfamongwolves on
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • OnTheEdgeOnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    Byrnzie wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    You supported Sadaam when he was killing and torturing people. But that was just a mistake, right?

    wth are you talking about?

    What am I talking about? I'm taking about the fact America supported Sadaam when he was killing and torturing people in the 1980's and at the end of the first Gulf War. Not everyone regards 9/11 as year zero.


    IF our government supported Saddam while he was torturing and killing people does not mean that I did.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    as I said no more than you or anybody else on this board but personally yes I think Saddam had his hand in there some how and I think he helped to fund the attack but thats just my opinion.

    Godfather.

    ok ... so based on this ... i think the people of kentucky were responsible for 9/11 ... i've got no evidence whatsoever but i got that feeling ... so, let's just bomb the shit out of kentucky ... :(
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Do you think Iraq was responsible for 9/11?

    as I said no more than you or anybody else on this board but personally yes I think Saddam had his hand in there some how and I think he helped to fund the attack but thats just my opinion.

    Godfather.

    Your opinion is that Sadaam funded the attacks on 9/11? And what do you base your opinion on?

    there is no proof that he did or did not it's just my opinion, what are you looking for ?

    Godfather.
  • OnTheEdgeOnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    edited November 2010
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I can't believe I'm attempting to have a debate with someone who believes in Satan.

    A classic case of pissing in the wind.


    So now you want to attack my beliefs. :roll:

    You're a good debater Byrnzie, and I can tell your a smart person. But as soon as you do not agree with something you turn to anger, accusations and personal attacks......typical liberal.
    Post edited by OnTheEdge on
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    IF our government supported Saddam while he was torturing and killing people does not mean that I did.


    There's no 'If' about it.

    Are you saying that it's wrong for Sadaam to torture and kill Iraqi's but o.k for Americans to kill and torture Iraqi's?
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I can't believe I'm attempting to have a debate with someone who believes in Satan.

    A classic case of pissing in the wind.

    you are debating with people who have been indoctrined that america is about freedom and justice ... they have no concept of history nor america's place in it ... that whatever they do overseas is in the name of freedom and liberty ...
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    as I said no more than you or anybody else on this board but personally yes I think Saddam had his hand in there some how and I think he helped to fund the attack but thats just my opinion.

    Godfather.

    ok ... so based on this ... i think the people of kentucky were responsible for 9/11 ... i've got no evidence whatsoever but i got that feeling ... so, let's just bomb the shit out of kentucky ... :(

    hayyy now your catching on....to what I don't know, your post was an attack on me with no provocation
    this tells me more about you than I need to know,have a nice day.

    Godfather.
  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,200
    Byrnzie wrote:
    My comment was in response to terrorist interrogations, not arms sales to Saddam Hussein. However, we've made our fair share of mistakes. You will never hear me say the United States has a perfect track record on foreign policy.

    By the way, as it relates to the U.N. - how can I take any organization seriously when it appoints Saudi Arabia to a Women's Rights Panel?

    I get it: It's a 'mistake' when you support dictators who kill and torture their own people, but it's o.k for you to kill and torture those same people when those same dictators get a little too independent.

    Think what you want.

    Terrorists deserve no mercy. Period.
    You are aware that there are many ordinary people (in Iraq, for example) who consider the US to be terrorists, right? You are aware that it is a subjective term, right? You are aware that torture is an act of terrorism, and that your ex-president has openly admitted that the US army engaged in these acts under his watch and with his full knowledge, right?

    So you must apply your "Terrorists deserve no mercy. Period." dictum equally to them. Right?
    [/quote]

    I have to agree with you here. Many in the world DO see the Americans as Terriorists with their invasion and occupation of 2 Middle Eastern countries. IF we were to invade a country it should have been Saudi Arabia in that a majority of the 9/11 terriorists were from Saudi Arabia. However they are are friends and we don't attack our friends until they become too independent from our needs and wants. You then become our enemy and your country becomes destined to be destroyed.

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Godfather. wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    Your opinion is that Sadaam funded the attacks on 9/11? And what do you base your opinion on?

    there is no proof that he did or did not it's just my opinion, what are you looking for ?

    Godfather.

    What am I looking for? Some integrity would be nice.

    There's no proof that he didn't, therefore you think he did? That's some real hard logic right there. The same kind of logic that the U.S and British governments used to sell the war to the masses in the first place: 'The weapons inspectors haven't found any WMD's, therefore Sadaam must be hiding them from us and so we should invade Iraq.'
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    as I said no more than you or anybody else on this board but personally yes I think Saddam had his hand in there some how and I think he helped to fund the attack but thats just my opinion.

    Godfather.

    ok ... so based on this ... i think the people of kentucky were responsible for 9/11 ... i've got no evidence whatsoever but i got that feeling ... so, let's just bomb the shit out of kentucky ... :(

    hayyy now your catching on....to what I don't know, your post was an attack on me with no provocation
    this tells me more about you than I need to know,have a nice day.

    Godfather.

    your gonna play this card on this post? ... really!?? ... you should really read what you post on here ...
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    So now you want to attack my beliefs. :roll:

    You're a good debater Byrnzie, and I can tell your a smart person. But as soon as you do not agree with something you turn to anger, accusations and personal attacks......typical liberal.

    I'm not typical anything. And I'm also not angry.
  • OnTheEdgeOnTheEdge Posts: 1,300
    Byrnzie wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    IF our government supported Saddam while he was torturing and killing people does not mean that I did.


    There's no 'If' about it.

    Are you saying that it's wrong for Sadaam to torture and kill Iraqi's but o.k for Americans to kill and torture Iraqi's?


    Show me where I stated that I supported torturing Iraqis. I have questioned waterboarding as torture. Yes, I could be wrong on this. But when somebody is waterboarded 180 times I either question how torturing is it, or KSM is one tough cookie. If we tortured any innocent Iraqi, then yes, I have a problem with that. But everyone is so quick to judge americans when nobody seems to have a problem with the things Saddam has done. If someone was in your house trying to kill you, and I came in and shot him for you, would you call me a murderer?
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    If someone was in your house trying to kill you, and I came in and shot him for you, would you call me a murderer?

    Your analogy is incorrect. You didn't just come into my house and shoot the murderer, you then shot me, my family, and all my neighbours, and then spent the next 6 years wrecking my country.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    Show me where I stated that I supported torturing Iraqis. I have questioned waterboarding as torture. Yes, I could be wrong on this. But when somebody is waterboarded 180 times I either question how torturing is it, or KSM is one tough cookie. If we tortured any innocent Iraqi, then yes, I have a problem with that. But everyone is so quick to judge americans when nobody seems to have a problem with the things Saddam has done. If someone was in your house trying to kill you, and I came in and shot him for you, would you call me a murderer?

    if only you could apply that same logic from the other side ...
  • Hey, g under p,

    would you mind editing your post so it doesn't look like I said what Electric Delta said?! :? Cheers! :D

    (By the way, you make a sage point.)
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • wolfamongwolveswolfamongwolves Posts: 2,414
    edited November 2010
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    ...nobody seems to have a problem with the things Saddam has done...
    I don't think there's anyone suggesting that!

    I think all anyone is saying is - how can the US justify committing acts of torture and terrorism, while simultaneously condemning others' acts of torture and terrorism?

    And, for the record, "What Saddam did was worse than what we did" is not an adequate response.
    Post edited by wolfamongwolves on
    93: Slane
    96: Cork, Dublin
    00: Dublin
    06: London, Dublin
    07: London, Copenhagen, Nijmegen
    09: Manchester, London
    10: Dublin, Belfast, London & Berlin
    11: San José
    12: Isle of Wight, Copenhagen, Ed in Manchester & London x2
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    If lives are at stake, why not extract the information however necessary? It's absurd to put lives in jeopardy because we might hurt someone's "feelings."

    Are you suggesting that using torture is Ok to get info?

    Absolutely.

    Every human being is created with certain rights and dignities endowed to them by God, I believe.

    However, if you WILLINGLY participate in activities meant to take innocent life, and you get caught, you forfeit those dignities. I'm not going to pity the terrorist who wishes to slaughter my fellow countrymen. If they're witholding knowledge which can save innocent life, then waterboard them until they squeal. They've fofeited those rights and those dignities in favor of MURDER.

    I seriously suggest you go back and read Byrzies posts on page 7.

    Do you completely disregard the fact that most admissions as a result of torture are false?
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Everyone interested in the subjects of torture, terrorism, and resistance to colonialism should watch this movie:

    viewtopic.php?f=13&t=136764&p=3091082&hilit=the+battle+of+algiers#p3091082
  • OnTheEdge wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I can't believe I'm attempting to have a debate with someone who believes in Satan.

    A classic case of pissing in the wind.


    So now you want to attack my beliefs. :roll:

    You're a good debater Byrnzie, and I can tell your a smart person. But as soon as you do not agree with something you turn to anger, accusations and personal attacks......typical liberal.

    Yes, because heaven knows conservatives have done nothing but take the moral high ground since Obama took office.

    Unless you consider the fact that Obama gets 4x the number of death threats Bush did to be an example of disagreeing with someone peacefully and calmly lol
    And I listen for the voice inside my head... nothing. I'll do this one myself.
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    g under p wrote:
    I have to agree with you here. Many in the world DO see the Americans as Terriorists with their invasion and occupation of 2 Middle Eastern countries. IF we were to invade a country it should have been Saudi Arabia in that a majority of the 9/11 terriorists were from Saudi Arabia. However they are are friends and we don't attack our friends until they become too independent from our needs and wants. You then become our enemy and your country becomes destined to be destroyed.

    Peace

    I agree. Not enough people in the US are able to think for one minute that we might be considered terrorists in some circles. This should be of utmost concern because we are creating a whole new batch of people who 'hate' us and are going to grow up with the desire to retaliate because thier families have been torn apart in the middle east.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    I agree. Not enough people in the US are able to think for one minute that we might be considered terrorists in some circles. This should be of utmost concern because we are creating a whole new batch of people who 'hate' us and are going to grow up with the desire to retaliate because thier families have been torn apart in the middle east.

    exactly! ... i think if people read even the last 30 years of american foreign policy ... it would shed some light as to why the US is one of the most if not the most hated country in the world ...
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    polaris_x wrote:
    I agree. Not enough people in the US are able to think for one minute that we might be considered terrorists in some circles. This should be of utmost concern because we are creating a whole new batch of people who 'hate' us and are going to grow up with the desire to retaliate because thier families have been torn apart in the middle east.

    exactly! ... i think if people read even the last 30 years of american foreign policy ... it would shed some light as to why the US is one of the most if not the most hated country in the world ...

    and yet they come here any way possible why is that ?

    Godfather.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    and yet they come here any way possible why is that ?

    Godfather.

    many people come from abject poverty ... many come from places where they earn $10 a day but would gladly stay for $15 ... many of these places have had their local economy affected by US intervention ...

    if you look up the charts ... most documented immigrants to the US come from mexico and central america ... it's not like there is a huge onslaught of people from developed first world countries ...

    in any case - people need to know what US foreign policy has done around the world before they cast judgement about people and cultures they know nothing about ...
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,497
    cajunkiwi wrote:
    OnTheEdge wrote:
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I can't believe I'm attempting to have a debate with someone who believes in Satan.

    A classic case of pissing in the wind.


    So now you want to attack my beliefs. :roll:

    You're a good debater Byrnzie, and I can tell your a smart person. But as soon as you do not agree with something you turn to anger, accusations and personal attacks......typical liberal.

    Yes, because heaven knows conservatives have done nothing but take the moral high ground since Obama took office.

    Unless you consider the fact that Obama gets 4x the number of death threats Bush did to be an example of disagreeing with someone peacefully and calmly lol

    Less crazies...they are just calling more. Repub. crazies work and can pay phone bills so they have more access. ;)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    and yet they come here any way possible why is that ?

    Godfather.

    many people come from abject poverty ... many come from places where they earn $10 a day but would gladly stay for $15 ... many of these places have had their local economy affected by US intervention ...

    if you look up the charts ... most documented immigrants to the US come from mexico and central america ... it's not like there is a huge onslaught of people from developed first world countries ...

    in any case - people need to know what US foreign policy has done around the world before they cast judgement about people and cultures they know nothing about ...
    now why would people need to know things like THAT???

    lol, i think if people did a little self examination of their own country's foreign policy they would agree with you, me, byrnzie, JP, wolfamomgwolves, gunderp and others. most of them arguing for the virtuousness of america have proven to be ignorant of many of the facts that we have read and posted here.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sign In or Register to comment.