the death penalty

chadwick

wolfamongwolves wrote:

JonnyPistachio wrote:

ed243421 wrote:

johnny p

please check out the first post in this thread

Whats your point? Nobody in here is taking the side of a murderer. thats ludicrous. I cant see where you deduced that from.

I think he's pointing out that he's the original poster, and that therefore that means he's up to speed. Clearly, he's not as he keeps making this tired and utterly baseless point, no matter how many times what we post proves that it's ludicrous. Some people have just decided they're right, and no facts, evidence or stronger argument will convince them otherwise.



"I will never apologise... I don't care what the facts are." GHWB

hey championship
same goes for you, Sir

you have decided you are right
have you not?

im pretty sure we all have
i know i am right... fact



you are right are you not?

ajedigecko

speaking of primates killing for "no reasons".......when you get time, look into the process of male lions eliminating the blood line of the previous pride leader.

catefrances

ed243421 wrote:

...
one cannot murder a murderer
one can only execute a murderer

by law murder is killing with intent to cause death. therefore, execution which is killling with intent to cause the death of an individual is murder. state sanctioned murder is still murder. pretending otherwise is just semantic folly.

chadwick

ajedigecko wrote:

speaking of primates killing for "no reasons".......when you get time, look into the process of male lions eliminating the blood line of the previous pride leader.

that too

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

hey championship
same goes for you, Sir

you have decided you are right
have you not?

im pretty sure we all have
i know i am right... fact



you are right are you not?

can something subjective be fact?

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

ed243421 wrote:

...
one cannot murder a murderer
one can only execute a murderer

by law murder is killing with intent to cause death. therefore, execution which is killling with intent to cause the death of an individual is murder. state sanctioned murder is still murder. pretending otherwise is just semantic folly.

i agree with you both
it is a unique situation

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

hey championship
same goes for you, Sir

you have decided you are right
have you not?

im pretty sure we all have
i know i am right... fact



you are right are you not?

can something subjective be fact?

i suppose so
in this thread anyway

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

ed243421 wrote:

...
one cannot murder a murderer
one can only execute a murderer

by law murder is killing with intent to cause death. therefore, execution which is killling with intent to cause the death of an individual is murder. state sanctioned murder is still murder. pretending otherwise is just semantic folly.

i agree with you both
it is a unique situation

you cant agree with both of us chad. we are diametrically opposed. unless of course you agree execution is murder but justified murder. is that the case here?

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

chimpanzees murder young that is not their own. and they kill when an 'alien' chimp wanders into their turf. is that killing for no reason i wonder? :think:

nasty little shit those chimps

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

hey championship
same goes for you, Sir

you have decided you are right
have you not?

im pretty sure we all have
i know i am right... fact



you are right are you not?

can something subjective be fact?

i suppose so
in this thread anyway

well my father always told me a fact is a lie and a half so...

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

you cant agree with both of us chad. we are diametrically opposed. unless of course you agree execution is murder but justified murder. is that the case here?

i would say yes
sure its murder
but who cares?
i dont

seriously

it's the same as defending your family from a home intruder @ 2am.
intruder inflicts harm... intruder gets shot

its like that but drug through the courts and prison time
it should be simple
when found guilty... (in some cases it is immediate)
pretty much within 24 hrs of the guilty judge's hammer knocking home
last supper, fucker...

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

you cant agree with both of us chad. we are diametrically opposed. unless of course you agree execution is murder but justified murder. is that the case here?

i would say yes
sure its murder
but who cares?
i dont

seriously

it's the same as defending your family from a home intruder @ 2am.
intruder inflicts harm... intruder gets shot

its like that but drug through the courts and prison time
it should be simple
when found guilty... (in some cases it is immediate)
pretty much within 24 hrs of the guilty judge's hammer knocking home
last supper, fucker...

but not all home invaders mean to do your family harm. they come for your stuff and then leave. what if you kill someone who had no intention of causing injury to your family? and no im not saying you should wait until the intruder has a knife at the throat of your child. im just curious how one makes that decision to end a life solely because someone has intruded on their property.

OnTheEdge

JonnyPistachio wrote:

Electric_Delta wrote:

I do. How about:

*No punishment for anything!
*Enjoy life! Live without consequences!
Or maybe...
*Anarchy is the best way!

haha, very funny. :roll:

Actually, The other side of this discussion that gets kinda lost (maybe it was discussed back on page 37b...)
is whether or not you think the death Pnalty is worse that living in maximum security prison forever for someone like this kid who just axed that girl and her daughter.

Personally, I'd take the DP if I had to chose. I feel its the easy way out.

No way!! Do you ever watch TLC or the Discovery Channel. They have shows on Death Row where these selfish cowards fight for the rest of their lives trying to get off death row. They can dish it out but they can't take it. They have no remorse for these victims while they are carrying out these crimes, then once they're on death row they expect sympathy for themselves....fuck-em.

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

you cant agree with both of us chad. we are diametrically opposed. unless of course you agree execution is murder but justified murder. is that the case here?

i would say yes
sure its murder
but who cares?
i dont

seriously

it's the same as defending your family from a home intruder @ 2am.
intruder inflicts harm... intruder gets shot

its like that but drug through the courts and prison time
it should be simple
when found guilty... (in some cases it is immediate)
pretty much within 24 hrs of the guilty judge's hammer knocking home
last supper, fucker...

but not all home invaders mean to do your family harm. they come for your stuff and then leave. what if you kill someone who had no intention of causing injury to your family? and no im not saying you should wait until the intruder has a knife at the throat of your child. im just curious how one makes that decision to end a life solely because someone has intruded on their property.

i did say intruder inflicts harm, yes?

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

chimpanzees murder young that is not their own. and they kill when an 'alien' chimp wanders into their turf. is that killing for no reason i wonder? :think:

nasty little shit those chimps

so much like humans.. or should that be the other way round?? :think:

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

but not all home invaders mean to do your family harm. they come for your stuff and then leave. what if you kill someone who had no intention of causing injury to your family? and no im not saying you should wait until the intruder has a knife at the throat of your child. im just curious how one makes that decision to end a life solely because someone has intruded on their property.

i did say intruder inflicts harm, yes?

some consider stealing and B&E as inflicting harm. so im just making sure. same page and all that.

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

chimpanzees murder young that is not their own. and they kill when an 'alien' chimp wanders into their turf. is that killing for no reason i wonder? :think:

nasty little shit those chimps

so much like humans.. or should that be the other way round?? :think:

that one chimp mangled some lady and was attacking ppl
ripped some lady's face off
attacked a cop
cop shot the chimp

chimps or humans
humans or chimps
what was that one movie
planet of the apes? :think:

OnTheEdge

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

you cant agree with both of us chad. we are diametrically opposed. unless of course you agree execution is murder but justified murder. is that the case here?

i would say yes
sure its murder
but who cares?
i dont

seriously

it's the same as defending your family from a home intruder @ 2am.
intruder inflicts harm... intruder gets shot

its like that but drug through the courts and prison time
it should be simple
when found guilty... (in some cases it is immediate)
pretty much within 24 hrs of the guilty judge's hammer knocking home
last supper, fucker...

but not all home invaders mean to do your family harm. they come for your stuff and then leave. what if you kill someone who had no intention of causing injury to your family? and no im not saying you should wait until the intruder has a knife at the throat of your child. im just curious how one makes that decision to end a life solely because someone has intruded on their property.

You see the little girl in my pic? She is my world, my life. I would give my life away in a heartbeat to save hers. If a pedophile murdering rapist ever entered my house in the middle of the night, I would put a 9mm in his back while he's trying to run away. Will I be sentenced? In this politicaly correct country....probably. But he would never come back to my house..........or anyone elses for that matter. He would never have the opportunity to harm anyone ever again. And if he's just there to rob me? Sucks to be him....how was I to know. You break into someones home in the middle of the night, you have the right to be shot.

chadwick

catefrances wrote:

chadwick wrote:

catefrances wrote:

but not all home invaders mean to do your family harm. they come for your stuff and then leave. what if you kill someone who had no intention of causing injury to your family? and no im not saying you should wait until the intruder has a knife at the throat of your child. im just curious how one makes that decision to end a life solely because someone has intruded on their property.

i did say intruder inflicts harm, yes?

some consider stealing and B&E as inflicting harm. so im just making sure. same page and all that.

inflicting harm
injurying someone
force them into some situation they do not agree with
a home invasion
hostage in your own home

happens a lot
domestic violence
breaking & entering
holy shit

more cops are injured during household calls than any other
pretty bad stuff inside some homes
dungeons in some cases

this is when the death sentence comes into play, yes/no?

catefrances

chadwick wrote:

that one chimp mangled some lady and was attacking ppl
ripped some lady's face off
attacked a cop
cop shot the chimp

chimps or humans
humans or chimps
what was that one movie
planet of the apes? :think:

and interestingly in planet of the apes it was the gorillas as the muscle when of the three primates depicted in that film, the chimpanzee is the most vicious. but of course gorillas look the part and so theyre given the part. damn hollywood. anyhoo...