This is what Fox News and Keith Obermann and the like have brought us. Nice work.
no that is what this forum has demonstrated time and again...
i only know most of you people by your words and posts, and those words and posts give that impression a lot of the time...
It's the jumping to outrage. It's the shock and awe. It's the with us or you're a racist, hate the poor, kick puppies, steal candy from little babies....seems to me you all have turned into GW.
Ya, and back then we could buy niggers for just a little silver...and all these stupid bitches couldn't vote. Why do things have to change??? At least they'll never get my guns. :roll:
Good thing the first Republican ever elected president freed the slaves. The Democrats only had 9 elected presidents to do it before Lincoln.
Your pont (as racist as it is) has no relevance to the conversation. The words "slave" or "slavery" do not exist in the Constitution. The constitution was put in place to limit central power, and keep the power with the states and the people. Basically to stop someone like Obama.
Where did I ever say that? People are giving him crap because he doesn't want to lose his plan. They are labeling him as selfish.
Laziness was never brought up until now. Who is making the generalities?
where in ANY of the house or senate bills does it say "you are going to lose your coverage with this new plan"???
obama has said on the record several times that "if you like your plan you do not have to change a thing".
Obama says alot of things. Like transparancy in his administration, no pork barrel politics, and plenty of time for the public to review legislation before passing. Seriously, don't ever trust a politician, do your own research. Regardless of political party, what has the government ever done to make you think that they will be successful at running healthcare?
So, you have to ask yourself if you even beleive what Obama says about Health care, given his track record of lying. Ok, so say you do believe him. Well in this case he actually is not lying. The bills don't explicitly state you will lose your coverage with this new plan. Doing so would be stupid. It's just understanding the reality of what would happen if there was a "low cost" government option. It would only be low cost because it would be subsidized by the tax payers, not because of competition. The low cost option would not allow the your current insurance provider to compete. When they go out of business, you would have to switch to the government plan. The quality of care would also decrease.
"FF, I've heard the droning about the Sawx being the baby dolls. Yeah, I get it, you guys invented baseball and suffered forever. I get it." -JearlPam0925
Comments
It's the jumping to outrage. It's the shock and awe. It's the with us or you're a racist, hate the poor, kick puppies, steal candy from little babies....seems to me you all have turned into GW.
Amen to that!
Good thing the first Republican ever elected president freed the slaves. The Democrats only had 9 elected presidents to do it before Lincoln.
Your pont (as racist as it is) has no relevance to the conversation. The words "slave" or "slavery" do not exist in the Constitution. The constitution was put in place to limit central power, and keep the power with the states and the people. Basically to stop someone like Obama.
Obama says alot of things. Like transparancy in his administration, no pork barrel politics, and plenty of time for the public to review legislation before passing. Seriously, don't ever trust a politician, do your own research. Regardless of political party, what has the government ever done to make you think that they will be successful at running healthcare?
So, you have to ask yourself if you even beleive what Obama says about Health care, given his track record of lying. Ok, so say you do believe him. Well in this case he actually is not lying. The bills don't explicitly state you will lose your coverage with this new plan. Doing so would be stupid. It's just understanding the reality of what would happen if there was a "low cost" government option. It would only be low cost because it would be subsidized by the tax payers, not because of competition. The low cost option would not allow the your current insurance provider to compete. When they go out of business, you would have to switch to the government plan. The quality of care would also decrease.