Here’s what the dinosaur Bernie thinks Dems should run on while forgetting that they had most of this with Brandon in office and Kamala running. Yet, ‘Murican voters rejected it in favour of authoritarianism and getting rid of “the other” and the “woke” lifestyle. So, what do Dems run on? Beating your partner behind closed doors? Exporting all blacks back to Africa? Only allowing white people to hold jobs and be educated? What’s the big ticket issue of the day that is going to attract racist indies and non-voters? Canceling Ivy League education?
What the Democrats have to absolutely make clear is this: we’re going to take on the billionaire class. They’re going to start paying their fair share of taxes. We’re going to have healthcare for all people as a human right. We’re going to have a strong childcare system that every American can afford. We’re going to make public colleges and universities tuition-free. We’re going to create millions of jobs transforming our energy system away from fossil fuel. We’re going to build housing – boy, housing is like it is here, just a huge crisis. We’re going to build millions of units of low-income and affordable housing. Do Democrats say that? No.”
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives.
it is the misconception that anything to the left of montana is too extreme and too liberal for americans.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
While a certain poster goes on and on about how Brandon deceived all of us, despite being killed and a robot likeness taking his place, and how higher education and colleges and universities with endowments are bankrupting ‘Murica, COOTWH wants to scrap the debt limit and nary a word or criticism. Brandon and Kamala must be the “shadow government” pulling COOTWH’s strings, eh?
Curious if anything bad regarding Newsom was self-inflicted compared to what the GOP is trashing him about?
newsome is hosting steve bannon and newt gingrich on his podcast and is attacking democrats, as if he would not need their votes in a primary.
i get that candidates moderate in a general election, but not 2 years before the primary. newsome, if he keeps giving a platform to the biggest shitbirds in our politics, is not going to fare well outside of california.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
Curious if anything bad regarding Newsom was self-inflicted compared to what the GOP is trashing him about?
newsome is hosting steve bannon and newt gingrich on his podcast and is attacking democrats, as if he would not need their votes in a primary.
i get that candidates moderate in a general election, but not 2 years before the primary. newsome, if he keeps giving a platform to the biggest shitbirds in our politics, is not going to fare well outside of california.
I'm fine with him hosting them as long as he holds their feet to the fire on topics they support that are controversial. These conversations should happen, but if it's just to pile on and try to make some plea that the rhetoric on the right isn't toxic, then yeah, that's not productive.
Curious if anything bad regarding Newsom was self-inflicted compared to what the GOP is trashing him about?
Not really....they will just tag him as the biggest liberal in the world and try to trash CA and make all of its shortcomings his fault. High taxes, liberal policies, etc.
He's definitely laying the tracks for 2026. He's publicly starting to get a bit more strict with the homeless issue (which is badly needed).
I am totally ok with him dancing with Bannon and the other chud. The more exposure he can get with repubs the better because he is likeable.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Curious if anything bad regarding Newsom was self-inflicted compared to what the GOP is trashing him about?
Not really....they will just tag him as the biggest liberal in the world and try to trash CA and make all of its shortcomings his fault. High taxes, liberal policies, etc.
He's definitely laying the tracks for 2026. He's publicly starting to get a bit more strict with the homeless issue (which is badly needed).
I am totally ok with him dancing with Bannon and the other chud. The more exposure he can get with repubs the better because he is likeable.
wait until trumpworld sicks kim g his ex wife on him. all that dirty laundry is going to come out.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
Curious if anything bad regarding Newsom was self-inflicted compared to what the GOP is trashing him about?
Not really....they will just tag him as the biggest liberal in the world and try to trash CA and make all of its shortcomings his fault. High taxes, liberal policies, etc.
He's definitely laying the tracks for 2026. He's publicly starting to get a bit more strict with the homeless issue (which is badly needed).
I am totally ok with him dancing with Bannon and the other chud. The more exposure he can get with repubs the better because he is likeable.
wait until trumpworld sicks kim g his ex wife on him. all that dirty laundry is going to come out.
You mean when the French Laundry scandel gets aired adnauseum?
Let's take a test. What's worse in your eyes Lerx:
Biden's "handlers" hiding his incapacities or
Trump eliciting a bribe for a free plane that goes to his library after his term Trump pushing his coins while his family cuts deals in the Middle East Trump jailing and deporting people without due process, defying the courts Trump cutting HIV funding to third world nations Trump slashing medicaid to the least among us Trump damaging everyone's retirement to the tune of down 3% since his tariff nonsense began Trump attacking Harvard and eliminating student visas across the board (no matter your country of origin) Trump slashing the NOAA Trump trying to eliminate FEMA with no replacement Trump threatening to suspend Habeas Corpus
I could go on and on. Yet, every one of your posts is about Biden WHO HAS NO FUCKING POWER. Can we find one criticism of Trump or his policies this year? Is there one by you?
C'mon man stop with the whataboutism. I'm being sarcastic here just in case anyone wouldn't know
Is that trashing, though? I would think it's a normal campaign topic. Even in a Dem primary it could come up. 🤷♂️
its kim g we are talking about. it is a distinct possibility that she will lie about their marriage. she was engaged to trump jr so you know she has no soul.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
So what do you propose Democrats do? Going forward? You’ve stated your case on how they screwed the election up you keep harping everything that happened! When will you move forward
It’s hysterical that this forum will go on and on for years for the obnoxious shit that Trump does. But when Democrats screw up, lie to us, we want to move on within six months? The absurdity around here is stunning
unless you know the who, what where when why …we were railroaded by Biden‘s team (or was dem leadership involved?) I’m not sure why anyone would be thinking of moving on right now
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
So what do you propose Democrats do? Going forward? You’ve stated your case on how they screwed the election up you keep harping everything that happened! When will you move forward
It’s hysterical that this forum will go on and on for years for the obnoxious shit that Trump does. But when Democrats screw up, lie to us, we want to move on within six months? The absurdity around here is stunning
unless you know the who, what where when why …we were railroaded by Biden‘s team (or was dem leadership involved?) I’m not sure why anyone would be thinking of moving on right now
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
So what do you propose Democrats do? Going forward? You’ve stated your case on how they screwed the election up you keep harping everything that happened! When will you move forward
It’s hysterical that this forum will go on and on for years for the obnoxious shit that Trump does. But when Democrats screw up, lie to us, we want to move on within six months? The absurdity around here is stunning
unless you know the who, what where when why …we were railroaded by Biden‘s team (or was dem leadership involved?) I’m not sure why anyone would be thinking of moving on right now
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
So what do you propose Democrats do? Going forward? You’ve stated your case on how they screwed the election up you keep harping everything that happened! When will you move forward
It’s hysterical that this forum will go on and on for years for the obnoxious shit that Trump does. But when Democrats screw up, lie to us, we want to move on within six months? The absurdity around here is stunning
unless you know the who, what where when why …we were railroaded by Biden‘s team (or was dem leadership involved?) I’m not sure why anyone would be thinking of moving on right now
this fucking guy.
White grievance is a hell of a drug
so is victimhood.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere.
“You’re 86’ed!” Cut off from being served and asked to leave or escorted out.
”Hey, 86 the filet with hollandaise.” Ran out of tonight’s special.
This term was being used in the 80’s when I worked in resort bars and restaurants. But the “woke” cancel culture of today has made it a reference to assassination of Herr Leader, all give praise to, COOTWH. Thin, thin, skins.
Does anyone remember the images of Brandon hogtied in the back of a pick up? Didn’t think so.
They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example.
Like, how do you combat that?
By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?
More from Silver….
“ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last weekthat found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men
“How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.
How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles.
You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives.
Democrats need to learn how to appeal to moderate voters to win back the Senate and presidency. We were told that Biden was the only man capable of beating Donald Trump so we all need to step in line. Then we learned the truth about Biden‘s condition which, according to Bob Woodward, was kept secret for over a year.
Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
Comments
What the Democrats have to absolutely make clear is this: we’re going to take on the billionaire class. They’re going to start paying their fair share of taxes. We’re going to have healthcare for all people as a human right. We’re going to have a strong childcare system that every American can afford. We’re going to make public colleges and universities tuition-free. We’re going to create millions of jobs transforming our energy system away from fossil fuel. We’re going to build housing – boy, housing is like it is here, just a huge crisis. We’re going to build millions of units of low-income and affordable housing. Do Democrats say that? No.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/jun/04/saying-trump-is-dangerous-is-not-enough-bernie-sanders-on-biden-billionaires-and-why-the-democrats-failedLibtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
i get that candidates moderate in a general election, but not 2 years before the primary. newsome, if he keeps giving a platform to the biggest shitbirds in our politics, is not going to fare well outside of california.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
He's definitely laying the tracks for 2026. He's publicly starting to get a bit more strict with the homeless issue (which is badly needed).
I am totally ok with him dancing with Bannon and the other chud. The more exposure he can get with repubs the better because he is likeable.
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
1996; 9/28 New York
1997: 11/14 Oakland, 11/15 Oakland
1998: 7/5 Dallas, 7/7 Albuquerque, 7/8 Phoenix, 7/10 San Diego, 7/11 Las Vegas
2000: 10/17 Dallas
2003: 4/3 OKC
2012: 11/17 Tulsa(EV), 11/18 Tulsa(EV)
2013: 11/16 OKC
2014: 10/8 Tulsa
2022: 9/20 OKC
2023: 9/13 Ft Worth, 9/15 Ft Worth
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
also this guy - why are we moving on *this* 2024 stuff?
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Right on. Below is a partial lyric from John Lennon's "Instant Karma". Very apropos.
There are no kings inside the gates of eden
”Hey, 86 the filet with hollandaise.” Ran out of tonight’s special.
This term was being used in the 80’s when I worked in resort bars and restaurants. But the “woke” cancel culture of today has made it a reference to assassination of Herr Leader, all give praise to, COOTWH. Thin, thin, skins.
Does anyone remember the images of Brandon hogtied in the back of a pick up? Didn’t think so.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©