Democrats

Options
1626365676896

Comments

  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,538
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
  • static111
    static111 Posts: 5,064
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
    Thin skinned grievance porn.  The people who love insulting others can’t take a joke, hard to believe I know.
    Scio me nihil scire

    There are no kings inside the gates of eden
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,499
    So many dopes think 86 means assassinate. Just the dumbest people. 
  • RunIntoTheRain
    RunIntoTheRain Texas Posts: 1,032
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
    That's what it means to me too
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,005
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
    “You’re 86’ed!” Cut off from being served and asked to leave or escorted out.

    ”Hey, 86 the filet with hollandaise.” Ran out of tonight’s special.

    This term was being used in the 80’s when I worked in resort bars and restaurants. But the “woke” cancel culture of today has made it a reference to assassination of Herr Leader, all give praise to, COOTWH. Thin, thin, skins.

    Does anyone remember the images of Brandon hogtied in the back of a pick up? Didn’t think so.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,449
    shecky said:
    Well, this didn't take long.



    Right on. Below is a partial lyric from John Lennon's "Instant Karma". Very apropos. 

    86'd means being removed, not assassinated. but dopes gonna dope. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,810
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
    Yup.  This is just political theater by bad actors.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    edited June 6
    shecky said:
    Well, this didn't take long.



    Right on. Below is a partial lyric from John Lennon's "Instant Karma". Very apropos. 

    Isn’t it awesome when social media takes aim at common citizens, like teachers, and they are forced to resign?  That must be very satisfying to you. 
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,542
    mrussel1 said:
    shecky said:
    Well, this didn't take long.



    Right on. Below is a partial lyric from John Lennon's "Instant Karma". Very apropos. 

    Isn’t it awesome when social media takes aim at common citizens, like teachers, and they are forced to resign?  That must be very satisfying to you. 
    It’s a Republican trait hatred and evil 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,813
    They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example. 

    Like, how do you combat that? 

    By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers  point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?




    More from Silver….

    “ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last week that found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men

    “How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.


    How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles. 

    You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
    I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives. 

    Democrats need to learn how to appeal to moderate voters to win back the Senate and presidency. We were told that Biden was the only man capable of beating Donald Trump so we all need to step in line. Then we learned the truth about Biden‘s condition which, according to Bob Woodward, was kept secret for over a year.

    Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,538
    When I hear 86’d I think of the restaurant context and getting kicked out of somewhere. 
    “You’re 86’ed!” Cut off from being served and asked to leave or escorted out.

    ”Hey, 86 the filet with hollandaise.” Ran out of tonight’s special.

    This term was being used in the 80’s when I worked in resort bars and restaurants. But the “woke” cancel culture of today has made it a reference to assassination of Herr Leader, all give praise to, COOTWH. Thin, thin, skins.

    Does anyone remember the images of Brandon hogtied in the back of a pick up? Didn’t think so.
    Guy in a nearby town did even better and has one of those Brandon hogtied wraps on the back of his…cybertruck. 
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,499
    edited June 6
    They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example. 

    Like, how do you combat that? 

    By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers  point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?




    More from Silver….

    “ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last week that found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men

    “How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.


    How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles. 

    You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
    I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives. 
    Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
    Aren't the answers to your questions self evident?

    again, you're hammering on this is incredibly tedious. 
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,499
    Guess what. The way DC works is the same people are generally always around. 
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,005
    Was Brandon on the ballot in 2024? I some how missed that.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,499
    Imagine living through 2024 and still asking the questions Who What When Where Why about covering for Biden's decline. To say nothing about living in America and expecting a bunch of people being held truly accountable 


  • Lerxst1992
    Lerxst1992 Posts: 7,813
    They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example. 

    Like, how do you combat that? 

    By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers  point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?




    More from Silver….

    “ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last week that found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men

    “How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.


    How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles. 

    You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
    I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives. 
    Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
    Aren't the answers to your questions self evident?

    again, you're hammering on this is incredibly tedious. 

    Ironically, someone earlier this week posted about a book written by a Biden operative, …”look at her. She’s leaving the Democratic Party. What a hero.” (Implied).  YouTube is flooded with misinformation and lies spread by that woman in the year leading up to Biden‘s retirement. I’m not sure what news you’re following, but I’m not aware of any accountability from the Democratic Party other than this. It’s great they seemingly pushed her out, but she is still putting out misinformation and I’m not sure we have the full story who else lied and forced Harris on us without a vote.

    tagline for her book “ . “In an era of disinformation, misinformation, the regressiveness of social policy, what we are seeing currently right now, what I have decided to do, and I really have thought long and hard about this, is to follow my own compass.”

    She was the one lying…democrats cry about democracy but in reality really don’t care.

    if I’m taking away from The fun from all the taco jokes and more about Trump for your enjoyment that are posted here, I sincerely apologize for that.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,012
    i just read israel is about to dissolve parliament. i wonder how this is the democrats' fault.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Tim Simmons
    Tim Simmons Posts: 9,499
    edited June 6
    They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example. 

    Like, how do you combat that? 

    By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers  point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?




    More from Silver….

    “ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last week that found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men

    “How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.


    How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles. 

    You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
    I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives. 
    Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
    Aren't the answers to your questions self evident?

    again, you're hammering on this is incredibly tedious. 

    Ironically, someone earlier this week posted about a book written by a Biden operative, …”look at her. She’s leaving the Democratic Party. What a hero.” (Implied).  YouTube is flooded with misinformation and lies spread by that woman in the year leading up to Biden‘s retirement. I’m not sure what news you’re following, but I’m not aware of any accountability from the Democratic Party other than this. It’s great they seemingly pushed her out, but she is still putting out misinformation and I’m not sure we have the full story who else lied and forced Harris on us without a vote.

    tagline for her book “ . “In an era of disinformation, misinformation, the regressiveness of social policy, what we are seeing currently right now, what I have decided to do, and I really have thought long and hard about this, is to follow my own compass.”

    She was the one lying…democrats cry about democracy but in reality really don’t care.

    if I’m taking away from The fun from all the taco jokes and more about Trump for your enjoyment that are posted here, I sincerely apologize for that.
    It just seems like your pleas here and in other posts are wrapped in a naiveté about the culture of politics and DC. Yeah it would be great to hold those responsible permanently responsible (a culture of cancel if you will), but thats not the way its ever worked in DC. 

    For the most part politicians and their staff are self serving. Both parties. You keep demanding accountability from a town that has very little unless other people can climb on someones back to reach a higher rung. 


    I mean if you want the WHOs, literally just get a list of Biden's campaign officers and his staff at the WH. There there are your fucking names to hold responsible. Don't vote for them or the candidates they work for. If its the WHY. Its because they want jobs and they don't want the opposition to win. The WHEN? Fucking always. They serve to protect their candidate. Whether is a gaffe or whether its senility. Anything in pursuit of keeping a job. Its all very self evident and this grinding on some principle that Dems, more than anybody else, need to be held accountable while they run fucking nothing is whats getting tedious.


    Post edited by Tim Simmons on
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    They are losing men because one party says ‘men be better and step up’ and the other is saying, ‘hey be your unrestrained self and do/say what you want’ and then prove that being leading by that same example. 

    Like, how do you combat that? 

    By offering voters something they might appeal to them? The problem is democrats are inside this bubble. The first few other replies, picture of an older R voter with their gun toting anti vaxxer. The exact opposite of what Silvers  point was, and something about a boxer…. Dems are not appealing to a large segment of voters, but it possibly can’t be their fault?




    More from Silver….

    “ I know it might not seem related at first, Carrie, but I’m thinking about your question in the context of the debate Democrats are having about how to win back young men. (Gen Z men actually voted majority Trump last year.) One Democratic group, for instance, recently proposed a $20 million initiative called “Speaking With American Men”. Adding fuel to the fire is the Catalist report I discussed last week that found an expanding gender gap, especially among young voters and Black and Latino men. In fact, essentially all of the decline that Harris experienced relative to Biden came from men

    “How does this relate to the River and the Village? For those who haven’t read On the Edge, the Village is my term for basically the progressive establishment, which is consensus-driven and risk-averse rather than individualistic. Its quintessential institutions are Harvard and the New York Times, but this attitude is also very much reflected in Democratic political campaigns. Conversely, the River is for analytical, contrarian, risk-seeking types: think Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Las Vegas. Until fairly recently, the River mostly saw itself as being apolitical or part of a third, vaguely libertarian-ish “Grey Tribe”. But a faction of the River — not all of it by any means, but a prominent faction associated with people like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen — has become heavily invested in the conservative political movement over the past few years.


    How should the dems respond is a reasonable question, but it starts with the question of why are people drawn to the republican message of anti-feminism, anti equal access, the politicization of gender, and the promotion of outdated, rigid gender roles. 

    You are trying to understand why moderates and independents would not consider voting for Democrats, as they see the Democrats as extreme, by looking at the extreme from the right? This makes absolutely no sense.
    I’m raising the question as to what the appeal of republicans is, as opposed to blaming the democrats for making them vote republican. And about half the population views both parties as too extreme, so another question is since the dems are mostly moderate, how did that perception take hold? The answer most likely lies in social media and the right’s grasp on misinformation and false narratives. 

    Democrats need to learn how to appeal to moderate voters to win back the Senate and presidency. We were told that Biden was the only man capable of beating Donald Trump so we all need to step in line. Then we learned the truth about Biden‘s condition which, according to Bob Woodward, was kept secret for over a year.

    Without learning the who what where when or why, the same people will be around to fuck up future elections for Democrats. And the sheep don’t care
    He did beat Trump.  You were "told" something, and it turned out to be true.  What a conspiracy.  
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,394
    edited June 6
    Reposting anything from liBS of tiQtoQ is like reposting aleQs jonez and fuQer Qarlson