The coronavirus
Comments
- 
            F Me In The Brain said:It is like eating eggs being good or bad for you...different study different day.
This is great news if true, it would greatly impact the way things are dealt with moving forward
Oh for sure. It's hard to know what to believe anymore. But yeah, if this is true that would be a game changer.0 - 
            Literally the exact opposite of what they’ve been saying all along. Unbelievable.0
 - 
            So the takeaways are to stay away from people with fevers, that are coughing and sneezing and you should be in good shape. If you’re sick, stay home. All seems pretty simple. What am I missing?0
 - 
            That they will change their minds in about a week?
                        The love he receives is the love that is saved0 - 
            
Amen!! Can’t keep up. LolF Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
0 - 
            F Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
Probably. From the article: "More research and data are needed to "truly answer" the question of whether the coronavirus can spread widely through asymptomatic carriers, Van Kerkhove added"I know we like hard, unwavering answers but you're going to get evolving / changing findings. That's science for you. But this doesn't mean the earlier evidence was some sort of conspiracy against Trump or capitalism.
1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 - 
            
No, but it was a Deep State plot to take down Team Trump Treason after the Russia, Russia, Russia and Impeachment hoaxes failed.OnWis97 said:F Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
Probably. From the article: "More research and data are needed to "truly answer" the question of whether the coronavirus can spread widely through asymptomatic carriers, Van Kerkhove added"I know we like hard, unwavering answers but you're going to get evolving / changing findings. That's science for you. But this doesn't mean the earlier evidence was some sort of conspiracy against Trump or capitalism.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            
I'm not a scientist or medical expert, so maybe this is how things go in the world of novel viruses. That said, as a layman, it is incredible to me that certain parts of this pandemic have literally done 180 degree turns in the matter of a few short weeks or months. These are topics that the "experts" announced with conviction, too. They said flat out that this virus was transmitted by asymptomatic carriers. Not only that, but that the transmission by asymptomatic carriers could be one of the biggest contributors to the spread of the virus. Now they say it cannot be spread by asymptomatic carriers. That's a pretty big one to get wrong, if they did. Maybe should have held tight on announcing to the world that it was spread that way.OnWis97 said:F Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
Probably. From the article: "More research and data are needed to "truly answer" the question of whether the coronavirus can spread widely through asymptomatic carriers, Van Kerkhove added"I know we like hard, unwavering answers but you're going to get evolving / changing findings. That's science for you. But this doesn't mean the earlier evidence was some sort of conspiracy against Trump or capitalism.
0 - 
            
They are not saying it can’t be spread by asymptotic carriers, they are saying that this is less common than had been believed and not the predominant method of spread.bbiggs said:
I'm not a scientist or medical expert, so maybe this is how things go in the world of novel viruses. That said, as a layman, it is incredible to me that certain parts of this pandemic have literally done 180 degree turns in the matter of a few short weeks or months. These are topics that the "experts" announced with conviction, too. They said flat out that this virus was transmitted by asymptomatic carriers. Not only that, but that the transmission by asymptomatic carriers could be one of the biggest contributors to the spread of the virus. Now they say it cannot be spread by asymptomatic carriers. That's a pretty big one to get wrong, if they did. Maybe should have held tight on announcing to the world that it was spread that way.OnWis97 said:F Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
Probably. From the article: "More research and data are needed to "truly answer" the question of whether the coronavirus can spread widely through asymptomatic carriers, Van Kerkhove added"I know we like hard, unwavering answers but you're going to get evolving / changing findings. That's science for you. But this doesn't mean the earlier evidence was some sort of conspiracy against Trump or capitalism.We have known about this virus for less than one year. This is lightning speed accumulation of knowledge, in comparison to how it usually goes. It’s completely unrealistic to expect that all preliminary findings will go on to be correct.
If scientists had said that there was little to no risk of asymptomatic spread and it turned out that it was actually significant, I suspect that you, and many others, would be screaming about that.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 - 
            My point is, they came out and said definitively that large scale asymptomatic spread was happening. Had they said, “there is a chance of asymptomatic spread, but we cannot be certain,” it would be different. Then, everyone would still need to assume worst case and act accordingly. I understand information is coming at light speed and ever changing. My gripe is the delivery of their messaging.0
 - 
            I realize there is a potential 2 week incubation period, however I recall many get sick 2 days after exposure or 2-5 days? Anyhow, the kids went back to school last week and the Interior region of BC has remained at 195 cases. It's a bit early to call it, but it seems like some of the parents around town can breathe a sigh of relief. I am so glad we re-opened with restaurants and retail before we let the kids back to school and playgrounds.
I was swimming in the Great Barrier Reef
Animals were hiding behind the Coral
Except for little Turtle
I could swear he's trying to talk to me
Gurgle Gurgle0 - 
            If asymptomatic can’t spread then the main reason for masks is off the table. Crazy.It is good news though and hope true0
 - 
            I’m sure the Trump-ets will spin the asymptomatic thing as reckless fear mongering from dems if it turns out it has little effect but it’s simply yet another failure of ol’ orange balls.
0 - 
            
I think you need be corrected on your first sentence. They are not saying it is just less common. They are saying that it is very rare. Huge difference imo. I agree with your last thought but wonder why they would say that with no evidence to back it up. I think it was wise to be careful of this virus the last couple of months due to the unknown factor but as time goes on and we do some proper learning I hope we will see ways that we can move forward with our living with necessary modifications and not have to live in fear of another full lockdown. Also if you look at the excess deaths in the USA it is staggering. Something needs to be done to protect the sick and old from this virus that I am sure of.oftenreading said:
They are not saying it can’t be spread by asymptotic carriers, they are saying that this is less common than had been believed and not the predominant method of spread.bbiggs said:
I'm not a scientist or medical expert, so maybe this is how things go in the world of novel viruses. That said, as a layman, it is incredible to me that certain parts of this pandemic have literally done 180 degree turns in the matter of a few short weeks or months. These are topics that the "experts" announced with conviction, too. They said flat out that this virus was transmitted by asymptomatic carriers. Not only that, but that the transmission by asymptomatic carriers could be one of the biggest contributors to the spread of the virus. Now they say it cannot be spread by asymptomatic carriers. That's a pretty big one to get wrong, if they did. Maybe should have held tight on announcing to the world that it was spread that way.OnWis97 said:F Me In The Brain said:That they will change their minds in about a week?
Probably. From the article: "More research and data are needed to "truly answer" the question of whether the coronavirus can spread widely through asymptomatic carriers, Van Kerkhove added"I know we like hard, unwavering answers but you're going to get evolving / changing findings. That's science for you. But this doesn't mean the earlier evidence was some sort of conspiracy against Trump or capitalism.We have known about this virus for less than one year. This is lightning speed accumulation of knowledge, in comparison to how it usually goes. It’s completely unrealistic to expect that all preliminary findings will go on to be correct.
If scientists had said that there was little to no risk of asymptomatic spread and it turned out that it was actually significant, I suspect that you, and many others, would be screaming about that.Post edited by PJNB on0 - 
            
Now I'm reading that they should have distinguished between "asymptomatic" and "pre-symptomatic" and that even seems like a sorta fine line. My brain is going to explode.bootlegger10 said:If asymptomatic can’t spread then the main reason for masks is off the table. Crazy.It is good news though and hope true0 - 
            
All of a sudden, they'll love the WHO. Greatest health care agency on earth. Nobody knows more about viruses, BIG VIRUSES, than the WHODewieCox said:I’m sure the Trump-ets will spin the asymptomatic thing as reckless fear mongering from dems if it turns out it has little effect but it’s simply yet another failure of ol’ orange balls.
Get ready for it0 - 
            
Yep.what dreams said:
All of a sudden, they'll love the WHO. Greatest health care agency on earth. Nobody knows more about viruses, BIG VIRUSES, than the WHODewieCox said:I’m sure the Trump-ets will spin the asymptomatic thing as reckless fear mongering from dems if it turns out it has little effect but it’s simply yet another failure of ol’ orange balls.
Get ready for it
0 - 
            Fauci....
Fauci...
Fauci...
2000: Camden 1, 2003: Philly, State College, Camden 1, MSG 2, Hershey, 2004: Reading, 2005: Philly, 2006: Camden 1, 2, East Rutherford 1, 2007: Lollapalooza, 2008: Camden 1, Washington D.C., MSG 1, 2, 2009: Philly 1, 2, 3, 4, 2010: Bristol, MSG 2, 2011: PJ20 1, 2, 2012: Made In America, 2013: Brooklyn 2, Philly 2, 2014: Denver, 2015: Global Citizen Festival, 2016: Philly 2, Fenway 1, 2018: Fenway 1, 2, 2021: Sea. Hear. Now. 2022: Camden, 2024: Philly 2, 2025: Pittsburgh 1
Pearl Jam bootlegs:
http://wegotshit.blogspot.com0 - 
            With the protests going on you have a lot of PO'd people that stayed home and and listened but nobody is really talking about all the people in the streets.
I really hope there isn't another outbreak. If there isn't it will seem like a proven conspiracy to a bunch of people.0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
 - 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
 - 110.1K The Porch
 - 278 Vitalogy
 - 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
 - 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
 - 39.2K Flea Market
 - 39.2K Lost Dogs
 - 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
 - 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
 - 29.1K Other Music
 - 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
 - 1.1K The Art Wall
 - 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
 - 22.2K A Moving Train
 - 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
 - 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help
 












