Canadian Politics Redux

1209210212214215463

Comments

  • DarthMaeglin
    DarthMaeglin Toronto Posts: 2,992
    I find it crazy that one party can get more seats and the incumbent PM can still "get the first crack" at forming government. 
    I’m hoping that if a Conservative minority is elected the GG will give them first crack at governing, but I’m not so sure she will. Personally I’m a fan of minority governments as they (sometimes) lead to more of a consensus than majorities.
    "The world is full of idiots and I am but one of them."

    10-30-1991 Toronto, Toronto 1 & 2 2016, Toronto 2022
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    edited October 2019
    I find it crazy that one party can get more seats and the incumbent PM can still "get the first crack" at forming government. 
    I think in a minority result all parties should be able to try and form a combined majority gov. Majority wins, voters win. I like it.

    ABC
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    dignin said:
    I find it crazy that one party can get more seats and the incumbent PM can still "get the first crack" at forming government. 
    I think in a minority result all parties should be able to try and form a combined majority gov. Majority wins, voters win. I like it.

    ABC
    with who at the helm?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    edited October 2019
    dignin said:
    I find it crazy that one party can get more seats and the incumbent PM can still "get the first crack" at forming government. 
    I think in a minority result all parties should be able to try and form a combined majority gov. Majority wins, voters win. I like it.

    ABC
    with who at the helm?
    Whoever the leader is with the most seats in that coalition. With possibly some cabinet members from the other parties. A nice more representative democratic solution. It is done in a lot of other democracies. 
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    edited October 2019
    I think a Liberal/NDP coalition government would be fantastic. For me, that is ideal. Fingers crossed! We have an NDP/Green coalition in BC, and it's the best provincial government of my lifetime, IMO obviously. I think it could work just as well on the national level.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    PJ_Soul said:
    I think a Liberal/NDP coalition government would be fantastic. For me, that is ideal. Fingers crossed! We have an NDP/Green coalition in BC, and it's the best provincial government of my lifetime, IMO obviously. I think it could work just as well on the national level.
    I'm with you. I wanted a Liberal/NDP coalition last go around. Maybe we would have some kind of PR system if that came to pass.
  • DarthMaeglin
    DarthMaeglin Toronto Posts: 2,992
    If the Conservatives are handed a minority mandate, how or why can/should that be denied in favour of a coalition that has no mandate from the people? Seriously, in this scenario, why shouldn’t the CPC be given a chance to govern as, under our system they would be most representative of the voting population’s desires? If the other parties choose to simply be obstructionist and defeat a minority CPC government that speaks volumes about their supposed tolerance, in my opinion.
    "The world is full of idiots and I am but one of them."

    10-30-1991 Toronto, Toronto 1 & 2 2016, Toronto 2022
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    edited October 2019
    If the Conservatives are handed a minority mandate, how or why can/should that be denied in favour of a coalition that has no mandate from the people? Seriously, in this scenario, why shouldn’t the CPC be given a chance to govern as, under our system they would be most representative of the voting population’s desires? If the other parties choose to simply be obstructionist and defeat a minority CPC government that speaks volumes about their supposed tolerance, in my opinion.
    Because a coalition would represent the majority of Canadian voters better? Canadian election law does allow for this to be done, so I'm not sure why Cons are suddenly trying to make it seem like there is something "off" about this possibility. I don't understand how they figure having the leader of the party who the minority of people voted for should necessarily be the leader, especially when this coalition has essentially been "put on the table" before the election. A coalition would in fact be the more democratic option than a Conservative minority government. In a country where progressives are split between 3 parties, while the entire right is lumped into only 1 party (PPC doesn't count), a coalition definitely seems like a very logical step to take. And it's a HELL of a lot better than 4 years of obstruction. I have no clue why you would prefer that scenario. Nothing would get done.
    Of course one has to acknowledge what a difficult pill that would be for Conservative voters to swallow.... But that is the way the cookie crumbles I figure, when the entire right only has one valid party. If they want to avoid this in the future, they should get more centrist and more right-leaning parties (that aren't insane) playing the game. Maybe then those could consider coalitions. Parties representing the majority of voters should lead, or we want to get as close to that as possible. Coalitions are a pretty good way to get closer to that.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • DarthMaeglin
    DarthMaeglin Toronto Posts: 2,992
    PJ_Soul said:
    If the Conservatives are handed a minority mandate, how or why can/should that be denied in favour of a coalition that has no mandate from the people? Seriously, in this scenario, why shouldn’t the CPC be given a chance to govern as, under our system they would be most representative of the voting population’s desires? If the other parties choose to simply be obstructionist and defeat a minority CPC government that speaks volumes about their supposed tolerance, in my opinion.
    Because a coalition would represent the majority of Canadian voters better? Canadian election law does allow for this to be done, so I'm not sure why Cons are suddenly trying to make it seem like there is something "off" about this possibility. I don't understand how they figure having the leader of the party who the minority of people voted for should necessarily be the leader, especially when this coalition has essentially been "put on the table" before the election. A coalition would in fact be the more democratic option than a Conservative minority government. In a country where progressives are split between 3 parties, while the entire right is lumped into only 1 party (PPC doesn't count), a coalition definitely seems like a very logical step to take. And it's a HELL of a lot better than 4 years of obstruction. I have no clue why you would prefer that scenario. Nothing would get done.
    Except our system isn’t representative of the popular vote (which I think is what you’re getting at), as evidenced by the vote breakdown in the last few elections at least. There’s no reason to believe a CPC minority couldn’t be an effective government, except for other parties saying they refuse to cooperate in that situation without seeing a single piece of legislation.

    As for the obstruction I mentioned, I probably wasn’t clear enough, sorry. What I was envisioning was the other parties blocking every piece of legislation, leading to the defeat of the government at the first confidence vote (likely the budget), so I’d be surprised to see a full four years of such.

    All I’m asking for is to give the CPC a chance (as I tried, even worked to give Trudeau a chance), and if they fall let the coalition take over and the voters will eventually judge all parties in the next election.

    After all, Harper successfully negotiated 2 minorities before his majority (prorogue notwithstanding, lol).
    "The world is full of idiots and I am but one of them."

    10-30-1991 Toronto, Toronto 1 & 2 2016, Toronto 2022
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    i'd rather not give scheer any chance whatsoever. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    i'd rather not give scheer any chance whatsoever. 
    I hear ya.

    So far it's pretty tight. But thankfully Scheer and the cons are not looking great.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    CBC called Liberal government.

    Will it be a majority?
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    CBC now says Liberal minority.

    I couldn't have asked for a better result.
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Meanwhile, those of us on the west coast just finished voting. Work went late tonight so I screamed into the polling station at 6:55, fully confident that the rest of the country has already decided the result, as always :lol:  
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Just looked at the CBC live results. NDP has one seat but leading in another 20 seats, likely most of them in the west. 

    People's Party  - elected 0, leading in 0 - that's the result I want for the Bernier racists - a total flop.
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Wow - Bernier didn't even win his own seat. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668

    dignin said:
    CBC now says Liberal minority.

    I couldn't have asked for a better result.
    Yes. The NDP can work well with the Libs on a lot of issues I think, and together they are likely to actually get some shit done.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,668
    edited October 2019
    Wow - Bernier didn't even win his own seat. 
    Lol. I was glad to see that. There aren't as many crazies in Canada as Facebook would have us believe, haha.
    Jane Philpott lost her riding too btw, which was more surprising.
    Finally, the term "the Ford factor" is apparently an official term, lol, to explain why the Cons failed so bad in Ontario. :)
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • DarthMaeglin
    DarthMaeglin Toronto Posts: 2,992
    At least the new Star Wars trailer dropped tonight, so there was something good for me, lol.

    It will be interesting to see (assuming the current count stands) if we get a more reasonable Trudeau out of this, though I’m not hopeful. And we’ll never know the full truth about the SNC story which should have killed this government.
    "The world is full of idiots and I am but one of them."

    10-30-1991 Toronto, Toronto 1 & 2 2016, Toronto 2022
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    This result was set in stone when the conservatives chose a leader with the personality of a potato.

    He made Harper look like the life of the party.