The Democratic Candidates
Comments
-
It still isn't obvious to me at all, even now that I know it was supposed to be sarcasm, lol.HughFreakingDillon said:
it was pretty obvious IMHOLedbetterman10 said:
I figured the exclamation point would suggest I was doing a Hannity-type character.PJ_Soul said:
Ahhh, lol. Don't forget about emojis, they can be so helpful.Ledbetterman10 said:
Let me repost that comment with instructions, as it's sometimes hard for tone to come across in writing.....PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. [BEGIN SARCASM] Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! [END SARCASM] If message boards count as social media lol
Didn't really see his personal attack other than calling someone an asshole, so I don't really know what the situation was.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
I thought there was a /s or a s/ that denoted sarcasm? Can’t keep up with all you whippasnappas.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
My theory is that the DNC promised Hillary the 2016 nomination and the Secretary of State position if she would drop out when she faced Obama. That is just theory but there were internal documents that proved the DNC was locking Hillary in and Bernie never had a realistic chance in a true democratic fight.mrussel1 said:
Did you get a bunch of facebook ads lying about Bernie on your newsfeed? My conservative friends continue to tag me in FB anti-HIllary memes that are completely untrue 98% of the time. You're saying that Hillary and the DNC having a joint fundraising agreement in 2015 affected voting 10,000 to 1, compared to lies on social media. Am I understanding you correctly?Jason P said:I would surmise that the DNC had 10,000x more involvement in influencing Hillary’s nomination than the Russians did with Trump.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
You are also making a statement that the Russians affected voting 1:1.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
Heck, the DNC total involvement may be zero if that is still what 10000 x 0 equals.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
Well, considering there was a brief time out not that long ago, I'd guess this one will be a little lengthier...mcgruff10 said:
Permanently banned or just a time out?Ledbetterman10 said:
Scroll up to a post of his and click on his username. His forum profile says banned.OnWis97 said:
How can you tell?Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.It's a hopeless situation...0 -
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.hippiemom = goodness0 -
T'wasn't to me either, considering Trump's recent tweets. I take him at his word though, and find it funny now.PJ_Soul said:
It still isn't obvious to me at all, even now that I know it was supposed to be sarcasm, lol.HughFreakingDillon said:
it was pretty obvious IMHOLedbetterman10 said:
I figured the exclamation point would suggest I was doing a Hannity-type character.PJ_Soul said:
Ahhh, lol. Don't forget about emojis, they can be so helpful.Ledbetterman10 said:
Let me repost that comment with instructions, as it's sometimes hard for tone to come across in writing.....PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. [BEGIN SARCASM] Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! [END SARCASM] If message boards count as social media lol
Didn't really see his personal attack other than calling someone an asshole, so I don't really know what the situation was.0 -
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Hahahah, yeah I know you have a different opinion on thisHughFreakingDillon said:
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use. hippiemom = goodness0 -
Ditto - of course I believe him, haha!mrussel1 said:
T'wasn't to me either, considering Trump's recent tweets. I take him at his word though, and find it funny now.PJ_Soul said:
It still isn't obvious to me at all, even now that I know it was supposed to be sarcasm, lol.HughFreakingDillon said:
it was pretty obvious IMHOLedbetterman10 said:
I figured the exclamation point would suggest I was doing a Hannity-type character.PJ_Soul said:
Ahhh, lol. Don't forget about emojis, they can be so helpful.Ledbetterman10 said:
Let me repost that comment with instructions, as it's sometimes hard for tone to come across in writing.....PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. [BEGIN SARCASM] Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! [END SARCASM] If message boards count as social media lol
Didn't really see his personal attack other than calling someone an asshole, so I don't really know what the situation was.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Plus I missed exact comment that got the ban. I know it wasn’t a passive aggressive name calling cause that never earns anyone anything.HughFreakingDillon said:
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use.hippiemom = goodness0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use.Yeah, those kinds of attacks are rare, and always bring consequences from what I've observed. I was surprised it was actually said, since it basically guaranteed a ban.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
She was losing to Obama, it was close but considering the pledged delegates, she had a very low chance of coming out. I agree that Obama promised her the SOS, not the DNC. There's a big difference there. There's no way a potential president is going to allow the party to choose the most important cabinet member. No way.Jason P said:
My theory is that the DNC promised Hillary the 2016 nomination and the Secretary of State position if she would drop out when she faced Obama. That is just theory but there were internal documents that proved the DNC was locking Hillary in and Bernie never had a realistic chance in a true democratic fight.mrussel1 said:
Did you get a bunch of facebook ads lying about Bernie on your newsfeed? My conservative friends continue to tag me in FB anti-HIllary memes that are completely untrue 98% of the time. You're saying that Hillary and the DNC having a joint fundraising agreement in 2015 affected voting 10,000 to 1, compared to lies on social media. Am I understanding you correctly?Jason P said:I would surmise that the DNC had 10,000x more involvement in influencing Hillary’s nomination than the Russians did with Trump.
Second, I agree that if Sanders and Clinton were a literal draw or Sanders slightly up on pledged delegates, that the supers probably would have been tipped for Hillary. I mean, after all she has been in the party, through thick and thin since the 80's. But I absolutely disagree that had the votes been reversed (55 to 44% for Sanders) that the supers would have gone fully for Hillary. Even then, it's unlikely they could have overcome the pledged delegates.
It's always been sour grapes to me. I'm tired of everyone blaming their preferred candidate's loss on the media, the delegates, twitter, yes the Russians, etc. This is true on both sides, it's a total victim culture in this country.0 -
I have no issue with people I disagree with. but when the delivery is constantly like it was......cincybearcat said:
Hahahah, yeah I know you have a different opinion on thisHughFreakingDillon said:
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use.By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
I don't know whether there are warnings applied (e.g., "you're on thin ice and the next insulting post could get you banned) but if not, I'd definitely prefer to see some sort of suspension as the first action, barring threats, etc.Post edited by OnWis97 on1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 -
There are normally warnings, yes (and apparently he's already been banned temporarily in the past)OnWis97 said:
I don't know whether there are warnings applied (e.g., "you're on thin ice and the next insulting post could get you banned) but if not, I'd definitely prefer to see some sort of suspension as the first action, barring threats, etc.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
Kat usually does provide warnings....ummm....a friend told me that....I don’t know first hand.OnWis97 said:
I don't know whether there are warnings applied (e.g., "you're on thin ice and the next insulting post could get you banned) but if not, I'd definitely prefer to see some sort of suspension as the first action, barring threats, etc.
He was already on her list. hippiemom = goodness0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
I have no issue with people I disagree with. but when the delivery is constantly like it was......cincybearcat said:
Hahahah, yeah I know you have a different opinion on thisHughFreakingDillon said:
don't usually see overt attacks like that. mods hands are pretty tied with that one.cincybearcat said:
Hasn’t stopped others. And my2hands is certainly not a conservative, like you say.PJ_Soul said:
He made personal attacks - it had literally NOTHING to do with his politics or anyone else's. Also, my2hands isn't a conservative.Ledbetterman10 said:
Seems like it already came. my2hands is banned. Another conservative voice silenced by left-wing social media police! If message boards count as social media lolmrussel1 said:Kat's judgment cometh, and that right soon.
well this place should be a lot less interesting.
interesting wouldn't be the word I'd use.I have to agree, and it tripped me out a little, just because it was always so inconsistent with the activity in all the other forums, and with private communications. It was like dealing with two different people.But anyway... onward, lol.With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata0 -
There was someone named Free here back in the Bernie days. I received a warning or two over my interactions. I never called him a name or anything, just being me. Kate was very fair and I knew I was walking a line.cincybearcat said:
Kat usually does provide warnings....ummm....a friend told me that....I don’t know first hand.OnWis97 said:
I don't know whether there are warnings applied (e.g., "you're on thin ice and the next insulting post could get you banned) but if not, I'd definitely prefer to see some sort of suspension as the first action, barring threats, etc.
He was already on her list.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help