Donald Trump
Comments
- 
            I really can't imagine how the repubs would react to this shit by a Democrat. I know that my facebook feed would be full of outrage and fake memes.
This is a really unusual time.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 - 
            It is NUTS.
Bristow 05132010 to Amsterdam 2 061320180 - 
            
 - 
            
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
hippiemom = goodness0 - 
            
Yes they would. This is crazy. The hypocrisy is disgustingHughFreakingDillon said:republicans would have declared civil war if a democrat had done that.hippiemom = goodness0 - 
            
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
'05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2
EV
Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 10 - 
            
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.0 - 
            
Amen brotherbenjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
0 - 
            
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.0 - 
            
I agree with all of thisdignin said:
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.0 - 
            
The left has to unapologetically fight back. “Tell it like it is.” Call it out for what it is.dignin said:
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.
09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            
Dont forget our centrist friends and everyone in the middleHalifax2TheMax said:
The left has to unapologetically fight back. “Tell it like it is.” Call it out for what it is.dignin said:
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.
0 - 
            Halifax2TheMax said:
The left has to unapologetically fight back. “Tell it like it is.” Call it out for what it is.dignin said:
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.
Agreed. F**k 'em.
You're not winning over that ridiculous mentality by playing nicely or turning the other cheek. When you wrestle with pigs you get muddy.
Bury them at the polls, unless you can't because the majority of the country likes what is happening to it."My brain's a good brain!"0 - 
            Pretty shocking that 1 out of 4 American Federation of Teachers members and 1 out of 3 members of the National Education Association members voted for Team Trump Treason. No wonder US primary and secondary education is a disgrace.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            
You're right but that doesn't make it wrong. We have the moral high ground and we need to keep it.dignin said:
It's about votes, money, perception and a mentality in the democratic party to not rock the boat. Don't say anything remotely controversial right now because the GOP and media is so good about blowing it out of proportion.mrussel1 said:
Normally I would write this off as being the distinction between being Jewish and being a Zionist. But I did hear some democratic congressman who aren't typically beholden to Israel express anger. Im not defending it, just discussing what I've seen.benjs said:
As a Jew, I'm not at all offended by Omar's tweets. In fact, I'm glad to see an American politician who isn't afraid to say a lobbyist for Israeli agendas might be responsible for the unearned positive media view of the country.cincybearcat said:
In the overly sensitive world...you guys are probably right. But this hardly seems like a bad tweet to me. I’m not Jewish though...but it does seem people are taking offense pretty easily.mrussel1 said:
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
The trope thing is something that I just can't wrap my head around. If milk was shown to be unhealthy (either ambiguously or not) and yet Congress was pushing for more funding of the dairy board, who other than the lobbyist (the dairy board) and the paradoxical capitalist politician would be responsible for that push? Yet Israel gets a free pass about arguably evil behaviours because people have been racist in the past towards Jews? Fuck that shit.
While the GOP basically gets a pass because they are so fucked up and the bar is extremely low.
Don't do anything that could help get Trump elected.
I kind of get that, but I don't think being stale and playing it safe is the best move. The left has to quit eating it's own.0 - 
            
Seems like a stretchHalifax2TheMax said:Pretty shocking that 1 out of 4 American Federation of Teachers members and 1 out of 3 members of the National Education Association members voted for Team Trump Treason. No wonder US primary and secondary education is a disgrace.hippiemom = goodness0 - 
            
What or how?cincybearcat said:
Seems like a stretchHalifax2TheMax said:Pretty shocking that 1 out of 4 American Federation of Teachers members and 1 out of 3 members of the National Education Association members voted for Team Trump Treason. No wonder US primary and secondary education is a disgrace.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 - 
            Halifax2TheMax said:Pretty shocking that 1 out of 4 American Federation of Teachers members and 1 out of 3 members of the National Education Association members voted for Team Trump Treason. No wonder US primary and secondary education is a disgrace.
For a large part, they'd represent the values of their geographical culture no?
"My brain's a good brain!"0 - 
            So he is now talking as if some of the wall has been built. Did I miss something or his he just feeding a pile of shit to a base that will eat it up?1995 Milwaukee 1998 Alpine, Alpine 2003 Albany, Boston, Boston, Boston 2004 Boston, Boston 2006 Hartford, St. Paul (Petty), St. Paul (Petty) 2011 Alpine, Alpine
2013 Wrigley 2014 St. Paul 2016 Fenway, Fenway, Wrigley, Wrigley 2018 Missoula, Wrigley, Wrigley 2021 Asbury Park 2022 St Louis 2023 Austin, Austin
2024 Napa, Wrigley, Wrigley0 - 
            
Assuming they themselves are educated, you might think they’d buck the trend or go against the grain? But I guess they’re just a product of their environment and go along to get along. Sad.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:Halifax2TheMax said:Pretty shocking that 1 out of 4 American Federation of Teachers members and 1 out of 3 members of the National Education Association members voted for Team Trump Treason. No wonder US primary and secondary education is a disgrace.
For a large part, they'd represent the values of their geographical culture no?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Categories
- All Categories
 - 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
 - 110.1K The Porch
 - 278 Vitalogy
 - 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
 - 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
 - 39.2K Flea Market
 - 39.2K Lost Dogs
 - 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
 - 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
 - 29.1K Other Music
 - 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
 - 1.1K The Art Wall
 - 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
 - 22.2K A Moving Train
 - 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
 - 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help
 



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJIaXaN7MY4





