Donald Trump

1153315341536153815392954

Comments

  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,407
    When you don't have an actual family in the white house, it makes sense they/he don't have a pet. His pet is money and gold plated appliances. I like how that list showed Roosevelt with so many "pets" when in reality it was all part of his public image he built. He was Trump before TV and internet could easily poke holes in all the fake bravado and expose the Teutonic superiority mentality. 
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    he'd have to fight the dog for all the pieces of fast food he drops on the bed. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    The always-impressive Don J, demonstrating his own sterling education, insults "loser teachers" who apparently fail to teach their students how to be proper conservatives.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-jr-loser-teachers_us_5c626b08e4b028d5431768c8
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,604
    Glad the Baffoon doesn’t have pets no animal deserves to be amongst vile humans like the whole Baffoon family 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?
    a chihuahua. 

    1) it reminds him of taco bell
    2) he can put it behind a fence and mockingly yell "BUILD THAT WALL" every time he walks through the kitchen. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?
    a chihuahua. 

    1) it reminds him of taco bell
    2) he can put it behind a fence and mockingly yell "BUILD THAT WALL" every time he walks through the kitchen. 

    And the best part is, it doesn't have to be a very tall wall for a chihuaha, so he can probably get the money for it. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Bentleyspop
    Bentleyspop Craft Beer Brewery, Colorado Posts: 11,418
    https://apple.news/ACoK3eXpvQRKDkpOScalGBw
    He has called for violence against the press for the last two years, this will happen again and it will be worse ..
    You know who else called for violence against the press?
    Josef Stalin
    But I guess that's okay now that Russia is our friend.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    hippiemom = goodness
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    I agree. File this one under "outrage culture".
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,836
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did. 
    So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic. 

    hippiemom = goodness
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did. 
    So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic. 

    haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    dignin said:
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    I agree. File this one under "outrage culture".
    I don't agree this applies as outrage culture. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    mrussel1 said:
    mrussel1 said:
    Good for Nancy.  It seemed awfully close to a trope.
    I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong.  Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet?  I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?  

    So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
    It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence,  politicians,  control the money supply,  etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope.  It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American,  it's considered a trope or overtly racist. 
    Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.

    I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups. 

    if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did. 
    So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic. 

    haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense. 
    I agree.  She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures. 
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,961
    So thug is going to steal funding from disaster relief and the military for his stupid wall? I wonder if it's military health care since he hates healthy Americans so much. What a disgusting human being and I use human being with reservations. 
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    republicans would have declared civil war if a democrat had done that. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,961
    Yes, they would have gone nuclear.

    Falling down,...not staying down
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,604
    republicans would have declared civil war if a democrat had done that. 
    No doubt Turtleface McConell & patriot Rand would of lead the troops into the WH ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.