Donald Trump
Comments
-
When you don't have an actual family in the white house, it makes sense they/he don't have a pet. His pet is money and gold plated appliances. I like how that list showed Roosevelt with so many "pets" when in reality it was all part of his public image he built. He was Trump before TV and internet could easily poke holes in all the fake bravado and expose the Teutonic superiority mentality.It's a hopeless situation...0
-
he'd have to fight the dog for all the pieces of fast food he drops on the bed.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?"My brain's a good brain!"0
-
The always-impressive Don J, demonstrating his own sterling education, insults "loser teachers" who apparently fail to teach their students how to be proper conservatives.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-jr-loser-teachers_us_5c626b08e4b028d5431768c8
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Glad the Baffoon doesn’t have pets no animal deserves to be amongst vile humans like the whole Baffoon familyjesus greets me looks just like me ....0
-
a chihuahua.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?
1) it reminds him of taco bell
2) he can put it behind a fence and mockingly yell "BUILD THAT WALL" every time he walks through the kitchen.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
HughFreakingDillon said:
a chihuahua.Thirty Bills Unpaid said:If he buckled under the extreme pressure... what type of dog would rub-o-shit get for himself?
1) it reminds him of taco bell
2) he can put it behind a fence and mockingly yell "BUILD THAT WALL" every time he walks through the kitchen.
And the best part is, it doesn't have to be a very tall wall for a chihuaha, so he can probably get the money for it.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
You know who else called for violence against the press?josevolution said:https://apple.news/ACoK3eXpvQRKDkpOScalGBw
He has called for violence against the press for the last two years, this will happen again and it will be worse ..
Josef Stalin
But I guess that's okay now that Russia is our friend.0 -
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.0 -
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
hippiemom = goodness0 -
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I agree. File this one under "outrage culture".cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.0 -
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.
hippiemom = goodness0 -
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I don't agree this applies as outrage culture.dignin said:
I agree. File this one under "outrage culture".cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
I agree. She needs to be cautious considering the conflict between the two cultures.HughFreakingDillon said:
haha, no, but given the sensitive nature of who she is criticizing and how, not to mention who she is (unfortunately that does play a part), I think a little more candor is applicable in this sense.cincybearcat said:
So you have to criticize all lobbyist at the same time? I guess I see it as nothing more than a normal attack against lobbyists. I’d let future behavior show if it was actually anti-Semitic.HughFreakingDillon said:
if she had criticized other lobbyists in a similar fashion, fair enough...but I don't think she did.cincybearcat said:
Thanks. I do find that to be ridiculous and extreme though. Nice way of avoiding criticism of lobbying. Crazy.mrussel1 said:
It's because of the basis of historic criticism of Jews; that they buy their influence, politicians, control the money supply, etc. So any accusations of Jews connected to money is considered a trope. It's similar to how there are some things that you can say about a white person but if you say the same about an African American, it's considered a trope or overtly racist.cincybearcat said:
I guess I need to do some learning, cause I don't really see what was that wrong. Maybe I'm missing the bad tweet? I mean it's ok to say the NRA influences legislation with $ but not ok to say pro-israeli lobbist/people influence people with $?mrussel1 said:
Good for Nancy. It seemed awfully close to a trope.Meltdown99 said:Pelosi, top Democrats demand Omar apologize for anti-Semitic tweets about Israel
https://globalnews.ca/news/4948753/ilhan-omar-anti-semitic-tweet-democrats/?utm_medium=Facebook&utm_source=GlobalNational&fbclid=IwAR02cMdcuyCIYD7Xhmo4JF0plPINkZZkqG7Yd0DlhtPeGUcByl0nAB5tNVE
So - someone that believes she needed to apologize, tell me why please.
I wouldn’t have apologized for that. Lobbying is $ and all lobbyist do it...even those pro-Israel groups.0 -
So thug is going to steal funding from disaster relief and the military for his stupid wall? I wonder if it's military health care since he hates healthy Americans so much. What a disgusting human being and I use human being with reservations.Falling down,...not staying down0
-
republicans would have declared civil war if a democrat had done that.Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0
-
Yes, they would have gone nuclear.
Falling down,...not staying down0 -
No doubt Turtleface McConell & patriot Rand would of lead the troops into the WH ...HughFreakingDillon said:republicans would have declared civil war if a democrat had done that.jesus greets me looks just like me ....0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.2K The Porch
- 279 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.3K Flea Market
- 39.3K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help









