Canadian Politics Redux

1161162164166167465

Comments

  • "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    I'd let Kadhr go to Saudi Arabia, as long as he agrees to stay...

    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Quebecers criticize 'dirty' Alberta oil but buy more gasoline, SUVs: reporth

    ttps://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/quebec-oil-use-1.4948546

    LOL.  They are eternally on welfare...

    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739


    Off to Quebec, the eternal freeloaders of confederation...
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    PJ_Soul said:
    We're set to deport a Colombian family who has lived in Canada for six years awaiting their claim to be processed.

    ttps://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/%e2%80%98i-was-devastated%e2%80%99-family-living-in-canada-for-6-years-to-be-deported-christmas-eve/ar-BBQQinb?ocid=spartanntp

    We will try to comfort child murderers as the poor poor killers are forced (gawd we should just get over it already... right PM Purple Socks?) to serve time and hastily admit violent refugees without proper vetting... but we take a strong stance against a family that owns property, run small businesses, and volunteer in the community.
    I don't think it makes sense to connect these two issues.
    But I do hate it when Immigration Canada does this kind of thing to productive people who want to be citizens, while it gives way too many chances to certain other immigrants who are bad from the country. I think Immigration Canada and many of its policies and procedures need a MASSIVE overhaul. I've been saying so for years.

    I just had to toss that one in there because it bugs the shit out of me.
    The family can stay. :) This forum SUCKS so much when posting on a phone that I can't even paste the link to the story. :angry:

    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    edited December 2018
    I think that tax should be more connected to income combined with property value. I do know that a LOT of those homeowners can easily afford that tax (including my bro-in-law and sister) and, considering how they are all treated like royalty otherwise in those areas, I don't mind the tax in principle. But i also know that some people with average incomes or retired people are just sitting in a house that was totally cheap when they bought it and it simply appreciated by millions and millions while they lived there for years and years. These are teachers and trades workers and small business owners and people on pensions and shit, and they are already struggling with the massively inflated property taxes reflecting the real estate boom/crisis. Those with incomes under a certain a level should absolutely be exempt.

    But don't let some of these people fool you. Many are fat cats who play the system like mad, are fully reaping the benefits if being the special people in the rich neighborhoods who are served better by tax funded institutions in general, including schools, and they can and should put a little more in.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    PJ_Soul said:
    I think that tax should be more connected to income combined with property value. I do know that a LOT of those homeowners can easily afford that tax (including my bro-in-law and sister) and, considering how they are all treated like royalty otherwise in those areas, I don't mind the tax in principle. But i also know that some people with average incomes or retired people are just sitting in a house that was totally cheap when they bought it and it simply appreciated by millions and millions while they loved there. These are teachers and people on pensions and shit, and they are already struggling with the massively inflated property taxes. Those with incomes under a certain a level should be exempt.
    But don't let some of these people fool you. Many are fat cats who play the system like mad, are fully reaping the benefits if being the special people in the rich neighborhoods who are served better by tax funded institutions in general, including schools, and they can and should put a little more in.
    Yes, that is true.  If you have been in your home for 30 plus years might make your home worth millions, but if you are retired nurse, the teacher pension certainly does not reflect the value of the house.  So maybe property taxes should be on household income.  We can not assume every homeowner is wealthy.  Even though as you said, "there are many who are wealthy.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Andrew Coyne: Trudeau seems unperturbed as trouble brews on all sides

    https://edmontonjournal.com/opinion/andrew-coyne-trudeau-seems-unperturbed-as-trouble-brews-on-all-sides/wcm/32d7fb37-995c-4d45-a5d5-e473461dc1e4?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR3cNa5yt4I7EAdiF1O46HnQCiRSa6Uc3m80qmoMBr-BklT60BKrvSfInXs#Echobox=1545141351


    “There is no support for a pipeline through Quebec,” was the prime minister’s blunt reply. You thought pipelines were a federal matter? You thought Trudeau’s professed willingness to push Trans Mountain through over B.C.’s objections had confirmed that? Think again. This is Quebec, after all.


    This does not make any sense, I think the opposition against pipelines in BC is far greater and riskier than Energy East.  Plus it would get us off Saudi Oil.

    Trans Mountain will never be built...

    So maybe they need to develop another way to get their oil to tidewater...
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    so starting today, cops can pull you over and force you to have a breathalyzer, with absolutely zero cause. before today, they had to have reasonable suspicion you were under the influence.  people are freaking out that this is a slippery slope and totally unconstitutional. 
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    I would have rather have seen harsher penalties, especially for 1st-time offenders.  I am sure it will be challenged at SC. 
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,759
    so starting today, cops can pull you over and force you to have a breathalyzer, with absolutely zero cause. before today, they had to have reasonable suspicion you were under the influence.  people are freaking out that this is a slippery slope and totally unconstitutional. 
    Yeah, I am not comfortable with this at all, to say the least. I have seen many people go off about how we shouldn't care unless we're drinking and driving. Obviously those folks are missing the point, lol. In any case, I think this will be challenged in the courts almost immediately, and I can't imagine it will hold up at the end of the day.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,758
    PJ_Soul said:
    so starting today, cops can pull you over and force you to have a breathalyzer, with absolutely zero cause. before today, they had to have reasonable suspicion you were under the influence.  people are freaking out that this is a slippery slope and totally unconstitutional. 
    Yeah, I am not comfortable with this at all, to say the least. I have seen many people go off about how we shouldn't care unless we're drinking and driving. Obviously those folks are missing the point, lol. In any case, I think this will be challenged in the courts almost immediately, and I can't imagine it will hold up at the end of the day.
    yeah, i saw a post on twitter saying that very thing. I'm thinking ok, but I have nothing to hide in my house either, doesn't mean I think it should be legal for cops to demand entrance without cause. 

    how about a cavity search with no cause? how about being handcuffed and being thrown in jail with no cause?
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    PJ_Soul said:
    so starting today, cops can pull you over and force you to have a breathalyzer, with absolutely zero cause. before today, they had to have reasonable suspicion you were under the influence.  people are freaking out that this is a slippery slope and totally unconstitutional. 
    Yeah, I am not comfortable with this at all, to say the least. I have seen many people go off about how we shouldn't care unless we're drinking and driving. Obviously those folks are missing the point, lol. In any case, I think this will be challenged in the courts almost immediately, and I can't imagine it will hold up at the end of the day.
    You are right people who don't drink and drive should care.  We all should care, it's slippery slope they are walking on.  
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    Cannabis is the one that concerning?  It stays in the system longer than alcohol.  I think a lot of defence lawyers will do well.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
  • oftenreading
    oftenreading Victoria, BC Posts: 12,856
    Yes. Disappointing.

    The main negative feedback I heard from people was (1) the question was too complicated, and (2) there were too many unknowns with a Yes vote for people to feel they knew what they would get.

    And now it's off the table for the foreseeable future. 
    my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    It's also very possible the no rejected is because they do no want fringe parties propping up the government.  Even though I do not consider the green party of BC as a fringe party (they got 17% of the vote), but my guess most people are only looking at a party with 3 seats essentially propping up the government.  Looks like the issue will not be revisited anytime soon.
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739

    Give Peas A Chance…
This discussion has been closed.