Canadian Politics Redux
Comments
-
HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.Give Peas A Chance…0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
-
HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
Seriously?
"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Thirty Bills Unpaid said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
Seriously?By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
0 -
fife said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.Give Peas A Chance…0
-
Meltdown99 said:fife said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
It's a common perception that earlier introduction to drinking within the family leads to fewer problems with alcohol, but what evidence is available suggests that isn't true. I knew I had read this in the past so I looked up some articles this morning and, while there aren't a lot of good studies, what evidence there is does not support the idea that drinking earlier leads to more responsible drinking. Teens in European countries with laxer drinking laws seems to have more, not fewer, problems with alcohol abuse.
Alcohol related motor vehicle crashes by young drivers also declined when the drinking age was raised in the US, which is a good thing.
Also, some countries have pretty weird drinking laws. Apparently in England the youngest that children are allowed to drink in a private setting is 6. Pardon me? It says a lot about a country that some committee thought about this and said "yeah, 5 seems too young to get smashed, but at 6 they can really hold their liquor".Post edited by oftenreading onmy small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:fife said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
It's a common perception that earlier introduction to drinking within the family leads to fewer problems with alcohol, but what evidence is available suggests that isn't true. I knew I had read this in the past so I looked up some articles this morning and, while there aren't a lot of good studies, what evidence there is does not support the idea that drinking earlier leads to more responsible drinking. Teens in European countries with laxer drinking laws seems to have more, not fewer, problems with alcohol abuse.
Alcohol related motor vehicle crashes by young drivers also declined when the drinking age was raised in the US, which is a good thing.
Also, some countries have pretty weird drinking laws. Apparently in England the youngest that children are allowed to drink in a private setting is 6. Pardon me? It says a lot about a country that some committee thought about this and said "yeah, 5 seems to young to get smashed, but at 6 they can really hold their liquor".Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Meltdown99 said:oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:fife said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
It's a common perception that earlier introduction to drinking within the family leads to fewer problems with alcohol, but what evidence is available suggests that isn't true. I knew I had read this in the past so I looked up some articles this morning and, while there aren't a lot of good studies, what evidence there is does not support the idea that drinking earlier leads to more responsible drinking. Teens in European countries with laxer drinking laws seems to have more, not fewer, problems with alcohol abuse.
Alcohol related motor vehicle crashes by young drivers also declined when the drinking age was raised in the US, which is a good thing.
Also, some countries have pretty weird drinking laws. Apparently in England the youngest that children are allowed to drink in a private setting is 6. Pardon me? It says a lot about a country that some committee thought about this and said "yeah, 5 seems to young to get smashed, but at 6 they can really hold their liquor".my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:fife said:Meltdown99 said:HughFreakingDillon said:and if you want to go even further, I believe it is perfectly legal for someone 12 and up to have alchohol at a restaurant or lounge as long as they are having a meal and are accompanied by an adult.
It's a common perception that earlier introduction to drinking within the family leads to fewer problems with alcohol, but what evidence is available suggests that isn't true. I knew I had read this in the past so I looked up some articles this morning and, while there aren't a lot of good studies, what evidence there is does not support the idea that drinking earlier leads to more responsible drinking. Teens in European countries with laxer drinking laws seems to have more, not fewer, problems with alcohol abuse.
Alcohol related motor vehicle crashes by young drivers also declined when the drinking age was raised in the US, which is a good thing.
Also, some countries have pretty weird drinking laws. Apparently in England the youngest that children are allowed to drink in a private setting is 6. Pardon me? It says a lot about a country that some committee thought about this and said "yeah, 5 seems to young to get smashed, but at 6 they can really hold their liquor".Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Vote No campaign calls to extend election reform vote due to low voter turnout
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vote-no-campaign-calls-for-voting-deadline-extension-1.4909836?fbclid=IwAR2bkPxPhjuQJGaMAtSJdWcqh1Zvf_pet6suQzChsST_z7sYscTbwata3OA
This really pisses me off. I'm sure many of you know I am a supporter of direct democracy. Something as important as this is upsetting.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol0 -
my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
http://bfy.tw/Kv9F
Give Peas A Chance…0 -
my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074
"My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074
I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0 -
mcgruff10 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074
It's got nothing to do with the legal system being lenient. He was found NCRMD (not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder), the rough equivalent to the US NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity). At that point it leaves the criminal justice system entirely, like your NGRI acquittees, and enters another system. He was treated and monitored under that system until his risk was low enough that it could be well managed in the community, and then discharged to the civil mental health system, where he is still being monitored and treated.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
mcgruff10 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074Give Peas A Chance…0 -
oftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074
It's got nothing to do with the legal system being lenient. He was found NCRMD (not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder), the rough equivalent to the US NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity). At that point it leaves the criminal justice system entirely, like your NGRI acquittees, and enters another system. He was treated and monitored under that system until his risk was low enough that it could be well managed in the community, and then discharged to the civil mental health system, where he is still being monitored and treated.
Except that he's completely in the clear and not being monitored or treated."My brain's a good brain!"0 -
Thirty Bills Unpaid said:oftenreading said:mcgruff10 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074
It's got nothing to do with the legal system being lenient. He was found NCRMD (not criminally responsible by reason of mental disorder), the rough equivalent to the US NGRI (not guilty by reason of insanity). At that point it leaves the criminal justice system entirely, like your NGRI acquittees, and enters another system. He was treated and monitored under that system until his risk was low enough that it could be well managed in the community, and then discharged to the civil mental health system, where he is still being monitored and treated.
Except that he's completely in the clear and not being monitored or treated.
That isn't true. He's not being monitored by the Review Board system but he's being monitored by the civil system.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
Meltdown99 said:mcgruff10 said:Thirty Bills Unpaid said:my2hands said:Remember the guy that ate the guys face on the bus a few years ago?
Did you maniacs let that guy go yet? lol
Of course we did!
In February 2017, Li received an absolute discharge and is now living independently in a Manitoba community. The province's Criminal Code Review Board ruled he is no longer required to attend annual reviews or abide by conditions. He later changed his name to Will Lee Baker.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/greyhound-beheading-10th-anniversary-1.4760074I'll ride the wave where it takes me......0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help