Canadian Politics Redux
Comments
-
yup.Meltdown99 said:Edmonton security guard who kicked man to death says he was 'involuntarily celibate,' frustrated with
work
https://nationalpost.com/news/crime/security-guard-who-kicked-man-to-death-says-he-was-involuntarily-celibate/wcm/dc78e759-eb3a-46ad-bef2-a04ac664e356
... 4 fucking years, what fucking joke...
Hamilton 9-13-05; Toronto 5-9-06, Toronto 8-21-09, Toronto 9-12-11, Hamilton 9-15-11....0 -
Pretty sad that unelected judges only think a mans life is worth 4 years ... a homeless man at that, wonder if that played into the judges decision ... I'd hope not, but then again...Nami said:
yup.Meltdown99 said:Edmonton security guard who kicked man to death says he was 'involuntarily celibate,' frustrated with
work
https://nationalpost.com/news/crime/security-guard-who-kicked-man-to-death-says-he-was-involuntarily-celibate/wcm/dc78e759-eb3a-46ad-bef2-a04ac664e356
... 4 fucking years, what fucking joke...Give Peas A Chance…0 -
what a mess. I hope the f'k JT don't turn down ol newfie when they come a asking for fed help on muskrat falls.... but I'm sure as hell he'll turn his back on us. He's gone next election.Meltdown99 said:
Good grief ... budgets balance themselves, maybe trade negotiate themselves and maybe pipelines build themselves ... oh yeah, veterans are more than we can give ... always got money to bail out corporations.
Hamilton 9-13-05; Toronto 5-9-06, Toronto 8-21-09, Toronto 9-12-11, Hamilton 9-15-11....0 -
regardless of anyone's mental state, position in life, taking a life should never ever receive such a sentence. How many, that's a good question, but hell.. 4yrs? wtfMeltdown99 said:
Pretty sad that unelected judges only think a mans life is worth 4 years ... a homeless man at that, wonder if that played into the judges decision ... I'd hope not, but then again...Nami said:
yup.Meltdown99 said:Edmonton security guard who kicked man to death says he was 'involuntarily celibate,' frustrated with
work
https://nationalpost.com/news/crime/security-guard-who-kicked-man-to-death-says-he-was-involuntarily-celibate/wcm/dc78e759-eb3a-46ad-bef2-a04ac664e356
... 4 fucking years, what fucking joke...
Hamilton 9-13-05; Toronto 5-9-06, Toronto 8-21-09, Toronto 9-12-11, Hamilton 9-15-11....0 -
Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
-
I agree totally. Locally where I live a drunk driver who ran a stop sign and killed a husband and wife just got 4 years. DUI where there is death should be treated as murder, only a fool drives under the influence In 2019. First time DUI should be a 5 year driving ban. A second DUI and DUI after that should be jail time...Nami said:
regardless of anyone's mental state, position in life, taking a life should never ever receive such a sentence. How many, that's a good question, but hell.. 4yrs? wtfMeltdown99 said:
Pretty sad that unelected judges only think a mans life is worth 4 years ... a homeless man at that, wonder if that played into the judges decision ... I'd hope not, but then again...Nami said:
yup.Meltdown99 said:Edmonton security guard who kicked man to death says he was 'involuntarily celibate,' frustrated with
work
https://nationalpost.com/news/crime/security-guard-who-kicked-man-to-death-says-he-was-involuntarily-celibate/wcm/dc78e759-eb3a-46ad-bef2-a04ac664e356
... 4 fucking years, what fucking joke...
No rehab ... these assholes use rehab as a means to get reduced charges...Give Peas A Chance…0 -
So President miscreant says he wont negotiate at all with us. We have to take a deal on his terms. He even laments the restraint of not being able to kill us.
I'm sorry but this has gone to far. Walk out of negotiations and watch his own greedy Republican party tear him a new butt hole. There is too much at stake to kill NAFTA. That report out of the star gave us all the ammo we need to say....we want to make a deal but the miscreant wont bargain. Just keep saying we want to but we can't just give away the farm.
This will never end in the death of NAFTA. Way to much money being made on both sides. The miscreant will be put in his place over this. Does anyone really believe the US Congress and Senate will kill NAFTA for the miscreant. He's a sinking ship.I remember when, yeah. I swore I knew everything, oh yeah.0 -
If NAFTA does die. Pipelines get built pronto. They head east west and any direction other than south.
Oh and a post script for Mexico
F you too. You say you prefer Canada is in but would make a deal without us
All of this goes to my Hope's and dreams that we begin the process of building a NLRB economy here at home. No more profits for miscreants. Healthy happy productive lives for all Canadians not shrouded under the world wasting system of the miscreants.....Capitalism.I remember when, yeah. I swore I knew everything, oh yeah.0 -
Well allowing politicians to appointing judges gets us judges that treat murder like it's no bid deal. What ever, set up an independent panel that appoints judges that are completely untouchable by politicians and where politician have no influence. You really trust Trudeau at this point, the guy is one clusterfuck after enough. Either way there needs to be a better way. Or pass hard sentencing laws...but once again PM Fluff would never do that, he pays off terrorist, then looks at military vet missing one leg, and tells him "you are asking more than we can give". Real good leadership...oftenreading said:Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
That so called terrorist was a 14 year old child and watched his father and family members blown up by the US war machine. He was brainwashed. I you and anyone else would have thrown that grenade.
That child was then held illegally. He is a Canadian citizen. His Conservative government at the time did nothing to protect his rights. He should have been given 50 million.I remember when, yeah. I swore I knew everything, oh yeah.0 -
As for our soldiers. Let that be a lesson to the next generation. They are not appreciated or respected or cared about...so don't serve the miscreantsI remember when, yeah. I swore I knew everything, oh yeah.0
-
Meltdown99 said:
Well allowing politicians to appointing judges gets us judges that treat murder like it's no bid deal. What ever, set up an independent panel that appoints judges that are completely untouchable by politicians and where politician have no influence. You really trust Trudeau at this point, the guy is one clusterfuck after enough. Either way there needs to be a better way. Or pass hard sentencing laws...but once again PM Fluff would never do that, he pays off terrorist, then looks at military vet missing one leg, and tells him "you are asking more than we can give". Real good leadership...oftenreading said:Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.
Trudeau didn't appoint this judge, or any other provincial court judge. The PM is only involved in Chief Justice appointments. You'll have to find some other reason to complain about him, but that's clearly not going to be a problem for you.
In fact, this is the procedure in Ontario:Ontario Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee[edit]
In Ontario, the Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee (JAAC) is made up of 13 members: 7 lay members, 2 judges, 1 member appointed by the Ontario Judicial Council, and 3 from the legal community.[2] JAAC recommends a list of 3 or 4 candidates, far less than its federal counterpart.[3] Proponents of the system argue that this procedure has limited patronage appoints to Ontario courts, and has diversified the makeup of judges in the province.[3] Unlike other committees, the JAAC advertises openings and interviews candidates in person.[4]
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I agree that Congress won't let it fly. I think we should just walk away and wait it out.TalonTedd said:So President miscreant says he wont negotiate at all with us. We have to take a deal on his terms. He even laments the restraint of not being able to kill us.
I'm sorry but this has gone to far. Walk out of negotiations and watch his own greedy Republican party tear him a new butt hole. There is too much at stake to kill NAFTA. That report out of the star gave us all the ammo we need to say....we want to make a deal but the miscreant wont bargain. Just keep saying we want to but we can't just give away the farm.
This will never end in the death of NAFTA. Way to much money being made on both sides. The miscreant will be put in his place over this. Does anyone really believe the US Congress and Senate will kill NAFTA for the miscreant. He's a sinking ship.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I thought they were still negotiating...have the talks broken down?TalonTedd said:So President miscreant says he wont negotiate at all with us. We have to take a deal on his terms. He even laments the restraint of not being able to kill us.
I'm sorry but this has gone to far. Walk out of negotiations and watch his own greedy Republican party tear him a new butt hole. There is too much at stake to kill NAFTA. That report out of the star gave us all the ammo we need to say....we want to make a deal but the miscreant wont bargain. Just keep saying we want to but we can't just give away the farm.
This will never end in the death of NAFTA. Way to much money being made on both sides. The miscreant will be put in his place over this. Does anyone really believe the US Congress and Senate will kill NAFTA for the miscreant. He's a sinking ship.
Hate to say it, the auto would have no problem relocating to US and Mexico ....if PM Fluff thinks for 1 minute that the auto gives a rats ass about Canada, he is once again sadly mistaken.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
They need a better process to select judges. He does have control over sentencing guidelines through legislation...but a liberal getting tough crime...LMFAO. If NAFTA dies over the dairy industry and tariffs are slapped on Autos then it won't matter ... he'll be voted out next year anyways.oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:
Well allowing politicians to appointing judges gets us judges that treat murder like it's no bid deal. What ever, set up an independent panel that appoints judges that are completely untouchable by politicians and where politician have no influence. You really trust Trudeau at this point, the guy is one clusterfuck after enough. Either way there needs to be a better way. Or pass hard sentencing laws...but once again PM Fluff would never do that, he pays off terrorist, then looks at military vet missing one leg, and tells him "you are asking more than we can give". Real good leadership...oftenreading said:Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.
Trudeau didn't appoint this judge, or any other provincial court judge. The PM is only involved in Chief Justice appointments. You'll have to find some other reason to complain about him, but that's clearly not going to be a problem for you.
In fact, this is the procedure in Ontario:Ontario Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee[edit]
In Ontario, the Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee (JAAC) is made up of 13 members: 7 lay members, 2 judges, 1 member appointed by the Ontario Judicial Council, and 3 from the legal community.[2] JAAC recommends a list of 3 or 4 candidates, far less than its federal counterpart.[3] Proponents of the system argue that this procedure has limited patronage appoints to Ontario courts, and has diversified the makeup of judges in the province.[3] Unlike other committees, the JAAC advertises openings and interviews candidates in person.[4]
Give Peas A Chance…0 -
I agree. Don't serve. To the ones who are serving, don't volunteer for pointless overseas mission...they need to take a stand.TalonTedd said:As for our soldiers. Let that be a lesson to the next generation. They are not appreciated or respected or cared about...so don't serve the miscreants
I do not see any need for us to be involved in any overseas missions anymore.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Show me your evidence that getting “tough on crime” improves public safety by measures such as reducing recidivism rates.Meltdown99 said:
They need a better process to select judges. He does have control over sentencing guidelines through legislation...but a liberal getting tough crime...LMFAO. If NAFTA dies over the dairy industry and tariffs are slapped on Autos then it won't matter ... he'll be voted out next year anyways.oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:
Well allowing politicians to appointing judges gets us judges that treat murder like it's no bid deal. What ever, set up an independent panel that appoints judges that are completely untouchable by politicians and where politician have no influence. You really trust Trudeau at this point, the guy is one clusterfuck after enough. Either way there needs to be a better way. Or pass hard sentencing laws...but once again PM Fluff would never do that, he pays off terrorist, then looks at military vet missing one leg, and tells him "you are asking more than we can give". Real good leadership...oftenreading said:Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.
Trudeau didn't appoint this judge, or any other provincial court judge. The PM is only involved in Chief Justice appointments. You'll have to find some other reason to complain about him, but that's clearly not going to be a problem for you.
In fact, this is the procedure in Ontario:Ontario Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee[edit]
In Ontario, the Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee (JAAC) is made up of 13 members: 7 lay members, 2 judges, 1 member appointed by the Ontario Judicial Council, and 3 from the legal community.[2] JAAC recommends a list of 3 or 4 candidates, far less than its federal counterpart.[3] Proponents of the system argue that this procedure has limited patronage appoints to Ontario courts, and has diversified the makeup of judges in the province.[3] Unlike other committees, the JAAC advertises openings and interviews candidates in person.[4]
my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0 -
I’m also curious why someone who hates politicians and wants to get politics out of the legal system can then think the solution is to make judges into politicians.my small self... like a book amongst the many on a shelf0
-
Where has anyone said they want politicians picking Judes...Doesn't matter who you have if the politicians had the balls to actually pass tough laws...oftenreading said:I’m also curious why someone who hates politicians and wants to get politics out of the legal system can then think the solution is to make judges into politicians.Give Peas A Chance…0 -
Yes we should let all murderers walk free after 4 years ... what the fuck am I thinking.oftenreading said:
Show me your evidence that getting “tough on crime” improves public safety by measures such as reducing recidivism rates.Meltdown99 said:
They need a better process to select judges. He does have control over sentencing guidelines through legislation...but a liberal getting tough crime...LMFAO. If NAFTA dies over the dairy industry and tariffs are slapped on Autos then it won't matter ... he'll be voted out next year anyways.oftenreading said:Meltdown99 said:
Well allowing politicians to appointing judges gets us judges that treat murder like it's no bid deal. What ever, set up an independent panel that appoints judges that are completely untouchable by politicians and where politician have no influence. You really trust Trudeau at this point, the guy is one clusterfuck after enough. Either way there needs to be a better way. Or pass hard sentencing laws...but once again PM Fluff would never do that, he pays off terrorist, then looks at military vet missing one leg, and tells him "you are asking more than we can give". Real good leadership...oftenreading said:Does anyone really think that electing judges is the way to go? Just look at the mess that is the judicial system in the US. Electing judges simply makes yet another space for completely partisan pandering for votes.
Trudeau didn't appoint this judge, or any other provincial court judge. The PM is only involved in Chief Justice appointments. You'll have to find some other reason to complain about him, but that's clearly not going to be a problem for you.
In fact, this is the procedure in Ontario:Ontario Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee[edit]
In Ontario, the Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee (JAAC) is made up of 13 members: 7 lay members, 2 judges, 1 member appointed by the Ontario Judicial Council, and 3 from the legal community.[2] JAAC recommends a list of 3 or 4 candidates, far less than its federal counterpart.[3] Proponents of the system argue that this procedure has limited patronage appoints to Ontario courts, and has diversified the makeup of judges in the province.[3] Unlike other committees, the JAAC advertises openings and interviews candidates in person.[4]
Give Peas A Chance…0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help