Why did they boo Eddie?

1235722

Comments

  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    Proves many Americans are ignorant stooges and it hasn't changed in 15 years.
  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    mace1229 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    Well, considering that Eddie had every right in the world to express his very valid and even verifiable opinion through song under the Constitution, and considering how much damage Bush's war did to America and the world, and considering how it all started on a bed of lies, I think it is actually fairly easy to say who was right in this particular case. ;)
    I think everyone agrees the war in Afghanistan was warranted however Iraq was always the one that people argued about. Some people thought we didn't belong there and others thought it was better to fight the terrorists five thousand miles away instead of here while taking out a pretty horrible leader. 
    I'm not sure how Bush's war did damage to the world but the overall lesson is, don't mess with the United States.  ;)
    It's been 15 years so my memory isn't perfect. Correct me on what I get wrong.
    I agree with the Afgahn war, I don't think you could find 2 people in the whole country who didn't want to go to water after 9/11.
    What my memory isn't clear on is the Iraq war. The claims of WMD turned out to not be true I agree. What I don't remember is why was that Bush's fault? Wasn't it just bad info? Didn't he go to war thinking there was WMDs, and his department had bad intel?
    And I personally don't blame it all on bad intel. Wasn't the UN trying to do an inspection and they were denied? Therefore even further assuming their [bad] intel was accurate? This could have been avoided if Iraq cooperated with the UN for a WMD inspection.
    Wasn't Saddam a tyrant who murdered thousands, even tens or hundreds of thousands of his own people for political reasons? It didn't seem like a stretch that he could have WMDs he was willing to use, and to not cooperate with an inspection would all but confirm that to me. I can;t recall any evidence that this WMD thing was made up for the sole purpose to pursue a war in Iraq, possibly further his father's legacy. There's a difference between bad intel and Iraq refusing to cooperate, and forging fake evidence to start a war.
    I don't think Bush was a great president. But it just seems like history is writing him down to be a lot worse than he was, as some sort of war hungry modern-day tyrant who intentionally started a war to have his name in history, or revenge his father, depending on who you ask.
    I didn't want to go to war after 9/11 and I bet there is at least one more in this thread.  Those who think the proper response was killing a million innocent people needs their head examined imo.
  • Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Becauuuuse, cousin, all them A-rabs is the same!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Afghanistan was the training grounds, the location of al qaeda and the taliban, as well as where the master mind of 9/11 was located.  

    Iraq was a cluster fuck in my opinion but like I said in previous posts I respect that fact that we tried to bring democracy to the country.

    Saudia Arabia....yeah definite head scratcher Del.  We should have went there but ya know, oil and stuff lol.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    mcgruff10 said:
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Afghanistan was the training grounds, the location of al qaeda and the taliban, as well as where the master mind of 9/11 was located.  

    Iraq was a cluster fuck in my opinion but like I said in previous posts I respect that fact that we tried to bring democracy to the country.

    Saudia Arabia....yeah definite head scratcher Del.  We should have went there but ya know, oil and stuff lol.
    You must be confusing democracy with death and displacement.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    mcgruff10 said:
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Afghanistan was the training grounds, the location of al qaeda and the taliban, as well as where the master mind of 9/11 was located.  

    Iraq was a cluster fuck in my opinion but like I said in previous posts I respect that fact that we tried to bring democracy to the country.

    Saudia Arabia....yeah definite head scratcher Del.  We should have went there but ya know, oil and stuff lol.
    I respect the fact the US killed 100's of thousands of innocent civilians
  • KC138045
    KC138045 Columbus, OH Posts: 2,716
    PJ_Soul said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    brianlux said:
    What gets me is the "USA, USA" chant thing.  It's hollow, thoughtless, war-like without a real cause and just fucking stupid.
    War-like?  how so?  It's a quick chant that gathers steam quickly.  
    it's a brainless rallying cry. i have always found it quite unintelligent. not just in the states. anyone that chants the name of their nation in solidarity of anything to me is bizarre and reminds me of something like what brian said. 
    I agree. I think most non-Americans find it quite unsettling and icky. There is something quite aggressive and barbaric and mindless about it.
    What about the Eddie chants that happen at almost every show or the Ole' chants and all the other ones that seem to be a constant at South American shows?
    Columbus-2000
    Columbus-2003
    Cincinnati-2006
    Columbus-2010
    Wrigley-2013
    Cincinnati-2014
    Lexington-2016
    Wrigley 1 & 2-2018
  • mcgruff10 said:
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Afghanistan was the training grounds, the location of al qaeda and the taliban, as well as where the master mind of 9/11 was located.  

    Iraq was a cluster fuck in my opinion but like I said in previous posts I respect that fact that we tried to bring democracy to the country.

    Saudia Arabia....yeah definite head scratcher Del.  We should have went there but ya know, oil and stuff lol.

    Okay.

    I thought this little bit was plain as day. My point being: why are people like Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld not brought to charges? The war on terror was clearly misplaced. For all intents and purposes... they could have sold 'Canada' to a public that just needed any country to put in their sights.

    These assholes protected their Saudi friends. They knew an ounce of flesh was necessary- the US public would have no less- but Saudi Arabia was off limits given the trade agreements in place so they invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq under false pretenses (any brown will do!).

    Cheney relaxes with his millions and nary a peep from the US public who are victims of fraud (let alone all the innocent lives taken abroad and all the soldiers dying or maimed).

    How the f**k does that happen?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    mcgruff10 said:
    Someone help me out here.

    9-11 attackers were Saudi Arabian.

    Why attack Afghanistan? Yah... I know of the 'training grounds' pitch... but I'm not buying it.

    And then why attack Iraq? Yah... I know of the 'weapons of mass destruction' pitch... but that was proven to be unequivocally false (a massive lie).

    The motives were sinister and criminal. Leaders have been imprisoned for less.
    Afghanistan was the training grounds, the location of al qaeda and the taliban, as well as where the master mind of 9/11 was located.  

    Iraq was a cluster fuck in my opinion but like I said in previous posts I respect that fact that we tried to bring democracy to the country.

    Saudia Arabia....yeah definite head scratcher Del.  We should have went there but ya know, oil and stuff lol.

    Okay.

    I thought this little bit was plain as day. My point being: why are people like Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld not brought to charges? The war on terror was clearly misplaced. For all intents and purposes... they could have sold 'Canada' to a public that just needed any country to put in their sights.

    These assholes protected their Saudi friends. They knew an ounce of flesh was necessary- the US public would have no less- but Saudi Arabia was off limits given the trade agreements in place so they invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq under false pretenses (any brown will do!).

    Cheney relaxes with his millions and nary a peep from the US public who are victims of fraud (let alone all the innocent lives taken abroad and all the soldiers dying or maimed).

    How the f**k does that happen?
    Fear. 9/11 sucked. At least here in New Jersey and New York people were scared as hell. At first these blue states seemed to be supporting W and his crew but then things turned after Iraq. I still think Afghanistan was the right call but Iraq was not. 

    I have no clue why they weren't brought up on charges but they definitely should have been. 

    It s ironic that I just brought up to my class how Hitler and the burning of the reichstag could have been so similiar to 9/11. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    KC138045 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    brianlux said:
    What gets me is the "USA, USA" chant thing.  It's hollow, thoughtless, war-like without a real cause and just fucking stupid.
    War-like?  how so?  It's a quick chant that gathers steam quickly.  
    it's a brainless rallying cry. i have always found it quite unintelligent. not just in the states. anyone that chants the name of their nation in solidarity of anything to me is bizarre and reminds me of something like what brian said. 
    I agree. I think most non-Americans find it quite unsettling and icky. There is something quite aggressive and barbaric and mindless about it.
    What about the Eddie chants that happen at almost every show or the Ole' chants and all the other ones that seem to be a constant at South American shows?
    chanting the name of an entertainer or sports hero or whomever is a bit different than chanting the name of your country you hold blind allegiance to. I'm sure those same people have chanted the name of any other untold amount of entertainers, not just the one. an american wouldn't be caught dead chanting "Sweden! Sweden!" when they were playing hockey against Canada. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • KC138045
    KC138045 Columbus, OH Posts: 2,716
    KC138045 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    brianlux said:
    What gets me is the "USA, USA" chant thing.  It's hollow, thoughtless, war-like without a real cause and just fucking stupid.
    War-like?  how so?  It's a quick chant that gathers steam quickly.  
    it's a brainless rallying cry. i have always found it quite unintelligent. not just in the states. anyone that chants the name of their nation in solidarity of anything to me is bizarre and reminds me of something like what brian said. 
    I agree. I think most non-Americans find it quite unsettling and icky. There is something quite aggressive and barbaric and mindless about it.
    What about the Eddie chants that happen at almost every show or the Ole' chants and all the other ones that seem to be a constant at South American shows?
    chanting the name of an entertainer or sports hero or whomever is a bit different than chanting the name of your country you hold blind allegiance to. I'm sure those same people have chanted the name of any other untold amount of entertainers, not just the one. an american wouldn't be caught dead chanting "Sweden! Sweden!" when they were playing hockey against Canada. 
    My response was more towards the comments on NFL games and wrestling and how it fuels testosterone and the pack mentality.  This clearly does not only happen in the US.  Just look at European soccer.

    I also feel like the USA! chant has become like yelling "free bird" at a concert.
    Columbus-2000
    Columbus-2003
    Cincinnati-2006
    Columbus-2010
    Wrigley-2013
    Cincinnati-2014
    Lexington-2016
    Wrigley 1 & 2-2018
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    KC138045 said:
    KC138045 said:
    PJ_Soul said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    brianlux said:
    What gets me is the "USA, USA" chant thing.  It's hollow, thoughtless, war-like without a real cause and just fucking stupid.
    War-like?  how so?  It's a quick chant that gathers steam quickly.  
    it's a brainless rallying cry. i have always found it quite unintelligent. not just in the states. anyone that chants the name of their nation in solidarity of anything to me is bizarre and reminds me of something like what brian said. 
    I agree. I think most non-Americans find it quite unsettling and icky. There is something quite aggressive and barbaric and mindless about it.
    What about the Eddie chants that happen at almost every show or the Ole' chants and all the other ones that seem to be a constant at South American shows?
    chanting the name of an entertainer or sports hero or whomever is a bit different than chanting the name of your country you hold blind allegiance to. I'm sure those same people have chanted the name of any other untold amount of entertainers, not just the one. an american wouldn't be caught dead chanting "Sweden! Sweden!" when they were playing hockey against Canada. 
    My response was more towards the comments on NFL games and wrestling and how it fuels testosterone and the pack mentality.  This clearly does not only happen in the US.  Just look at European soccer.

    I also feel like the USA! chant has become like yelling "free bird" at a concert.
    true, but I feel that people in the US are chanting as a political phrase, whereas at european soccer, it is allegiance to a sports team. 

    I would NEVER go to a soccer game in europe. My wife went in the 90's, and she said it was absolute bedlam and she was legitimately afraid. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • I really enjoyed this song and theatre when they played it in Toronto.

    The poison from the poison stream caught up to you ELEVEN years ago and you floated out of here. Sept. 14, 08

  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,825
    I don't see what is wrong with the "USA" chant. 
    Chants are usually spontaneous and require hundreds of people to join in. That often can't work if they are more than a few words.
    Unless it is more organized or something pre-learned, almost all chants I've seen or heard follow that sample. 
    What "patriotic" chant would others here suggest that could be learned on the spot in an instant with hundreds of people?
    I can't think of any.
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,825
    edited January 2018
    tbergs said:
    mace1229 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    JC29856 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EguwlTSzc80

    I thought the majority of PJ fans are democrats?
    awesome stuff! when was that?
    uniondale '03.  (Nassau coliseum)
    when you say it turned ugly you mean, like fights broke out or throwing things at the band?
    The crowd turned on him real quick.  People were screaming "fuck you" and giving him the finger.  It got really tense in my section; it felt like a fight could break out in any moment.  The walk out was interesting too, people yelling how Ed was a douche, he should stick to music and just play rock n roll, people paid for music not politics...others defended him.  It was a really decisive moment for the band and the country.

    This 2003 tour was definitely crazy; the most upset I ever was at a pearl jam show was at Hershey not at Uniondale.  Ed said some pretty fucked up shit that night.
    okay. Now you have to explain. What did he say that night?
    Hershey rant

    https://youtu.be/bLHTfKueFL4
    Wow, never heard that before.
    Kinda of surprises me that he would make fun of a girl for her chest size. I know he was calling her out for flashing which I guess he didn't appreciate, but seemed like a little too far to call her out like that. Especially for that this band stands for.
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,458
    mace1229 said:
    tbergs said:
    mace1229 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    JC29856 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    JC29856 said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EguwlTSzc80

    I thought the majority of PJ fans are democrats?
    awesome stuff! when was that?
    uniondale '03.  (Nassau coliseum)
    when you say it turned ugly you mean, like fights broke out or throwing things at the band?
    The crowd turned on him real quick.  People were screaming "fuck you" and giving him the finger.  It got really tense in my section; it felt like a fight could break out in any moment.  The walk out was interesting too, people yelling how Ed was a douche, he should stick to music and just play rock n roll, people paid for music not politics...others defended him.  It was a really decisive moment for the band and the country.

    This 2003 tour was definitely crazy; the most upset I ever was at a pearl jam show was at Hershey not at Uniondale.  Ed said some pretty fucked up shit that night.
    okay. Now you have to explain. What did he say that night?
    Hershey rant

    https://youtu.be/bLHTfKueFL4
    Wow, never heard that before.
    Kinda of surprises me that he would make fun of a girl for her chest size. I know he was calling her out for flashing which I guess he didn't appreciate, but seemed like a little too far to call her out like that. Especially for that this band stands for.
    I thought the same thing too, but when you think about it, he was shaming her for that type of behaviour. I think he was probably insulted that this woman thought they were the kind of band that would appreciate/encourage that, like Motley Crue. i think he was probably personally offended. 

    Shaming someone for their looks/features is always in poor taste, so I can't say I can defend that. I wouldn't be surprised if he regrets saying it, given, as you said, what he/they stand for. 
    Hugh Freaking Dillon is currently out of the office, returning sometime in the fall




  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    I'm blown away by Mike's guitar tone at the beginning of the Uniondale version Thoughts posted.  Fantastic!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,825
    It sounded like he regretted it almost right away and tried to make a joke by making that weird left turn into crapping on little girls, but it was just weird and uncomfortable, not funny.
    I did like his comment about getting an education and voting instead though. Could have just said that and nothing else.
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,111
    edited January 2018
    mace1229 said:
    It sounded like he regretted it almost right away and tried to make a joke by making that weird left turn into crapping on little girls, but it was just weird and uncomfortable, not funny.
    I did like his comment about getting an education and voting instead though. Could have just said that and nothing else.
    Yeah it was the shitting on girls heads that resonated with me. I had experienced angry ed many times live but nothing like that. 
    Post edited by mcgruff10 on
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......