Hillary Clinton: What happened

PJfanwillneverleave1 · October 2017

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/celebrity/trump-jr-feuds-with-kimmel-‘you’re-probably-due-for-a-change’/ar-AAt23ht?li=AAadgLE&ocid=spartanntp
Trump Jr. and other Republicans have called on Democrats such as Hillary Clinton and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to return past donations from Weinstein in the wake of the harassment allegations. A number of Democrats, including Schumer, have returned donations.
"Weird, Hillary has been really quiet about Harvey Weinstein," he tweeted. "You would think she would be all Over this."

Lizard · October 2017

Kat said:

This was great, really enjoyed it. Thank you, Hillary.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/thank-you-notes-hillary-clinton_us_59d5c75ee4b0cde45872e445?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

And yes, thank heavens we didn't end up with an emotional and unstable president because that would have been a nightmare.

D'oh..... no shit eh??

ledvedderman · October 2017

Wait. Some Democrats in America are hypocrites as well?!?! And Jr. is a hypocrite for caring about Weinstein, but condoning his father?!? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked!

HughFreakingDillon · October 2017

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/celebrity/trump-jr-feuds-with-kimmel-‘you’re-probably-due-for-a-change’/ar-AAt23ht?li=AAadgLE&ocid=spartanntp
Trump Jr. and other Republicans have called on Democrats such as Hillary Clinton and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to return past donations from Weinstein in the wake of the harassment allegations. A number of Democrats, including Schumer, have returned donations.
"Weird, Hillary has been really quiet about Harvey Weinstein," he tweeted. "You would think she would be all Over this."

so Trump is accused, and he's elected president. Weinstein is accused, and the dem's are responsible for returning money he gave them? so then shouldn't trump give back the presidency?

cincybearcat · October 2017

HughFreakingDillon said:

show previous quotes

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/entertainment/celebrity/trump-jr-feuds-with-kimmel-‘you’re-probably-due-for-a-change’/ar-AAt23ht?li=AAadgLE&ocid=spartanntp
Trump Jr. and other Republicans have called on Democrats such as Hillary Clinton and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to return past donations from Weinstein in the wake of the harassment allegations. A number of Democrats, including Schumer, have returned donations.
"Weird, Hillary has been really quiet about Harvey Weinstein," he tweeted. "You would think she would be all Over this."

so Trump is accused, and he's elected president. Weinstein is accused, and the dem's are responsible for returning money he gave them? so then shouldn't trump give back the presidency?

Yes please.

JC29856 · October 2017

Speaking of New York

And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

The Juggler · October 2017

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

omg

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

CM189191 · October 2017

PJPOWER · October 2017

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

The Juggler · October 2017

PJPOWER said:

show previous quotes

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

Halifax2TheMax · October 2017

The Juggler said:

show previous quotes

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

The Republican spin machine is in overdrive as trump brilliantly displays his unfitness for the Office. His racist base will always be there for him. The independents and blue dog Dems not so much. Ship is a sinking.

Halifax2TheMax · October 2017

7Xs X 4Xs Follow the money.

JC29856 · October 2017

PJPOWER said:

show previous quotes

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

I have a nice tweet for you in about 24hours... You will enjoy it!!

The Juggler · October 2017

Halifax2TheMax said:

show previous quotes

The Juggler said:

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

The Republican spin machine is in overdrive as trump brilliantly displays his unfitness for the Office. His racist base will always be there for him. The independents and blue dog Dems not so much. Ship is a sinking.

Two republican senators are warning us that our republican president is a danger to our democracy.....but....but the dems paid for opposition research (which happens to be be true)! Look at the new shiny object that we ignored back in January!

PJPOWER · October 2017

The Juggler said:

show previous quotes

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

Non-news? Seems like a lot of news outlets, including CNN, think it is pretty newsworthy right now. I’m no fan of Trump, but I think it’s great that the Clintons are finally getting exposed too. I guess Russian collusion is fine with some around here as long as it was the dems doing it?

The Juggler · October 2017

PJPOWER said:

show previous quotes

The Juggler said:

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

Non-news? Seems like a lot of news outlets, including CNN, think it is pretty newsworthy right now. I’m no fan of Trump, but I think it’s great that the Clintons are finally getting exposed too. I guess Russian collusion is fine with some around here as long as it was the dems doing it?

Did you ignore this when CNN reported it in January?

And it seems like you are confused about the collusion thing...

PJPOWER · October 2017

The Juggler said:

show previous quotes

PJPOWER said:

The Juggler said:

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

Non-news? Seems like a lot of news outlets, including CNN, think it is pretty newsworthy right now. I’m no fan of Trump, but I think it’s great that the Clintons are finally getting exposed too. I guess Russian collusion is fine with some around here as long as it was the dems doing it?

Did you ignore this when CNN reported it in January?

And it seems like you are confused about the collusion thing...

Are you keeping up? This has a lot more to do with than just that dossier. Starting to show a long history of Clinton collusion with Russia and the Clinton foundation being heavily funded (bribed?) by Russians. As is said so many times here...”follow the money”.

Kat · October 2017

I'm sure not glad she's not the president. She would have been great and actually supported our Constitution.
Since the collection of opposition research is a long tradition with politicians, her organization collecting it is no big deal at all...just like it's no big deal who the Republican was who initially contracted with Fusion to collect the data on trump. It'll be interesting when that identity is revealed though. ) What's more important is, is the stuff in the dossier accurate? What's real and what isn't?

CM189191 · October 2017

PJPOWER said:

show previous quotes

The Juggler said:

PJPOWER said:

JC29856 said:

Speaking of New York
And so the worm turns. Make that worms.

Just as key congressional panels open new probes into the still-smoking debris of last year’s election, the revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee paid as much as $9 million for the discredited Russian dossier on Donald Trump flips the collusion script on its head.

Now it’s Democrats’ turn in the barrel.

The explosive report in the Washington Post goes a long way to explaining how the dossier was so widely spread among political reporters during the election. The Clinton camp must have passed it out like Halloween candy to its media handmaidens.

News organizations tried for months to confirm the salacious details, but couldn’t. The document became public when BuzzFeed, a loud Clinton booster, published it 10 days before the inauguration, while acknowledging it couldn’t verify the contents.

The Post report provides possible answers to other questions, too. Because Clinton’s team paid for the dossier, it’s likely that she gave it to the FBI, where James Comey planned to hire the former British agent who had compiled it to keep digging dirt on Trump.

The finding also raises the possibility that the dossier is what led the Obama White House to snoop on members of Trump’s team, and leak the “unmasked” names to the anti-Trump media in a bid to help Clinton.

In short, we now have compelling evidence that the dossier was the largest and dirtiest dirty trick of the 2016 campaign. And Clinton, who has played the victim card ever since her loss, was behind it the whole time.

Anybody surprised? Me neither.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/24/the-trump-dossier-was-clintons-dirtiest-political-trick/

Nope, Clinton’s have been chasing dirty money for years. Not surprised at all, glad she is not the President.

Figures this non news would bring our conspiracy theorists out of the woodworks

Top link on Drudge right now. GET.YOUR.NEWS.FROM.BETTER.SOURCES.

CNN reported this exact same thing in January.....they also reported, accurately, that it was originally ordered and funded by a GOP donor and after Trump secured the nomination it was picked up by the dems in mid summer 2016. Wow--politics!

The dossier is real. It has been corroborated. The fact that republicans and democrats paid for it means nothing. What's in it means everything.

Non-news? Seems like a lot of news outlets, including CNN, think it is pretty newsworthy right now. I’m no fan of Trump, but I think it’s great that the Clintons are finally getting exposed too. I guess Russian collusion is fine with some around here as long as it was the dems doing it?

Is that a joke? How were you able to type that without breaking into fits of laughter?

PJPOWER · October 2017

Kat said:

I'm sure not glad she's not the president. She would have been great and actually supported our Constitution.
Since the collection of opposition research is a long tradition with politicians, her organization collecting it is no big deal at all...just like it's no big deal who the Republican was who initially contracted with Fusion to collect the data on trump. It'll be interesting when that identity is revealed though. ) What's more important is, is the stuff in the dossier accurate? What's real and what isn't?

As well as “are the rumors about the uranium one deal benefiting the Clinton foundation true”. Lots of truths starting to surface.

Hillary Clinton: What happened

Comments

Welcome!

Quick Links

Categories