Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
she might be more honest now knowing that her political run is over.
Is it?
two failed presidential bids in a row? I'd say it is. now she's just going to cash in on the speech circuit to fund Chelsea's run for Senate. LOL
If we just gave up this silly presidential business and became a Monarchy we could have a strong run of Clintons ad infinitum.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
I honestly don't know what your point is. Is there a single person who belongs to (or even knows about the existence of) the DNC that don't know that from the get-go, Clinton was preferred by party officials? This isn't news - it's been assumed and/or known for at least two years.
Because cheating has never happened before in politics? Ever? You know whats never happened? A presidential campaign for POTUS colluding with a hostile foreign power to influence an election outcome. That's what has never happened before until Trump came along.
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
you remember arriving and running for cover from sniper fire?
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
she might be more honest now knowing that her political run is over.
Is it?
two failed presidential bids in a row? I'd say it is. now she's just going to cash in on the speech circuit to fund Chelsea's run for Senate. LOL
If we just gave up this silly presidential business and became a Monarchy we could have a strong run of Clintons ad infinitum.
can you imagine the Trump sons as the successors to the American throne? Good god.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
she might be more honest now knowing that her political run is over.
toasted first by a no name senator community organizer and then by a celebrity game show host bafoon
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
she might be more honest now knowing that her political run is over.
Is it?
two failed presidential bids in a row? I'd say it is. now she's just going to cash in on the speech circuit to fund Chelsea's run for Senate. LOL
Yeah I remain unconvinced that it is. Or, maybe more accurately, that she has accepted that it is. Time will tell. I would be stunned to see her get the nomination in 2020 but I would not be stunned to learn she was dipping her toe in and feeling out a possible run.
I honestly don't know what your point is. Is there a single person who belongs to (or even knows about the existence of) the DNC that don't know that from the get-go, Clinton was preferred by party officials? This isn't news - it's been assumed and/or known for at least two years.
Because cheating has never happened before in politics? Ever? You know whats never happened? A presidential campaign for POTUS colluding with a hostile foreign power to influence an election outcome. That's what has never happened before until Trump came along.
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
Here's an idea...don't buy her book. Check the sales once it comes out and update us as to whether the world wanted it.
Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018) The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago 2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy 2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE) 2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston 2020: Oakland, Oakland:2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana 2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville 2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
Here's an idea...don't buy her book. Check the sales once it comes out and update us as to whether the world wanted it.
The last presidential election was a mess. We had no one who truly inspired with leadership potential and because of that added up enough protest votes such that we ended up electing a clown. And if you are not a strong enough candidate to beat a clown in an election, you are probably not going to make a good (let alone a great) president.
Please, America, give us better choices in 2020!
anyone ever stop to ask, of all the talk of Trump running pres since he became a household name, why he chose this particular election to run? at age 72 or however old he is. just dumb luck I guess, maybe it's all about his tv network aspirations, or simply Putin told him to do so. Putin had such a miserable relationship with Clinton and Co(uranium1)(toni podesta)
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,346
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
Here's an idea...don't buy her book. Check the sales once it comes out and update us as to whether the world wanted it.
Her book will do fine for a time and then in a few years you will see one in every thrift store in America. I've seen this time and again. Books on political figure with staying power are not all that common. A few few example: David McCullough's Truman, Walter Isaacson's Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
The last presidential election was a mess. We had no one who truly inspired with leadership potential and because of that added up enough protest votes such that we ended up electing a clown. And if you are not a strong enough candidate to beat a clown in an election, you are probably not going to make a good (let alone a great) president.
Please, America, give us better choices in 2020!
I think there is a difference between winning an election and being a great president. was Hillary a leader, yes I would say she was. look at all the things she fought and won for. shit just her speech in Beijing on womans right makes her a great leader.
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
Here's an idea...don't buy her book. Check the sales once it comes out and update us as to whether the world wanted it.
Her book will do fine for a time and then in a few years you will see one in every thrift store in America. I've seen this time and again. Books on political figure with staying power are not all that common. A few few example: David McCullough's Truman, Walter Isaacson's Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.
you can realistically say that about all books not just books on political figures
0
brianlux
Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,346
Keep cashing them checks I guess. I don't think the world really needs another Hillary Clinton book, and I doubt very much she is going to be any more open and honest here than she's ever been in the past. That's not because she is a liar, but it is because she is a lifelong politician. But hey, if some publisher is willing to pay and there's an audience for it, have at it.
Hillary was a deeply flawed candidate who secured the nomination of her party via an even more flawed process that began (and arguably ended) long before the Iowa caucuses. She would undoubtedly have made a better President than Donald Trump but so too would almost anyone else. That isn't the bar for being a great or even good President.
Here's an idea...don't buy her book. Check the sales once it comes out and update us as to whether the world wanted it.
Her book will do fine for a time and then in a few years you will see one in every thrift store in America. I've seen this time and again. Books on political figure with staying power are not all that common. A few few example: David McCullough's Truman, Walter Isaacson's Benjamin Franklin: An American Life.
you can realistically say that about all books not just books on political figures
Well, it's true, there's a lot of landfill out there.
"Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!" -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
I honestly don't know what your point is. Is there a single person who belongs to (or even knows about the existence of) the DNC that don't know that from the get-go, Clinton was preferred by party officials? This isn't news - it's been assumed and/or known for at least two years.
Because cheating has never happened before in politics? Ever? You know whats never happened? A presidential campaign for POTUS colluding with a hostile foreign power to influence an election outcome. That's what has never happened before until Trump came along.
typical centrist math 1wrong + 1wrong = right
What was wrong? That she cheated? Or that the party machination chose a democrat over a socialist? Typical Bernie Bro feeling the Bern. And hey, trump's an idiot but lets justify his presidency.
I honestly don't know what your point is. Is there a single person who belongs to (or even knows about the existence of) the DNC that don't know that from the get-go, Clinton was preferred by party officials? This isn't news - it's been assumed and/or known for at least two years.
Because cheating has never happened before in politics? Ever? You know whats never happened? A presidential campaign for POTUS colluding with a hostile foreign power to influence an election outcome. That's what has never happened before until Trump came along.
typical centrist math 1wrong + 1wrong = right
What was wrong? That she cheated? Or that the party machination chose a democrat over a socialist? Typical Bernie Bro feeling the Bern. And hey, trump's an idiot but lets justify his presidency.
are you asking for my quote posts about Bernie? it didn't work out well for the last guy that asked for non-whiteness quote posts.... say the word, I'm at 62% battery and the search is properly functioning
I honestly don't know what your point is. Is there a single person who belongs to (or even knows about the existence of) the DNC that don't know that from the get-go, Clinton was preferred by party officials? This isn't news - it's been assumed and/or known for at least two years.
Because cheating has never happened before in politics? Ever? You know whats never happened? A presidential campaign for POTUS colluding with a hostile foreign power to influence an election outcome. That's what has never happened before until Trump came along.
typical centrist math 1wrong + 1wrong = right
What was wrong? That she cheated? Or that the party machination chose a democrat over a socialist? Typical Bernie Bro feeling the Bern. And hey, trump's an idiot but lets justify his presidency.
are you asking for my quote posts about Bernie? it didn't work out well for the last guy that asked for non-whiteness quote posts.... say the word, I'm at 62% battery and the search is properly functioning
What are "non-whiteness quote posts?" Crypticness strikes again? Search and post away, just refrain from Comet Pizza, please.
Too expensive of toilet paper for me...maybe an "elite" could use it to wipe their butt.
A Trump supporter that wipes his ass?
Do you brush your tooth too?
(kidding... kind of lol)
Haha, I wouldn't call myself a Trump supporter as much as an anti-Clintonite. Maybe those are both the same now with all the blurry lines. Wonder if Billy will hollow out any of these books to hide his Cuban cigars in. https://youtu.be/eFktbuhAyLM
The last presidential election was a mess. We had no one who truly inspired with leadership potential and because of that added up enough protest votes such that we ended up electing a clown. And if you are not a strong enough candidate to beat a clown in an election, you are probably not going to make a good (let alone a great) president.
Please, America, give us better choices in 2020!
anyone ever stop to ask, of all the talk of Trump running pres since he became a household name, why he chose this particular election to run? at age 72 or however old he is. just dumb luck I guess, maybe it's all about his tv network aspirations, or simply Putin told him to do so. Putin had such a miserable relationship with Clinton and Co(uranium1)(toni podesta)
He ran in the past and the idiot has been a household name for years. Bullies are opportunists, and 2016 provided a good opportunity since the Republicans were rudderless and had no platform.
I hope it's a good read; I'm looking forward to reading it. She's had time to analyze the events. She would have made a very good president, much better than what we have now....a president who divides us worse than we are.
I am sorry to disagree with you Kat but she would not have been a very good president, she would have been a great president.
Comments
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-EV 8/14/93
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Putin had such a miserable relationship with Clinton and Co(uranium1)(toni podesta)
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Do you brush your tooth too?
(kidding... kind of lol)
say the word, I'm at 62% battery and the search is properly functioning
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Well I'll be!
-Eddie Vedder, "Smile"
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©