President Elect Trump

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/science/nuclear-weapons-obama-united-states.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-trillion-dollar-question-obama-did-not-answer-in-hiroshima/

Yea, because like, you know, in an oversimplified Trumpian world, like slow, slow, slowing the dismantling of, you know, like, nuclear bombs and stuff, is like, you know, the same as, like, you know, increasing the nuclear arsenal, bigly. When like the world, the whole world, like everybody you know like gets it and comes to their senses about nukes, like we need more than 7,000 + nukes, hugely.

Say what, shouldn't this conversation have taken place 9 months ago?

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-cost-of-modernizing-us-nuclear-weapons-to-fall-to-next-president-2016-9

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/23/obamas-new-rationale-for-1-trillion-nuclear-program-augurs-a-new-arms-race-with-russia/

http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trillion-dollar-question-the-media-have-neglected-to-ask-presidential-candidates/

http://www.defenseone.com/business/2016/11/obamas-final-arms-export-tally-more-doubles-bushs/133014/

josevolution said:

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/science/nuclear-weapons-obama-united-states.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-trillion-dollar-question-obama-did-not-answer-in-hiroshima/

Yea, because like, you know, in an oversimplified Trumpian world, like slow, slow, slowing the dismantling of, you know, like, nuclear bombs and stuff, is like, you know, the same as, like, you know, increasing the nuclear arsenal, bigly. When like the world, the whole world, like everybody you know like gets it and comes to their senses about nukes, like we need more than 7,000 + nukes, hugely.

Say what, shouldn't this conversation have taken place 9 months ago?

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-cost-of-modernizing-us-nuclear-weapons-to-fall-to-next-president-2016-9

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/23/obamas-new-rationale-for-1-trillion-nuclear-program-augurs-a-new-arms-race-with-russia/

http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trillion-dollar-question-the-media-have-neglected-to-ask-presidential-candidates/

http://www.defenseone.com/business/2016/11/obamas-final-arms-export-tally-more-doubles-bushs/133014/

Don't act like you don't live on this planet or this country he's your president too and he represents you even though you might of not voted for him or her , what ever bad decisions his administration makes will affect all of us as a whole ! So are you ok with more nukes for Russia & USA?

JC29856 said:

josevolution said:

JC29856 said:

Halifax2TheMax said:

JC29856 said:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/05/27/science/nuclear-weapons-obama-united-states.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-trillion-dollar-question-obama-did-not-answer-in-hiroshima/

Yea, because like, you know, in an oversimplified Trumpian world, like slow, slow, slowing the dismantling of, you know, like, nuclear bombs and stuff, is like, you know, the same as, like, you know, increasing the nuclear arsenal, bigly. When like the world, the whole world, like everybody you know like gets it and comes to their senses about nukes, like we need more than 7,000 + nukes, hugely.

Say what, shouldn't this conversation have taken place 9 months ago?

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-cost-of-modernizing-us-nuclear-weapons-to-fall-to-next-president-2016-9

https://theintercept.com/2016/02/23/obamas-new-rationale-for-1-trillion-nuclear-program-augurs-a-new-arms-race-with-russia/

http://billmoyers.com/story/the-trillion-dollar-question-the-media-have-neglected-to-ask-presidential-candidates/

http://www.defenseone.com/business/2016/11/obamas-final-arms-export-tally-more-doubles-bushs/133014/

Don't act like you don't live on this planet or this country he's your president too and he represents you even though you might of not voted for him or her , what ever bad decisions his administration makes will affect all of us as a whole ! So are you ok with more nukes for Russia & USA?

Im not sure what you're getting at but Ill answer your last question. OBAMA bought into the new nukes program to the tune of a trillion dollars based on the old nukes being "dangerous and possibly ineffective". If this is in fact the case (which I doubt) then yes I guess we should replace old dangerous nukes with new effective safer nukes (???) and I guess that applies to all countries with nukes (Israel doesnt have nukes so no worry there!). My opinion, we should live in a nuke free world but thats not going to happen so whats the alternative? Old ineffective nukes or new safer nukes.
Now moving on to the point of my posts, Obama agreed to this a year ago, if Trump is a bafoon and an idiot now what does that make Obama a year ago?? Furthermore, if Trump is a bafoon for calling for upgraded weapons programs what does is make Obama given this:

The Obama administration has approved more than $278 billion in foreign arms sales in its eight years, more than double the total of the previous administration, according to figures released by the Pentagon on Tuesday.

Many of the approved deals — most but hardly all of which have become actual sales — have been to Mideast nations, including key allies in the campaign against Islamic State militants and countries that have been building up their defenses in fear of a nuclear Iran.

Saudi Arabia has been the largest recipient, reaping prospective deals worth more than $115 billion, according to notices announcing the deals that were sent to Congress for approval.

“Nobody even comes close” for the number of deals and total value, said William Hartung, director of the Arms Security Project at the Center for International Policy.

Among the weapons approved for Riyadh: F-15 fighter jets, Apache attack helicopters, Blackhawk utility helicopters, missile interceptors, armored vehicles and bombs and missiles.