The Podesta Emails
Comments
-
Did you not read the link? The guy that wrote the Newsweek article spells it out pretty clearly. Unless I'm misunderstandingJC29856 said:
Edited? Where's the edit?Gern Blansten said:
But the email that we were discussing was clearly edited to make it seem like Podesta was making statements that were in the Newsweek article.JC29856 said:
I consider myself a good filter, if you'be seen my posts Sid doesn't rank too high, I didn't post that particular leak bec it was reference being made but newsweek and the author are trying to distort what may have happened. I posted the YouTube and said, not entirely true.Gern Blansten said:
I have zero doubt these leaks are authentic based on wiki track record and that no one has said otherwise. The lazy way to disprove them is to repeat Putin and Russia hackers over and over without proof.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Gern Blansten said:
I didn't say he couldn't get the uninformed votetonifig8 said:
You said he couldn't get dems or independents.Gern Blansten said:
Do you have a link for the full context of that statement?tonifig8 said:
How about her public policy and private policy? Was that earth shattering?!?!?! Ah, of course not, we all new she was a two face lying politician.Gern Blansten said:
Earth Shattering!!JC29856 said:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
Nope nothing hear. Exactly 1 day before the debate.
Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
From:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com To: donna@brazileassociates.com, balcantara@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-03-12 19:41 Subject: Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
Hi. Yes, it is one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it. Betsaida - can you send her answer on death penalty? Sent from my iPhone
He's getting my vote. If you need proof that I've been a strong supporter of candidates on the left- let me know. I'm sure I can pull an article or two.
why don't you inform me then, since you're apparently above it all. Or why don't you update your post to clarify this, instead of acting like a condescending prick.
Educate me on Clinton. We all know Trump is garbage.Post edited by Boxes&Books on0 -
Those words sounded really, really familiar. Really familiar. Like, so familiar they struck me as something I wrote. Because they were something I wrote.
The Russians were quoting two sentences from a 10,000-word piece I wrote for Newsweek, which Blumenthal had emailed to Podesta. There was no mistaking that Blumenthal was citing Newsweek—the magazine’s name and citations for photographs appeared throughout the attached article. The Russians had carefully selected the “of course” paragraph, which mentions there were legitimate points of criticism regarding Clinton and Benghazi, all of which had been acknowledged in nine reports about the attack and by the former secretary of state herself. But that was hardly the point of the story, “Benghazi Biopsy: A Comprehensive Guide to One of America’s Worst Political Outrages.” The piece is about the obscene politicization of the assault that killed four Americans, and the article slammed the Republican Benghazi committee, which was engaged in a political show trial disguised as a congressional investigation—the 10th inquiry into the tragedy.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Correct as reference.mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20380 -
..0
-
Why would I read the newsweek article when I read the source itself, the leak?Gern Blansten said:
Did you not read the link? The guy that wrote the Newsweek article spells it out pretty clearly. Unless I'm misunderstandingJC29856 said:
Edited? Where's the edit?Gern Blansten said:
But the email that we were discussing was clearly edited to make it seem like Podesta was making statements that were in the Newsweek article.JC29856 said:
I consider myself a good filter, if you'be seen my posts Sid doesn't rank too high, I didn't post that particular leak bec it was reference being made but newsweek and the author are trying to distort what may have happened. I posted the YouTube and said, not entirely true.Gern Blansten said:
I have zero doubt these leaks are authentic based on wiki track record and that no one has said otherwise. The lazy way to disprove them is to repeat Putin and Russia hackers over and over without proof.0 -
Just as I thought. Read the link dude.JC29856 said:
Why would I read the newsweek article when I read the source itself, the leak?Gern Blansten said:
Did you not read the link? The guy that wrote the Newsweek article spells it out pretty clearly. Unless I'm misunderstandingJC29856 said:
Edited? Where's the edit?Gern Blansten said:
But the email that we were discussing was clearly edited to make it seem like Podesta was making statements that were in the Newsweek article.JC29856 said:
I consider myself a good filter, if you'be seen my posts Sid doesn't rank too high, I didn't post that particular leak bec it was reference being made but newsweek and the author are trying to distort what may have happened. I posted the YouTube and said, not entirely true.Gern Blansten said:
I have zero doubt these leaks are authentic based on wiki track record and that no one has said otherwise. The lazy way to disprove them is to repeat Putin and Russia hackers over and over without proof.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I voted for Sanders, and donated some money to his campaign as well.tonifig8 said:
Wait one minute. I donated a whole lot of money and time to help elect Sanders. I wanted to build on that progress we made and hopefully fine tune it. Clinton is not my fault. That's your fault.rgambs said:
Wait, you're joking right?tonifig8 said:
I'm an independent - I've never voted on the right.Gern Blansten said:I don't think any of this is revealing. The GOP has already convinced their sheeple that she is the devil. These emails are certainly not going to influence the dems or moderates.
This evidence has convinced me to vote for Trump. I was never planning on voting for Trump- I think he's complete garbage.
You are willing to risk throwing away every bit of forward motion hard fought by true progressives because you of an irrational hatred of Clinton? A likely majority for conservatives in the Senate, House, White House, and Supreme Court...all because Hiwwawy huwts youw feewings?
I recognize now that a trump presidency would do nothing for our country, other then having a shit president (wouldn't be the first) and having to wait four more years for a good president.
Clinton's corruption is a gigantic threat to our democracy and we may never have another chance at this again. She has the DOJ, Wall Street, FBI, career politicians, and the media under her thumb. Think about that for one min. If she wants war who better then the media to spin it? She'll have Assange and Snowden silenced and I'm sure she won't be so careless next time around.
She would have a free pass, not saying republicans are going to roll over in public, but think about the things we can't see- the Blackdoot deals - the Tarmac meetings... All of that good stuff.
Trump on the other hand wouldn't be able to fart without the media blowing shit up. After he leaves the White House we can burn all the sheets and erase him from our memories. Shit we could probably get him impeached
Use common sense. It's our greatest trait.
A Trump presidency extends well beyond 4 years of a bad President, that's just common sense with the Supreme Court nominations that are on the horizon. Trump will nominate Justices that will rule against everything you care about for decades. Common sense says don't vote for that.
To the part I bolded:
You are paranoid and you sound like a right-winger who is afraid Obama is going to confiscate all the guns and declare himself Emperor.
Just yesterday I told a right-winger friend of a friend on Facebook to take a chill pill because they sounded like an insane person. Speaking on the possibility of Clinton being elected he said:
"The Republic is gone, freedom and liberty are dead. No more honor and duty, no more kumbaya. America will be no more."
Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
Exactly. Just what I thought when I read the link. Does Julian Assange vet this shit before he claims it'll take Hillary down or is he just adding to the confusion and trying to make himself relevant?mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038
And this is why the republicans haven't piled on and stayed with Trump, they know its all political theater. No substance. Again, where are the indictments?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Dude. I read the email and posted here, i know it was making references, that's why I didn't post it here. Trump was too stupid to realize that or he was trying to deceive. The newsweek guy is a spinster, I don't need to read his second hand article.Gern Blansten said:
Just as I thought. Read the link dude.JC29856 said:
Why would I read the newsweek article when I read the source itself, the leak?Gern Blansten said:
Did you not read the link? The guy that wrote the Newsweek article spells it out pretty clearly. Unless I'm misunderstandingJC29856 said:
Edited? Where's the edit?Gern Blansten said:
But the email that we were discussing was clearly edited to make it seem like Podesta was making statements that were in the Newsweek article.JC29856 said:
I consider myself a good filter, if you'be seen my posts Sid doesn't rank too high, I didn't post that particular leak bec it was reference being made but newsweek and the author are trying to distort what may have happened. I posted the YouTube and said, not entirely true.Gern Blansten said:
I have zero doubt these leaks are authentic based on wiki track record and that no one has said otherwise. The lazy way to disprove them is to repeat Putin and Russia hackers over and over without proof.Post edited by JC29856 on0 -
There was no mistaking that Blumenthal was citing Newsweek.
Isn't that the same as using as reference?0 -
and presented AS words directly spoken/written by either of those two men by Trump.JC29856 said:
Correct as reference.mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Correct...and as I stated plausible that anyone reading would could make the same mistake or that Trump was purposefully trying to deceive.mickeyrat said:
and presented AS words directly spoken/written by either of those two men by Trump.JC29856 said:
Correct as reference.mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038
Still searching for "edited" or "edit"0 -
JC29856 said:
This isn't exactly true ENTERTAINING yes.
https://youtu.be/Y86z3k5s8XY0 -
gotcha...I misunderstood you (dude)JC29856 said:
Dude. I read the email and posted here, i know it was making references, that's why I didn't post it here. Trump was too stupid to realize that or he was trying to deceive. The newsweek guy is a spinster, I don't need to read his second hand article.Gern Blansten said:
Just as I thought. Read the link dude.JC29856 said:
Why would I read the newsweek article when I read the source itself, the leak?Gern Blansten said:
Did you not read the link? The guy that wrote the Newsweek article spells it out pretty clearly. Unless I'm misunderstandingJC29856 said:
Edited? Where's the edit?Gern Blansten said:
But the email that we were discussing was clearly edited to make it seem like Podesta was making statements that were in the Newsweek article.JC29856 said:
I consider myself a good filter, if you'be seen my posts Sid doesn't rank too high, I didn't post that particular leak bec it was reference being made but newsweek and the author are trying to distort what may have happened. I posted the YouTube and said, not entirely true.Gern Blansten said:
I have zero doubt these leaks are authentic based on wiki track record and that no one has said otherwise. The lazy way to disprove them is to repeat Putin and Russia hackers over and over without proof.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Not paranoid at all. And the whole fear tactic is played by both party's. Clinton released pics of Obama in Muslim garments. She was called out on it again during the debate and didn't fight the accusation, for the second time.rgambs said:
I voted for Sanders, and donated some money to his campaign as well.tonifig8 said:
Wait one minute. I donated a whole lot of money and time to help elect Sanders. I wanted to build on that progress we made and hopefully fine tune it. Clinton is not my fault. That's your fault.rgambs said:
Wait, you're joking right?tonifig8 said:
I'm an independent - I've never voted on the right.Gern Blansten said:I don't think any of this is revealing. The GOP has already convinced their sheeple that she is the devil. These emails are certainly not going to influence the dems or moderates.
This evidence has convinced me to vote for Trump. I was never planning on voting for Trump- I think he's complete garbage.
You are willing to risk throwing away every bit of forward motion hard fought by true progressives because you of an irrational hatred of Clinton? A likely majority for conservatives in the Senate, House, White House, and Supreme Court...all because Hiwwawy huwts youw feewings?
I recognize now that a trump presidency would do nothing for our country, other then having a shit president (wouldn't be the first) and having to wait four more years for a good president.
Clinton's corruption is a gigantic threat to our democracy and we may never have another chance at this again. She has the DOJ, Wall Street, FBI, career politicians, and the media under her thumb. Think about that for one min. If she wants war who better then the media to spin it? She'll have Assange and Snowden silenced and I'm sure she won't be so careless next time around.
She would have a free pass, not saying republicans are going to roll over in public, but think about the things we can't see- the Blackdoot deals - the Tarmac meetings... All of that good stuff.
Trump on the other hand wouldn't be able to fart without the media blowing shit up. After he leaves the White House we can burn all the sheets and erase him from our memories. Shit we could probably get him impeached
Use common sense. It's our greatest trait.
A Trump presidency extends well beyond 4 years of a bad President, that's just common sense with the Supreme Court nominations that are on the horizon. Trump will nominate Justices that will rule against everything you care about for decades. Common sense says don't vote for that.
To the part I bolded:
You are paranoid and you sound like a right-winger who is afraid Obama is going to confiscate all the guns and declare himself Emperor.
Just yesterday I told a right-winger friend of a friend on Facebook to take a chill pill because they sounded like an insane person. Speaking on the possibility of Clinton being elected he said:
"The Republic is gone, freedom and liberty are dead. No more honor and duty, no more kumbaya. America will be no more."
I believe we wont get another stab at this since Clinton wont make these same mistakes again. People who expose this corruption will have a much harder time gaining access, and I'm sure Clinton will come down hard on whistleblowers. She is a bigger threat to our democracy then Trump can ever be. Her behavior and untrustworthiness is off the charts and doesn't deserve to hold the highest office. I wont give her that prize. Trump will probably be impeached or would have to step down because of lawsuits. We can make a real mess of his presidency. I prefer that to having someone who is going to make the corruption bigger. That's not conspiracy talk.
The SJ is something I too am concerned about. But that alone wont convince me to vote for her. We'll have to make sure we elect progressives this election cycle to put up a fight against a bad nomination. Besides Dems and Reps are basically the same thing.0 -
Hahahaha yeah, they sure are!tonifig8 said:
Not paranoid at all. And the whole fear tactic is played by both party's. Clinton released pics of Obama in Muslim garments. She was called out on it again during the debate and didn't fight the accusation, for the second time.rgambs said:
I voted for Sanders, and donated some money to his campaign as well.tonifig8 said:
Wait one minute. I donated a whole lot of money and time to help elect Sanders. I wanted to build on that progress we made and hopefully fine tune it. Clinton is not my fault. That's your fault.rgambs said:
Wait, you're joking right?tonifig8 said:
I'm an independent - I've never voted on the right.Gern Blansten said:I don't think any of this is revealing. The GOP has already convinced their sheeple that she is the devil. These emails are certainly not going to influence the dems or moderates.
This evidence has convinced me to vote for Trump. I was never planning on voting for Trump- I think he's complete garbage.
You are willing to risk throwing away every bit of forward motion hard fought by true progressives because you of an irrational hatred of Clinton? A likely majority for conservatives in the Senate, House, White House, and Supreme Court...all because Hiwwawy huwts youw feewings?
I recognize now that a trump presidency would do nothing for our country, other then having a shit president (wouldn't be the first) and having to wait four more years for a good president.
Clinton's corruption is a gigantic threat to our democracy and we may never have another chance at this again. She has the DOJ, Wall Street, FBI, career politicians, and the media under her thumb. Think about that for one min. If she wants war who better then the media to spin it? She'll have Assange and Snowden silenced and I'm sure she won't be so careless next time around.
She would have a free pass, not saying republicans are going to roll over in public, but think about the things we can't see- the Blackdoot deals - the Tarmac meetings... All of that good stuff.
Trump on the other hand wouldn't be able to fart without the media blowing shit up. After he leaves the White House we can burn all the sheets and erase him from our memories. Shit we could probably get him impeached
Use common sense. It's our greatest trait.
A Trump presidency extends well beyond 4 years of a bad President, that's just common sense with the Supreme Court nominations that are on the horizon. Trump will nominate Justices that will rule against everything you care about for decades. Common sense says don't vote for that.
To the part I bolded:
You are paranoid and you sound like a right-winger who is afraid Obama is going to confiscate all the guns and declare himself Emperor.
Just yesterday I told a right-winger friend of a friend on Facebook to take a chill pill because they sounded like an insane person. Speaking on the possibility of Clinton being elected he said:
"The Republic is gone, freedom and liberty are dead. No more honor and duty, no more kumbaya. America will be no more."
I believe we wont get another stab at this since Clinton wont make these same mistakes again. People who expose this corruption will have a much harder time gaining access, and I'm sure Clinton will come down hard on whistleblowers. She is a bigger threat to our democracy then Trump can ever be. Her behavior and untrustworthiness is off the charts and doesn't deserve to hold the highest office. I wont give her that prize. Trump will probably be impeached or would have to step down because of lawsuits. We can make a real mess of his presidency. I prefer that to having someone who is going to make the corruption bigger. That's not conspiracy talk.
The SJ is something I too am concerned about. But that alone wont convince me to vote for her. We'll have to make sure we elect progressives this election cycle to put up a fight against a bad nomination. Besides Dems and Reps are basically the same thing.
Except for their stances on nearly every single issue lolMonkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-hillary-clinton-is-the-right-choice-for-progressives/2016/10/11/e5e58c9c-8f2f-11e6-a6a3-d50061aa9fae_story.html?utm_term=.20bd77a5b67f
...At the same time, though, it’s important for progressives to recognize just how far we’ve come. Since her last campaign eight years ago, Clinton has moved considerably to the left on a number of issues in response to movements for change. In the first debate, when the stakes were at their highest, she talked about her commitment to affordable college, Medicare for all, and combatting institutional racism. That is something to celebrate. As president, she will fight for paid family leave, affordable child care, and a woman’s right to choose. We can have disagreements and still believe that she is going to move us forward.
For progressives who remain wary of Clinton, the answer is not to vote for a third-party candidate. While he gets some issues right, Johnson’s economic plan is a more extreme version of the Republican economic agenda, and he seems totally ignorant of world affairs. Stein has helped advance many progressive issues, but until we make the electoral reforms needed to open up the two-party system, neither the Greens nor other third parties can truly serve as an effective vehicle for their ideas. And voting for either Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson or Green Party candidate Jill Stein is a poor way to send a message when there is any chance, no matter how small, that it could lead to a President Trump.
Clinton is clearly the best candidate in the race. She also offers progressives the best chance to advance our issues and vision for the country — but only if we keep applying pressure and holding her accountable. As the Nation wrote last week, “Over the past eight years, progressives have learned the hard way that voting for hope and change doesn’t always deliver hope and change. So while voting for Clinton may be necessary, it is hardly sufficient.” That’s why, the day after we elect her president, we must redouble our efforts to push for the platform that progressives helped create.
Take it from Sanders himself. “On many, many issues, her views are progressive. In many areas, they are awesome,” he recently said of Clinton. “Where they’re not progressive, we’ve got to push her.”Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
and presented AS words directly spoken/written by either of those two men by Trump.JC29856 said:
Correct as reference.mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2038_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help