The Podesta Emails
Comments
-
Correct...and as I stated plausible that anyone reading would could make the same mistake or that Trump was purposefully trying to deceive.mickeyrat said:
and presented AS words directly spoken/written by either of those two men by Trump.JC29856 said:
Correct as reference.mickeyrat said:
that whole thing read as a copy paste OF the article. not as words directly from either podesta or blumanthalJC29856 said:Here is the leak email that Trump read aloud and that Dem spinsters are falsely claiming are fake.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/20380 -
Wiki calls out spinster
@kurteichenwald You are a fraud. Link to actual email: https://t.co/akvUCmWbot it is clearly not implying that you are Sidney Blumenthal.0 -
War on terror vs US allies
We need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region… The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.
How can Hilliary NOT know US allies and Clinton foundation donors support ISISPost edited by JC29856 on0 -
Intelligence authorship
Clinton herself sent the 2014 email directly from her personal account to campaign chairman John Podesta. But the intelligence content has the look and style of Sidney Blumenthal’s authorship. Blumenthal is a long-time top Clinton advisor who has provided many such sensitive intelligence briefings to Clinton, even when she was Secretary of State.
It appears that Clinton either copied or forwarded the intelligence briefing which was the basis for the short exchange with Podesta.0 -
-
ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
I think he was trying to reach out to the African-American demographic. A little late for that Trumpy. That ship sailed when you took answer from a black man in the last debate and immediately assumed he was from the inner city, and then proceeded to call him poor, uneducated and unemployed.mickeyrat said:ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?
0 -
Is this an attack on JC? Not sure why you need to dumb down the convo. He's providing information (leaks) that not even the White House is questioning its authenticity. That's pretty serious.CM189191 said:
I think he was trying to reach out to the African-American demographic. A little late for that Trumpy. That ship sailed when you took answer from a black man in the last debate and immediately assumed he was from the inner city, and then proceeded to call him poor, uneducated and unemployed.mickeyrat said:ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?
0 -
* mistake
0 -
Stonyfield Farm CEO raises 400k for Clinton after she pledged her anti-GMO stance to him. Gets upset when she says the opposite in public speeches.
"Hillary's publicly opposing this [GMO labeling] is both the wrong policy position but also a direct breach of what she told me, namely that she supports average citizens and moms having the right to know. I have raised nearly $400K for her because I believed what she told me. If that is not the case, I'd like the chance to speak to her."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2397
As a progressive, and someone who only purchases foods with the label for my daughter - this is a very important matter to me.
Anyone know what her official position is on this? I mean the real position. Hope someone around here knows her on a personal level.
Clearly she must know most millennials favor the label.Post edited by Boxes&Books on0 -
Not once but thrice!tonifig8 said:Stonyfield Farm CEO raises 400k for Clinton after she pledged her anti-GMO stance to him. Gets upset when she says the opposite in public speeches.
"Hillary's publicly opposing this [GMO labeling] is both the wrong policy position but also a direct breach of what she told me, namely that she supports average citizens and moms having the right to know. I have raised nearly $400K for her because I believed what she told me. If that is not the case, I'd like the chance to speak to her."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2397
As a progressive, and someone who only purchases foods with the label for my daughter - this is a very important matter to me.
Anyone know what her official position is on this? I mean the real position. Hope someone around here knows her on a personal level.
Clearly she must know most millennials favor the label.0 -
What are you even going on about now? I was responding to Trump's 'shackles' comment that mickeyrat was referring to. not sure how you went from there to attacking Jesus Christ. But while we're on the subject, his dad does come across as a bit of practical jokertonifig8 said:
Is this an attack on JC? Not sure why you need to dumb down the convo. He's providing information (leaks) that not even the White House is questioning its authenticity. That's pretty serious.CM189191 said:
I think he was trying to reach out to the African-American demographic. A little late for that Trumpy. That ship sailed when you took answer from a black man in the last debate and immediately assumed he was from the inner city, and then proceeded to call him poor, uneducated and unemployed.mickeyrat said:ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?
0 -
Trump is a horrible choice, can't deny that. I can understand weighing what little good you can find from the candidates and think Hilary is the lesser evil, I get that. I weigh everything and think Trump, as horrible as he is, is the better choice, but still admit he is a horrible choice and still can't fathom how in the world he was chosen over the 16 other much more qualified candidates.
This is directed to those who no matter what seem to stand by Hilary's side and make excuses for her or blame the repubs for making mountains out of molehills.
I don't get how anyone can ignore all of the scandals or give the impression they are fabricated.
I'm not as concerned that she used a private server as I am she destroyed evidence AFTER a subpoena was issued to hand it over, and everyone, including the FBI seems okay with that. That's just one example among the dozens listed here and elsewhere. If you're going to vote for her, can you at least admit she is also a terrible candidate, just the lesser of the two evils in your mind?0 -
Your interpretation of this quote is totally off base. She is saying she no longer lives the life she lived growing up as a regular middle class person but SHE REMEMBERS IT. For goodness sakes, copy the whole email instead of clipping only the part that serves your purpose. I've read this particular leaked email in its entirety, and you left out the very crucial part where she describes what it was like growing up middle class and SHE REMEMBERS IT even though she no longer lives it.JC29856 said:
That's not public interest thou, no biggie, Hilliary closest sadviser saying she hates everyday Americans. Then connect that to Hillary saying she has no idea what its like to not be super rich.tonifig8 said:
How about her public policy and private policy? Was that earth shattering?!?!?! Ah, of course not, we all new she was a two face lying politician.Gern Blansten said:
Earth Shattering!!JC29856 said:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
Nope nothing hear. Exactly 1 day before the debate.
Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
From:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com To: donna@brazileassociates.com, balcantara@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-03-12 19:41 Subject: Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
Hi. Yes, it is one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it. Betsaida - can you send her answer on death penalty? Sent from my iPhone
"And now, obviously, I'm kind of far removed because of the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven't forgotten it."
In another email she talks about a bias voters have against successful people, that they get criticized for improving their lot in life. Seems to me that's what we have here in your post. God forbid, the Clintons pulled themselves up by the bootstraps and became wealthy. Isn't that everyone's dream? If I ever growing rich, I'll be sure not to share my good fortune on this page.0 -
ummmm .. I was referring to OP.CM189191 said:
What are you even going on about now? I was responding to Trump's 'shackles' comment that mickeyrat was referring to. not sure how you went from there to attacking Jesus Christ. But while we're on the subject, his dad does come across as a bit of practical jokertonifig8 said:
Is this an attack on JC? Not sure why you need to dumb down the convo. He's providing information (leaks) that not even the White House is questioning its authenticity. That's pretty serious.CM189191 said:
I think he was trying to reach out to the African-American demographic. A little late for that Trumpy. That ship sailed when you took answer from a black man in the last debate and immediately assumed he was from the inner city, and then proceeded to call him poor, uneducated and unemployed.mickeyrat said:ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?
funny picture though.0 -
The victim card.what dreams said:
Your interpretation of this quote is totally off base. She is saying she no longer lives the life she lived growing up as a regular middle class person but SHE REMEMBERS IT. For goodness sakes, copy the whole email instead of clipping only the part that serves your purpose. I've read this particular leaked email in its entirety, and you left out the very crucial part where she describes what it was like growing up middle class and SHE REMEMBERS IT even though she no longer lives it.JC29856 said:
That's not public interest thou, no biggie, Hilliary closest sadviser saying she hates everyday Americans. Then connect that to Hillary saying she has no idea what its like to not be super rich.tonifig8 said:
How about her public policy and private policy? Was that earth shattering?!?!?! Ah, of course not, we all new she was a two face lying politician.Gern Blansten said:
Earth Shattering!!JC29856 said:https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
Nope nothing hear. Exactly 1 day before the debate.
Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
From:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com To: donna@brazileassociates.com, balcantara@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2016-03-12 19:41 Subject: Re: From time to time I get the questions in advance
Hi. Yes, it is one she gets asked about. Not everyone likes her answer but can share it. Betsaida - can you send her answer on death penalty? Sent from my iPhone
"And now, obviously, I'm kind of far removed because of the life I've lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I now enjoy, but I haven't forgotten it."
In another email she talks about a bias voters have against successful people, that they get criticized for improving their lot in life. Seems to me that's what we have here in your post. God forbid, the Clintons pulled themselves up by the bootstraps and became wealthy. Isn't that everyone's dream? If I ever growing rich, I'll be sure not to share my good fortune on this page.
But wait, How dare you get information from a source outside of C-Span.0 -
That's not at all how I interpreted the linked email. I read a donor, Stonyfield, asking a question and getting an answer that was admittedly not the precise answer they wanted but it also wasn't what Stonyfield was told or had heard. Sounded like Hillary was explaining the "politics" of GMO labeling and her support and strategy for getting it.JC29856 said:
Not once but thrice!tonifig8 said:Stonyfield Farm CEO raises 400k for Clinton after she pledged her anti-GMO stance to him. Gets upset when she says the opposite in public speeches.
"Hillary's publicly opposing this [GMO labeling] is both the wrong policy position but also a direct breach of what she told me, namely that she supports average citizens and moms having the right to know. I have raised nearly $400K for her because I believed what she told me. If that is not the case, I'd like the chance to speak to her."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2397
As a progressive, and someone who only purchases foods with the label for my daughter - this is a very important matter to me.
Anyone know what her official position is on this? I mean the real position. Hope someone around here knows her on a personal level.
Clearly she must know most millennials favor the label.
Have you contacted your state representatives and congressional delegation as to the importance of GMO labeling for you and your family?09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITECM189191 said:
What are you even going on about now? I was responding to Trump's 'shackles' comment that mickeyrat was referring to. not sure how you went from there to attacking Jesus Christ. But while we're on the subject, his dad does come across as a bit of practical jokertonifig8 said:
Is this an attack on JC? Not sure why you need to dumb down the convo. He's providing information (leaks) that not even the White House is questioning its authenticity. That's pretty serious.CM189191 said:
I think he was trying to reach out to the African-American demographic. A little late for that Trumpy. That ship sailed when you took answer from a black man in the last debate and immediately assumed he was from the inner city, and then proceeded to call him poor, uneducated and unemployed.mickeyrat said:ok so now the shackles are off? and what we've seen up to now has been restraint?
0 -
To quote podesta...."stay off the GMOs"Halifax2TheMax said:
That's not at all how I interpreted the linked email. I read a donor, Stonyfield, asking a question and getting an answer that was admittedly not the precise answer they wanted but it also wasn't what Stonyfield was told or had heard. Sounded like Hillary was explaining the "politics" of GMO labeling and her support and strategy for getting it.JC29856 said:
Not once but thrice!tonifig8 said:Stonyfield Farm CEO raises 400k for Clinton after she pledged her anti-GMO stance to him. Gets upset when she says the opposite in public speeches.
"Hillary's publicly opposing this [GMO labeling] is both the wrong policy position but also a direct breach of what she told me, namely that she supports average citizens and moms having the right to know. I have raised nearly $400K for her because I believed what she told me. If that is not the case, I'd like the chance to speak to her."
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2397
As a progressive, and someone who only purchases foods with the label for my daughter - this is a very important matter to me.
Anyone know what her official position is on this? I mean the real position. Hope someone around here knows her on a personal level.
Clearly she must know most millennials favor the label.
Have you contacted your state representatives and congressional delegation as to the importance of GMO labeling for you and your family?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help