DNC Leaks

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

pjalive21 said:

what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary

What makes her a fraud?

How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.

So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.

Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.

I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?

Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.

tonifig8 said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

pjalive21 said:

what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary

What makes her a fraud?

How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.

So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.

Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.

I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?

Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.

Why do you continue to defend Clinton? DWS use to work for Clinton during her previous campaign. Do you think that relationship ended? Most of the people currently in power worked with the Clintons. They have a vested interest in making sure she wins. Clinton brought DWS on board the minute she was forced to resign, why would Clinton want someone like that on her team?
Clinton is shady as fuck and you're defending her as if she were completely innocent of any wrong doings. The list goes on and on and on... Shady money surrounding the foundation, her email server, not releasing her Wall Street speeches, flip flopping more than Romney, etc etc etc!! Give me a break! What's it going to take for you to realize that she's been fooling you guys this whole time?

I'm not defending her. I'm not even a supporter. I'm not going to vote for ber. But you're acting like you're surprised that a politician naming a shady character to her campaign is somehow new. Maybe clinton thinks DWS can get shit done. What she did was not illegal. Hell, Donald trump is going to have Roger Ailes advising him. I don't hear much about that. (Yes, I know nothing has been finalized. But ailes will certainly be helping trump.)

You want to talk about shady money? 2 words; trump university. Trump won't release his tax returns, het you expect HRC to releases a speech? Ok, we get it, you don't like her. Fine. But a fraud? Really?

PJ_Soul said:

Trump hiring Roger Ailes?! What the fuck??

Ailes and trump are close and ailes has advised him early in his campaign. It is not that much of a stretch to think trump will bring him on.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/20160724_Reuters_tagreuterscom2016newsmlMT1VRT1201821618_Donald_Trump_on_Roger_Ailes__Fox_News_Exit___Very_Sad_.html

Bentleyspop said:

Degeneratefk said:

tonifig8 said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

pjalive21 said:

what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary

What makes her a fraud?

How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.

So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.

Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.

I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?

Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.

Why do you continue to defend Clinton? DWS use to work for Clinton during her previous campaign. Do you think that relationship ended? Most of the people currently in power worked with the Clintons. They have a vested interest in making sure she wins. Clinton brought DWS on board the minute she was forced to resign, why would Clinton want someone like that on her team?
Clinton is shady as fuck and you're defending her as if she were completely innocent of any wrong doings. The list goes on and on and on... Shady money surrounding the foundation, her email server, not releasing her Wall Street speeches, flip flopping more than Romney, etc etc etc!! Give me a break! What's it going to take for you to realize that she's been fooling you guys this whole time?

I'm not defending her. I'm not even a supporter. I'm not going to vote for ber. But you're acting like you're surprised that a politician naming a shady character to her campaign is somehow new. Maybe clinton thinks DWS can get shit done. What she did was not illegal. Hell, Donald trump is going to have Roger Ailes advising him. I don't hear much about that. (Yes, I know nothing has been finalized. But ailes will certainly be helping trump.)

You want to talk about shady money? 2 words; trump university. Trump won't release his tax returns, het you expect HRC to releases a speech? Ok, we get it, you don't like her. Fine. But a fraud? Really?

She had also been called by some on here a criminal and a murderer.
Yet there is no evidence, indictments, or guilty verdicts.
Guess fraud is okay

I am still failing to see the fraud argument

Bentleyspop said:

Degeneratefk said:

Bentleyspop said:

Degeneratefk said:

tonifig8 said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

Free said:

Degeneratefk said:

pjalive21 said:

what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary

What makes her a fraud?

How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.

So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.

Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.

I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?

Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.

Why do you continue to defend Clinton? DWS use to work for Clinton during her previous campaign. Do you think that relationship ended? Most of the people currently in power worked with the Clintons. They have a vested interest in making sure she wins. Clinton brought DWS on board the minute she was forced to resign, why would Clinton want someone like that on her team?
Clinton is shady as fuck and you're defending her as if she were completely innocent of any wrong doings. The list goes on and on and on... Shady money surrounding the foundation, her email server, not releasing her Wall Street speeches, flip flopping more than Romney, etc etc etc!! Give me a break! What's it going to take for you to realize that she's been fooling you guys this whole time?

I'm not defending her. I'm not even a supporter. I'm not going to vote for ber. But you're acting like you're surprised that a politician naming a shady character to her campaign is somehow new. Maybe clinton thinks DWS can get shit done. What she did was not illegal. Hell, Donald trump is going to have Roger Ailes advising him. I don't hear much about that. (Yes, I know nothing has been finalized. But ailes will certainly be helping trump.)

You want to talk about shady money? 2 words; trump university. Trump won't release his tax returns, het you expect HRC to releases a speech? Ok, we get it, you don't like her. Fine. But a fraud? Really?

She had also been called by some on here a criminal and a murderer.
Yet there is no evidence, indictments, or guilty verdicts.
Guess fraud is okay

I am still failing to see the fraud argument

That was my point
No facts
No data
No evidence
No arrests
No indictments
No guilty verdicts

But they,are insisting she's a fraud....

tonifig8 said:

As a Hispanic I find this to be hilarious. However it's sad that the Dems try to pander to Hispanics for votes, yet they're demeaning us in private. I'm sure Clinton and most of the party aren't supportive of this type of behavior. It's not like Clinton would hire people associated with this crap onto her team.

"Taco Bowl Engagement"

http://hypeline.org/dnc-email-leak-refers-to-hispanic-outreach-as-taco-bowl-engagement/

I feel like you and that article and some tweeters have really misinterpreted that email, and that concerns me a lot.They are clearly insulting Donald for his use of that stupid Taco Bowl tweet and trying to address the fact that he did that, not suggesting that the Dem's Hispanic outreach itself is actually being called taco bowl engagement. In other words, the term was being used facetiously. It's Trump who did the "Taco Bowl Engagement" thing, and that is what the email is referring to. Hispanics should be happy about that email, not mad.
This is the problem with a lot of these emails. I feel like a lot of them aren't being considered in their intended context at all. Also, what some person no one ever heard of happens to say in an email surely can't be considered reflective of Hillary or the entire Democratic party. I think everyone needs to be really careful about how they interpret some of these emails. I say this objectively.

This article cuts to the heart of the matter...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/dnc-leak-shows-mechanics-of-a-slanted-campaign-w430814

It's all about the money