Did you read the one how they did in fact, pay young Clinton supporters to go on social networks and go against Sanders supporters? It's there, too.
Hillary didn't do that....GF was yammering about Hillary doing illegal stuff
The DNC emails aren't illegal I don't think. Shady as hell for sure but criminal?
that's just it nobody thinks.......are you one of those union guy's who vote according to party no matter how fucked up the party is ? normally for my union I'd find a reason to vote Democrat but in this election I just don't see it and sure as shit will not be a union sheep that's not what a union is about.
Godfather.
If you like your benefits you had better bet your ass that you'll vote Clinton. If Trump and the Pence/Walker crowd get in your union will be dust and your benefits will go right along with it.
Wake up man.
Edit: And no I am not union....I'm a white collar former republican
You heard him Godfather, wake up and vote Hillary.
If voting for Hilary makes me a fraud, a conformist, a quitter or a pussy, I'm perfectly ok with that. I would much rather be any of those things than be part of a movement that helps Donald Trump be the next leader of the free world.
None of the things she has done or has been involved with scare me anywhere near as much as the idea of Donald Trump appointing multiple Supreme Court Justices.
what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary
What makes her a fraud?
How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.
So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.
Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.
I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?
Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.
Why do you continue to defend Clinton? DWS use to work for Clinton during her previous campaign. Do you think that relationship ended? Most of the people currently in power worked with the Clintons. They have a vested interest in making sure she wins. Clinton brought DWS on board the minute she was forced to resign, why would Clinton want someone like that on her team? Clinton is shady as fuck and you're defending her as if she were completely innocent of any wrong doings. The list goes on and on and on... Shady money surrounding the foundation, her email server, not releasing her Wall Street speeches, flip flopping more than Romney, etc etc etc!! Give me a break! What's it going to take for you to realize that she's been fooling you guys this whole time?
I'm not defending her. I'm not even a supporter. I'm not going to vote for ber. But you're acting like you're surprised that a politician naming a shady character to her campaign is somehow new. Maybe clinton thinks DWS can get shit done. What she did was not illegal. Hell, Donald trump is going to have Roger Ailes advising him. I don't hear much about that. (Yes, I know nothing has been finalized. But ailes will certainly be helping trump.)
You want to talk about shady money? 2 words; trump university. Trump won't release his tax returns, het you expect HRC to releases a speech? Ok, we get it, you don't like her. Fine. But a fraud? Really?
She had also been called by some on here a criminal and a murderer. Yet there is no evidence, indictments, or guilty verdicts. Guess fraud is okay
I am still failing to see the fraud argument
That was my point No facts No data No evidence No arrests No indictments No guilty verdicts
what would it take for some of you to be convinced that Hillary is a fraud? I just cant comprehend the blindness from people, not just with Hillary, but in general...no one is worth standing side by side with that I don't know on a personal level (and even then you can be had) like some do for Hillary
What makes her a fraud?
How about this... After these Wikileaks, resignation and then promotion of Wasserface by HRC herself, showing us all that Hillary Doesn't Care that the DNC blatantly CHEATED in her favor, all the while lying about it saying she had no knowledge of any of it happening...but hiring DWS as honorary campaign manager immediately afterward, AND DWS was her campaign manager in '08.... tell us why we SHOULD vote Hillary ASIDE from using The fear of a trump presidency. ONE good reason.
So Clinton's a fraud for the bad decision of others? She hired somebody that supports her? Maybe you should look up the dedicated it ion of a fraud.
Look the other way, Clinton supporters are notorious for this. Flat out denying DNC WikiLeaks in knowing about them as well as having no bias whatsoever? Laughable.
I'm not looking the other way. Your claim is that HRC is a fraud. Your reason for this claim is because she hired DWS to an honorary position. Did any of those emails that claimed to have boxed sanders out come from Schultz? Or was it that she was in charge at the time and took the heat? Even if she did send an email, is what she did breaking the law?
Like I said, you may need to look up the definition of fraud.
Why do you continue to defend Clinton? DWS use to work for Clinton during her previous campaign. Do you think that relationship ended? Most of the people currently in power worked with the Clintons. They have a vested interest in making sure she wins. Clinton brought DWS on board the minute she was forced to resign, why would Clinton want someone like that on her team? Clinton is shady as fuck and you're defending her as if she were completely innocent of any wrong doings. The list goes on and on and on... Shady money surrounding the foundation, her email server, not releasing her Wall Street speeches, flip flopping more than Romney, etc etc etc!! Give me a break! What's it going to take for you to realize that she's been fooling you guys this whole time?
I'm not defending her. I'm not even a supporter. I'm not going to vote for ber. But you're acting like you're surprised that a politician naming a shady character to her campaign is somehow new. Maybe clinton thinks DWS can get shit done. What she did was not illegal. Hell, Donald trump is going to have Roger Ailes advising him. I don't hear much about that. (Yes, I know nothing has been finalized. But ailes will certainly be helping trump.)
You want to talk about shady money? 2 words; trump university. Trump won't release his tax returns, het you expect HRC to releases a speech? Ok, we get it, you don't like her. Fine. But a fraud? Really?
She had also been called by some on here a criminal and a murderer. Yet there is no evidence, indictments, or guilty verdicts. Guess fraud is okay
I am still failing to see the fraud argument
That was my point No facts No data No evidence No arrests No indictments No guilty verdicts
But they,are insisting she's a fraud....
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
Leaked emails show the Democratic National Committee scrambled this spring to conceal the details of a joint fundraising arrangement with Hillary Clinton that funneled money through state Democratic parties.
During the three-month period when the DNC was working to spin the situation, state parties kept less than one half of one percent of the $82 million raised through the arrangement — validating concerns raised by campaign finance watchdogs, state party allies and Bernie Sanders supporters.
But... people want to defend Hillary out of fear of a clown named Donald Drumpf. Who doesn't even want to be president. He offered Kasich his VP spot so when/if he wins, he'll quit and Kasich could take over. But he didn't buy into it.
As a Hispanic I find this to be hilarious. However it's sad that the Dems try to pander to Hispanics for votes, yet they're demeaning us in private. I'm sure Clinton and most of the party aren't supportive of this type of behavior. It's not like Clinton would hire people associated with this crap onto her team.
As a Hispanic I find this to be hilarious. However it's sad that the Dems try to pander to Hispanics for votes, yet they're demeaning us in private. I'm sure Clinton and most of the party aren't supportive of this type of behavior. It's not like Clinton would hire people associated with this crap onto her team.
I feel like you and that article and some tweeters have really misinterpreted that email, and that concerns me a lot.They are clearly insulting Donald for his use of that stupid Taco Bowl tweet and trying to address the fact that he did that, not suggesting that the Dem's Hispanic outreach itself is actually being called taco bowl engagement. In other words, the term was being used facetiously. It's Trump who did the "Taco Bowl Engagement" thing, and that is what the email is referring to. Hispanics should be happy about that email, not mad. This is the problem with a lot of these emails. I feel like a lot of them aren't being considered in their intended context at all. Also, what some person no one ever heard of happens to say in an email surely can't be considered reflective of Hillary or the entire Democratic party. I think everyone needs to be really careful about how they interpret some of these emails. I say this objectively.
Post edited by PJ_Soul on
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
I'm sure feeling as strongly as you do about the benefits of Citizens United to the voters in the US, you're actively advocating and lobbying for a similar law to be passed in Canada, seeing how it'll benefit the average voter there and seeing how you can't vote or legally contribute to campaigns in the US? You are trying to be the change you want to see, yes?
“‘Good f***ing riddance,’ one former top DNC staffer during her tenure told me of Wasserman Schultz’s ouster... a different former staffer went so far as to compare her personality to Donald Trump’s, describing a “narcissism” that filtered everything through her personal interests.” In addition, according to the Atlantic, DNC staff are claiming that Wasserman Schultz “treated the committee as a personal promotion vehicle, constantly seeking television appearances and even urging donors to give to her personal fundraising committee.”
Simply put: this all fits into a blatant pattern of corruption and misuse of power by Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
You guys wanna blame Russia. It could have easily been someone from DNC
if the shit don't hit the fan with Hillary and her shanaggins AND she becomes president even her supporters should see the severity and far reach of corruption this criminal has.
Is it a requirement that she speak? I still don't see the tactic that prevented people from voting for sanders.
dude, look through all the threads regarding Clinton and read through them. Everyone is tired of hearing your crap over and over. If you don't get it than go about your business. Do you feel we're somehow miss representing Clinton?
Is it a requirement that she speak? I still don't see the tactic that prevented people from voting for sanders.
dude, look through all the threads regarding Clinton and read through them. Everyone is tired of hearing your crap over and over. If you don't get it than go about your business. Do you feel we're somehow miss representing Clinton?
Dude, I've been reading your conspiracy theories throughout all of the threads and not once have you answered the question. How did some emails prevent anyone from voting for sanders? I know that people are passionate about bernie, but he lost. It's a bitter pill to swallow. I get it. But simply crying foul play because a few people in the DNC preferred Clinton ton over sanders doesn't explain it.
will myself to find a home, a home within myself we will find a way, we will find our place
Is it a requirement that she speak? I still don't see the tactic that prevented people from voting for sanders.
dude, look through all the threads regarding Clinton and read through them. Everyone is tired of hearing your crap over and over. If you don't get it than go about your business. Do you feel we're somehow miss representing Clinton?
Dude, I've been reading your conspiracy theories throughout all of the threads and not once have you answered the question. How did some emails prevent anyone from voting for sanders? I know that people are passionate about bernie, but he lost. It's a bitter pill to swallow. I get it. But simply crying foul play because a few people in the DNC preferred Clinton ton over sanders doesn't explain it.
People have addressed you over and over. Read through the facts that have occurred and posted, there is nothing "conspiracy" about it. You're wasting peoples time. This isn't about being passionate. This is about being a sore loser. Those aren't just some emails. Those emails carry a whole lot of weight. Those people involved are the people that control the Dem party and that have loads of influence. This isn't two people applying for a job at McDonald's with one person getting an advantage because they have a hook up. The information is still rolling out. The red flags are everywhere. If the DEMS affected the voting process in states, than that can affect the outcome of election. Even if it's only a few people. It wasn't fair. At least Trump won fair and square. This is bigger than you and this forum.
Now stop wasting my time and that of others. Read through the post and bring the evidence together. More to come I'm sure.
Comments
Godfather.
this just keeps getting crazier !
Godfather.
None of the things she has done or has been involved with scare me anywhere near as much as the idea of Donald Trump appointing multiple Supreme Court Justices.
No facts
No data
No evidence
No arrests
No indictments
No guilty verdicts
we will find a way, we will find our place
"Taco Bowl Engagement"
http://hypeline.org/dnc-email-leak-refers-to-hispanic-outreach-as-taco-bowl-engagement/
This is the problem with a lot of these emails. I feel like a lot of them aren't being considered in their intended context at all. Also, what some person no one ever heard of happens to say in an email surely can't be considered reflective of Hillary or the entire Democratic party. I think everyone needs to be really careful about how they interpret some of these emails. I say this objectively.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/dnc-leak-shows-mechanics-of-a-slanted-campaign-w430814
It's all about the money
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
I'm sure feeling as strongly as you do about the benefits of Citizens United to the voters in the US, you're actively advocating and lobbying for a similar law to be passed in Canada, seeing how it'll benefit the average voter there and seeing how you can't vote or legally contribute to campaigns in the US? You are trying to be the change you want to see, yes?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
This from the Atlantic is really quite telling:
“‘Good f***ing riddance,’ one former top DNC staffer during her tenure told me of Wasserman Schultz’s ouster... a different former staffer went so far as to compare her personality to Donald Trump’s, describing a “narcissism” that filtered everything through her personal interests.”
In addition, according to the Atlantic, DNC staff are claiming that Wasserman Schultz “treated the committee as a personal promotion vehicle, constantly seeking television appearances and even urging donors to give to her personal fundraising committee.”
Simply put: this all fits into a blatant pattern of corruption and misuse of power by Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
You guys wanna blame Russia. It could have easily been someone from DNC
Godfather.
Trump on the DNC payroll since April.
https://joeyscazzola.wordpress.com/2016/07/23/leaked-spreadsheet-shows-donald-trump-and-family-receiving-payments-from-dnc/
"So I am getting several reports that state that the xls spreadsheet from wikileaks is just from the FEC about Donald Trumps expenses."
Great work gumshoe.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
we will find a way, we will find our place
The link in the text will open in Excel.
http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2016/07/guccifer-20-leaks-show-donald-trump-on.html?m=1#axzz4FH7zExxY
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/nina-turner-sanders-democratic-national-convention
Again this isn't simply about sanders - this is our democracy!
we will find a way, we will find our place
we will find a way, we will find our place
If the DEMS affected the voting process in states, than that can affect the outcome of election. Even if it's only a few people. It wasn't fair. At least Trump won fair and square. This is bigger than you and this forum.
Now stop wasting my time and that of others. Read through the post and bring the evidence together. More to come I'm sure.