Trump

1…119120122124125…623

Comments

  • Gern Blansten
    Gern Blansten Mar-A-Lago Posts: 22,191
    edited June 2016
    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/283744-poll-trump-has-94-percent-unfavorable-rating-with-blacks
    The poll, released Wednesday, only shows the problem is evolving for the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. A staggering 94 percent of black adults surveyed view Trump negatively, a 13 percent increase since the same poll was conducted in May.
    While Trump's likely general election opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, is boasting a 79 percent favorability rating among black Americans, Trump is fighting claims of racism after launching attacks on a U.S.-born judge of Mexican descent.
    LOL...
    Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
    The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)

    1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
    2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
    2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
    2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
    2020: Oakland, Oakland:  2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
    2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
    2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt2
  • pjalive21
    pjalive21 St. Louis, MO Posts: 2,818


    Degeneratefk said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    The Juggler said:

    Only way I could have seen Trump winning was if there was some sort of a terrorist attack and people felt to side with him because he's perceived as the "stronger" candidate.

    But......... yeah, he completely fucked that up too.

    Gonna be an absolute bloodbath in November.

    He's already down about 12 or 13 points in the polls. By November, he is going to lose by 20.
    You're using polls :rofl:
    Laugh all you want. I don't need a poll to know trump will not only lose, but be embarrassed in november. I can't wait to hear the concession speech.


    Interestingly enough, poll and troll rhyme
    I actually disagree...I think polls are completely worthless, especially during this election cycle as people are afraid to speak out on who they are voting for. I myself will not announce who I am voting for and will not till after the election. Polls are proving to be worthless and if you paid attention to this whole election cycle they have been off and sometimes embarrassingly off in numbers

    There is a silent majority out there that will cast their vote and shock those poll numbers
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    pjalive21 said:





    Degeneratefk said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    The Juggler said:

    Only way I could have seen Trump winning was if there was some sort of a terrorist attack and people felt to side with him because he's perceived as the "stronger" candidate.

    But......... yeah, he completely fucked that up too.

    Gonna be an absolute bloodbath in November.

    He's already down about 12 or 13 points in the polls. By November, he is going to lose by 20.
    You're using polls :rofl:
    Laugh all you want. I don't need a poll to know trump will not only lose, but be embarrassed in november. I can't wait to hear the concession speech.


    Interestingly enough, poll and troll rhyme
    I actually disagree...I think polls are completely worthless, especially during this election cycle as people are afraid to speak out on who they are voting for. I myself will not announce who I am voting for and will not till after the election. Polls are proving to be worthless and if you paid attention to this whole election cycle they have been off and sometimes embarrassingly off in numbers

    There is a silent majority out there that will cast their vote and shock those poll numbers
    That's not true. The only poll I can remember that had the wrong person on top was Michigan. The other ones have been around the MOE, but picking the right winner. Regarding the general from 2012, 538 was remarkably accurate. http://rationality.org/2012/11/09/was-nate-silver-the-most-accurate-2012-election-pundit/
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    mrussel1 said:

    pjalive21 said:





    Degeneratefk said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    The Juggler said:

    Only way I could have seen Trump winning was if there was some sort of a terrorist attack and people felt to side with him because he's perceived as the "stronger" candidate.

    But......... yeah, he completely fucked that up too.

    Gonna be an absolute bloodbath in November.

    He's already down about 12 or 13 points in the polls. By November, he is going to lose by 20.
    You're using polls :rofl:
    Laugh all you want. I don't need a poll to know trump will not only lose, but be embarrassed in november. I can't wait to hear the concession speech.


    Interestingly enough, poll and troll rhyme
    I actually disagree...I think polls are completely worthless, especially during this election cycle as people are afraid to speak out on who they are voting for. I myself will not announce who I am voting for and will not till after the election. Polls are proving to be worthless and if you paid attention to this whole election cycle they have been off and sometimes embarrassingly off in numbers

    There is a silent majority out there that will cast their vote and shock those poll numbers
    That's not true. The only poll I can remember that had the wrong person on top was Michigan. The other ones have been around the MOE, but picking the right winner. Regarding the general from 2012, 538 was remarkably accurate. http://rationality.org/2012/11/09/was-nate-silver-the-most-accurate-2012-election-pundit/
    I'm glad you contribute here, your voice is needed and appreciated.

    The argument can be made that polls this early can't be trusted (Dukakis we are looking at you lol) but the overall accuracy of aggregate polling data is an irrefutable thorn in the side of those who refuse to believe their candidate is losing.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    rgambs said:

    mrussel1 said:

    pjalive21 said:





    Degeneratefk said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    Degeneratefk said:

    The Juggler said:

    Only way I could have seen Trump winning was if there was some sort of a terrorist attack and people felt to side with him because he's perceived as the "stronger" candidate.

    But......... yeah, he completely fucked that up too.

    Gonna be an absolute bloodbath in November.

    He's already down about 12 or 13 points in the polls. By November, he is going to lose by 20.
    You're using polls :rofl:
    Laugh all you want. I don't need a poll to know trump will not only lose, but be embarrassed in november. I can't wait to hear the concession speech.


    Interestingly enough, poll and troll rhyme
    I actually disagree...I think polls are completely worthless, especially during this election cycle as people are afraid to speak out on who they are voting for. I myself will not announce who I am voting for and will not till after the election. Polls are proving to be worthless and if you paid attention to this whole election cycle they have been off and sometimes embarrassingly off in numbers

    There is a silent majority out there that will cast their vote and shock those poll numbers
    That's not true. The only poll I can remember that had the wrong person on top was Michigan. The other ones have been around the MOE, but picking the right winner. Regarding the general from 2012, 538 was remarkably accurate. http://rationality.org/2012/11/09/was-nate-silver-the-most-accurate-2012-election-pundit/
    I'm glad you contribute here, your voice is needed and appreciated.

    The argument can be made that polls this early can't be trusted (Dukakis we are looking at you lol) but the overall accuracy of aggregate polling data is an irrefutable thorn in the side of those who refuse to believe their candidate is losing.
    Very kind of you...
  • InHiding80
    InHiding80 Upland,CA Posts: 7,623
    Gern Blansten said:

    http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/trump-tv-trump-already-has-his-next-grift-planned-after-he-loses-in-november/

    This will be good....as if TV could get dumbed down from Faux News

    Vanity Fair is reporting that Trump is considering starting his own cable news network that will be targeted at the army of ardent supporters he’s garnered throughout the Republican primary campaign this year.

    “According to several people briefed on the discussions, the presumptive Republican nominee is examining the opportunity presented by the ‘audience’ currently supporting him,” Vanity Fair’s sources say. “He has also discussed the possibility of launching a ‘mini-media conglomerate’ outside of his existing TV-production business, Trump Productions LLC.”
    It does add to the speculation that Trump just ran to promote himself...that he never really expected to get this far.

    Makes me miss the good old days when Howard Stern was the king of all media and not him.
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,532
    edited June 2016
    /\
    Would anyone be surprised?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/book-party/wp/2015/07/30/i-just-binge-read-eight-books-by-donald-trump-heres-what-i-learned/?tid=sm_tw
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/donald-trump-tv-network

    The breakout media star of 2016 is, inarguably, Donald Trump, who has masterfully—and horrifyingly—demonstrated an aptitude for manipulating the news cycle, gaining billions of dollars worth of free airtime, and dominating coverage on every screen. Now, several people around him are looking for a way to leverage his supporters into a new media platform and cable channel.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,626
    edited June 2016
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/donald-trump-tv-network

    The breakout media star of 2016 is, inarguably, Donald Trump, who has masterfully—and horrifyingly—demonstrated an aptitude for manipulating the news cycle, gaining billions of dollars worth of free airtime, and dominating coverage on every screen. Now, several people around him are looking for a way to leverage his supporters into a new media platform and cable channel.

    That's all his good for Make believe world TV , you want him up there in Canada running your country you can have him ,,,
    89% of Hispanics like myself will not be voting for him
    90 % of blacks will not be voting for him
    Should I go on I haven't even put up women's %
    Muslims %
    G&L community %
    It's impossible to win the WH without these voters backing you , just ask MCCain & Romney!!
    Post edited by josevolution on
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • g under p
    g under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,236
    josevolution said:

    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/06/donald-trump-tv-network

    The breakout media star of 2016 is, inarguably, Donald Trump, who has masterfully—and horrifyingly—demonstrated an aptitude for manipulating the news cycle, gaining billions of dollars worth of free airtime, and dominating coverage on every screen. Now, several people around him are looking for a way to leverage his supporters into a new media platform and cable channel.

    That's all his good for Make believe world TV , you want him up there in Canada running your country you can have him ,,,
    89% of Hispanics like myself will not be voting for him
    90 % of blacks will not be voting for him
    Should I go on I haven't even put up women's %
    Muslims %
    G&L community %
    It's impossible to win the WH without these voters backing you , just ask MCCain & Romney!!
    Trump will probably throw in the reigns as soon as he sees he has no chance that a woman is about to crush him. It should no it will pretty interesting how this election will go come this fall.

    Peace

    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 24,098
    there is evidence that trump is in for the election trouncing of historic proportions. i saw a report yesterday that said projections show some red states turning blue. EC projection of 419 for clinton, 119 for trump.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/projection-shows-clinton-defeats-donald-trump-419-119-on-electoral-college-map
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    edited June 2016
    gimmesometruth27 said:

    there is evidence that trump is in for the election trouncing of historic proportions. i saw a report yesterday that said projections show some red states turning blue. EC projection of 419 for clinton, 119 for trump.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/projection-shows-clinton-defeats-donald-trump-419-119-on-electoral-college-map

    I've been trying to tell people, this guy has zero shot and is going to be outright destroyed and embarrassed

    And I fucking love it

    Dipshit fucking republicans... anybody that supports this clown should be ashamed if themselves
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    gimmesometruth27 said:

    there is evidence that trump is in for the election trouncing of historic proportions. i saw a report yesterday that said projections show some red states turning blue. EC projection of 419 for clinton, 119 for trump.

    http://www.examiner.com/article/projection-shows-clinton-defeats-donald-trump-419-119-on-electoral-college-map

    That won't be as bad as Mondale in 84 or McGovern in 72. But still bad...
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    The power of the NRA is strong and Trump is feeling it since he went against them.
    http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/americas/2016/06/trump-trouble-160616171335493.html

    The NRA, who had endorsed Trump at its national convention just two weeks ago, said it was happy to meet. But many supporters were furious the Republican nominee would even consider changes to gun legislation.

    Right-wing blogger Erik Erikson wrote: "This is a terrible idea and a flat-out cave by Donald Trump. You cannot deny constitutional rights to American citizens because the government is suspicious of you."


    And still none of the anti-gun folks on this train will even give acknowledgement that Trump had a good idea. No fly, no buy.
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    What idea did Trump propose?
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    The power of the NRA is strong and Trump is feeling it since he went against them.
    http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/americas/2016/06/trump-trouble-160616171335493.html

    The NRA, who had endorsed Trump at its national convention just two weeks ago, said it was happy to meet. But many supporters were furious the Republican nominee would even consider changes to gun legislation.

    Right-wing blogger Erik Erikson wrote: "This is a terrible idea and a flat-out cave by Donald Trump. You cannot deny constitutional rights to American citizens because the government is suspicious of you."


    And still none of the anti-gun folks on this train will even give acknowledgement that Trump had a good idea. No fly, no buy.

    He didn't 'have a good idea'. The Dems in Congress tried to pass this legislation in December and it failed. So no kudos for having a good idea. Kudos for 'trying' to negotiate with the NRA but this seems like an unusual tactic. All reports are that this will not get through the House. So if Trump can't convince the NRA, how the fuck will he convince the Chinese to do anything? If this fails, another 'premise' of his campaign is out.
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    Does Trump have a platform at all except that he will build a wall to keep the white walkers out?

    Perhaps it wasn't the children of the forest that created the white walkers ... It was Obama
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited June 2016
    ^^^
    It shows that he is willing to listen to dems unlike the current congress.
    If even this wont get through the house by a republican (if he was in office) then you guys have a seriously flawed congress much like Trump has been saying all along.
    The NRA is powerful and has the constitution on it's side it is not Chinese.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,882
    PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

    ^^^
    It shows that he is willing to listen to dems unlike the current congress.
    If even this wont get through the house by a republican (if he was in office) then you guys have a seriously flawed congress much like Trump has been saying all along.
    The NRA is powerful and has the constitution on it's side it is not Chinese.

    You're right. The Chinese don't have the Constitution, they have sovereignty, and an army, and an enormous economy. That's all slightly more powerful. And Trump hasn't once criticized the Republican Congress to my knowledge. Your argument is a huge reach here. The political downside of this 'effort' is pretty enormous. It's pretty easy to declare Trump a blowhard for not being able to convince a right wing special interest group to do something.
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited June 2016
    ^^^
    The Chinese would listen to the pros and cons of what Trump proposes as POTUS.

    Your second amendment that the country holds so dear is no match for anyone not even a POTUS. Trump at least approached them as "one of their own"
    You can't reason with a right wing special interest group they wont listen.
    He hasn't in those words criticized the Repub congress but painted the inner workings of the whitehouse with the same brush as defunct.

This discussion has been closed.

Categories