i think its time to admit we all, myself included, underestimated the man.
I wish I had been wrong. By last December, before any primary, I had predicted it would come down in the end to Trump v. Clinton. None of my friends believed me, but I totally called it. I wish I had put money on it!!
im done saying he can't win. i am one of the many idiots that has had to eat crow over and over. too concerned with his bad hair to see The Movement happening right before my eyes. he will defeat Crooked Hillary.
well, i have people assuming they know my intentions. then another calling me a spineless lemming for my beliefs. then we have you saying hitler himself would like me. all because i was raised to keep my word. the RadLibs are too much sometimes....
I didn't call you a spineless lemming. I said a person who would not break said pledge when circumstances change is a spineless lemming. Are RadCons hypersensitive or unfamiliar with the general 'royal you'?
Actually, it's "the royal we." There is no "royal you." "You" is a dangerous pronoun because it is almost invariably interpreted as a direct address, and we should be careful to avoid it unless we are in fact talking directly to our reader. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi -- or any kind of Nazi -- just letting *you* know that if *you* want to avoid being misinterpreted, avoid "you" when referring to people in general.
well, i have people assuming they know my intentions. then another calling me a spineless lemming for my beliefs. then we have you saying hitler himself would like me. all because i was raised to keep my word. the RadLibs are too much sometimes....
I didn't call you a spineless lemming. I said a person who would not break said pledge when circumstances change is a spineless lemming. Are RadCons hypersensitive or unfamiliar with the general 'royal you'?
Actually, it's "the royal we." There is no "royal you." "You" is a dangerous pronoun because it is almost invariably interpreted as a direct address, and we should be careful to avoid it unless we are in fact talking directly to our reader. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi -- or any kind of Nazi -- just letting *you* know that if *you* want to avoid being misinterpreted, avoid "you" when referring to people in general.
i think its time to admit we all, myself included, underestimated the man.
I wish I had been wrong. By last December, before any primary, I had predicted it would come down in the end to Trump v. Clinton. None of my friends believed me, but I totally called it. I wish I had put money on it!!
i think its time to admit we all, myself included, underestimated the man.
I wish I had been wrong. By last December, before any primary, I had predicted it would come down in the end to Trump v. Clinton. None of my friends believed me, but I totally called it. I wish I had put money on it!!
I actually said I hoped Trump would win so that none of the pathetic Republican nominees had a chance of actually becoming POTUS, but in didn't really think my hopes would come to fruition because I underet9mated Job's capacity to bore the country to death. But so far so good I guess, although I don't recall factoring in the amount of hate for Hillary coming from the left (some of which I find extremely overwrought), to the point where the left might split the vote and let Trump win anyhow.
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
well, i have people assuming they know my intentions. then another calling me a spineless lemming for my beliefs. then we have you saying hitler himself would like me. all because i was raised to keep my word. the RadLibs are too much sometimes....
I didn't call you a spineless lemming. I said a person who would not break said pledge when circumstances change is a spineless lemming. Are RadCons hypersensitive or unfamiliar with the general 'royal you'?
Actually, it's "the royal we." There is no "royal you." "You" is a dangerous pronoun because it is almost invariably interpreted as a direct address, and we should be careful to avoid it unless we are in fact talking directly to our reader. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi -- or any kind of Nazi -- just letting *you* know that if *you* want to avoid being misinterpreted, avoid "you" when referring to people in general.
well, i have people assuming they know my intentions. then another calling me a spineless lemming for my beliefs. then we have you saying hitler himself would like me. all because i was raised to keep my word. the RadLibs are too much sometimes....
I didn't call you a spineless lemming. I said a person who would not break said pledge when circumstances change is a spineless lemming. Are RadCons hypersensitive or unfamiliar with the general 'royal you'?
Actually, it's "the royal we." There is no "royal you." "You" is a dangerous pronoun because it is almost invariably interpreted as a direct address, and we should be careful to avoid it unless we are in fact talking directly to our reader. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi -- or any kind of Nazi -- just letting *you* know that if *you* want to avoid being misinterpreted, avoid "you" when referring to people in general.
I think we all can agree on hating grammar nazis.
Yes, I know it can be annoying, but how many times do conversations begin to break down as soon as someone says "you" instead of "people"? I speak publicly for a living, as well as teach writing for a living. People almost always take the "you" personally, so I avoid it unless I am directly speaking to a person. I teach that as well -- but of course, we know how well people listen to and learn from their teachers. It's just a suggestion here, in the interest of promoting effective communication. Carry on . . .
Speech leaked. Frum says it's good. He hates trump.
Palin also gave a good convention speech though...
True, but it's delivery. His foreign policy speech was well written but poorly delivered. Can he deliver a high energy speech that he isn't winging it? We will find out tonight.
well, i have people assuming they know my intentions. then another calling me a spineless lemming for my beliefs. then we have you saying hitler himself would like me. all because i was raised to keep my word. the RadLibs are too much sometimes....
I didn't call you a spineless lemming. I said a person who would not break said pledge when circumstances change is a spineless lemming. Are RadCons hypersensitive or unfamiliar with the general 'royal you'?
Actually, it's "the royal we." There is no "royal you." "You" is a dangerous pronoun because it is almost invariably interpreted as a direct address, and we should be careful to avoid it unless we are in fact talking directly to our reader. Not trying to be a grammar Nazi -- or any kind of Nazi -- just letting *you* know that if *you* want to avoid being misinterpreted, avoid "you" when referring to people in general.
Well if he is white then the link he posted serves what purpose? If he is black he has a point. Posting accusatory racism links should be questioned. So again it matters. #all questions matter
Well if he is white then the link he posted serves what purpose? If he is black he has a point. Posting accusatory racism links should be questioned. So again it matters. #all questions matter
If he's white he has a point. And you didn't question the link, you questioned about the race of the person who posted it. It's safe to say Trump is a bigot.
Well if he is white then the link he posted serves what purpose? If he is black he has a point. Posting accusatory racism links should be questioned. So again it matters. #all questions matter
If he's white he has a point. And you didn't question the link, you questioned about the race of the person who posted it. It's safe to say Trump is a bigot.
Well if he is white then the link he posted serves what purpose? If he is black he has a point. Posting accusatory racism links should be questioned. So again it matters. #all questions matter
If he's white he has a point. And you didn't question the link, you questioned about the race of the person who posted it. It's safe to say Trump is a bigot.
if The Movement rolls on all the way to The Oval Office, could we one day see Trump, Jr., or the sensational Ivanka follow the path? they will have the support of The Movement.
You also don't speak Walmart right? The thing I like most about when you post is that you never make it personal and are always left open for a debate.
Comments
When stuff like this comes out.
"Now let us consider the state of affairs abroad."
No humanization. Says he assumes he is going to get bored and ad lib..
If he is black he has a point.
Posting accusatory racism links should be questioned.
So again it matters.
#all questions matter
No more anchovies! We vanka Ivanka!
The thing I like most about when you post is that you never make it personal and are always left open for a debate.
on a serious note, that anchovy gave a helluva speech.
or
Big Trump Owns