Trump

1102103105107108623

Comments

  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,665
    edited June 2016
    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
  • 2-feign-reluctance
    2-feign-reluctance TigerTown, USA Posts: 23,459
    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    www.cluthelee.com
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
    Haha...mister I don't care what a known chicken hawk has to say. Clearly you care. Once Gambs posts an actual question I will be happy to answer. Then you can reply with your intelligent ad hominem.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
    Haha...mister I don't care what a known chicken hawk has to say. Clearly you care. Once Gambs posts an actual question I will be happy to answer. Then you can reply with your intelligent ad hominem.
    I asked a question that is obviously articulate enough for someone of your intelligence to answer. You are known to me as intelligent and honest, and I have backed you on that before, so please don't make me into a liar.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
    :clap:
    :rofl:
    :rock_on:

    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Is Donald Trump Racist? Here's What the Record Shows

    http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/donald-trump-racism-quotes/
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
    Haha...mister I don't care what a known chicken hawk has to say. Clearly you care. Once Gambs posts an actual question I will be happy to answer. Then you can reply with your intelligent ad hominem.
    I asked a question that is obviously articulate enough for someone of your intelligence to answer. You are known to me as intelligent and honest, and I have backed you on that before, so please don't make me into a liar.
    I for real do not understand your question as you have just phrased it. Would you care to try again?
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,546
    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    So BS, what about race and discussions of race gets shut down? What do you want to talk about, but can't? What's the difference when someone says something racist vs. just "aggressively confronting" an issue?
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    dignin said:

    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Lets have your definition of racism then. Curious to know.
    It's not about my definition...it's about the definition:

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/racism

    As you can see the concept of superiority/inferiority has a lot to do with it...no matter what Paul Ryan says.
    So, if one has to assume that some individuals in a particular race are good people, doesn't that mean that one is assuming the majority are not? Sounds like a belief in superiority to me... and everyone but you lol

    I have posed this question to you a number of times and I can't recall you actually addressing it without deflection.
    I probably haven't answered it because you keep asking it in a way that is beyond understandable.
    image
    Haha...mister I don't care what a known chicken hawk has to say. Clearly you care. Once Gambs posts an actual question I will be happy to answer. Then you can reply with your intelligent ad hominem.
    I asked a question that is obviously articulate enough for someone of your intelligence to answer. You are known to me as intelligent and honest, and I have backed you on that before, so please don't make me into a liar.
    I for real do not understand your question as you have just phrased it. Would you care to try again?
    I don't see how it is incomprehensible to you, can someone help me out here? The question makes perfect sense to me.

    Maybe if I change it to a statement with which you can agree or disagree.

    I assume that some politicians must be honest. Implicit in that statement is the fact that I assume that most politicians are not honest, otherwise there is no need for the words "some" and "must".
    Agree? Disagree?

    In addition, my assumption that some politicians must be honest means that I have never met an honest politician, or that I have never met a politician at all, but that isn't relevant to Trump, who has surely met Mexican immigrants.
    Agree? Disagree?

    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • BS44325
    BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    So BS, what about race and discussions of race gets shut down? What do you want to talk about, but can't? What's the difference when someone says something racist vs. just "aggressively confronting" an issue?
    Well in politics/academia any discussion of illegal immigration always leads to accusations of racism. It is pretty much inevitable. What Trump is doing is aggressively confronting the sacred cows surrounding the issue. Mentioning crimes that are actually occurring is tough to hear but that in it of itself is not racism.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879
    BS44325 said:

    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    So BS, what about race and discussions of race gets shut down? What do you want to talk about, but can't? What's the difference when someone says something racist vs. just "aggressively confronting" an issue?
    Well in politics/academia any discussion of illegal immigration always leads to accusations of racism. It is pretty much inevitable. What Trump is doing is aggressively confronting the sacred cows surrounding the issue. Mentioning crimes that are actually occurring is tough to hear but that in it of itself is not racism.
    This all may be true, but not what we were discussing. Weren't you saying that his attacks on Curiel were not racist? Curiel is a native American citizen and a Federal judge. Further, his original state appointment was by a Republican Governor. However, Trump said he can't get a fair hearing because Curiel is Mexican (he isn't). Even though the case before Curiel has ZERO to do with immigration, Mexico, walls or anything of the like. Telling someone they cannot do their job because of their lineage is pretty much an excellent example of racism.
  • Kat
    Kat Posts: 4,956
    Here's a thought...take it or leave it. :)

    Our illegal immigration problem involves many people of many races, not just a single ethnicity. The problem is our policy. So why doesn't that politician just talk about the issue instead of making nasty comments about a single race and wanting to build a wall to separate us from one of our allies? I'm disturbed by how that politician categorizes people by race instead of just seeing human beings as human beings. Example, Senator Warren and her ethnicity. Why bring that up at all? It's how he sees people...how he defines them. Racist? If it quacks like a duck....

    I've said it before...when there's a hostile alien invasion, we'll all be in it together...humans vs ? :) Maybe they'll be peaceful aliens. Have a beautiful Sunday. all.
    Falling down,...not staying down
  • callen
    callen Posts: 6,388
    BS44325 said:

    PJ_Soul said:

    I guess I am just also intrigued by your lack of concern or even acknowledgement that Trump incites racism and is using it in his campaign. Your denial of something that seems so self-evident I suppose comes off as support, since that level denial usually accompanies blind support for something. So apologies for the misconception.

    No worries. I just happen to disagree on "the incites racism" bit. He is aggressively confronting sacred cows (illegal immigration, radical Islam, etc..) which discomforts the progressive and the establishment class. I have been called a racist on these boards for discussing the same. It is simply a label that I find unacceptable and is used by others to try and shut down speech. There is plenty to attack Trump on, lots of which I would agree with, but the political correctness angle will lose me every time.
    Bull Shit. Trumps campaign strategy is to pander to dumb racists.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,576
    Kat said:

    Here's a thought...take it or leave it. :)

    Our illegal immigration problem involves many people of many races, not just a single ethnicity. The problem is our policy. So why doesn't that politician just talk about the issue instead of making nasty comments about a single race and wanting to build a wall to separate us from one of our allies? I'm disturbed by how that politician categorizes people by race instead of just seeing human beings as human beings. Example, Senator Warren and her ethnicity. Why bring that up at all? It's how he sees people...how he defines them. Racist? If it quacks like a duck....

    I've said it before...when there's a hostile alien invasion, we'll all be in it together...humans vs ? :) Maybe they'll be peaceful aliens. Have a beautiful Sunday. all.

    Ditto , you too enjoy the day we never know when it will be our last on this planet !!
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.