Paris Attacks

1192022242546

Comments

  • Posts: 12,885
    edited December 2015

    People become radicalized without, or even in spite of, parental influence.

    .
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • To a degree yes.
    The radicals in question have been influenced since conception.
    I don't think you can definitively state this. There are many factors linked to developing into a brainwashed, psychopathic, religious fanatic.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • I don't think you can definitively state this. There are many factors linked to developing into a brainwashed, psychopathic, religious fanatic.
    Really?
    Religious fanatic says it all.
  • Posts: 6,124
    Kat said:

    That would definitely be hysteria...kind of like thinking ALL refugees are ISIS...and some people are acting like they are. I'm having trouble containing my anger about the reaction to this tragic event by some of our so-called leaders and those who aspire to lead us. It's embarrassing, to say the least. Let me put it this way. I ain't afraid of no ghosts...and I'm certainly not afraid of refugees. Some people need a backbone. We're America and we can handle this situation without fear-mongering. I see great strength in the French as they handle this. Solidarity.

    No one is acting like "all refugees are ISIS". That is so disingenuous. Read the following link

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3322960/The-Syrian-passports-terror-EIGHT-migrants-got-Europe-papers-stadium-suicide-bomber.html

    The system for verifying refugees is clearly broken. It is completely reasonable to insist upon knowing who is an actual refugee and who isn't. That is not "fear-mongering" it is responsible governance.
  • Posts: 6,124
    callen said:

    "Drilling for fear makes the job simple."

    Republicans are sooo happy this fell into their laps.

    Imagine saying Syrian Christians can come but not Syrian Muslims. Oh boy. Doesn't seem to be all constitutional now does it.

    For you to say "Republicans are sooo happy about this" is beneath contempt but I guess not unexpected. Conservatives are always enemy number 1 on the AMT.
  • Posts: 6,124

    Ya BDS incites murder. Ok. You are shameless.
    Meanwhile the Israeli education minister brags about killing Palestinians....the justice minister openly calls for Palestinian genocide. you reach and speculate and draw imaginary lines to demonize peaceful protest and resistance by Palestinians, yet don't seem to cast any blame on people like Bennett and shaked, and their ever growing support among Israelis.
    Fine by me, I enjoy knowing that BDS makes you nervous enough to go to these extremist lengths.
    BDS doesn't make me nervous but the anti-semities they provide cover for do. Chris Cornell will receive the same letter from Roger Waters that Eagles of Death Metal received. As a BDS supporter how comfortable will that make you feel?

    (Pause and think)

    This is a fanclub dedicated to music and the free expression of ideas after all. Who will stand up from the BDS crowd to ensure others will behave in a non-violent fashion? I am sorry but this burden falls upon the movements defenders. What happened at the Eagles show must not repeat.
  • Posts: 6,124
    mickeyrat said:

    Which brand of tin foil do you prefer?
    I guess the same kind of tin foil that the French security services prefer:

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/17/politics/paris-terror-attacks-isis-syria/index.html

    The key quote:

    "One theory French investigators are pursuing is whether the suicide attacks on the Stade de France were simply a diversion designed to draw police and give the other attackers room to carry out their shootings on restaurants and at the Bataclan concert hall. No conclusions have been made."

    Throw up some diversions to hit the Bataclan.

    Hmmmm
  • BS44325 said:

    I guess the same kind of tin foil that the French security services prefer:

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/17/politics/paris-terror-attacks-isis-syria/index.html

    The key quote:

    "One theory French investigators are pursuing is whether the suicide attacks on the Stade de France were simply a diversion designed to draw police and give the other attackers room to carry out their shootings on restaurants and at the Bataclan concert hall. No conclusions have been made."

    Throw up some diversions to hit the Bataclan.

    Hmmmm
    That is a hmmm
    I will say this though,
    Does the bacon in your avatar spell PJ?
    I have wanted to ask this for awhile, or is it just me hallucinating.
  • Posts: 6,124

    That is a hmmm
    I will say this though,
    Does the bacon in your avatar spell PJ?
    I have wanted to ask this for awhile, or is it just me hallucinating.
    Ha...yes. That was taken at breakfast between the the Vancouver and Seattle shows a couple years back. I was deep into Breaking Bad at the point and was spelling many things with bacon.
  • Posts: 24,524
    Wish I could play the asshole-role and shout "stay on topic!"

    Been seeing reports of more happening in Paris, police shot. From CNN but not sure of its accuracy at this point.
  • Toronto, ON Posts: 9,448
    BS44325 said:

    BDS doesn't make me nervous but the anti-semities they provide cover for do. Chris Cornell will receive the same letter from Roger Waters that Eagles of Death Metal received. As a BDS supporter how comfortable will that make you feel?

    (Pause and think)

    This is a fanclub dedicated to music and the free expression of ideas after all. Who will stand up from the BDS crowd to ensure others will behave in a non-violent fashion? I am sorry but this burden falls upon the movements defenders. What happened at the Eagles show must not repeat.
    Roger Waters aside (because while I find him insensitive, I don't find him to be spewing anti-Jewish rhetoric as many claim), I have an honest question. If this aggression was aimed at Jews or supporters of Israel, why would IS not admit to this? Until now, they've been very clear about their mandate and what they feel is wrong to justify their expansionist and murderous group. Why, all of a sudden, would they obfuscate that mandate on the topic of Israel? That seems out of character for such a candid group.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Posts: 6,124
    benjs said:

    Roger Waters aside (because while I find him insensitive, I don't find him to be spewing anti-Jewish rhetoric as many claim), I have an honest question. If this aggression was aimed at Jews or supporters of Israel, why would IS not admit to this? Until now, they've been very clear about their mandate and what they feel is wrong to justify their expansionist and murderous group. Why, all of a sudden, would they obfuscate that mandate on the topic of Israel? That seems out of character for such a candid group.
    First...I don't want anyone to think that for a second I believe Roger Waters condones this or believes in violent action whatsoever. He has his own criticism which I obviously disagree with but I absolutely believe him to be a pacifist on this subject.

    As far as your main question there can be two possible answers. If it was in fact an ISIS ordered attack (and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise at the moment) a successful attack on a known "Zionist" establishment serves a recruitmant tool. It is awful to say but many jihadist are inspired by and attracted to those who are able to defeat and strike at Israel. This attack would then serve the general mandate of establishing a greater caliphate. The second possible answer is that there is a very slight possibility that the attack was not actually conducted by ISIS proper. Again I have no evidence for this but their are so many radical islamic offshoots of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Ansar Al Islam, etc that we may never know what the pure intent of the attack was. We have to remember that radical Islam does not just want to commit terror. It actually has a more profound goal of driving a wedge between muslims and some of the westernized countries they reside in. We must acknowledge the fact that while a majority of muslims do not condone violence many do consider "Zionist" entities as legitimate targets when it comes to the Israeli/Palestinian issue. An attack on the Bataclan serves to drive this wedge regardless of which group actually committed the attack. The mandate proceeds apace either way.

  • Posts: 13,576
    BS44325 said:

    For you to say "Republicans are sooo happy about this" is beneath contempt but I guess not unexpected. Conservatives are always enemy number 1 on the AMT.
    Have you been paying attention to the things they have been saying? How could you see them salivating and tripping over themselves to capitalize on this politically and not think they are happy about it?
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • Posts: 11,900
    I'm sure on some level hillary or her staff is happy too. She has the foreign relations experience, sat there when they killed bin laden... stepped out before isis really became a big thing.... and her "top" opponents, trump, carson, and Rubio have nothing.
    They are all looking for ways to spin this into their favor. I'm sure trump is probably already beating the fear card with the refugees.


    Remember what Vietnow told us. Fear is your only god.
  • Posts: 19,893
    trump can always use God as a fear factor if he wishes im sure it works for some.....
  • Posts: 6,388
    BS44325 said:

    For you to say "Republicans are sooo happy about this" is beneath contempt but I guess not unexpected. Conservatives are always enemy number 1 on the AMT.
    So republican candidates didn't start drooling? Yes they did.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • Toronto, ON Posts: 9,448
    BS44325 said:

    First...I don't want anyone to think that for a second I believe Roger Waters condones this or believes in violent action whatsoever. He has his own criticism which I obviously disagree with but I absolutely believe him to be a pacifist on this subject.

    As far as your main question there can be two possible answers. If it was in fact an ISIS ordered attack (and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise at the moment) a successful attack on a known "Zionist" establishment serves a recruitmant tool. It is awful to say but many jihadist are inspired by and attracted to those who are able to defeat and strike at Israel. This attack would then serve the general mandate of establishing a greater caliphate. The second possible answer is that there is a very slight possibility that the attack was not actually conducted by ISIS proper. Again I have no evidence for this but their are so many radical islamic offshoots of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Ansar Al Islam, etc that we may never know what the pure intent of the attack was. We have to remember that radical Islam does not just want to commit terror. It actually has a more profound goal of driving a wedge between muslims and some of the westernized countries they reside in. We must acknowledge the fact that while a majority of muslims do not condone violence many do consider "Zionist" entities as legitimate targets when it comes to the Israeli/Palestinian issue. An attack on the Bataclan serves to drive this wedge regardless of which group actually committed the attack. The mandate proceeds apace either way.

    I understand your points (and actually agree with them), I just feel that it's significantly out of character for IS or a splinter cell to hide a motive: especially if it's in the interest of recruiting others. IS's public face has, since its inception, been proud, visible, and fearless. A subtle motive alluded to only by context is very un-IS.

    We're both convinced we're following the evidence presented to gauge an MO, and we both yielded different conclusions. At the end of the day, however, undisputed remains the reprehensible actions of sub-humans. I'm not sure much else matters, and I'm not sure the world's actions will change regardless of which is deemed correct, or which actually is correct.
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • Here Posts: 4,283
    Terrorism is not a Democratic vs Republican debate. WTF is wrong with some of you crazy Right wing and Left wing people. Where are the middle people? Why does common sense and morality not guide political parties to the middle? I would say that there needs to be a Repeublican and a Democratic combined Co-presidency because there is no 1 perfect candidate in either party!!!
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • Posts: 6,388
    PP193448 said:

    Terrorism is not a Democratic vs Republican debate. WTF is wrong with some of you crazy Right wing and Left wing people. Where are the middle people? Why does common sense and morality not guide political parties to the middle? I would say that there needs to be a Repeublican and a Democratic combined Co-presidency because there is no 1 perfect candidate in either party!!!

    Huh? So republican candidates and republican governors didn't stumble all over each other to make news capitalizing on fear? Denial.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • Here Posts: 4,283
    edited November 2015
    callen said:

    Huh? So republican candidates and republican governors didn't stumble all over each other to make news capitalizing on fear? Denial.
    Yes they did. I am not arguing that. Just turn on Fox News and see that. But fear mongering is how some people win elections, especially less democratic ones... But it's extremely naive to not learn from world issues and act like everything is fine and we live in utopia... You must be a Democratic voter and believe socialism is the answer. Just keep creative big government, spending more taxes, and giving away money to welfare.
    I would relate myself to being independent. I am not easily swayed by fear.
    Back on track. Round up all the terrorists. Good for the French people.
    Post edited by PP193448 on
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.