Your pick for first U.S. female president?
Comments
-
To clarify, I meant BS is a pro-war Canadian.
Edit-and you can add both parties candidates as well.0 -
Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.josevolution said:
1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....rr165892 said:You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.
looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.
Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.
All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.
Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.0 -
Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.rr165892 said:
Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.josevolution said:
1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....rr165892 said:You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.
looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.
Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.
All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.
Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.0 -
All of them.Every single one of them.They wouldn't be there without getting in bed with some unsavory folks.its how the game is played.badbrains said:
Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.rr165892 said:
Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.josevolution said:
1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....rr165892 said:You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.
looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.
Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.
All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.
Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.0 -
Of all the currently declared candidates Hillary is clearly the one who has taken the most Big $$$$ over the years. I just don't see how the democrat base comes out to support her. They have to put up a more populist alternative.rr165892 said:
All of them.Every single one of them.They wouldn't be there without getting in bed with some unsavory folks.its how the game is played.badbrains said:
Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.rr165892 said:
Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.josevolution said:
1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....rr165892 said:You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.
looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.
Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.
All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.
Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.0 -
Elizabeth Warren
He would have WRECKED the economy! Proficiency in making money and managing an economy are not even close to being the same.rr165892 said:
Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.josevolution said:
1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....rr165892 said:You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.
looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.
Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.
All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.
Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.
What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?
I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...0 -
Elizabeth Warren
The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.kce8 said:I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.
What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?
I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
And Obamargambs said:
The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.kce8 said:I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.
What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?
I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...0 -
Elizabeth Warren
Well, I wasn't talking about politicians.... Only the craziest liberals disapprove of it among politicians lolBS44325 said:
And Obamargambs said:
The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.kce8 said:I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.
What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?
I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...
Monkey Driven, Call this Living?0 -
I think we all agree on this point.rgambs said:
The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.kce8 said:I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.
What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?
I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...
Single terms will really help as no one would have to be concerned about raising $ and re election.0 -
Can't there just be a cap on campaign funds? Get ("earn"?) X amount, and that's it.0
-
the biggest inherent flaw is that the top office is always inhabited by the super rich. you simply cannot get there unless you are shitting money. it's disgusting.hedonist said:Can't there just be a cap on campaign funds? Get ("earn"?) X amount, and that's it.
By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
Hillary ClintonObama wasn't rich in the truest sense of the word10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG0
-
OtherBernice Sanders! BUT if sHe doesn't run, I suppose Elizabeth Warren.0
-
Othersorry I'm late, I'll write in Shania Twain.
Godfather.0 -
he was worth over a million, so no, you are correct. but you have to admit that 99% of the candidates are in the 1% of wealth.callen said:Obama wasn't rich in the truest sense of the word
By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.0 -
It's not about the money to them, it's POWER. These people don't ever pay for anything.HughFreakingDillon said:
he was worth over a million, so no, you are correct. but you have to admit that 99% of the candidates are in the 1% of wealth.callen said:Obama wasn't rich in the truest sense of the word
0 -
Yepbadbrains said:
It's not about the money to them, it's POWER. These people don't ever pay for anything.HughFreakingDillon said:
he was worth over a million, so no, you are correct. but you have to admit that 99% of the candidates are in the 1% of wealth.callen said:Obama wasn't rich in the truest sense of the word
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help