Your pick for first U.S. female president?

1356789

Comments

  • STAYSEASTAYSEA Posts: 3,814
    edited April 2015
    Hillary Clinton
    Post edited by STAYSEA on
    image
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    Hillary Clinton
    hedonist said:


    callen said:

    callen said:

    hedonist said:

    callen said:

    badbrains said:

    callen said:

    I know this will just piss of many in America and cause 8 more years of republican blockage but think she has best chance. She's also very intelligent and experienced and be great to have woman backing up minority.

    I love you Callen, but shes cut from the same cloth as all of them. Both sides. Same agenda and goal.
    Back at you BB.

    Yeah I know.
    muskydan said:

    There has got to be a more competent candidate then another Fraud from Chicago…I mean she couldn't even manage the simple task of keeping ole Billy Boy Happy and had to leave that for Monica.
    The Dems better find someone relevant or everyones biggest fear on here will win this election.

    So when men cheat it's the woman's fault. Okay then.
    If I may chime in, of course not - although relationships are about both people, as in when there's a problem, it's typically to do with both and not necessarily about fault.

    Were I married to someone in public office (*edit - public office wouldn't necessarily apply to myself but since we're talking about that scenario) who fucked his intern (with a cigar, but still) and then lied about it via dancing around semantics, not sure I could stay with him and continue to champion his character. But, never know what goes on in a marriage, behind closed doors.
    Wow you also blame the woman for man cheating.
    badbrains said:

    Ok I just read up on it and it's all over the place. Now they don't really know what the term natural born citizen is. So if it's ok for Ted Cruz to run then what's with all the bullshit Obama birthcertificate the republicans always seem to be crying about. Or tea naggers, I forget which one is which now days.

    Come on BB, we all know why it was a problem for Obama.
    Is there a reason why my earlier post is tacked onto a comment that implies racist under/overtones and more assumptions of me on your part?

    Your making assumptions.
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    callen said:



    Your making assumptions.

    Alrighty then - but the question still stands!

  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    You might have to add Carly Fiorina to the poll as it looks like she is running
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    BS44325 said:

    You might have to add Carly Fiorina to the poll as it looks like she is running

    I liked what I saw of her during her run for the CA Senate seat.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    hedonist said:

    BS44325 said:

    You might have to add Carly Fiorina to the poll as it looks like she is running

    I liked what I saw of her during her run for the CA Senate seat.
    She's been on fire in every interview over the last few weeks. Could be a strong dark horse. Either way she would add a very interestig dynamic to the race.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,297
    Elizabeth Warren
    BS44325 said:

    hedonist said:

    BS44325 said:

    You might have to add Carly Fiorina to the poll as it looks like she is running

    I liked what I saw of her during her run for the CA Senate seat.
    She's been on fire in every interview over the last few weeks. Could be a strong dark horse. Either way she would add a very interestig dynamic to the race.
    OK, good! We have women from two parties so far.

    Greens? Independents? Commies? Tea Party? Who else?

    "Pretty cookies, heart squares all around, yeah!"
    -Eddie Vedder, "Smile"

    "Try to not spook the horse."
    -Neil Young













  • g under pg under p Surfing The far side of THE Sombrero Galaxy Posts: 18,199
    edited April 2015
    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace
    *We CAN bomb the World to pieces, but we CAN'T bomb it into PEACE*...Michael Franti

    *MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
    .....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti

    *The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)


  • Elizabeth Warren
    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    badbrains said:

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
    If only someone in the current administration was doing it.
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    Elizabeth Warren
    BS44325 said:

    badbrains said:

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
    If only someone in the current administration was doing it.
    Hahhaa funny not funny... I'm hearing Michael Caine:
    "Some men just want to watch the world burn"
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    badbrains said:

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
    If only someone in the current administration was doing it.
    Hahhaa funny not funny... I'm hearing Michael Caine:
    "Some men just want to watch the world burn"
    And has no shame in wanting war. That's a sick person.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    Speaking of Palin, I thought this clip was hilarious on Stern this morning:

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/louis-c-k-tells-howard-stern-he-apologized-to-sarah-palin-at-snl40/
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    badbrains said:

    rgambs said:

    BS44325 said:

    badbrains said:

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
    If only someone in the current administration was doing it.
    Hahhaa funny not funny... I'm hearing Michael Caine:
    "Some men just want to watch the world burn"
    And has no shame in wanting war. That's a sick person.
    Are you refering to Hillary?
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,908
    No BS his referring to all the GOP candidates .....everyone of e'm is pro war
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124

    No BS his referring to all the GOP candidates .....everyone of e'm is pro war

    I'm not sure about Rand Paul. Either way none are more "pro-war" then Hillary. Bosnia, Iraq, Libya...she has her fingerprints on all of them.
  • rr165892rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

  • rr165892rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    BS44325 said:

    badbrains said:

    g under p said:

    Say how come there's not a choice for the that woman with the mouth from Alaska? Say who's
    Marge Simpson?

    Peace

    Dare I say that we've heard enough already from that woman?
    She's to busy keeping an eye on Russia from her front yard. Very tough and important job.
    If only someone in the current administration was doing it.
    Nice!
  • josevolutionjosevolution Posts: 29,908
    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    edited April 2015
    To clarify, I meant BS is a pro-war Canadian.

    Edit-and you can add both parties candidates as well.
  • rr165892rr165892 Posts: 5,697

    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.
    Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.
  • badbrainsbadbrains Posts: 10,255
    rr165892 said:

    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.
    Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.
    Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.
  • rr165892rr165892 Posts: 5,697
    badbrains said:

    rr165892 said:

    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.
    Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.
    Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.
    All of them.Every single one of them.They wouldn't be there without getting in bed with some unsavory folks.its how the game is played.
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rr165892 said:

    badbrains said:

    rr165892 said:

    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.
    Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.
    Follow the trail of money from the supporters (the BIG $$$) and you'll know who's what/who.
    All of them.Every single one of them.They wouldn't be there without getting in bed with some unsavory folks.its how the game is played.
    Of all the currently declared candidates Hillary is clearly the one who has taken the most Big $$$$ over the years. I just don't see how the democrat base comes out to support her. They have to put up a more populist alternative.
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    Elizabeth Warren
    rr165892 said:

    rr165892 said:

    You see Jose I think you really brought to light some of the hypocrisy on this board,
    According to your above statement.ALL republicans are war mongers with their hand in the pants of every military subcontractor.While it may be true with some,it is certainly not true with all.

    looking in the Mirror ,there are plenty of the super cool, always right ,Do no wrong regardless of the issue,hip,progressive Democrats,who have their hands in the same pants and are using the same money as there republican brothers and sisters.Equally as filthy.

    Each one regardless of party should be examined and judged on their record ,past and present and as individuals be held accountable for what,who and how they support our best interests.

    All should only have 1 term,and do what they can with it.

    1 term i'm totally on board with you that's for both parties ....The ones ive heard all love to bang the war drums ....Shit if either McCain or Romney would of beat Obama Iran would of already had bombs dropped on them .....
    Mcain I can see.Romney Im not so sure is a war monger.
    Romney had his faults but I think he would have done a nice job with both Health care and The Economy.Hes a smart $$ guy for sure.
    He would have WRECKED the economy! Proficiency in making money and managing an economy are not even close to being the same.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • kce8kce8 Posts: 1,636
    I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.

    What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
    What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?

    I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
    Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    Elizabeth Warren
    kce8 said:

    I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.

    What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
    What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?

    I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
    Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...

    The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • BS44325BS44325 Posts: 6,124
    rgambs said:

    kce8 said:

    I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.

    What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
    What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?

    I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
    Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...

    The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.
    And Obama
  • rgambsrgambs Posts: 13,576
    Elizabeth Warren
    BS44325 said:

    rgambs said:

    kce8 said:

    I´ve got some informations the last two days. Read about Elizabeth Warren etc but not enough to make a choice at this point.

    What really moves me, since I´m interested in Americas election contest and what I really always wanted to ask you Americans is:
    What do you think about all this heaps of money they use for it?

    I´m still wondering thinking about how many and needed good things they could do with only half of it!
    Don´t want to offend somebody...I´m just interested...

    The huge amount of money poured into our political campaign system is pretty universally despised among the American people. Only the craziest conservatives and free market cult members approve of it.
    And Obama
    Well, I wasn't talking about politicians.... Only the craziest liberals disapprove of it among politicians lol
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
Sign In or Register to comment.