i understand,but

dimitrispearljam · February 2013

LukinFan wrote:

pdalowsky wrote:

i remain convinced when those fall dates drop the arse will fall out of the wrigley demand

I agree 100%

and i hope they play the south!!!!!!!

dougfloyd · February 2013

LukinFan wrote:

pdalowsky wrote:

i remain convinced when those fall dates drop the arse will fall out of the wrigley demand

I agree 100%

I hope so!

LukinFan · February 2013

dimitrispearljam wrote:

LukinFan wrote:

pdalowsky wrote:

i remain convinced when those fall dates drop the arse will fall out of the wrigley demand

I agree 100%

and i hope they play the south!!!!!!!

I've given up hope on a show for 2013. It's all good though. I had a killer PJ 2012!

pdalowsky · February 2013

A recap for anyone who cant be bothered to read the 6 pages up to here

the vast majority support the notion of the ticket being a tradable commodity, (however scalping is frowned upon)

Its seemingly against the rules here.

Dimitris is passionately opposed to anything other than $84.

There is much debate about why merch is considered at market value rather than its original price yet tickets are only assessed at their issue price.

oh and GA tickets appear to be like Gold dust.

dimitrispearljam · February 2013

pdalowsky wrote:

A recap for anyone who cant be bothered to read the 6 pages up to here

the vast majority support the notion of the ticket being a tradable commodity, (however scalping is frowned upon)

Its seemingly against the rules here.

Dimitris is passionately opposed to anything other than $84.

There is much debate about why merch is considered at market value rather than its original price yet tickets are only assessed at their issue price.

oh and GA tickets appear to be like Gold dust.

good one Paul..

+ isnt only how i see that things must be,and i feel its the right thing to do..
but clearly seems to me ,after i found some similar thread ,is the rules of 10c

: My sealed vinyl for your 1 GA Wrigley.
by Sea » 11 Feb 2013 10:02

See the Posting Guideline lines. face value only

EdsonNascimento · February 2013

dimitrispearljam wrote:

pdalowsky wrote:

A recap for anyone who cant be bothered to read the 6 pages up to here

the vast majority support the notion of the ticket being a tradable commodity, (however scalping is frowned upon)

Its seemingly against the rules here.

Dimitris is passionately opposed to anything other than $84.

There is much debate about why merch is considered at market value rather than its original price yet tickets are only assessed at their issue price.

oh and GA tickets appear to be like Gold dust.

good one Paul..

+ isnt only how i see that things must be,and i feel its the right thing to do..
but clearly seems to me ,after i found some similar thread ,is the rules of 10c

: My sealed vinyl for your 1 GA Wrigley.
by Sea » 11 Feb 2013 10:02

See the Posting Guideline lines. face value only

Not to re-ignite this b/c Paul was spot on - but why isn't an $84 valuation of a record the same as the face of the ticket? Bartering has existed LONG before dollar bills. As a matter of fact, cash currency isn't even a gov't operation (technically) in the US. I don't see in the posting guidelines - CASH ONLY!!!!! Face VALUE is just that - VALUE.

dimitrispearljam · February 2013

EdsonNascimento wrote:

dimitrispearljam wrote:

pdalowsky wrote:

A recap for anyone who cant be bothered to read the 6 pages up to here

the vast majority support the notion of the ticket being a tradable commodity, (however scalping is frowned upon)

Its seemingly against the rules here.

Dimitris is passionately opposed to anything other than $84.

There is much debate about why merch is considered at market value rather than its original price yet tickets are only assessed at their issue price.

oh and GA tickets appear to be like Gold dust.

good one Paul..

+ isnt only how i see that things must be,and i feel its the right thing to do..
but clearly seems to me ,after i found some similar thread ,is the rules of 10c

: My sealed vinyl for your 1 GA Wrigley.
by Sea » 11 Feb 2013 10:02

See the Posting Guideline lines. face value only

Not to re-ignite this b/c Paul was spot on - but why isn't an $84 valuation of a record the same as the face of the ticket? Bartering has existed LONG before dollar bills. As a matter of fact, cash currency isn't even a gov't operation (technically) in the US. I don't see in the posting guidelines - CASH ONLY!!!!! Face VALUE is just that - VALUE.

i have my opinion..i post it..

people have different opinion..seems its better for them

im cool with that..people can do what ever they want..i clearly am against trades for 10c tix..
cos will fuck up the whole sharing your spare and people will sell 1oc tix to the biggest bidder-offer trade...

and i care less for my self..ill find tix ,...others here will have problem..

and in the end isnt our call..i just saw Sea post..sure she knows better than anyone if trades are ok for 10c tix or not..

and for a last time...

THERE IS NO MARKET FOR 10C TICKETS

Massara133 · February 2013

I agree with Dimitri on this one, if you trade your 10c spare for something of greater value than $84 then you've profited and broken 10c rules. Assessing an item (let's say a Binaural LP, that would normally sell for $200) with a lower value is simply turning a blind eye to the obvious. The person who traded the tic for the $84 Binaural could easily flip it for much more.

EdsonNascimento · February 2013

Massara133 wrote:

I agree with Dimitri on this one, if you trade your 10c spare for something of greater value than $84 then you've profited and broken 10c rules. Assessing an item (let's say a Binaural LP, that would normally sell for $200) with a lower value is simply turning a blind eye to the obvious. The person who traded the tic for the $84 Binaural could easily flip it for much more.

So, if someone comes on here and offers their Binaural up for $84 they are breaking some sort of rule?

Wouldn't we CELEBRATE that person?

Folks now HAVE TO price their stuff to prevent others from flipping? This line of logic is so back assward that it's

pjl44 · February 2013

EdsonNascimento wrote:

So, if someone comes on here and offers their Binaural up for $84 they are breaking some sort of rule?

Wouldn't we CELEBRATE that person?

Folks now HAVE TO price their stuff to prevent others from flipping? This line of logic is so back assward that it's

Right? I have seen a few offers that were CLEARLY over face value for tickets. When it comes to merch, though, I don't think you can justifiably police it as long as the original purchase price is at or below the cost of the ticket. If this were Fenway instead of Wrigley and I got shut out, there is a bunch of stuff I'd be happy to part with to get into the show.

There is a bit of a gamble, though, when you're not dealing with tickets in hand. You better feel solid about who you're swapping with because, unlike the larger secondary market, if you get burned there is ZERO safety net.

dimitrispearljam · February 2013

pjl44 wrote:

EdsonNascimento wrote:

So, if someone comes on here and offers their Binaural up for $84 they are breaking some sort of rule?

Wouldn't we CELEBRATE that person?

Folks now HAVE TO price their stuff to prevent others from flipping? This line of logic is so back assward that it's

Right? I have seen a few offers that were CLEARLY over face value for tickets. When it comes to merch, though, I don't think you can justifiably police it as long as the original purchase price is at or below the cost of the ticket. If this were Fenway instead of Wrigley and I got shut out, there is a bunch of stuff I'd be happy to part with to get into the show.

There is a bit of a gamble, though, when you're not dealing with tickets in hand. You better feel solid about who you're swapping with because, unlike the larger secondary market, if you get burned there is ZERO safety net.

now you mention that,i post in another thread..
there is no way for me to pay someone today list at ebay fanclub tix(we know only he will get them the day of the show) and wait 5 months,a few hours before show out of the venue to expect he will be ok and give it to me..no safety net at all

Massara133 · February 2013

EdsonNascimento wrote:

Massara133 wrote:

I agree with Dimitri on this one, if you trade your 10c spare for something of greater value than $84 then you've profited and broken 10c rules. Assessing an item (let's say a Binaural LP, that would normally sell for $200) with a lower value is simply turning a blind eye to the obvious. The person who traded the tic for the $84 Binaural could easily flip it for much more.

So, if someone comes on here and offers their Binaural up for $84 they are breaking some sort of rule?

Wouldn't we CELEBRATE that person?

Folks now HAVE TO price their stuff to prevent others from flipping? This line of logic is so back assward that it's

If someone offers to sell their binaural vinyl for $84 CASH I will celebrate that person and PM them as fast as I can. If they assess their binaural vinyl at $84 (when the market clearly shows it's worth more) for the purpose of obtaining a 10c ticket then they have helped a 10c member profit from their spare 10c ticket. Would the same person that trades the vinyl for the ticket sell that vinyl for $84 cash, I don't think so.

Just to be clear, my concern is the 10c member that is soliciting trades (of higher value) for the 10c ticket. The person assessing the vinyl for $84 is probably a fan that really wants to go to the show. However that fan is helping someone profit from their spare and I don't think that should be supported.

pjl44 · February 2013

Massara133 wrote:

If someone offers to sell their binaural vinyl for $84 CASH I will celebrate that person and PM them as fast as I can. If they assess their binaural vinyl at $84 (when the market clearly shows it's worth more) for the purpose of obtaining a 10c ticket then they have helped a 10c member profit from their spare 10c ticket. Would the same person that trades the vinyl for the ticket sell that vinyl for $84 cash, I don't think so.

Just to be clear, my concern is the 10c member that is soliciting trades (of higher value) for the 10c ticket. The person assessing the vinyl for $84 is probably a fan that really wants to go to the show. However that fan is helping someone profit from their spare and I don't think that should be supported.

But that's only assuming someone is going to sell the album on the open market upon receiving it. If they are attempting to fill holes in their collection, they are technically still paying a premium on the record based on the cost of their ticket.

SPEEDY MCCREADY · February 2013

I will never understand.
:P

Dr. Delight · February 2013

dimitrispearljam · February 2013

SPEEDY MCCREADY wrote:

I will never understand.
:P

Sea · February 2013

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=204066

i understand,but

Comments

Categories