THE 2013 CHICAGO BEARS!!!!!!!!!!
Comments
-
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Last-12-Exit wrote:Fortes deal seems a little cheap. What's AP or Foster making a year? Either way, hope he's happy and runs for 2200 yards.
Foster is at 43.5 over 5 years
AP is at 100 over 7 years.
Chris Johnson is 53.5 over 481 is now off the air0 -
Glorious day for Bears fans!!!
GO BEARS!!!0 -
81 wrote:Last-12-Exit wrote:Fortes deal seems a little cheap. What's AP or Foster making a year? Either way, hope he's happy and runs for 2200 yards.
Foster is at 43.5 over 5 years
AP is at 100 over 7 years.
Chris Johnson is 53.5 over 4
Shouldn't he be up there with foster and Johnson?0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Tremor Chris wrote:Glorious day for Bears fans!!!
GO BEARS!!!
nice to get him signed and into camp......not sure it is glorious level81 is now off the air0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Last-12-Exit wrote:81 wrote:Last-12-Exit wrote:Fortes deal seems a little cheap. What's AP or Foster making a year? Either way, hope he's happy and runs for 2200 yards.
Foster is at 43.5 over 5 years
AP is at 100 over 7 years.
Chris Johnson is 53.5 over 4
Shouldn't he be up there with foster and Johnson?
you could make that case, but bears didn't wanna give a RB a ton of cash...and rightfully so....most RB's are only at the top of their game for a few years. over work them and they crap out and with all the hitting they get...they don't last long.
both sides signed the deal...so i'm cool with it.
lets get this season on.81 is now off the air0 -
Forte after he signed the under-valued contract:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... 4670.storyPost edited by davidtrios on0 -
0
-
81 wrote:Tremor Chris wrote:Glorious day for Bears fans!!!
GO BEARS!!!
nice to get him signed and into camp......not sure it is glorious level
Its glorious (for me anyway) not to have this as a distraction going into camp. The Bears have a chance to be a really good or maybe even a great team this year....
But what do I know. They have let me down before! LOL I swear they will be the death of me.... :?0 -
Mamasan23 wrote:Indifference71 wrote:
Get this fake cheesehead out of here!
Wait...is that...do I smell....could it be....
Jealousy?
No, just pointing out that you should be in the sports fan fraud thread! I can respect the real cheeseheads. But someone from Chicago trying to be a cheesehead.... :nono: :nono:0 -
81 wrote:you could make that case, but bears didn't wanna give a RB a ton of cash...and rightfully so....most RB's are only at the top of their game for a few years. over work them and they crap out and with all the hitting they get...they don't last long.
both sides signed the deal...so i'm cool with it.
lets get this season on.
I don't think Forte is that elite type of RB like Foster, AP, Johnson, McCoy. He has been very productive the past couple seasons, but the lack of TDs hurts him I think. Only 3 TDs last year before he got hurt I believe.0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Indifference71 wrote:81 wrote:you could make that case, but bears didn't wanna give a RB a ton of cash...and rightfully so....most RB's are only at the top of their game for a few years. over work them and they crap out and with all the hitting they get...they don't last long.
both sides signed the deal...so i'm cool with it.
lets get this season on.
I don't think Forte is that elite type of RB like Foster, AP, Johnson, McCoy. He has been very productive the past couple seasons, but the lack of TDs hurts him I think. Only 3 TDs last year before he got hurt I believe.
without looking at stats, off the top of my head, i'd say he is currently a top 5 back...maybe top 3. he does it all. he's got some power, speed, moves...he's not flashy, but he does a solid job at everything.81 is now off the air0 -
81 wrote:without looking at stats, off the top of my head, i'd say he is currently a top 5 back...maybe top 3. he does it all. he's got some power, speed, moves...he's not flashy, but he does a solid job at everything.
Top 3?? That's a bold statement. Maybe top 5. I'd put AP, Foster, Johnson, Ray Rice all ahead of him so yeah, I'd put him top 5. Like I said, the lack of TDs hurts him....he does a lot of things well, but you gotta get the ball in the end zone.0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Indifference71 wrote:81 wrote:without looking at stats, off the top of my head, i'd say he is currently a top 5 back...maybe top 3. he does it all. he's got some power, speed, moves...he's not flashy, but he does a solid job at everything.
Top 3?? That's a bold statement. Maybe top 5. I'd put AP, Foster, Johnson, Ray Rice all ahead of him so yeah, I'd put him top 5. Like I said, the lack of TDs hurts him....he does a lot of things well, but you gotta get the ball in the end zone.
AP is basically out for the year....Johnson slowed down big time...i'd put Forte above both of them today. Befeore he was hurt last year, he was on pace for an all time monster season when you include both rushing and recieving. he was like 45% of the offense or some crazy number like that. he's defianltly top 5.81 is now off the air0 -
Indifference71 wrote:81 wrote:without looking at stats, off the top of my head, i'd say he is currently a top 5 back...maybe top 3. he does it all. he's got some power, speed, moves...he's not flashy, but he does a solid job at everything.
Top 3?? That's a bold statement. Maybe top 5. I'd put AP, Foster, Johnson, Ray Rice all ahead of him so yeah, I'd put him top 5. Like I said, the lack of TDs hurts him....he does a lot of things well, but you gotta get the ball in the end zone.0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276how crazy is all this skilled position talent...arguablly a top 5 RB, top 5 WR (defianltly top 10), and a top 10 QB (potential to move higher). good solid backups at the skill positions.... the defense should be solid.....and special teams should be above average, as always.... i know training camp will be dominated by O line talk, but i'm not super concerned about it. IMO, the new offense will take into account that and move the pocket, audiable, and play to its skill set. unless we see massive fall off on D, or injuries catch up....this team should easily make the playoffs.....and once there, have as good of a chance as anybody else.81 is now off the air0
-
81 wrote:how crazy is all this skilled position talent...arguablly a top 5 RB, top 5 WR (defianltly top 10), and a top 10 QB (potential to move higher). good solid backups at the skill positions.... the defense should be solid.....and special teams should be above average, as always.... i know training camp will be dominated by O line talk, but i'm not super concerned about it. IMO, the new offense will take into account that and move the pocket, audiable, and play to its skill set. unless we see massive fall off on D, or injuries catch up....this team should easily make the playoffs.....and once there, have as good of a chance as anybody else.
Love me some Bears.........unfortunately I have two very scary words for you.
Left and Tackle0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276ofthegirl99 wrote:81 wrote:how crazy is all this skilled position talent...arguablly a top 5 RB, top 5 WR (defianltly top 10), and a top 10 QB (potential to move higher). good solid backups at the skill positions.... the defense should be solid.....and special teams should be above average, as always.... i know training camp will be dominated by O line talk, but i'm not super concerned about it. IMO, the new offense will take into account that and move the pocket, audiable, and play to its skill set. unless we see massive fall off on D, or injuries catch up....this team should easily make the playoffs.....and once there, have as good of a chance as anybody else.
Love me some Bears.........unfortunately I have two very scary words for you.
Left and Tackle
i know i'm nutty, but i'm not overly scared. i think anouther year, a change in coaching and play calling will see that side get shored up. more moving pockets/rollouts help. i think we will also see more RB chip shots on that side. obviously, that's the biggest link....but i think they can play call to cover it.81 is now off the air0 -
Now if you could only teach your sorry ass QB to sing
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/dailypitch/post/2012/07/jay-cutler-butchers-7th-innings-stretch-at-cubs-game/1#.UASRv_XhdOQ0 -
Heisenberg wrote:Now if you could only teach your sorry ass QB to sing
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/dailypitch/post/2012/07/jay-cutler-butchers-7th-innings-stretch-at-cubs-game/1#.UASRv_XhdOQ
Oof.0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Heisenberg wrote:Now if you could only teach your sorry ass QB to sing
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/dailypitch/post/2012/07/jay-cutler-butchers-7th-innings-stretch-at-cubs-game/1#.UASRv_XhdOQ81 is now off the air0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help