I know this is a double standard but.....
Comments
-
Would you do it if it was "allowed"? I really don't get your argument. You say you wouldn't cheat on your wife and you love her very much, but it sounds like the only reason you're not screwing around is because it's not " allowed". What about your wife's feelings? If she'd ask you not to go fuck around even though it's allowed, would you do it? And why would you want it to be allowed if you wouldn't ever do it?
Sorry, dude, but you lost me...
You are a weird but very funny, dude
I bet you're thinking ahead...THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
acoustic guy wrote:LOL Hahahaha, People are reading into this way way to much! All I am saying is men should be allowed to have more then one women! Thats it! I am not gonna go cheat on my wife people! i love her to much. I have not given any details on this subject. My wife and i are fine, we are very much in love and again, we have a great relationship. I just want it to be okay to sleep with other women! LOL Isnt this what every guy wants?
I know that and I know most people feel that way. I was just meaning if my boyfriend started this thread, I'd want to kick him in the nuts.0 -
decides2dream wrote:and all many of us are saying is SURE! but the flipside arrangement for women too. why should the husband's have all the fun and variety?
ALL get to play, or no game. simple.
yep, all are equal.
pretty simple shit.
a dude isn't any better than the chic.
i will laugh my ass right off if and when his misses ventures out a bit
or discusses her thoughts on the sanctity of their marriage with some bullshit message board and he finds it.
that will be quality entertainment.for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce0 -
chadwick wrote:what, you can't handle it?
so go and rat me out like you did that one fuckin dude.
that was you that got someone banned right?
I have no fucking idea what you are talking about guy? Who got banned?
I am not that type of guy. I don't tell on people like a pussy got it? Don't accuse me of something i did not do again!Get em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0 -
Collin wrote:Would you do it if it was "allowed"? I really don't get your argument. You say you wouldn't cheat on your wife and you love her very much, but it sounds like the only reason you're not screwing around is because it's not " allowed". What about your wife's feelings? If she'd ask you not to go fuck around even though it's allowed, would you do it? And why would you want it to be allowed if you wouldn't ever do it?
Sorry, dude, but you lost me...
You are a weird but very funny, dude
I bet you're thinking ahead...
well isn't THAT the REAL issue. it IS allowed, right now. there is NO law that says you cannot have sexual relations with numerous people after mariage. sure, it can be used in divorce proceedings, it IS socially frowned upon, etc. but there ARE fringe groups/couples who live this very lifestyle. beyond that, we also know of the numerous people who DO so with their partners none the wiser. so it really comes down to is wanting it BE 'socially acceptible'.....so he just can.hell, 200 years ago i was more than likely the norm for men to bed as many women as they like, even after marriage...while the wives turned a blind eye, and/or didn't care. w/o birth control being tied to the home, no social or financial rights of their own...the wife more than likely married to a man she didn't love in any case, she was probably happpy for the break. now that we more often than not marry for LOVE.....and there IS much more equality in relationships, women have choice and can leave......fidelity has gained more and more acceptance and to be 'expected.' so yes....today is WAY better imo.
but that 'allowing' factor...is still there...you just need to respet your partner and ASK, preferably before you marry
.....and either have an open marriage or one of fidelity...depending what you BOTH want, or choose another partner. simple.
Stay with me...
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow0 -
acoustic guy wrote:Just got back. WHAT??????
I have no fucking idea what you are talking about guy? Who got banned?
I am not that type of guy. I don't tell on people like a pussy got it? Don't accuse me of something i did not do again!
hhmmm..if i am mistaken i am sorry
(i have been known to be wrong, it is rare but it has happened)
i must have gotten you mixed up with someone else
if that is the case i retract my assumption
i will leave you be
and dude, good luckfor poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce0 -
decides2dream wrote:well isn't THAT the REAL issue. it IS allowed, right now. there is NO law that says you cannot have sexual relations with numerous people after mariage. sure, it can be used in divorce proceedings, it IS socially frowned upon, etc. but there ARE fringe groups/couples who live this very lifestyle. beyond that, we also know of the numerous people who DO so with their partners none the wiser. so it really comes down to is wanting it BE 'socially acceptible'.....so he just can.
hell, 200 years ago i was more than likely the norm for men to bed as many women as they like, even after marriage...while the wives turned a blind eye, and/or didn't care. w/o birth control being tied to the home, no social or financial rights of their own...the wife more than likely married to a man she didn't love in any case, she was probably happpy for the break. now that we more often than not marry for LOVE.....and there IS much more equality in relationships, women have choice and can leave......fidelity has gained more and more acceptance and to be 'expected.' so yes....today is WAY better imo.
but that 'allowing' factor...is still there...you just need to respet your partner and ASK, preferably before you marry
.....and either have an open marriage or one of fidelity...depending what you BOTH want, or choose another partner. simple.
I would not want to have that type of relationship with my wife. That type of lifestyle is not for me, group sex with other swingers i mean. No thanks, This is all for fun really, just thinking out loud.
Some in here are way to seriousGet em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0 -
a couple of pages back, someone said this is anonymous. it's not. many users give details, post pics and have met each other at concerts.
acoustic guy might be joking or kidding around, but if his wife was nosey and read stuff on his computer, I doubt she would find it funny.9/98, 9/00 - DC, 4/03 - Pitt., 7/03 - Bristow, 10/04 - Reading, 10/05 - Philly, 5/06 - DC, 6/06 - Pitt., 6/08 - Va Beach, 6/08 - DC, 5/10 - Bristow, 10/13 B'more
8/08 - Ed solo in DC, 6/09 Ed in B'more,
10/10 - Brad in B'more0 -
acoustic guy wrote:I would not want to have that type of relationship with my wife. That type of lifestyle is not for me, group sex with other swingers i mean. No thanks, This is all for fun really, just thinking out loud.
Some in here are way to serioushey! whats wrong with SWINGERS!!!! :eek:~~~~~~ALWAYS HAVE A GOOD TIME~~~~~~
Sir Mike McCready is....THE MASTER!!! WAHHH!!!
EVENFLOW PSYCHOS H.N.I.C~FEEL THE FLOW!!!
"Pearl Jam fans are obsessed, they'd see the boys in HELL if tickets were sold."-CROJAM95
It takes balls to put out a UKE album!0 -
decides2dream wrote:well isn't THAT the REAL issue. it IS allowed, right now. there is NO law that says you cannot have sexual relations with numerous people after mariage. sure, it can be used in divorce proceedings, it IS socially frowned upon, etc. but there ARE fringe groups/couples who live this very lifestyle. beyond that, we also know of the numerous people who DO so with their partners none the wiser. so it really comes down to is wanting it BE 'socially acceptible'.....so he just can.
hell, 200 years ago i was more than likely the norm for men to bed as many women as they like, even after marriage...while the wives turned a blind eye, and/or didn't care. w/o birth control being tied to the home, no social or financial rights of their own...the wife more than likely married to a man she didn't love in any case, she was probably happpy for the break. now that we more often than not marry for LOVE.....and there IS much more equality in relationships, women have choice and can leave......fidelity has gained more and more acceptance and to be 'expected.' so yes....today is WAY better imo.
but that 'allowing' factor...is still there...you just need to respet your partner and ASK, preferably before you marry
.....and either have an open marriage or one of fidelity...depending what you BOTH want, or choose another partner. simple.
very well statedfor poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce0 -
iluvcats wrote:a couple of pages back, someone said this is anonymous. it's not. many users give details, post pics and have met each other at concerts.
acoustic guy might be joking or kidding around, but if his wife was nosey and read stuff on his computer, I doubt she would find it funny.Get em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0 -
acoustic guy wrote:I would not want to have that type of relationship with my wife. That type of lifestyle is not for me, group sex with other swingers i mean. No thanks, This is all for fun really, just thinking out loud.
Some in here are way to serious
um, who said that?
you think there is only one way to have an open relationship?
seriously?
it could be however you and your wife want it to be.
obviously, we all KNOW how you wanted it to be...you get your cake and eat it too...she gets whatever crumbs you throw her way.and hey, i am sure there ARe women who would even be game for that. most, men AND women..prefer fidelity, or at least to try for that monogamous relationship...but i am sure the right couple could be open to each indulging, individually, with a new partner of their choice now and again....and then back home. just as long as BOTH got to indulge when they wanted. life is what you make it.
and i am not 'too serious'..i always love that backpedal. you started a topic, obviously an interesting one...so some of us choose to actually DISCUSS it. not belittle your thoughts, or get hung up on who's 'good' or 'bad'...but discuss the topic. it happens.Stay with me...
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow0 -
acoustic guy wrote:I am gonna tell her to read this thread tonight so chill out. She is not that type of person, she knows that she married a wild man. I say a do a lot of crazy shit and she is the only one who can realy control me. its really not a big deal lol wtf?
lol at wild man9/98, 9/00 - DC, 4/03 - Pitt., 7/03 - Bristow, 10/04 - Reading, 10/05 - Philly, 5/06 - DC, 6/06 - Pitt., 6/08 - Va Beach, 6/08 - DC, 5/10 - Bristow, 10/13 B'more
8/08 - Ed solo in DC, 6/09 Ed in B'more,
10/10 - Brad in B'more0 -
iluvcats wrote:lol at wild manGet em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0 -
The last two pages are entirely too serious. The guy is obviously not going to cheat on his wife. He's just like "ALL" other guys. Yes, even the magical guys that some of you lady jammers married. We are all human. We all have desires (even if they are well hidden). And when a guy sees a hot chick walking down the street, he may think to himself.... wow I'd like to do her. That doesn't mean he would. Girls, obviously, may think the same.
Bottom line, if he was presented with an open invite from his wife to bang any chicka he wanted, I'm betting he wouldn't. I know that I wouldn't. But, that doesn't mean I (he) don't think it would be fun (hence the point of the thread). I think it would have a cost (hurting my wife) and that cost is not worth it.
From the way I took the thread, he was jokingly saying he thinks it would be good to allow this. Then a bunch of people got their collective panties in a bunch. It's not for real, he didn't do anything, so please settle. This is not a law that's being passed through congress.... it's a f'ing message board. So, you have nothing to worry about. Chillax.0 -
decides2dream wrote:
.i always love that backpedal.
She told me before that if i did she would cut it off! lol......not really lol but kindaGet em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0 -
saveuplife wrote:The last two pages are entirely too serious. The guy is obviously not going to cheat on his wife. He's just like "ALL" other guys. Yes, even the magical guys that some of you lady jammers married. We are all human. We all have desires (even if they are well hidden). And when a guy sees a hot chick walking down the street, he may think to himself.... wow I'd like to do her. That doesn't mean he would. Girls, obviously, may think the same.
Bottom line, if he was presented with an open invite from his wife to bang any chicka he wanted, I'm betting he wouldn't. I know that I wouldn't. But, that doesn't mean I (he) don't think it would be fun (hence the point of the thread). I think it would have a cost (hurting my wife) and that cost is not worth it.
From the way I took the thread, he was jokingly saying he thinks it would be good to allow this. Then a bunch of people got their collective panties in a bunch. It's not for real, he didn't do anything, so please settle. This is not a law that's being passed through congress.... it's a f'ing message board. So, you have nothing to worry about. Chillax.
Good for you. I didn't have the patience to type all that out. I agree.Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer
Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:
https://www.createspace.com/3437020
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696
http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/0 -
saveuplife wrote:The last two pages are entirely too serious. The guy is obviously not going to cheat on his wife. He's just like "ALL" other guys. Yes, even the magical guys that some of you lady jammers married. We are all human. We all have desires (even if they are well hidden). And when a guy sees a hot chick walking down the street, he may think to himself.... wow I'd like to do her. That doesn't mean he would. Girls, obviously, may think the same.
Bottom line, if he was presented with an open invite from his wife to bang any chicka he wanted, I'm betting he wouldn't. I know that I wouldn't. But, that doesn't mean I (he) don't think it would be fun (hence the point of the thread). I think it would have a cost (hurting my wife) and that cost is not worth it.
From the way I took the thread, he was jokingly saying he thinks it would be good to allow this. Then a bunch of people got their collective panties in a bunch. It's not for real, he didn't do anything, so please settle. This is not a law that's being passed through congress.... it's a f'ing message board. So, you have nothing to worry about. Chillax.
"I'm married, not dead!"0 -
but acoustic guy, wild makes me think of this hairy goon for some reason.9/98, 9/00 - DC, 4/03 - Pitt., 7/03 - Bristow, 10/04 - Reading, 10/05 - Philly, 5/06 - DC, 6/06 - Pitt., 6/08 - Va Beach, 6/08 - DC, 5/10 - Bristow, 10/13 B'more
8/08 - Ed solo in DC, 6/09 Ed in B'more,
10/10 - Brad in B'more0 -
saveuplife wrote:The last two pages are entirely too serious. The guy is obviously not going to cheat on his wife. He's just like "ALL" other guys. Yes, even the magical guys that some of you lady jammers married. We are all human. We all have desires (even if they are well hidden). And when a guy sees a hot chick walking down the street, he may think to himself.... wow I'd like to do her. That doesn't mean he would. Girls, obviously, may think the same.
Bottom line, if he was presented with an open invite from his wife to bang any chicka he wanted, I'm betting he wouldn't. I know that I wouldn't. But, that doesn't mean I (he) don't think it would be fun (hence the point of the thread). I think it would have a cost (hurting my wife) and that cost is not worth it.
From the way I took the thread, he was jokingly saying he thinks it would be good to allow this. Then a bunch of people got their collective panties in a bunch. It's not for real, he didn't do anything, so please settle. This is not a law that's being passed through congress.... it's a f'ing message board. So, you have nothing to worry about. Chillax.
Thanks again. people are funny in here LOLGet em a Body Bag Yeeeeeaaaaa!
Sweep the Leg Johnny.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help